| Literature DB >> 35855730 |
Aakansha Gupta1, Rahul Katarya1.
Abstract
After a consistent drop in daily new coronavirus cases during the second wave of COVID-19 in India, there is speculation about the possibility of a future third wave of the virus. The pandemic is returning in different waves; therefore, it is necessary to determine the factors or conditions at the initial stage under which a severe third wave could occur. Therefore, first, we examine the effect of related multi-source data, including social mobility patterns, meteorological indicators, and air pollutants, on the COVID-19 cases during the initial phase of the second wave so as to predict the plausibility of the third wave. Next, based on the multi-source data, we proposed a simple short-term fixed-effect multiple regression model to predict daily confirmed cases. The study area findings suggest that the coronavirus dissemination can be well explained by social mobility. Furthermore, compared with benchmark models, the proposed model improves prediction R 2 by 33.6%, 10.8%, 27.4%, and 19.8% for Maharashtra, Kerala, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu, respectively. Thus, the simplicity and interpretability of the model are a meaningful contribution to determining the possibility of upcoming waves and direct pandemic prevention and control decisions at a local level in India. © Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science 2022.Entities:
Keywords: Coronavirus; Fixed-effect multiple regression model; Google mobility; Multi-source data; Prediction model
Year: 2022 PMID: 35855730 PMCID: PMC9281261 DOI: 10.1007/s12648-022-02425-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Phys Proc Indian Assoc Cultiv Sci (2004)
Fig. 1Time plot of daily confirmed cases
Fig. 2Correlation analysis between daily confirmed cases and multi-source data from February 20, 2021, to March 12, 2021, which consists of a grocery and pharmacy mobility, b retail and recreation mobility, c parks mobility, d transit and stations mobility, e workplaces mobility, f average temperature, g relative humidity, h PM2.5, i PM10 and j NO2
Correlation coefficient between the observed factors and confirmed cases
| Variables | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPM* | Pearsonr | 0.546 | 0.581 | 0.704 | 0.755 | 0.573 | 0.582 | 0.5247 | 0.6125 | 0.5719 |
| 0.0010 | 0.005 | 0.0003 | 0.0007 | 0.0055 | 0.0056 | 0.0014 | 0.0031 | 0.0057 | ||
| RR* | Pearsonr | 0.128 | 0.093 | 0.234 | 0.379 | 0.283 | 0.283 | 0.050 | 0.192 | 0.080 |
| 0.580 | 0.688 | 0.306 | 0.090 | 0.213 | 0.213 | 0.831 | 0.404 | 0.729 | ||
| Parks mobility | Pearsonr | 0.145 | 0.084 | − 0.126 | 0.104 | 0.178 | 0.240 | 0.124 | 0.161 | 0.067 |
| 0.532 | 0.718 | 0.588 | 0.653 | 0.441 | 0.294 | 0.592 | 0.487 | 0.774 | ||
| Transit and station mobility | Pearsonr | − 0.084 | − 0.092 | − 0.321 | − 0.299 | − 0.250 | − 0.036 | − 0.199 | − 0.115 | − 0.108 |
| 0.719 | 0.691 | 0.156 | 0.188 | 0.274 | 0.875 | 0.387 | 0.620 | 0.641 | ||
| Workplace mobility | Pearsonr | 0.120 | 0.143 | − 0.099 | 0.155 | − 0.081 | 0.096 | 0.022 | 0.077 | 0.110 |
| 0.606 | 0.536 | 0.671 | 0.502 | 0.728 | 0.679 | 0.926 | 0.741 | 0.634 | ||
| PM2.5 | Pearsonr | 0.148 | 0.305 | 0.313 | 0.364 | 0.296 | 0.147 | 0.120 | 0.161 | 0.325 |
| 0.522 | 0.179 | 0.167 | 0.104 | 0.192 | 0.524 | 0.604 | 0.485 | 0.150 | ||
| PM10 | Pearsonr | − 0.284 | − 0.224 | − 0.005 | − 0.006 | 0.021 | − 0.049 | − 0.220 | − 0.240 | − 0.203 |
| 0.212 | 0.330 | 0.984 | 0.980 | 0.929 | 0.832 | 0.337 | 0.295 | 0.378 | ||
| No2 | Pearsonr | − 0.513 | − 0.478 | − 0.342 | − 0.285 | − 0.426 | − 0.436 | − 0.474 | − 0.433 | − 0.414 |
| 0.017 | 0.028 | 0.129 | 0.211 | 0.054 | 0.048 | 0.030 | 0.050 | 0.062 | ||
| Temperature | Pearsonr | − 0.097 | − 0.022 | − 0.112 | 0.105 | 0.061 | 0.090 | − 0.032 | − 0.042 | 0.015 |
| 0.674 | 0.924 | 0.629 | 0.650 | 0.792 | 0.697 | 0.891 | 0.858 | 0.949 | ||
| Humidity | Pearsonr | 0.627 | 0.550 | 0.665 | 0.504 | 0.452 | 0.472 | 0.515 | 0.585 | 0.489 |
| 0.002 | 0.009 | 0.001 | 0.020 | 0.040 | 0.031 | 0.017 | 0.005 | 0.025 | ||
*GPM, grocery and pharmacy mobility; RRM, retail and recreation mobility
Fig. 3Time plot of percentage change in mobility from a baseline to grocery and pharmacy places, where marker fill with black denotes the change in GPM percentage on weekends
One day ahead prediction performance with a single factor in different states of India
| Accuracy measure | Maharashtra | Kerala | Karnataka | Tamil Nadu | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RR | LASSO | FE_MR | RR | LASSO | FE_MR | RR | LASSO | FE_MR | RR | LASSO | FE_MR | |
| 0.532 | 0.503 | 0.671 | 0.555 | 0.576 | 0.471 | 0.684 | 0.640 | 0.857 | 0.763 | 0.742 | 0.918 | |
| RMSE | 3387.48 | 3561.93 | 2954.36 | 767.986 | 734.589 | 448.425 | 592.217 | 632.821 | 535.047 | 271.906 | 273.039 | 194.599 |
| MAPE | 1.108% | 1.110% | 1.107% | 1.174% | 1.197% | 1.147% | 1.212% | 1.384% | 1.207% | 1.230% | 1.215% | 1.052% |
| MAE | 2078.87 | 2207.53 | 1680.8 | 653.666 | 613.333 | 390.933 | 488.466 | 456.933 | 421.2 | 220.928 | 224.714 | 176.071 |
One day ahead prediction performance with multiple factors in different states of India
| Accuracy measure | Maharashtra | Kerala | Karnataka | Tamil Nadu | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RR | LASSO | FE_MR | RR | LASSO | FE_MR | RR | LASSO | FE_MR | RR | LASSO | FE_MR | |
| 0.650 | 0.630 | 0.842 | 0.637 | 0.643 | 0.713 | 0.721 | 0.718 | 0.915 | 0.829 | 0.802 | 0.961 | |
| RMSE | 843.742 | 825.034 | 770.596 | 713.771 | 556.123 | 416.024 | 727.296 | 701.897 | 420.386 | 236.990 | 238.492 | 164.313 |
| MAPE | 1.371% | 1.592% | 1.253% | 1.289% | 1.293% | 1.272% | 1.141% | 1.155% | 1.213% | 1.165% | 1.152% | 1.179% |
| MAE | 718.467 | 710.6 | 604.333 | 553.6 | 429.866 | 326.928 | 637.214 | 607.214 | 346.357 | 203.285 | 206.857 | 139.285 |
n-days ahead prediction of the total infected cases by the proposed model for Maharashtra, Kerala, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu
| Region | Accuracy measure | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maharashtra | 0.791 | 0.754 | 0.622 | 0.496 | |
| RMSE | 9113.093 | 10,047.713 | 12,666.566 | 16,558.677 | |
| MAPE | 38.54% | 40.24% | 38% | 55% | |
| MAE | 6308.733 | 6544.467 | 7653 | 9871.667 | |
| Kerala | 0.577 | 0.555 | 0.541 | 0.428 | |
| RMSE | 583.540 | 423.650 | 474.220 | 1076.430 | |
| MAPE | 27.45% | 16.44% | 24.43% | 58.36% | |
| MAE | 246.62 | 318.82 | 321.21 | 528.46 | |
| Karnataka | 0.901 | 0.905 | 0.826 | 0.501 | |
| RMSE | 478.320 | 693.440 | 361.830 | 761.820 | |
| MAPE | 23.76% | 39.72% | 14.73% | 32.81% | |
| MAE | 322.71 | 313.71 | 145.3 | 430.74 | |
| Tamil Nadu | 0.956 | 0.868 | 0.772 | 0.510 | |
| RMSE | 177.870 | 341.470 | 431.270 | 612.870 | |
| MAPE | 17.33% | 30.13% | 25.59% | 33.62% | |
| MAE | 114.93 | 237.12 | 278.15 | 473.85 |
Fig. 4Number of cases estimated for (a) Maharashtra, (b) Kerala, (c) Karnataka and (d) Tamil Nadu