Philipp E Hartrampf1, Ralph A Bundschuh2, Franz-Xaver Weinzierl1, Sebastian E Serfling1, Aleksander Kosmala1, Anna Katharina Seitz3, Hubert Kübler3, Andreas K Buck1, Markus Essler2, Rudolf A Werner4,5. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Oberdürrbacherstraße Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany. 3. Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Oberdürrbacherstraße 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Oberdürrbacherstraße Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. werner_r1@ukw.de. 5. The Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. werner_r1@ukw.de.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) scheduled for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT), biochemical response is assessed based on repeated measurements of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. We aimed to determine overall survival (OS) in patients experiencing sustained PSA increase, decrease, or fluctuations during therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this bicentric study, we included 176 mCRPC patients treated with PSMA-directed RLT. PSA levels were determined using blood samples prior to the first RLT and on the admission days for the following cycles. We calculated relative changes in PSA levels compared to baseline. Kaplan-Meier curves as well as log-rank test were used to compare OS of different subgroups, including patients with sustained PSA increase, decrease, or fluctuations (defined as change after initial decrease or increase after the first cycle). RESULTS: Sixty-one out of one hundred seventy-six (34.7%) patients showed a sustained increase and 86/176 (48.8%) a sustained decrease in PSA levels. PSA fluctuations were observed in the remaining 29/176 (16.5%). In this subgroup, 22/29 experienced initial PSA decrease followed by an increase (7/29, initial increase followed by a decrease). Median OS of patients with sustained decrease in PSA levels was significantly longer when compared to patients with sustained increase of PSA levels (19 vs. 8 months; HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.22-0.56; P < 0.001). Patients with PSA fluctuations showed a significantly longer median OS compared to patients with sustained increase of PSA levels (18 vs. 8 months; HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.80; P < 0.01), but no significant difference relative to men with sustained PSA decrease (18 vs. 19 months; HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.78-2.49; P = 0.20). In addition, in men experiencing PSA fluctuations, median OS did not differ significantly between patients with initial decrease or initial increase of tumor marker levels (16 vs. 18 months; HR 1.2, 95% CI 0.38-4.05; P = 0.68). CONCLUSION: Initial increase or decrease of PSA levels is sustained in the majority of patients undergoing RLT. Sustained PSA decrease was linked to prolonged survival and men with PSA fluctuations under treatment experienced comparable survival benefits. As such, transient tumor marker oscillations under RLT should rather not lead to treatment discontinuation, especially in the absence of radiological progression.
INTRODUCTION: In men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) scheduled for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT), biochemical response is assessed based on repeated measurements of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. We aimed to determine overall survival (OS) in patients experiencing sustained PSA increase, decrease, or fluctuations during therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this bicentric study, we included 176 mCRPC patients treated with PSMA-directed RLT. PSA levels were determined using blood samples prior to the first RLT and on the admission days for the following cycles. We calculated relative changes in PSA levels compared to baseline. Kaplan-Meier curves as well as log-rank test were used to compare OS of different subgroups, including patients with sustained PSA increase, decrease, or fluctuations (defined as change after initial decrease or increase after the first cycle). RESULTS: Sixty-one out of one hundred seventy-six (34.7%) patients showed a sustained increase and 86/176 (48.8%) a sustained decrease in PSA levels. PSA fluctuations were observed in the remaining 29/176 (16.5%). In this subgroup, 22/29 experienced initial PSA decrease followed by an increase (7/29, initial increase followed by a decrease). Median OS of patients with sustained decrease in PSA levels was significantly longer when compared to patients with sustained increase of PSA levels (19 vs. 8 months; HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.22-0.56; P < 0.001). Patients with PSA fluctuations showed a significantly longer median OS compared to patients with sustained increase of PSA levels (18 vs. 8 months; HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.80; P < 0.01), but no significant difference relative to men with sustained PSA decrease (18 vs. 19 months; HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.78-2.49; P = 0.20). In addition, in men experiencing PSA fluctuations, median OS did not differ significantly between patients with initial decrease or initial increase of tumor marker levels (16 vs. 18 months; HR 1.2, 95% CI 0.38-4.05; P = 0.68). CONCLUSION: Initial increase or decrease of PSA levels is sustained in the majority of patients undergoing RLT. Sustained PSA decrease was linked to prolonged survival and men with PSA fluctuations under treatment experienced comparable survival benefits. As such, transient tumor marker oscillations under RLT should rather not lead to treatment discontinuation, especially in the absence of radiological progression.
Authors: Peter Jochen Olbert; Axel Hegele; Petra Kraeuter; Axel Heidenreich; Rainer Hofmann; Andres Jan Schrader Journal: Anticancer Drugs Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 2.248
Authors: Kambiz Rahbar; Martin Bögeman; Anna Yordanova; Maria Eveslage; Michael Schäfers; Markus Essler; Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar; Simone Wegen; Anna Yordanova; Rolf Fimmers; Stefan Kürpig; Elisabeth Eppard; Xiao Wei; Carl Schlenkhoff; Stefan Hauser; Markus Essler Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-05-09 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Michael S Hofman; Louise Emmett; Shahneen Sandhu; Amir Iravani; Anthony M Joshua; Jeffrey C Goh; David A Pattison; Thean Hsiang Tan; Ian D Kirkwood; Siobhan Ng; Roslyn J Francis; Craig Gedye; Natalie K Rutherford; Andrew Weickhardt; Andrew M Scott; Sze-Ting Lee; Edmond M Kwan; Arun A Azad; Shakher Ramdave; Andrew D Redfern; William Macdonald; Alex Guminski; Edward Hsiao; Wei Chua; Peter Lin; Alison Y Zhang; Margaret M McJannett; Martin R Stockler; John A Violet; Scott G Williams; Andrew J Martin; Ian D Davis Journal: Lancet Date: 2021-02-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: John Violet; Shahneen Sandhu; Amir Iravani; Justin Ferdinandus; Sue-Ping Thang; Grace Kong; Aravind Ravi Kumar; Tim Akhurst; David A Pattison; Alexis Beaulieu; Jennifer Mooi; Ben Tran; Christina Guo; Victor Kalff; Declan G Murphy; Price Jackson; Peter Eu; Mark Scalzo; Scott Williams; Rodney J Hicks; Michael S Hofman Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2019-11-15 Impact factor: 11.082
Authors: Oliver Sartor; Johann de Bono; Kim N Chi; Karim Fizazi; Ken Herrmann; Kambiz Rahbar; Scott T Tagawa; Luke T Nordquist; Nitin Vaishampayan; Ghassan El-Haddad; Chandler H Park; Tomasz M Beer; Alison Armour; Wendy J Pérez-Contreras; Michelle DeSilvio; Euloge Kpamegan; Germo Gericke; Richard A Messmann; Michael J Morris; Bernd J Krause Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 91.245