| Literature DB >> 35855891 |
Hongmei Xiao1, Jun Ye2.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the application effect of health education based on phased transition theory model in the continuous nursing for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Method: A total of 106 patients with IBD admitted to the hospital were enrolled as the research objects between October 2020 and September 2021. According to random number table method, they were divided into observation group and control group, 53 cases in each group. The control group was given routine nursing, while observation group was additionally given health education based on phased transition theory model. The nutritional status (serum prealbumin (PA), albumin (ALB), body mass index (BMI)), scores of Disease Knowledge Mastery Scale, exercise of self-care agency scale (ESCA), and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) were compared between the two groups before and after intervention.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35855891 PMCID: PMC9288322 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4194178
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Med Int ISSN: 2090-2840 Impact factor: 1.621
Comparison of baseline data of two groups of patients.
| Group | Gender (number of cases) | Age (year) | Education (year) | IBD type (number of cases) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Ulcerative colitis | Crohn's disease | |||
| Observation group ( | 29 | 24 | 36.55 ± 4.88 | 11.25 ± 2.66 | 31 | 22 |
| Control group ( | 33 | 20 | 36.96 ± 6.50 | 11.17 ± 2.04 | 34 | 19 |
|
| 0.622 | 0.372 | 0.164 | 0.358 | ||
|
| 0.430 | 0.711 | 0.870 | 0.550 | ||
Comparison of the mastery of disease knowledge between the two groups of patients.
| Group | Overall mastery rate after intervention (number of cases (%)) | Disease knowledge mastery score | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before intervention | After intervention | ||
| Observation group ( | 50 (94.34) | 66.35 ± 2.80 | 84.25 ± 4.29 |
| Control group ( | 41 (77.36) | 66.91 ± 4.97 | 72.40 ± 3.40 |
|
| 6.290 | 0.481 | 15.767 |
|
| 0.012 | 0.632 | 0.000 |
Comparison of BMI, PA, and ALB levels between the two groups before and after intervention (±s).
| Group | PA (mg/L) | ALB (g/L) | BMI (kg/m2) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | |
| Observation group ( | 175.18 ± 12.22 | 213.34 ± 18.68 | 31.47 ± 3.46 | 32.07 ± 3.48 | 20.57 ± 1.15 | 20.87 ± 1.39 |
| Control group ( | 175.89 ± 11.88 | 257.23 ± 15.99 | 31.12 ± 2.20 | 34.34 ± 3.00 | 20.30 ± 1.08 | 22.86 ± 1.65 |
|
| 0.303 | 12.995 | 0.627 | 3.592 | 1.264 | 6.731 |
|
| 0.762 | 0.000 | 0.533 | 0.001 | 0.209 | 0.000 |
Note. PA: serum prealbumin; ALB: albumin; BMI: body mass index; compared with the group of before intervention, P < 0.05.
Comparison of ESCA scores between the two groups before and after intervention (points, ±s).
| Group | Self-responsibility | Mastery of health knowledge | Self-care skills | Self-concept | Total score | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | |
| Observation group ( | 15.53 ± 2.33 | 21.40 ± 2.32 | 30.62 ± 3.46 | 57.30 ± 3.77 | 24.34 ± 3.11 | 35.00 ± 3.61 | 17.62 ± 2.40 | 28.42 ± 3.69 | 88.11 ± 5.91 | 142.11 ± 6.07 |
| Control group ( | 16.19 ± 2.10 | 17.92 ± 2.98 | 30.36 ± 2.96 | 45.60 ± 3.18 | 23.70 ± 2.28 | 28.25 ± 2.62 | 18.09 ± 2.70 | 21.26 ± 2.22 | 88.34 ± 4.45 | 113.04 ± 5.20 |
|
| 1.533 | 6.689 | 0.422 | 17.288 | 1.197 | 11.039 | 0.952 | 12.096 | 0.223 | 26.494 |
|
| 0.128 | 0.000 | 0.674 | 0.000 | 0.234 | 0.000 | 0.343 | 0.000 | 0.824 | 0.000 |
Note. Compared with the group of before intervention, P < 0.05.
Comparison of IBDQ scores between the two groups before and after intervention (points, ±s).
| Group | Intestinal symptoms | Systemic symptoms | Emotional capacity | Social competence | Total score | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | |
| Observation group ( | 33.58 ± 3.52 | 53.51 ± 2.93 | 22.81 ± 2.42 | 33.55 ± 2.50 | 57.40 ± 4.21 | 74.98 ± 5.20 | 21.15 ± 2.32 | 32.74 ± 3.79 | 135.42 ± 7.49 | 194.77 ± 8.27 |
| Control group ( | 33.96 ± 3.37 | 47.58 ± 3.53 | 23.38 ± 2.68 | 29.91 ± 2.73 | 56.74 ± 4.49 | 67.51 ± 4.87 | 20.85 ± 3.50 | 28.40 ± 2.80 | 134.92 ± 7.76 | 173.66 ± 7.57 |
|
| 0.483 | 8.984 | 1.142 | 7.166 | 0.781 | 7.631 | 0.524 | 6.709 | 0.013 | 13.711 |
|
| 0.574 | 0.000 | 0.256 | 0.000 | 0.437 | 0.000 | 0.602 | 0.000 | 0.990 | 0.000 |
Note. Compared with the group of before intervention, P < 0.05.