| Literature DB >> 35855206 |
Matthew J Hatter1, Ryan S Beyer1, Gaston Camino-Willhuber2, Austin Franklin1, Nolan J Brown1, Sohaib Hashmi2, Michael Oh3, Nitin Bhatia2, Yu-Po Lee2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Primary spinal infections (PSIs) are a group of uncommon but serious infectious diseases considered more prevalent and aggressive among patients with chronic immunocompromised states. Association of PSI and solid organ transplant has not been systematically analyzed. The authors performed a systematic review analyzing clinical presentation and mortality of patients with PSI in the setting of solid organ transplant. OBSERVATIONS: PSIs in patients with immunosuppressive therapy, such as those with solid organ transplant, may behave differently in terms of epidemiology, clinical presentation, and outcomes compared with nonimmunosuppressed patients. Overall PSI in solid organ transplant patients is associated with a high rate of neurological compromise, postoperative complications, and mortality. LESSONS: Accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment of PSI require a multidisciplinary effort. Localized pain is the most frequently reported symptom associated with PSI. As opposed to PSI in patients without transplant, inflammatory and infectious markers such as white blood cells and C-reactive protein are often not elevated. Furthermore, the causative microorganism profile varies significantly when compared to pyogenic spinal infection in patients without transplant. Aspergillus species was responsible for spondylodiscitis in transplant patients in more than 50% of cases, and the incidence of Aspergillus infection is projected to rise in the coming years.Entities:
Keywords: CRP = C-reactive protein; IFI = invasive fungal infection; PSI = primary spinal infection; WBC = white blood cell; complications; solid organ transplant; spondylodiscitis; vertebral osteomyelitis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35855206 PMCID: PMC9237658 DOI: 10.3171/CASE22157
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurosurg Case Lessons ISSN: 2694-1902
FIG. 1.Sagittal (A and B) and axial (C and D) magnetic resonance images showing T12–L1 compromise with slight spinal canal involvement.
FIG. 2.Sagittal (A and B), coronal (C), and axial (D and E) computed tomography scans showing osseous involvement and bony erosion.
FIG. 3.Postoperative radiographs showing T11–L2 posterior instrumentation and debridement.
FIG. 4.PRISMA study selection flow diagram. Data added to the PRISMA template (from Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6[7]:e1000097) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Summary of studies included
| Authors & Year | Study Design | No. of Pts | Age (yrs), Sex | Type of Solid Organ Transplant | Pathology | Level of Manifestation | Main Microorganism | Neurological Deficit | Op | Time Btwn Sxs & Op | Antimicrobial Tx Duration | Last FU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belvisi et al., 2013[ | CR | 1 | 61, F | Liver | L4–5 spondylodiscitis | Lumbar (1) | 1 | NA | 7 days | 6 wks | 1 mo | |
| Buzelé et al., 2015[ | 1:3 case- control | 9 | Mean, 52.7; range, 28–61 | Liver (9) | Vertebral osteomyelitis (9), epidural abscess (5) | Thoracic (3), lumbar (4), multifocal (2) | 3 | 1 | 5 wks (range, 1–9 wks) | Median, 12 wks; range, 6–88 wks | Median, 48 wks; range, 7–150 wks | |
| Ersoy et al., 2011[ | CR | 1 | 46, M | Kidney | T8–9 & L2–3 spondylodiscitis | Thoracic (1), lumbar (1), multifocal (1) | NA | 1 | 82 days | 6 mos | 18 mos | |
| Falakassa et al., 2014[ | CS | 6 | Mean, 63; range, 51–80; 4M, 2F | Kidney (2), liver (2), combined liver/kidney (2) | Spondylodiscitis (6), epidural abscess (1) | Thoracic (2), lumbar (4) | 1 | 4 | NR | 7 wks (2), NR (4) | Mean, 20 mos | |
| Freiberg et al., 2019[ | CR | 1 | 49, M | kidney | L2–5 & S1–2 epidural abscesses | Lumbosacral (1), multifocal (1) | NA | NA | 2 wks | 12 mos | 12 mos | |
| Li et al., 2010[ | CS | 15 | Mean, 43.2; range, 18–59; 12M, 3F | Liver (3), kidney (4), heart (7), SPK (1) | Spondylodiscitis (15) | Cervical (1), thoracic (4), lumbar (13), multifocal (3) | 3 | 9 | NR | NR | NR | |
| Li et al., 2012[ | CR | 1 | 44, M | Liver | L4–5, L5–S1 spondylodiscitis | Lumbar (1) | NA | 1 | 4 mos | 20 wks | 20 wks | |
| Luijk et al., 2011[ | CR | 1 | 17, F | Lung | L2–3 spondylodiscitis | Lumbar (1) | NA | NA | 2 mos | 3.5 yrs | 6 yrs | |
| Navanukroh et al., 2014[ | CR | 1 | 42, F | Kidney | S1 osteomyelitis, epidural abscess L4–S1 | Lumbar (1) | 1 | 1 | 12 days | 3 mos | 3 mos | |
| Tv et al., 2015[ | CR | 1 | 34, M | Kidney | Thoracic spondylodiscitis | Thoracic (1) | NA | 1 | 2 mos | 16 days | 16 days | |
| Silva et al., 2015[ | CR | 1 | 71, F | Heart | T6 vertebral osteomyelitis | Thoracic (1) | NA | NA | 2 mos | 3 mos | 11 mos | |
| Thomson et al., 2015[ | CR | 1 | 19, F | Lung | T12–L3 spondylodiscitis | Thoracic (1), | NA | 1 | 5 yrs | 9.5 mos | 3.5 mos | |
| Zhu et al., 2011[ | CR | 1 | 46, M | Liver | L1–5 spondylodiscitis | Lumbar (1) | NA | 1 | 66 days | 15 mos | 27 mos |
CR = case report; CS = case series; FU = follow-up; NR = not reported; Pts = patients; Sxs = symptoms; Tx = treatment.
Time between symptoms and diagnosis.