| Literature DB >> 35855051 |
Xinyu Zhuang1, Yisong Xu2, Li Zhang3,4, Xin Li5,6, Jie Lu7.
Abstract
After the outbreak of COVID-19, the indoor environment has become particularly important in closed spaces, being a common concern in environmental science and public health, and of great significance for the building environment. To improve the indoor air quality and control the spread of viruses, the analysis of inhalable particles in indoor environments is critical. In this research, we study standards focused on inhalable particles and indoor environmental quality, as well as analyzing the movement and diffusion of indoor particles. Based on our analysis, we conduct an experimental study to determine the distribution of indoor inhalable particles of different sizes before and after diffusion under the conditions of underfloor air distribution. Furthermore, the mathematical modeling method is adopted to simulate the indoor flow field, particle trajectories, and pollutant dispersion process. The k-ε two-equation model is applied as the turbulence model in the numerical simulation, while the Lagrangian discrete phase model is adopted to trace the motion of particles and analyze the distribution characteristics of indoor particles. The results demonstrate that fine particles (i.e., those with size less than 0.5 μm) have a significant impact on the indoor particle concentration, while coarse particles (i.e., with size above 2.5 μm) have a greater influence on the total mass concentration of indoor particles. Small-sized particles can easily follow the airflow and diffuse to upper parts of the room. Overall, the effects of indoor particles on indoor air quality, including the potential threat of aerosol transmission of respiratory infectious diseases, are non-negligible. Application of the presented research can contribute to improving the health-related aspects of the building environment.Entities:
Keywords: Aerosol transmission; Building environment; Inhalable particles; Mathematical modeling method; Particle experiment; Underfloor air distribution (UFAD) system
Year: 2022 PMID: 35855051 PMCID: PMC9284541 DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112309
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Energy Build ISSN: 0378-7788 Impact factor: 7.201
Fig. 1Diagram of particulate matter size division for particles in air.
Fig. 2Infected persons can spread diseases through a variety of aerosol forms, including close contact and inhalation by susceptible persons (upper part); airborne aerosols inhaled by susceptible persons (medium); or, after sedimentation, spreading through touching the mucosa and spreading on surfaces used by susceptible persons (lower part). Source: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Comparison between displacement of Brownian diffusion and gravitational sedimentation distance of particles in standard condition.
| Particle size dp (μm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00037 | 6×10−3 | 2.4×10−9 | 2.5×106 |
| 0.01 | 2.6×10−4 | 6.6×10−8 | 3900 |
| 0.1 | 3.0×10−5 | 8.6×10−7 | 35 |
| 1.0 | 5.9×10−6 | 3.5×10−5 | 0.17 |
| 10 | 1.7×10−6 | 3.0×10−3 | 5.7×10−4 |
Equal to the diameter of an air molecule.
Fig. 3Layout of test room.
Technical parameters of Grimm Model 1.108 aerosol spectrometer.
| Laser | Wavelength:λ = 655 mm Power:Pmax = 40 mW |
|---|---|
| Particle channel | 15 Particle channels: 0.30/0.40/0.50/0.75/1.0/1.5/2.0/3.0/4.0/5.0/7.5/10/12.5/15/20 μm |
| Particle counting range | 1–2,000,000P/L |
| Mass concentration range | 0.1–100,000 μg/m3 |
| Accuracy | ±2% |
| Sample flow rate | 1.2 L/min |
| Dust collection | Ф47 mm Polytetrafluoroethylene filter membrane |
| Temperature | 4–45 ℃ |
Comparison of the most recent research methods and conclusions.
| Researcher | Time | Experiment | Numerical investigation | Analog parameters | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. Zhong | 2010 | A full-scale room with two different ventilation methods | RNG k-ε turbulent model and the Lagrangian particle tracking method | L(x)*W(z)*H(y) = 5.4 m*3.4 m*3.6 m d = 1.0 μm, 2.5 μm, 5.0 μm, 10 μm | The UFAD system had low deposition loss and best particle removal efficiency by exhaust air, and had the greatest potential to reduce cross-contamination. |
| C. Li | 2012 | Using particle concentration tester MIEPDR-1000AN and particle counter | The Euler and Lagrangian models | L(x)*W(y)*H(z) = 3 m*3m*2.65 m d = 5 μm ρ = 1200 kg/m3 | Human walking caused the particles greater than 5 μm to increase rapidly, which resuspended into indoor air. |
| M. Salmanzadeh | 2012 | —— | The Euler and Lagrangian computational models & k-ε turbulence model | L(x)*W(y)*H(z) = 1.8 m*2.4 m*2.4 m | The thermal plume flow generated by the temperature gradient adjacent to the body can lead to a high concentration of suspended particles in the breathing zone. |
| C. Zhuang | 2016 | —— | The Euler–Lagrangian approach (DPM) & RNG k-ε model | L(x)*W(y)*H(z) = 5 m*4m*3m d = 0.01 μm, 0.1 μm, 0.5 μm, 1 μm, 2.5 μm, 5 μm, 10 μm ρ = 1180 kg/m3 | The central-type air conditioner had a higher efficiency in removing indoor particles and, therefore, reduced the airborne pollution more efficiently in comparison with the split-type one. |
| Y.M. Fan | 2017 | Model validation using experimental data from others | RNG model | L(x)*W(y)*H(z) = 6 m*3 m*2.6 m | The position of the air return vent significantly affects the performance of the UFAD system. |
| B. Rahmati | 2018 | Simulation of UFAD-DDV + system in a typical office | RANS | L(x)*W(y)*H(z) = 5.16 m*3.65 m*2.5 m | Integrating the UFAD system with the improved displacement ventilation improves indoor air quality. |
| A.Morteza | 2019 | Data from Coelho Leite and Tribess 2005 & Pustelnik and Tribess 2006 | The Eulerian–Lagrangian model & v2-f turbulence model | L(x)*W(z)*H(y) = 5.4 m*3.4 m*3.6 m d = 0.1 μm, 10 μm | The studied UFAD system provides good thermal comfort condition, and the large particles, due to their high weight, stayed in lower heights of the room and deposited on the floor. |
| T.H. Zhang | 2021 | —— | RANS & RNG k-ε model | L(x)*W(y)*H(z) = 5.16 m*3.56 m*2.43 m | The removal of particulate matter and VOCs is consistent with the Langmuir–Hinshelwood (L-H) kinetic model when there are no barriers. |
| S.M.Liu | 2022 | Used an environmental chamber to simulate a typical open office | RANS & RNG k-ε model | L(x)*W(y)*H(z) = 7 m*5.8 m*3.05 m d = 0.4 μm | Increased ventilation can reduce particulate concentrations, but this improvement is not proportional to the ventilation rate. |
| This paper | GRIMM Model 1.108 aerosol spectrometer & mosquito-repellent incense experiment | The Euler model, Lagrange discrete phase model, and k-ε two-equation model | L(x)*W(z)*H(y) = 6 m*7m*2.8 m d = 0.3 μm, 1.0 μm, 2.5 μm, 5.0 μm, 10 μm | UFAD systems can significantly reduce indoor particulate matter concentrations, creating a cleaner indoor environment. |
Comparison of different particle phase models.
| Model | Method | Effect of particles | Interphase sliding | UCS | Particle transport properties |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single particle dynamic model | Discrete system | Neglect | Yes | Lagrange | None |
| Sliding model | Continuous medium | Neglect | Yes | Euler | Yes |
| Non sliding model | Continuous medium | Partial Consideration | None | Euler | Yes (diffusion equilibrium) |
| Particle-trajectory model | Discrete system | Consideration | Yes | Lagrange | None (orbit determination)Yes (stochastic) |
| Pseudo-fluid model | Continuous medium | Consideration | Yes | Euler | Yes |
Fig. 4Comparison between stable and initial concentrations of particles under UFAD system.
Particle concentration in different particle size range.
| Particle range(μm) | Steady state value of air supply n | Initial value n0 | n/n0 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No./L | Cumulative frequencies | No./L | Cumulative frequencies | ||
| 0.3–0.5 | 94,609 | 94,609 | 142,080 | 152,080 | 0.6221 |
| 0.5–1 | 3733 | 98,342 | 7731 | 159,811 | 0.4828 |
| 1–2.5 | 360 | 98,702 | 910 | 160,721 | 0.3955 |
| 2.5–10 | 62 | 98,762 | 209 | 160,930 | 0.2968 |
Particle mass concentration in different particle size ranges.
| Particle range(μm) | Steady state value of air supply m | Initial value m0 | m/m0 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| μg/m3 | Cumulative mass concentration | μg/m3 | Cumulative mass concentration | ||
| 0.3–0.5 | 8.442 | 8.442 | 14.849 | 14.849 | 0.5685 |
| 0.5–1 | 3.900 | 12.342 | 8.053 | 22.902 | 0.4842 |
| 1–2.5 | 2.823 | 15.165 | 10.705 | 33.607 | 0.2637 |
| 2.5–10 | 4.295 | 19.460 | 45.755 | 79.362 | 0.0939 |
Fig. 5Distribution of indoor particle concentration before and after mosquito-repellent incense burning.
Fig. 6Solution flowchart of gas–solid two-phase bidirectional coupling.
Fig. 7Geometric structure and indoor layout of simulated underfloor air distribution room.
Indoor equipment parameters.
| Name | Size(m) | Number | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 0.4×0.3×1.1 | 2 | Both space obstacle and heat source |
| Lighting | 1.2×0.2×0.01 | 4 | Downward single side heat dissipation |
| Computer | 0.4×0.4×0.4 | 8 | at the height of desks (0.7 m), of which 2 are in operation |
| Bookcase | 1.0×0.4×1.8 | 3 | Only as a space obstacle |
| Refrigerator | 0.5×0.5×1.4 | 1 | Only as a space obstacle |
| Cabinet air-conditioner | 0.5×0.35×1.25 | 1 | Only as a space obstacle |
Fig. 8Grid division of UFAD room.
Grid division of the test room.
| Grid | Surface mesh | Node |
|---|---|---|
| 290,313 | 524,662 | 50,997 |
Fig. 9Typical plane temperature distribution in room.
Initial conditions of particles.
| Particle size/μm | Mass of particles per trajectory/μg | Trajectory number | Particles number of per trajectory |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.3 | 1.2×10−1 | 200 | 8.084×106 |
| 1 | 1.2×10−1 | 200 | 2.183×105 |
| 2.5 | 1.2×10−1 | 200 | 1.397×104 |
| 5 | 1.2×10−1 | 200 | 1.746×103 |
| 10 | 1.2×10−1 | 200 | 2.183×102 |
Fig. 10Trajectory of a single particle.
Fig. 11Trajectories of particles with different particle sizes.
Comparison of orbital numbers of particles with different sizes.
| Particle size/μm | Discharge trajectory | Sedimentation trajectory | Suspended trajectory |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.3 | 123 | 23 | 54 |
| 1 | 98 | 56 | 46 |
| 2.5 | 43 | 122 | 35 |
| 5 | 26 | 148 | 26 |
| 10 | 9 | 172 | 19 |
Fig. 12Comparison of particle trajectory numbers with different particle sizes.
Fig. 13Indoor positions of two longitudinal sections through dust points.
Fig. 14Concentration cloud diagram of mosquito-repellent incense diffusion process (X = 5.5 m).
Fig. 15Layout of particle concentration measurement points.
Fig. 16Comparison of velocity attenuation of air supply jet.
Fig. 17Temperature comparison at the measurement points (X = 5.5 m, Z = 2.7 m).
Fig. 18Particle concentration comparison at the measured points (X = 4.3 m, Y = 1.1 m).