Literature DB >> 35854868

The underestimated incidence of an orbital angioleiomyoma is possibly associated with an orbital cavernous hemangioma: illustrative case.

Seonah Choi1, JaeSang Ko2, Se Hoon Kim3,4, Eui Hyun Kim1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Orbital angioleiomyoma is generally considered a rare tumor; approximately 40 cases have been reported. However, after their experience with 6 consecutive cases in their single institution during 3 years, the authors speculate that the incidence of orbital angioleiomyomas is possibly underestimated. OBSERVATIONS: A 34-year-old female presented with progressive exophthalmos of 2 years' duration. Orbital computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a well-circumscribed orbital tumor with partial and heterogeneous gadolinium enhancement. Technetium-99m red blood cell single-photon emission computed tomography showed positive perfusion in the late blood-pool phase, which was exactly consistent with the finding of a cavernous hemangioma. Under the impression of a cavernous hemangioma, the authors accessed the mass with an endoscopic endonasal approach and completely removed it without neurological deficit. Pathological examination revealed that the final diagnosis was an angioleiomyoma with positive immunostaining results for smooth muscle actin (SMA). LESSONS: The incidence of orbital angioleiomyomas may not be very low, as these lesions have possibly been misdiagnosed as orbital cavernous hemangiomas because of their histological similarity. Preoperative presumption and differentiation from cavernous hemangiomas are very challenging because of the rarity of orbital angioleiomyoma and similar radiological findings. SMA immunostaining may be critical to differentiate orbital angioleiomyomas from cavernous hemangiomas.
© 2021 The authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEA = endoscopic endonasal approach; IHC = immunohistochemistry; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; OCT = optical coherence tomography; RBC = red blood cell; RNFL = retinal nerve fiber layer; SMA = smooth muscle actin; SPECT = single-photon emission computed tomography; Tc-99m = technetium-99m; angioleiomyoma; cavernous hemangioma; orbit tumor; smooth muscle actin

Year:  2021        PMID: 35854868      PMCID: PMC9245745          DOI: 10.3171/CASE2172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Case Lessons        ISSN: 2694-1902


Angioleiomyoma, also known as vascular leiomyoma or hemangioleiomyoma, is a benign tumor that frequently occurs in the lower extremities. It originates from vascular smooth muscle in the tunica media layer of the vascular wall and is characterized by proliferating pathological vessels containing abundant smooth muscle cells. Most cases develop in the lower extremities; they are rarely reported in the head and neck regions, especially in the orbit.[1] Since we reported our first case of an orbital angioleiomyoma,[2] we have encountered five more cases of pathologically confirmed orbital angioleiomyomas during the last 3 years, which led us to speculate that the incidence may be higher than reported. Herein, we report a case of an orbital angioleiomyoma that mimicked an orbital hemangioma and present an in-depth discussion on its differential diagnosis through a literature review.

Illustrative Case

Patient History and Examinations

A 34-year-old female presented with progressive exophthalmos of 2 years’ duration. Her visual acuity was decreased on her left side. Tests for extraocular muscles revealed no particular restriction or pain, although she complained of subjective diplopia on her left gaze. Her Hess screen chart results showed a minimal difference in the left inferior oblique muscle. Ocular fundoscopic examination revealed left papilledema (Fig. 1), which was consistent with increased retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness on optical coherence tomography (OCT).
FIG. 1.

Preoperative examinations. A: Ocular fundoscopic examination revealed papilledema (white arrow) on the left side optic disc. B: Perimetry test showed no significant visual field defect on both sides. MRI demonstrated a round tumor with homogeneous hyperintensity on a T2-weighted image (C), with heterogeneous gadolinium enhancement on a T1-weighted image (D), and compressing the optic nerve laterally (black arrowhead). E: The relationship between tumor and medial/inferior rectus muscles (white arrowheads) was noticed on the coronal T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced image. Tc-99m RBC scan with perfusion (F), early blood pool (G), and late blood pool (H) images shows perfusion/blood pool mismatch (black arrows).

Preoperative examinations. A: Ocular fundoscopic examination revealed papilledema (white arrow) on the left side optic disc. B: Perimetry test showed no significant visual field defect on both sides. MRI demonstrated a round tumor with homogeneous hyperintensity on a T2-weighted image (C), with heterogeneous gadolinium enhancement on a T1-weighted image (D), and compressing the optic nerve laterally (black arrowhead). E: The relationship between tumor and medial/inferior rectus muscles (white arrowheads) was noticed on the coronal T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced image. Tc-99m RBC scan with perfusion (F), early blood pool (G), and late blood pool (H) images shows perfusion/blood pool mismatch (black arrows). Orbital computed tomography showed a round, well-circumscribed, space-occupying intraconal mass with iso- to hyperdensity compressing the left optic nerve. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) also demonstrated a partially and heterogeneously gadolinium-enhanced round mass just lateral to the left medial rectus muscle on T1-weighted images; relatively homogeneous hyperintensity was observed on T2-weighted images. Suspecting an orbital cavernous hemangioma, which is the most common benign mass-forming lesion in the orbit, we performed technetium (Tc)-99m red blood cell (RBC) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), as it is highly useful in the diagnosis of this condition.[3,4] We observed a perfusion/blood pool mismatch with negative uptake in the perfusion phase, weak positive uptake in the early blood-pooling phase, and positive uptake in the late blood-pooling phase, which was exactly consistent with a cavernous hemangioma. Considering the location of the tumor inside the orbit and its relative anatomical orientation with the optic nerve, resection through an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) was planned.

Operation and Surgical Findings

The EEA to the left orbital tumor was simulated preoperatively, and resection via the EEA was considered feasible. A rigid endoscope 4 mm in diameter and 18 cm in length (Synergy UHD4 endoscope system, Arthrex) and a cranial navigation system (StealthStation S8 surgical navigation system, Medtronic) were used during surgery. A bilateral nostril, four-handed EEA was employed to access the left orbital tumor. First, a hemitransfixion incision (also known as Freer’s incision) was made on the medial mucocutaneous junction on the septum, just behind the right nostril. The right septal mucosa was reflected laterally, and the perpendicular plate of the ethmoid and a superior part of the vomer were removed for later use in reconstruction at the very last stage of the operation. A transverse incision was made on the left septal mucosa to secure transseptal accessibility from the right side of the nostril to the left orbit. After a left middle turbinectomy, a posterior ethmoidectomy was performed with removal of the uncinated process and ethmoid bullae until we exposed the optic canal and medial wall of the orbit (lamina papyracea). After removal of the lamina papyracea, a careful periorbital incision was made to avoid intraorbital structure injury. After localizing the tumor with the aid of the neuronavigation system, the space between the medial and inferior rectus muscles was dissected. Fat tissue was partially removed and pushed aside with cottonoid. After intraorbital dissection, the tumor was easily identified as a solid, pinkish, hypervascularized mass. The tumor capsule was not adhered to the surrounding structures, which facilitated extracapsular dissection. Electrooculographic monitoring was continued during dissection to prevent injury to the oculomotor nerve and its branches.[5] After cauterization of a few feeding arteries, the tumor was removed in one piece. After bleeding control was achieved, the periorbital layer was closed with several stay sutures and covered with a fleece-coated fibrin glue patch (TachoSil, Nycomed Austria). The medial orbital wall was reconstructed with placement of the septal bone piece, which was reinforced by a topical tissue sealant (BioGlue, CryoLife Inc.) (Video 1). VIDEO 1. Case illustration of EEA for a left orbital tumor. The 34-year-old female patient with left proptosis presented with a medial orbital tumor, confirmed as angioleiomyoma later. For the best performance, we chose the binostril EEA. The middle turbinate and posterior ethmoid sinus were removed on the tumor side. Freer’s incision was made on the opposite nostril, and we reflected septal mucosa. We tried to take nasal bone in a piece to be used for reconstruction later. After the bone was removed, we made another incision on the opposite side of septal mucosa so that tumor was approached from the contralateral nostril though the septum. The sphenoid and maxillary sinuses were also opened for surgical freedom. We removed the medial orbital wall from the very proximal side of the view to near the apex. With navigation guidance, the tumor’s location was confirmed, and we split the periorbita several ways and removed some of the fat. Then we performed careful dissection between the medial and inferior rectus muscles. We found the highly vascularized, solid mass with several feeding arteries on its medial side. These vessels were carefully dissected and coagulated, and these were continued until we freed the tumor from the surrounding intraconal compartments. Since there was less adhesion on its lateral side, the tumor was removed easily in one piece. To prevent possible injury on the oculomotor nerve and its branches, electrooculographic monitoring was continued during the procedure. After approximating the periorbital layer, part of the nasal bone was used for orbital wall reconstruction and covered with a fibrin sealant patch and glue. The septal mucosa was closed with nasal bone reconstruction. Postoperative MRI confirmed total resection with improved proptosis. Click here to view.

Pathological Findings

Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the tumor revealed multiple enlarged vascular channels with partially thickened vessel walls containing spindle-shaped tumor cells. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) revealed a strong positivity for smooth muscle actin (SMA) in the tumor, consistent with an angioleiomyoma (Fig. 2).
FIG. 2.

Histopathological examination. A well-demarcated mass is demonstrated with multiple enlarged vascular channels with partially thickened vessel walls (A; hematoxylin and eosin [H&E], original magnification ×40). Fibrous stroma surrounding a vascular channel (B; H&E, original magnification ×400) with prominent smooth muscle cells (C; SMA, original magnification ×100) is noted.

Histopathological examination. A well-demarcated mass is demonstrated with multiple enlarged vascular channels with partially thickened vessel walls (A; hematoxylin and eosin [H&E], original magnification ×40). Fibrous stroma surrounding a vascular channel (B; H&E, original magnification ×400) with prominent smooth muscle cells (C; SMA, original magnification ×100) is noted.

Postoperative Course

Postoperative MRI confirmed complete resection (Fig. 3). The patient’s exophthalmos fully resolved immediately after the operation, and no postoperative neurological deficits developed. The subjective diplopia symptom was also resolved. Postoperative OCT demonstrated a decrease in RNFL thickness, and fundoscopic examination showed complete resolution of papilledema.
FIG. 3.

Postoperative examinations. A: Papilledema was resolved on 1-month follow-up fundoscopic examination (white arrow). B: Visual field test showed no neurological deficit postoperatively. C–E: MRI with T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced images and T2-weighted image confirmed complete removal of the tumor.

Postoperative examinations. A: Papilledema was resolved on 1-month follow-up fundoscopic examination (white arrow). B: Visual field test showed no neurological deficit postoperatively. C–E: MRI with T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced images and T2-weighted image confirmed complete removal of the tumor.

Single-Institution Experience of Orbital Angioleiomyomas

Since our first patient with orbital angioleiomyoma,[2] we have encountered a total of six cases of pathologically confirmed orbital angioleiomyomas at a single institution over 3 years. Four orbital angioleiomyomas were relatively small in size, located at the apex with decreased visual acuity as the main symptom. The other two were large tumors with profound exophthalmos. Interestingly, two were evaluated with Tc-99m RBC SPECT, which showed evident perfusion/blood pool mismatches. Three patients underwent transcranial surgery with frontotemporal craniotomy, and the other three tumors were approached via EEA. Total removal was achieved in all six cases, and none experienced long-standing neurological complications. The details of our six patients are summarized in Table 1.
TABLE 1.

Patient characteristics in six cases of orbital angioleiomyoma

Case No.Age (yrs)SexSymptomsOrbital LocationRBC ScanCT DensityMRI Signal IntensityOperationResection Status
1*
56
F
VA decrease
Apex
ND
Hyperdense
T1 isodensity, T1e homogeneously enhanced, T2 hyperdensity
EEA
TR
2
36
M
VA decrease
Apex
ND
ND
T1 isodensity, T1e homogeneously enhanced, T2 isodensity
EEA
TR
3
42
F
Exophthalmos
Conal, lateral
OCH pattern
Isodense
T1 isodensity, T1e homogeneously enhanced, T2 hyperdensity
Transcranial
TR
4
44
M
VA decrease
Apex
ND
Isodense
T1 isodensity, T1e homogeneously enhanced, T2 hyperdensity
Transcranial
TR
5
35
M
VA decrease
Apex
ND
Isodense to hyperdense
T1 isodensity, T1e homogeneously enhanced, T2 hyperdensity
Transcranial
TR
6 34FExophthalmosConal, medialOCH patternIsodense to hyperdenseT1 isodensity, T1e homogeneously enhanced, T2 highEEATR

CT = computed tomography; ND = not done; OCH = orbital cavernous hemangioma; T1e = T1 weighted, gadolinium enhanced; TR = total resection; VA = visual acuity.

Case 1 is the case previously published.

Case 6 is the case in this study.

Patient characteristics in six cases of orbital angioleiomyoma CT = computed tomography; ND = not done; OCH = orbital cavernous hemangioma; T1e = T1 weighted, gadolinium enhanced; TR = total resection; VA = visual acuity. Case 1 is the case previously published. Case 6 is the case in this study.

Discussion

Observations

Angioleiomyoma is a benign tumor originating from vascular smooth cells and synonymous with vascular angioleiomyoma, hemangioleiomyoma, angiomyoma, or dermal angioma.[6] It is a rare soft tissue tumor with the highest prevalence in middle-aged females, and most affect the lower extremities.[7] Angioleiomyoma as an orbital/periorbital lesion is much rarer, with only 40 cases of pathologically proven orbital angioleiomyomas reported in the literature so far.[2,8,9] Our single-institution experience of six cases during such a short period cast doubt on the extremely low incidence of orbital angioleiomyoma. There were several attempts to obtain a large-scale histopathological classification of the orbital tumors in recent decades. Most of the classifications included thousands of orbital/periorbital lesions, and the top-ranked benign tumors were either cavernous hemangiomas or dermoid cysts.[10-12] However, one interesting study with the largest patient population reported similar incidence rates for cavernous hemangioma and vascular leiomyoma among the orbital lesions.[13] We therefore assumed that the incidence of angioleiomyoma, which is extremely low in the literature, might be much higher than reported. According to the report by Morimoto,[7] angioleiomyomas have three histological subtypes of solid, venous, and cavernous, and they can be divided into two groups based on location and populations. The larger group comprises solid, painful masses in the extremities, and the smaller group presents with venous, painless masses in the head. The three subtypes are determined by quantitative differences between vascular channels and smooth muscle cells, with the lowest incidence of the cavernous type in the extremities.[14] Conversely, as an intracranial lesion, the cavernous type was the most frequent,[15] including in the orbit.[9] This is very interesting because the cavernous type is characterized by the fewest smooth muscle cells and the most abundant pathological vascular channels, sharing histological similarities with cavernous hemangiomas. Although preoperative presumption of an angioleiomyoma based only on clinical and radiological findings is very challenging, there are studies suggesting radiological characteristics that help guide the differential diagnosis.[6] Tumors with flame-like partial enhancement on T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced imaging[16] and delayed progressive enhancement on dynamic MRI[17] were suggested as characteristics of an angioleiomyoma. Tc-99m RBC SPECT, also known as RBC scintigraphy or RBC scan, has a high predictive value for diagnosing orbital cavernous hemangioma.[3,4,18] However, both cases of angioleiomyoma evaluated by RBC scan in our series showed the same findings indicative of cavernous hemangioma. Considering the histological similarities, it is possible that the cavernous type of an orbital angioleiomyoma mimics a cavernous hemangioma on MRI and RBC scans and may be misdiagnosed, especially when the diagnosis is not based on histopathological examination. This could explain why the incidence of orbital angioleiomyomas has been underestimated. Although angioleiomyoma is known to be radioresistant and resection is the treatment of choice,[19] it is possible that the cavernous subtype of orbital angioleiomyoma shows a good response to radiation similar to that of cavernous hemangioma. We recommend performing IHC for SMA in every case of orbital cavernous hemangioma. Although the differentiation between a cavernous subtype of angioleiomyoma and a cavernous hemangioma is not always easy, the presence of smooth muscle cells and the amount and thickness of the smooth muscle layer will be strong evidence of an angioleiomyoma. Our hypothesis can be tested by retrospective SMA IHC on tissues previously diagnosed as cavernous hemangiomas.

Lessons

The incidence of orbital angioleiomyoma may have been underestimated because of its histological similarity with orbital cavernous hemangioma. Preoperative differentiation from cavernous hemangiomas is very challenging because of the rarity of orbital angioleiomyoma and similar radiological findings. We recommend that SMA immunostaining be performed during differential diagnosis.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by Yonsei University College of Medicine (6-2020-0224).

Disclosures

The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

Author Contributions

Conception and design: EH Kim, Choi, SH Kim. Acquisition of data: all authors. Analysis and interpretation of data: EH Kim, Choi, Ko. Drafting the article: Choi, SH Kim. Critically revising the article: EH Kim. Reviewed submitted version of manuscript: EH Kim, SH Kim. Approved the final version of the manuscript on behalf of all authors: EH Kim. Statistical analysis: Choi. Administrative/technical/material support: EH Kim. Study supervision: EH Kim.

Supplemental Information

Videos

Video 1. https://vimeo.com/519547976.
  17 in total

1.  Technetium tc 99m-labeled red blood cells in the preoperative diagnosis of cavernous hemangioma and other vascular orbital tumors.

Authors:  Ennio Polito; Luca Burroni; Patrizia Pichierri; Antonio Loffredo; Angelo G Vattimo
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-12

Review 2.  Primary Intracranial Angioleiomyomas as Rare, Nonmalignant, and Distinct Neoplastic Entities: A Series of 8 Cases and a Literature Review.

Authors:  Cheng-Bei Li; Ming-Guo Xie; Jun-Peng Ma; Liang Wang; Shu-Yu Hao; Li-Wei Zhang; Wang Jia; Gui-Jun Jia; Jun-Ting Zhang; Da Li; Huan Li; Zhen Wu
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 3.  Leiomyoma of the orbit and periocular region: a clinicopathologic study of four cases.

Authors:  Yonca Ozkan Arat; Ramon L Font; Imtiaz A Chaudhry; Milton Boniuk
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.746

4.  Leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma of the orbit.

Authors:  F A Jakobiec; G M Howard; M Rosen; M Wolff
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 5.  An analysis of 2,480 space-occupying lesions of the orbit from 1976 to 2011.

Authors:  Giulio Bonavolontà; Diego Strianese; Piergiacomo Grassi; Chiara Comune; Fausto Tranfa; Giovanni Uccello; Adriana Iuliano
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.746

6.  Angioleiomyoma. A clinicopathologic reappraisal of 562 cases.

Authors:  T Hachisuga; H Hashimoto; M Enjoji
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Survey of 1264 patients with orbital tumors and simulating lesions: The 2002 Montgomery Lecture, part 1.

Authors:  Jerry A Shields; Carol L Shields; Richard Scartozzi
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Angioleiomyoma of the cavernous sinus: case report.

Authors:  Sophie Colnat-Coulbois; Emmanuelle Schmitt; Olivier Klein; Nicolas Weinbreck; Jean Auque; Thierry Civit
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 9.  Angioleiomyoma, a rare intracranial tumor: 3 case report and a literature review.

Authors:  Lijun Sun; Yan Zhu; Hong Wang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Angioleiomyoma in the Orbital Apex: A Case Report.

Authors:  Boeun Lee; Soo Jeong Park; Ju Hyung Moon; Se Hoon Kim; Jong Hee Chang; Sun Ho Kim; Eui Hyun Kim
Journal:  Brain Tumor Res Treat       Date:  2019-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.