| Literature DB >> 35855429 |
Xin Wang1, Yuefeng Guo1, Wei Qi2, Li Zhen3, Yunfeng Yao1, Fucang Qin1.
Abstract
Background: This study was aimed to explore the compensatory growth ability and influence mechanism of Hippophae rhamnoides at the decaying phase in feldspathic sandstone areas of Ordos, and clarify the stubble height when the compensatory growth ability of H. rhamnoides was the strongest.Entities:
Keywords: Compensation growth; Feldspathic sandstone zones; Hippophae rhamnoides; Soil stoichiometry
Year: 2022 PMID: 35855429 PMCID: PMC9288824 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13363
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 3.061
Figure 1The location of the study area.
The study area is located in Geqiu groove watershed (39°42′–39°50′N, 110°25′–110°48′E) of Nuanshui Village, Jungar Banner, Ordos, Inner Mongolia. Figure source credit: 10.27229/d.cnki.gnmnu.2020.000695.
Information of plots before stubbling.
| Index | 0 cm stubble (S1) | 10 cm stubble (S2) | 15 cm stubble (S3) | 20 cm stubble (S4) | Control (CK) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total coverage/% | 65.0 ± 1.15 | 58.9 ± 1.2 | 68.4 ± 0.51 | 64.6 ± 0.85 | 67.2 ± 0.67 |
| Average height/cm | 98.63 ± 2.69 | 99.93 ± 3.07 | 99.13 ± 2.75 | 102.63 ± 3.25 | 100.87 ± 5.53 |
| Species richness | 5.2 ± 0.43 | 5.5 ± 0.41 | 5 ± 0.82 | 5.1 ± 0.7 | 5.2 ± 0.59 |
| Ground biomass/g m−2 | 2536 ± 1.5 | 2673 ± 4.78 | 2635 ± 0.65 | 2673 ± 2.78 | 2622 ± 0.85 |
Notes.
Data are all expressed as mean ± standard deviation; different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments (P < 0.05).
Figure 2Shoot height and biomass compensatory ability of H. rhamnoides at different stubble heights.
Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference between treatments.
Figure 3Eco-stoichiometric characteristics in soil C, N, P contents of H. rhamnoides at different stubble heights.
Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference between treatments.
Variation coefficients of soil eco-stoichiometric ratios of H. rhamnoides at different stubble heights.
Eco-stoichiometric characteristics of soil C, N, P contents in H. rhamnoides at different stubble heights.
| TP | TN | SOC | C:N | C:P | N:P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TP | 1.0000 | |||||
| TN | 0.87 | 1.0000 | ||||
| SOC | 0.96 | 0.89 | 1.0000 | |||
| C:N | 0.1500 | −0.2700 | 0.2000 | 1.0000 | ||
| C:P | −0.91 | −0.73 | −0.78 | −0.0600 | 1.0000 | |
| N:P | −0.86 | −0.52 | −0.77 | −0.51 | 0.89 | 1.0000 |
Notes.
Pearson correlation analysis, two-tailed test; * significant correlation; P < 0.05, ** extreme significant correlations, P < 0.01.
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level.
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level.
Figure 4RDA of eco-stoichiometric ratio and soil properties.
SM, soil moisture content; SH, stubble height; SB, soil bulk density; TPo, total porosity; WH, water-holding capability; GH/C, plant height compensation index; GB/C, biomass compensation index.
Eco-stoichiometric characteristics of soil C, N, P contents in H. rhamnoides at different stubble heights.
Importance sorting and significance test of explanation by environmental variables.
| Influence factor | Interpretive degree/% | Contribution/% |
|
| Sorting by importance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM | 81.6 | 87.6 | 79.6 | 0.002 | 1 |
| TPo | 7.4 | 7.9 | 11.4 | 0.008 | 2 |
| WH (%) | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 0.186 | 3 |
| SB | 1.5 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 0.146 | 4 |
| SH | 1.2 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 0.17 | 5 |
| PH | <0.1 | <0.1 | 0.2 | 0.704 | 6 |
| GB/C | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.522 | 7 |
| GH/C | <0.1 | <0.1 | <0.1 | 0.966 | 8 |
Notes.
soil moisture content
stubble height
soil bulk density
total porosity
water-holding capability
plant height compensation index
biomass compensation index