Literature DB >> 35851843

Acoustic regularities in infant-directed speech and song across cultures.

Courtney B Hilton1,2, Cody J Moser3,4, Mila Bertolo5, Harry Lee-Rubin5, Dorsa Amir6, Constance M Bainbridge5,7, Jan Simson5,8, Dean Knox9, Luke Glowacki10, Elias Alemu11, Andrzej Galbarczyk12, Grazyna Jasienska12, Cody T Ross13, Mary Beth Neff14,15, Alia Martin14, Laura K Cirelli16,17, Sandra E Trehub17, Jinqi Song18, Minju Kim19, Adena Schachner19, Tom A Vardy20, Quentin D Atkinson20,21, Amanda Salenius22, Jannik Andelin22, Jan Antfolk22, Purnima Madhivanan23,24,25,26, Anand Siddaiah26, Caitlyn D Placek27, Gul Deniz Salali28, Sarai Keestra28,29, Manvir Singh30,31, Scott A Collins32, John Q Patton33, Camila Scaff34, Jonathan Stieglitz31,35, Silvia Ccari Cutipa36, Cristina Moya37,38, Rohan R Sagar39,40, Mariamu Anyawire41, Audax Mabulla42, Brian M Wood43, Max M Krasnow5,44, Samuel A Mehr45,46,47.   

Abstract

When interacting with infants, humans often alter their speech and song in ways thought to support communication. Theories of human child-rearing, informed by data on vocal signalling across species, predict that such alterations should appear globally. Here, we show acoustic differences between infant-directed and adult-directed vocalizations across cultures. We collected 1,615 recordings of infant- and adult-directed speech and song produced by 410 people in 21 urban, rural and small-scale societies. Infant-directedness was reliably classified from acoustic features only, with acoustic profiles of infant-directedness differing across language and music but in consistent fashions. We then studied listener sensitivity to these acoustic features. We played the recordings to 51,065 people from 187 countries, recruited via an English-language website, who guessed whether each vocalization was infant-directed. Their intuitions were more accurate than chance, predictable in part by common sets of acoustic features and robust to the effects of linguistic relatedness between vocalizer and listener. These findings inform hypotheses of the psychological functions and evolution of human communication.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35851843     DOI: 10.1038/s41562-022-01410-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Hum Behav        ISSN: 2397-3374


  50 in total

1.  Empathic-like responding by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) to distress in humans: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Deborah Custance; Jennifer Mayer
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Recognizing intentions in infant-directed speech: evidence for universals.

Authors:  Gregory A Bryant; H Clark Barrett
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-08

3.  Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants.

Authors:  P K Kuhl; J E Andruski; I A Chistovich; L A Chistovich; E V Kozhevnikova; V L Ryskina; E I Stolyarova; U Sundberg; F Lacerda
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Wild birds learn to eavesdrop on heterospecific alarm calls.

Authors:  Robert D Magrath; Tonya M Haff; Jessica R McLachlan; Branislav Igic
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  The signal functions of early infant crying.

Authors:  Joseph Soltis
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 6.  Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems.

Authors:  J A Endler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1993-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Hierarchical organization in the temporal structure of infant-direct speech and song.

Authors:  Simone Falk; Christopher T Kello
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-03-11

8.  Infant directed speech in natural interaction--Norwegian vowel quantity and quality.

Authors:  Kjellrun T Englund; Dawn M Behne
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2005-05

9.  Deer mothers are sensitive to infant distress vocalizations of diverse mammalian species.

Authors:  Susan Lingle; Tobias Riede
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Extraordinary intelligence and the care of infants.

Authors:  Steven T Piantadosi; Celeste Kidd
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Laughter and culture.

Authors:  Gregory A Bryant; Constance M Bainbridge
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 6.671

Review 2.  Roughness perception: A multisensory/crossmodal perspective.

Authors:  Nicola Di Stefano; Charles Spence
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 2.157

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.