Literature DB >> 35852316

Metagenomes from Eastern Brazilian Amazonian Floodplains in the Wet and Dry Seasons.

Andressa M Venturini1,2, Júlia B Gontijo1, Aline G da França1, José M S Moura3, Klaus Nüsslein4, Brendan J M Bohannan5, Jorge L M Rodrigues6, Siu M Tsai1.   

Abstract

Here, we report the metagenomes from two Amazonian floodplain sediments in eastern Brazil. Tropical wetlands are well known for their role in the global carbon cycle. Microbial information on this diversified and dynamic landscape will provide further insights into its significance in regional and global biogeochemical cycles.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35852316      PMCID: PMC9387299          DOI: 10.1128/mra.00432-22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

Floodplains and wetlands constitute 14% of the total area of the Amazon basin (1) and are considered the largest natural geographic source of methane (CH4) in the tropics (2). Therefore, several studies have investigated the CH4-producing and -consuming microbial communities in these sediments and their responses to a range of environmental factors using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing (3–5). However, their overall microbial taxonomic and functional diversity remains little explored. Here, we report 12 metagenomes from two Amazonian floodplains in the wet and dry seasons. The samplings were carried out in two floodplains in the State of Pará, Brazil, namely, one located at the Amazon River (FP2, “Maicá”, 2°28′11.2″S 54°38′49.9″W) and the other at the intersection between the Amazon and the Tapajós rivers (FP3, “Açu”, 2°22′44.8″S 54°44′21.1″W). The Amazon and Tapajós are considered whitewater and clearwater rivers, respectively, according to Junk et al. (6). Sediment samples from a depth of 0 to 10 cm were collected using a corer (5-cm diameter by 10-cm depth) at both sites in the wet and dry seasons (May and October 2016, respectively) in triplicate, totaling 12 samples, and homogenized thoroughly. Total DNA was extracted in duplicate from 0.25 g of sediment using the PowerLyzer PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), following an optimized protocol for Amazonian sediments (7). Metagenomic libraries were constructed using the NEBNext Ultra II DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England BioLabs, Inc., Ipswich, MA) and paired-end sequenced (2 × 150 bp) on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 instrument (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA) at Novogene Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Detailed information about the study sites, sampling, sediment physicochemical properties, and DNA extraction and quantification have been described previously (5). Metagenomic reads were imported into the KBase platform (8), and default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified. Reads were evaluated using FastQC v0.11.9 (9), trimmed and filtered using Trimmomatic v0.36 (adapters, TruSeq3-PE-2; seed mismatches, 5; sliding window size, 5; sliding window minimum quality, 20; head crop length, 10; leading minimum quality, 20; trailing minimum quality, 20; minimum read length, 70) (10), and again evaluated using FastQC v0.11.9 (9). Overlapping paired-end reads were joined with FASTQ-JOIN v2.0.2 (8, 11) and taxonomically classified using Kaiju v1.7.3 (taxonomic level, phylum/class; reference database, NCBI BLAST nr+euk; low abundance filter, 0.01%; subsample percent, 100%) (12). The results were plotted using ggplot2 3.3.5 (13) in R 4.1.2 (14). The metagenomic samples had between 22 and 31 million 150-bp long paired-end reads (Table 1). After quality control, between 19 and 29 million paired-end reads remained, ranging from 70 to 140 bp. The joining of the overlapping paired-end reads resulted in samples with between 9 and 15 million reads, ranging from 76 to 274 bp. A considerable part of the reads (mean of 42% across samples) was not classified. Most of the classified reads were assigned to Bacteria, but also Archaea, Fungi, and viruses (Fig. 1). The most dominant phyla (mean relative abundance of > 10% across samples), among the 90 microbial phyla found, were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Acidobacteria.
TABLE 1

Results of 12 metagenomic samples

SampleSiteSeasonSediment depth (cm)Raw sequences
Cleaned sequences
Joined sequences
BioSample no.SRA no.
No. of paired-end sequencesLength (bp)No. of paired-end sequencesLength (bp)No. of sequencesLength (bp)
M1FP2Wet0–1031,488,50115029,364,15770–14010,771,25680–274 SAMN28058191 SRR19084119
M2FP2Wet0–1029,116,93815027,014,22670–14012,575,70580–274 SAMN28058192 SRR19084118
M3FP2Wet0–1027,241,04015025,337,44170–1409,974,80784–274 SAMN28058193 SRR19084115
M4FP3Wet0–1026,476,61915024,083,10370–1409,194,67776–274 SAMN28058194 SRR19084114
M5FP3Wet0–1022,244,66815019,225,44070–1409,616,17481–274 SAMN28058195 SRR19084113
M6FP3Wet0–1027,177,68715024,535,24070–14011,683,63084–274 SAMN28058196 SRR19084112
M7FP2Dry0–1025,506,16715021,673,39170–14010,228,31383–274 SAMN28058197 SRR19084111
M8FP2Dry0–1025,273,52815021,972,82170–14011,907,89783–274 SAMN28058198 SRR19084110
M9FP2Dry0–1027,627,62515025,293,87270–14014,575,81681–274 SAMN28058199 SRR19084109
M10FP3Dry0–1027,345,38015024,609,08870–14011,042,67886–274 SAMN28058200 SRR19084108
M11FP3Dry0–1029,299,44215026,571,41370–14010,860,48476–274 SAMN28058201 SRR19084117
M12FP3Dry0–1024,643,12815022,183,79970–1409,214,96878–274 SAMN28058202 SRR19084116
FIG 1

Taxonomic classification of the sequence reads at the phylum level. (A) Most abundant bacterial phyla (mean relative abundance of > 1% across samples). (B) Archaeal phyla. (C) Fungal phyla. Relative abundance calculated based on the classified reads. WS, wet season; DS, dry season.

Taxonomic classification of the sequence reads at the phylum level. (A) Most abundant bacterial phyla (mean relative abundance of > 1% across samples). (B) Archaeal phyla. (C) Fungal phyla. Relative abundance calculated based on the classified reads. WS, wet season; DS, dry season. Results of 12 metagenomic samples

Data availability.

The raw metagenomic sequences are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the umbrella project PRJNA782633. The raw sequences, apps, and all the outputs of the analyses described here are also available on the KBase platform at https://www.doi.org/10.25982/113717.182/1864845.
  7 in total

1.  Not just a methane source: Amazonian floodplain sediments harbour a high diversity of methanotrophs with different metabolic capabilities.

Authors:  Júlia B Gontijo; Fabiana S Paula; Andressa M Venturini; Caio A Yoshiura; Clovis D Borges; José Mauro S Moura; Brendan J M Bohannan; Klaus Nüsslein; Jorge L Mazza Rodrigues; Siu M Tsai
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2021-04-04       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Large emissions from floodplain trees close the Amazon methane budget.

Authors:  Sunitha R Pangala; Alex Enrich-Prast; Luana S Basso; Roberta Bittencourt Peixoto; David Bastviken; Edward R C Hornibrook; Luciana V Gatti; Humberto Marotta; Luana Silva Braucks Calazans; Cassia Mônica Sakuragui; Wanderley Rodrigues Bastos; Olaf Malm; Emanuel Gloor; John Bharat Miller; Vincent Gauci
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Methane emission suppression in flooded soil from Amazonia.

Authors:  Gabriele V M Gabriel; Luciana C Oliveira; Dayane J Barros; Marília S Bento; Vania Neu; Rogério H Toppa; Janaina B Carmo; Acacio A Navarrete
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Robust DNA protocols for tropical soils.

Authors:  Andressa Monteiro Venturini; Fernanda Mancini Nakamura; Júlia Brandão Gontijo; Aline Giovana da França; Caio Augusto Yoshiura; Jéssica Adriele Mandro; Siu Mui Tsai
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-05-13

5.  KBase: The United States Department of Energy Systems Biology Knowledgebase.

Authors:  Adam P Arkin; Robert W Cottingham; Christopher S Henry; Nomi L Harris; Rick L Stevens; Sergei Maslov; Paramvir Dehal; Doreen Ware; Fernando Perez; Shane Canon; Michael W Sneddon; Matthew L Henderson; William J Riehl; Dan Murphy-Olson; Stephen Y Chan; Roy T Kamimura; Sunita Kumari; Meghan M Drake; Thomas S Brettin; Elizabeth M Glass; Dylan Chivian; Dan Gunter; David J Weston; Benjamin H Allen; Jason Baumohl; Aaron A Best; Ben Bowen; Steven E Brenner; Christopher C Bun; John-Marc Chandonia; Jer-Ming Chia; Ric Colasanti; Neal Conrad; James J Davis; Brian H Davison; Matthew DeJongh; Scott Devoid; Emily Dietrich; Inna Dubchak; Janaka N Edirisinghe; Gang Fang; José P Faria; Paul M Frybarger; Wolfgang Gerlach; Mark Gerstein; Annette Greiner; James Gurtowski; Holly L Haun; Fei He; Rashmi Jain; Marcin P Joachimiak; Kevin P Keegan; Shinnosuke Kondo; Vivek Kumar; Miriam L Land; Folker Meyer; Marissa Mills; Pavel S Novichkov; Taeyun Oh; Gary J Olsen; Robert Olson; Bruce Parrello; Shiran Pasternak; Erik Pearson; Sarah S Poon; Gavin A Price; Srividya Ramakrishnan; Priya Ranjan; Pamela C Ronald; Michael C Schatz; Samuel M D Seaver; Maulik Shukla; Roman A Sutormin; Mustafa H Syed; James Thomason; Nathan L Tintle; Daifeng Wang; Fangfang Xia; Hyunseung Yoo; Shinjae Yoo; Dantong Yu
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data.

Authors:  Anthony M Bolger; Marc Lohse; Bjoern Usadel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Fast and sensitive taxonomic classification for metagenomics with Kaiju.

Authors:  Peter Menzel; Kim Lee Ng; Anders Krogh
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.