Literature DB >> 3585450

Controlled-release oral morphine sulfate in the treatment of cancer pain with pharmacokinetic correlation.

A Khojasteh, W Evans, R D Reynolds, G Thomas, J J Savarese.   

Abstract

The bioavailability and clinical effects of an oral controlled-release morphine sulfate tablet, MS-contin (MSC; Purdue-Frederick, Norwalk, CT) in comparison to an immediate-release (IRMS) preparation were evaluated in normal subjects and cancer patients, respectively. The inherent slow-release character of MSC was confirmed by 2 1/2 X T1/2 absorption rate, one-half Cmax, and twice Tmax relative to IRMS. The T1/2 elimination of the two morphine preparations was similar, demonstrating insignificant risk of MSC accumulation. The difference in the mean number of side effects experienced by the control group per subject was significant (.70 for MSC and 1.26 for IRMS, P = .05) and was consistent with peak plasma morphine attenuation. The cancer patients were initially switched from their previous analgesic to four hourly IRMS and then to MSC at double the dose every eight hours. The majority had their MSC dosing interval lengthened to every 12 hours with a decrease in the total daily morphine requirement. While the mean duration on MSC was 20.5 days, many patients were followed poststudy for an extended period with no appreciable development of tolerance. Overall, MSC analgesia and side effects were perceived by the patients as superior compared with prestudy opioids. The advantage of less frequent dosing may lead to improvement of the quality of life of cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3585450     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1987.5.6.956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  11 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of opioid treatment in acute pain therapy.

Authors:  R N Upton; T J Semple; P E Macintyre
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetics of opioids in liver disease.

Authors:  I Tegeder; J Lötsch; G Geisslinger
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Oral morphine for cancer pain.

Authors:  Philip J Wiffen; Bee Wee; R Andrew Moore
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-22

4.  The bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of morphine after intravenous, oral and buccal administration in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  P J Hoskin; G W Hanks; G W Aherne; D Chapman; P Littleton; J Filshie
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Translating safety, efficacy and compliance into economic value for controlled release dosage forms.

Authors:  M P Cramer; S R Saks
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  The dosing frequency of sustained-release opioids and the prevalence of end-of-dose failure in cancer pain control: a Korean multicenter study.

Authors:  Do-Yeun Kim; Hong-Suk Song; Jin-Seok Ahn; Baek-Yeol Ryoo; Dong-Bok Shin; Chang-Yeol Yim; Si-Young Kim
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Abuse potential of various opioid medications.

Authors:  D Brookoff
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Opioid Rotation in Cancer Pain Treatment.

Authors:  Michael Schuster; Oliver Bayer; Florian Heid; Rita Laufenberg-Feldmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 9.  Common emergencies in cancer medicine: cardiovascular and neurologic syndromes.

Authors:  C R Thomas; E A Edmondson
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.798

10.  Morphine and morphine-glucuronide concentrations in plasma and CSF during long-term administration of oral morphine.

Authors:  R T van Dongen; B J Crul; P M Koopman-Kimenai; T B Vree
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.