Literature DB >> 35851421

Early versus delayed bronchial artery embolization for non-massive hemoptysis.

Sung-Joon Park1, Sangjoon Lee2, Hyoung Nam Lee3, Youngjong Cho4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to compare clinical outcomes of early versus delayed bronchial artery embolization (BAE) for non-massive hemoptysis and to investigate predictors of recurrent hemoptysis.
METHODS: From March 2018 to February 2021, 138 consecutive patients (age, 65.5 ± 12.4 years; male, 67.4%) with non-massive hemoptysis underwent BAE. The enrolled patients were divided into an early embolization (EE) group (within the first 24 h, n = 79) and a delayed embolization (DE) group (n = 59).
RESULTS: The time to embolization ranged between 0 and 15 days and was shorter in the EE group (0.47 ± 0.5 days) than in the DE group (4.02 ± 2.8 days, p < 0.001). The in-hospital clinical outcomes were not different between the two groups, except for hospital stay and post-embolization hospital stay. The recurrence-free survival in the EE group was significantly better than that in the DE group (p = 0.018). The time to embolization (hazard ratio (HR), 1.21; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04-1.42; p = 0.015) and aspergilloma (HR, 6.89; 95% CI, 2.08-22.86; p = 0.002) were predictive factors for recurrent hemoptysis.
CONCLUSIONS: BAE is an effective and safe treatment modality for non-massive hemoptysis. An early interventional strategy should be considered in patients presenting with non-massive hemoptysis to reduce the length of hospital stay and early recurrence. A delayed time to embolization and the presence of aspergilloma were independent risk factors for recurrent hemoptysis. KEY POINTS: • Bronchial artery embolization afforded good clinical improvement for treating non-massive hemoptysis without significant complications. • An early interventional strategy should be considered in patients presenting with non-massive hemoptysis to reduce the length of hospital stay and early recurrence. • A delayed time to embolization and the presence of aspergilloma were independent risk factors for recurrent hemoptysis.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bronchial arteries; Hemoptysis; Retrospective studies; Survival rate; Therapeutic embolization

Year:  2022        PMID: 35851421     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08993-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   7.034


  3 in total

1.  Risk factors for recurrence of haemoptysis following bronchial artery embolisation for life-threatening haemoptysis.

Authors:  M M van den Heuvel; Z Els; C F Koegelenberg; K M Naidu; C T Bolliger; A H Diacon
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Randomised trial of first-line bronchial artery embolisation for non-severe haemoptysis of mild abundance.

Authors:  Muriel Fartoukh; Alexandre Demoule; Olivier Sanchez; Sophie Tuffet; Emmanuel Bergot; Cendrine Godet; Claire Andrejak; Sandrine Pontier-Marchandise; Antoine Parrot; Julien Mayaux; Guy Meyer; Philippe Cluzel; Marc Sapoval; Vincent Le Pennec; Marie-France Carette; Jacques Cadranel; Alexandra Rousseau; Antoine Khalil; Tabassome Simon
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2021-06

Review 3.  Antifibrinolytic therapy to reduce haemoptysis from any cause.

Authors:  Gabriela Prutsky; Juan Pablo Domecq; Carlos A Salazar; Roberto Accinelli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.