Bright Kwadwo Bour1, Edem Kwabla Sosu1,2, Francis Hasford1,2, Prince Kwabena Gyekye1,3, Daniel Gyingiri Achel1,2, Augustine Faanu1,3, Joseph Kwabena Amoako1,4, Richard Denys Pitcher5. 1. School of Nuclear and Allied Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana. 2. Radiological and Medical Sciences Research Institute, Ghana Atomic Energy Commission, Accra, Ghana. 3. Radiological and Non-Ionizing Radiation Directorate, Nuclear Regulatory Authority, Accra, Ghana. 4. Radiation Protection Institute, Ghana Atomic Energy Commission, Accra, Ghana. 5. Division of Radiodiagnosis, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Abstract
Introduction: to address the challenge of inadequate and non-equitable distribution of diagnostic imaging equipment, countries are encouraged to evaluate the distribution of installed systems and undertake adequate monitoring to ensure equitability. Ghana´s medical imaging resources have been analyzed in this study and evaluated against the status in other countries. Methods: data on registered medical imaging equipment were retrieved from the database of the Nuclear Regulatory Authority and analyzed. The equipment/population ratio was mapped out graphically for the 16 regions of Ghana. Comparison of the equipment/population ratio was made with the situation in other countries. Results: six hundred and seventy-four diagnostic imaging equipment units from 266 medical imaging facilities (2.5 units/facility), comprising computed tomography (CT), general X-ray, dental X-ray, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) gamma camera, fluoroscopy, mammography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were surveyed nationally. None of the imaging systems measured above the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) average imaging units per million populations (u/mp). The overall equipment/population ratio estimated nationally was 21.4 u/mp. Majority of the imaging systems were general X-ray, installed in the Greater Accra and Ashanti regions. The regional estimates of equipment/population ratios were Greater Accra (49.6 u/mp), Ashanti (22.4 u/mp), Western (21.4 u/mp), Eastern (20.6 u/mp), Bono East (20.0 u/mp), Bono (19.2 u/mp), Volta (17.9 u/mp), Upper West (16.7 u/mp), Oti (12.5 u/mp), Central (11.9 u/mp), Northern (8.9 u/mp), Ahafo (8.9 u/mp), Upper East (6.9 u/mp), Western North (6.7 u/mp), Savannah (5.5 u/mp) and North-East (1.7 u/mp). Conclusion: medical imaging equipment shortfall exist across all imaging modalities in Ghana. A wide inter-regional disparity in the distribution of medical imaging equipment exists contrary to WHO´s recommendation for equitable distribution. A concerted national plan will be needed to address the disparity. Copyright: Bright Kwadwo Bour et al.
Introduction: to address the challenge of inadequate and non-equitable distribution of diagnostic imaging equipment, countries are encouraged to evaluate the distribution of installed systems and undertake adequate monitoring to ensure equitability. Ghana´s medical imaging resources have been analyzed in this study and evaluated against the status in other countries. Methods: data on registered medical imaging equipment were retrieved from the database of the Nuclear Regulatory Authority and analyzed. The equipment/population ratio was mapped out graphically for the 16 regions of Ghana. Comparison of the equipment/population ratio was made with the situation in other countries. Results: six hundred and seventy-four diagnostic imaging equipment units from 266 medical imaging facilities (2.5 units/facility), comprising computed tomography (CT), general X-ray, dental X-ray, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) gamma camera, fluoroscopy, mammography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were surveyed nationally. None of the imaging systems measured above the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) average imaging units per million populations (u/mp). The overall equipment/population ratio estimated nationally was 21.4 u/mp. Majority of the imaging systems were general X-ray, installed in the Greater Accra and Ashanti regions. The regional estimates of equipment/population ratios were Greater Accra (49.6 u/mp), Ashanti (22.4 u/mp), Western (21.4 u/mp), Eastern (20.6 u/mp), Bono East (20.0 u/mp), Bono (19.2 u/mp), Volta (17.9 u/mp), Upper West (16.7 u/mp), Oti (12.5 u/mp), Central (11.9 u/mp), Northern (8.9 u/mp), Ahafo (8.9 u/mp), Upper East (6.9 u/mp), Western North (6.7 u/mp), Savannah (5.5 u/mp) and North-East (1.7 u/mp). Conclusion: medical imaging equipment shortfall exist across all imaging modalities in Ghana. A wide inter-regional disparity in the distribution of medical imaging equipment exists contrary to WHO´s recommendation for equitable distribution. A concerted national plan will be needed to address the disparity. Copyright: Bright Kwadwo Bour et al.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diagnostic radiology; Ghana; equipment; medical imaging; population ratio
Authors: Rodney D Welling; Ezana M Azene; Vivek Kalia; Krit Pongpirul; Anna Starikovsky; Ryan Sydnor; Matthew P Lungren; Benjamin Johnson; Cary Kimble; Sarah Wiktorek; Tom Drum; Brad Short; Justin Cooper; Nagi F Khouri; William W Mayo-Smith; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Barry B Goldberg; Brian S Garra; Kristen K Destigter; Jonathan S Lewin; Daniel J Mollura Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Duncan Smith-Rohrberg Maru; Ryan Schwarz; Andrews Jason; Sanjay Basu; Aditya Sharma; Christopher Moore Journal: Global Health Date: 2010-10-14 Impact factor: 4.185