| Literature DB >> 35855955 |
Mohamed Gadallah1,2, Zeinab Shabib1,3, Taghreed El-Hazmi1.
Abstract
The effect of substituted wheat flour with pomegranate peel powder (PPP) at different ratios 5, 10, 15, and 20% on chemical composition, physical properties, color appearance, staling, and the sensory evaluation of the high-fibre cupcake was evaluated. The obtained results revealed that a slight increase in ash of cake samples with all levels of PPP was found. The highest value of ash was 1.92% given by cupcakes with 20% PPP. It was observed that a gradual significant (p ≤ 0.05) increase in dietary fibre of prepared cupcakes with PPP compared to control cake. The dietary fibre values ranged from 2.73% for the control cake to 17.00% with 20% of PPP; it may be due to the high content of ash and dietary fibre in PPP. Also, using PPP in cupcake manufacturing had a lowered effect on their volume and specific volume, where control cupcake recorded 48.00 cm3 and 1.40 cm3/g for volume and specific volume, respectively. In addition, a gradual significant (p ≤ 0.05) decrease in L value (lightness) with incorporated different levels of PPP was found. The control cupcake had the highest lightness value (65.97) with a significant (p ≤ 0.05) increase compared to all other cupcake samples that ranged between 37.67 and 30.18 by 5% and 20% of PPP, respectively. The results indicated that the highest value of taste was 18.75, which was given by cupcake with 5% PPP. While increasing the percentage of PPP in cupcake, the taste is less acceptable by panelists, and perhaps, this decreases in taste due to the high ratio of fibre in PPP. The highest staling was given by cupcake replaced with PPP at 20% after the ninth day of storage. Finally, it can be concluded that PPP can be used in cupcake production to raise its dietary fibre and mineral content up to a substitution rate of 10% PPP while retaining acceptable organoleptic properties.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35855955 PMCID: PMC9288326 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6461949
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Food Sci ISSN: 2314-5765
Weight (g) of cupcake ingredients incorporated with PPP.
| Cake samples | Cake ingredients (g) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wheat flour | PPP | Sugar | Shortening | Fresh egg | Milk powder | Baking powder | |
| Control | 100 | 0 | 60 | 50 | 85 | 3 | 4 |
| 5% PPP | 95 | 5 | 60 | 50 | 85 | 3 | 4 |
| 10% PPP | 90 | 10 | 60 | 50 | 85 | 3 | 4 |
| 15% PPP | 85 | 15 | 60 | 50 | 85 | 3 | 4 |
| 20% PPP | 80 | 20 | 60 | 50 | 85 | 3 | 4 |
Functional properties of wheat flour and pomegranate peel powder.
| Materials | Functional properties | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHC (g/g) | OHC (g/g) | Specific density (g/cm3) | Swelling index (cm3/g) | |
| Wheat flour | 3.15 ± 0.34a | 1.79 ± 0.03a | 0.64 ± 0.05a | 6.83 ± 0.66a |
| PPP | 3.66 ± 0.68a | 2.24 ± 0.32a | 0.75 ± 0.01a | 7.68 ± 0.09a |
PPP: pomegranate peel powder. Data are the mean ± SE; n = 3. Values followed by the same letters in the same column are not significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
Chemical composition (% on dry weight basis) and color of wheat flour and PPP.
| Parameters | Wheat flour | PPP |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical composition | ||
| Moisture | 11.44 ± 0.29a | 9.22 ± 0.16b |
| Ash | 0.58 ± 0.07b | 5.32 ± 1.35a |
| Lipids | 1.49 ± 0.28a | 0.92 ± 0.27a |
| Crude protein | 11.73 ± 0.30a | 3.45 ± 0.38b |
| Dietary fibre | 0.99 ± 0.28b | 12.12 ± 0.20a |
| Nitrogen-free extract (NFE) | 85.18 ± 0.07a | 78.17 ± 2.03b |
| Color values | ||
| L∗ | 87.95 ± 0.50a | 42.32 ± 0.15b |
| a∗ | −0.34 ± 0.14b | 9.28 ± 0.02a |
| b∗ | 9.31 ± 0.05b | 18.53 ± 0.07a |
PPP: pomegranate peel powder. Data are the mean ± SE; n = 3. Values followed by the same letters in the same column are not significantly different (p ≤ 0.05). NFE: calculated by difference. L∗: lightness; a∗: redness; b∗: yellowness.
Chemical composition (% on dry weight basis) of cupcake containing PPP.
| Cake samples | Moisture | Ash | Lipids | Crude protein∗ | Dietary fibre | NFE∗∗ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 9.84 ± 0.19d | 1.76 ± 0.11c | 21.20 ± 0.07a | 10.60 ± 0.20a | 2.73 ± 0.29d | 63.70 ± 0.23a |
| 5% PPP | 13.25 ± 0.17a | 1.80 ± 0.02b | 20.10 ± 0.08ab | 10.10 ± 0.05b | 10.46 ± 0.48c | 57.52 ± 0.50b |
| 10% PPP | 12.39 ± 0.08b | 1.81 ± 0.04b | 20.10 ± 0.10ab | 9.70 ± 0.08c | 11.00 ± 0.46c | 57.38 ± 0.43b |
| 15% PPP | 12.34 ± 0.04b | 1.83 ± 0.08ab | 19.50 ± 0.33b | 9.60 ± 0.09cd | 14.73 ± 3.06b | 54.32 ± 3.40c |
| 20% PPP | 11.33 ± 0.13c | 1.92 ± 0.02a | 19.30 ± 0.08b | 9.30 ± 0.04d | 17.00 ± 2.00a | 52.47 ± 2.11c |
PP: pomegranate peel powder. Data are the mean ± SE; n = 3. Values followed by the same letters in the same column are not significantly different (p ≤ 0.05). ∗Wheat flour (N × 5.70); cake samples (N × 6.25). NFE∗∗: calculated by difference.
Physical properties of cupcake samples containing different ratios of PPP.
| Cake samples | Weight (g) | Volume (cm3) | Specific volume (cm3/g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control cupcake | 34.20 ± 0.20c | 48.00 ± 0.70a | 1.40 ± 0.01a |
| Cupcake with 5% PPP | 35.00 ± 0.00b | 42.80 ± 0.48b | 1.22 ± 0.01ab |
| Cupcake with 10% PPP | 35.30 ± 0.20ab | 37.80 ± 0.37c | 1.07 ± 0.01b |
| Cupcake with 15% PPP | 35.80 ± 0.37a | 35.40 ± 0.40d | 0.98 ± 0.00c |
| Cupcake with 20% PPP | 36.10 ± 0.20a | 33.00 ± 0.44e | 0.91 ± 0.01c |
PPP: pomegranate peel powder. Data are the mean ± SE; n = 3. Mean values in the same column with the same superscript do not differ significantly (p ≤ 0.05).
Color parameters of cupcake with different levels of PPP.
| Cake samples | L∗ | a∗ | b∗ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control cupcake | 65.97 ± 0.41a | 0.64 ± 0.20c | 25.91 ± 0.09a |
| Cupcake with 5% PPP | 37.67 ± 0.70b | 5.03 ± 0.03b | 14.64 ± 0.17b |
| Cupcake with 10% PPP | 35.07 ± 0.46c | 5.34 ± 0.03ab | 14.44 ± 0.15b |
| Cupcake with 15% PPP | 33.93 ± 0.24c | 5.70 ± 0.10a | 14.21 ± 0.28b |
| Cupcake with 20% PPP | 30.18 ± 0.57d | 6.37 ± 0.16a | 12.93 ± 0.32c |
PPP: pomegranate peel powder. Data are the mean ± SE; n = 3. Mean values in the same column bearing the same superscript do not differ significantly (p ≤ 0.05). L∗: lightness; a∗: redness; b∗: yellowness.
Figure 1The surface color of prepared cupcake samples containing of PPP.
Sensory evaluation of cupcake samples partially substituted with PPP.
| Cake samples | Appearance (15) | Crust color (15) | Crumb color (15) | Texture (15) | Taste (20) | Odor (20) | Overall acceptability (100) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 14.50 ± 0.16a | 14.70 ± 0.15a | 14.80 ± 0.13a | 14.20 ± 0.20ab | 18.30 ± 0.59a | 19.60 ± 0.16a | 96.10 ± 0.78a |
| 5% PPP | 14.70 ± 0.15a | 14.60 ± 0.16ab | 14.60 ± 0.22ab | 14.40 ± 0.30a | 18.75 ± 0.30a | 18.95 ± 0.24ab | 95.90 ± 0.78a |
| 10% PPP | 14.10 ± 0.23a | 14.50 ± 0.16ab | 14.50 ± 0.26ab | 13.60 ± 0.33ab | 18.10 ± 0.43a | 18.10 ± 0.72b | 93.00 ± 1.29ab |
| 15% PPP | 13.10 ± 0.43b | 14.00 ± 0.33ab | 14.10 ± 0.31ab | 13.20 ± 0.29ab | 17.90 ± 0.27b | 17.90 ± 0.54b | 89.55 ± 1.97b |
| 20% PPP | 12.60 ± 0.52b | 13.90 ± 0.31b | 13.80 ± 0.32b | 12.90 ± 0.50c | 17.25 ± 0.79b | 15.70 ± 0.33c | 89.80 ± 1.54b |
PPP: pomegranate peel powder. Data are the mean ± SE; n = 10. Mean values in the same column bearing the same superscript do not differ significantly (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 2Staling rate (%) for cupcake samples incorporated with PPP. 5: cake containing 5% of PPP, 10: cake containing 10% of PPP, 15: cake containing 15% of PPP, 20: cake containing 20% of PPP.