Literature DB >> 35851010

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, ABO blood group and risk of COVID-19: population-based cohort study.

Joel G Ray1,2, Alison L Park2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes between O and non-O blood groups, and by modified RNA (mRNA) and adenovirus-vectored (Ad-V) vaccines.
DESIGN: Population-based cohort study.
SETTING: All of Ontario, Canada. Linked data sets captured clinical encounters, vaccinations and laboratory testing for SARS-CoV-2. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 12+ years with known ABO blood group and free of SARS-CoV-2 before 15 January 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The main exposure, first SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, was modelled in a time-varying manner. O and non-O blood group was known prior to vaccination. SARS-CoV-2 infection, and severe COVID-19 (hospitalisation or death), were assessed starting 14 days after vaccination, up to 27 June 2021.
RESULTS: 2 472 261 individuals were included. 1 743 916 (70.5%) had at least one vaccination, of which 24.6% were fully vaccinated. Those vaccinated were more likely to be women, older in age, residing in a higher-income area and have higher rates of certain comorbid conditions, like cancer, diabetes and hypertension. Relative to unvaccinated, after receiving their first mRNA (adjusted HR (aHR) 0.46, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.47) or Ad-V (aHR 0.49, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.54) vaccine, the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection was lower, as was severe COVID-19 (aHR 0.29, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.43 (mRNA); aHR 0.29, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.33 (Ad-V)). Stratifying by blood group produced similar results. For example, after first mRNA vaccination, the aHR of severe COVID-19 was 0.31 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.36) among non-O blood groups, and 0.27 (95% CI 0.22 to 0.32) among O blood groups, relative to unvaccinated. Fully vaccinated individuals had the lowest risk of SARS-CoV-2 and severe COVID-19.
CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 are reduced by vaccination. This effect does not vary by vaccine type or blood group, but is more pronounced among fully, than partially, vaccinated individuals. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood bank & transfusion medicine; COVID-19; Epidemiology; HAEMATOLOGY; INFECTIOUS DISEASES

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35851010      PMCID: PMC9297000          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   3.006


This study was limited to persons who had ABO blood group testing, and who are more likely to have required blood transfusion or to have been pregnant in the past. We did not know who had acquired natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2. The potential for immortal time bias was mitigated by treating vaccine exposure as time varying, and by setting follow-up time to a common starting date. The current study was largely completed prior to the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta/B.1.617 variant.

Introduction

Emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, and COVID-19-related disease, led to rapid development of various vaccines. Efficacy was demonstrated for the modified RNA (mRNA) vaccine of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, to induce neutralising antibodies,1 as well as a recombinant, replication-incompetent adenovirus vector that encodes a full-length and stabilised SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (adenovirus-vectored (Ad-V)).2 Demonstrated vaccine efficacy shown from pooled data of randomised clinical trials is 95% (95% CI 94 to 95) and 80% (95% CI 56 to 93), respectively.3 Even within 14 days of receipt of a first dose, vaccine efficacy can reach 80%.4 5 It is of interest that adults with O blood group appear to be at lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related severe illness, compared with those with A, B and AB (ie, non-O) blood groups.6 7 Those with O blood group are identified by their anti-A and anti-B antibodies; these same antibodies may offer immunoprotection against SARS-CoV-2, as they are concomitantly produced by certain epithelial cells within the respiratory and digestive tract—prime targets for COVID-19 tissue injury.7 What is not known, however, is whether vaccinated persons with O blood group experience different rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease than those of non-O blood group. Such information might guide vaccine type, recipient prioritisation and the need for repeat vaccination. The current study evaluated SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease in a population with a universal vaccination system offered to those aged 12+ years, a high uptake of at least one vaccine8 and systematic collection of vaccination and infection data. Herein, we compared outcomes between O and non-O blood groups, and by mRNA and Ad-V vaccines.

Method

This population-based retrospective cohort study was performed in Ontario, Canada. Patient-level data sets included all hospitalisations, emergency department visits, the majority of laboratory tests for SARS-CoV-2 and all SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations administered within Ontario,9 as further detailed in online supplemental table S1.6 10 Data sets were linked using unique encoded identifiers and analysed at ICES. Study eligibility required that an individual was aged 12+ years, a resident of Ontario, had undergone ABO testing and also did not have an SARS-CoV-2 positive swab before 15 January 2021 (online supplemental table S1 and figure S1). SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and associated risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, or severe COVID-19 (hospitalisation or death), stratified by O and non-O blood groups. Data are presented for the entire cohort (upper panel), and 614 455 individuals who had SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing during the follow-up period (lower panel). Analyses are by time-varying exposure after first vaccination. Unadjusted HRs are in red, and adjusted HRs in blue, adjusted for age, sex, rural residence, area income quintile—each at baseline—as well as prior diabetes mellitus, malignancy, heart failure, cardiac ischaemia or arrhythmia, chronic kidney disease or venous thromboembolism.

Exposures and outcomes

The main study exposure was a first SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, handled in a time-varying manner, with a lag of 14 days after vaccination to ensure that the person had a chance to develop immunity. High-risk persons were first vaccinated on 15 December 2020, and Canada started mass vaccinating its citizens on 15 January 2021.11 So, for example, a person who was vaccinated on 1 January 2021 or earlier was considered exposed on 15 January 2021, whereas a person who was vaccinated on 1 February 2021 was considered exposed on 15 February 2021 and unexposed before that date. The main study outcome was SARS-CoV-2 infection, defined as a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test—regardless of indication, symptoms or illness severity—arising during the follow-up period, from 15 January 2021 to 27 June 2021. The second study outcome was a severe COVID-19, defined as a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test in conjunction with either a hospitalisation within ±3 days, or a death within −1 to +3 days, of that positive PCR test. A ±3-day margin was to allow for PCR testing antecedent to, or following, the hospital admission. The −1 day window permitted the possibility that a PCR specimen was labelled on the day following a COVID-19 death. Both study outcomes were assessed starting at least 14 days after vaccination, among those vaccinated12 (online supplemental table S1).

Data analyses

For the overall cohort, study outcomes were based on population-at-risk denominators, which included both those who did and did not necessarily undergo SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing after 15 January 2021. Time-to-event analyses generated incidence rates, and Cox proportional hazard models produced unadjusted and adjusted HRs, comparing first-vaccinated to unvaccinated persons (referent). Censoring occurred if a person lost their Ontario Health Insurance Plan coverage, were outcome-free by 27 June 2021 (the end of study period), or the day after they died (if a death occurred). HRs were adjusted for age, sex, rural residence, area income quintile—each at baseline—as well as prior diabetes mellitus, malignancy, heart failure, cardiac ischaemia or arrhythmia, chronic kidney disease or venous thromboembolism (online supplemental table S1). Additional analysis 1, (online supplemental table S2) restricted the at-risk denominator for those individuals who underwent SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing at least 14 days after their first vaccination. The main cohort model was repeated, with each study outcome assessed by more specifically comparing first mRNA vaccination or first Ad-V vaccination to unvaccinated persons (referent). Next, and central to the study, we examined the risk of each study outcome in relation to first-vaccination status, further stratified by O and non-O blood groups. This was done among the entire cohort, as well as restricted to those who underwent SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing at least 14 days after their first vaccination. Consideration was given to receipt of a second vaccination as a time-dependent variable. Hence, ‘fully vaccinated’ and ‘partially vaccinated’ persons were each compared with unvaccinated individuals, stratified by O and non-O groups—with these analyses conducted among the whole cohort, as well as limited to just those who had SARS-CoV-2 testing in the observation period. Analyses were planned a priori. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS V.9.4 for UNIX (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA).

Patient and public involvement

No patient was consulted or involved in this study. Did we involve patients/service users/carers/lay people in the design of this study? No. Was the development of outcome measures informed by patients’ priorities, experience and preferences? No. Were patients/carers/lay people involved in the recruitment to and conduct of the study? No. How will the results be disseminated to study participants? Not applicable. Are patients/carers/lay people thanked in the contributorship statement/acknowledgements? Not applicable. Was the development of the research question and outcome measures informed by patients’ priorities, experience and preferences? No.

Results

Among 2 938 215 individuals, 2 472 261 met the inclusion criteria (online supplemental figure S1). Of these, 1 743 916 (70.5%) had at least one vaccination (table 1). Those vaccinated were more likely to be women, older in age, residing in a higher-income area and have higher rates of certain comorbid conditions, like cancer, diabetes and hypertension (table 1). Of those vaccinated, 1 600 524 (91.8%) first received an mRNA vaccine, and 143 358 (8.2%) an Ad-V vaccine. A second vaccine was administered to 24.6% of individuals by 13 June 2021 (ie, by 2 weeks before the end of the study observation period), comprising the mRNA vaccine among 415 632 (23.8%) and the Ad-V among 12 855 (0.7%) (table 1).
Table 1

Characteristics of 2 472 261 individuals in Ontario, Canada, aged 12 years and older, with known ABO blood group and without evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection before 15 January 2021. All data are presented as a number (%) unless otherwise indicated

CharacteristicAny SARS-CoV-2vaccination(N=1 743 916)No SARS-CoV-2vaccination(N=728 345)Standardised difference
On 15 January 2021 (time zero)
Mean (SD) age, year50.8 (18.4)40.6 (15.4)0.60
12–1713 009 (0.7)11 509 (1.6)0.08
18–39589 158 (33.8)415 983 (57.1)0.48
40–59568 693 (32.6)208 310 (28.6)0.09
60–69218 653 (12.5)42 386 (5.8)0.23
70–79209 118 (12.0)29 116 (4.0)0.30
80+145 285 (8.3)21 041 (2.9)0.24
Female1 200 499 (68.8)548 647 (75.3)0.15
Area income quintile (Q)*Q1 (lowest)298 360 (17.1)182 483 (25.1)0.20
Q2 332 128 (19.0)153 526 (21.1)0.05
Q3 360 666 (20.7)147 174 (20.2)0.01
Q4 375 199 (21.5)134 421 (18.5)0.08
Q5 (highest)373 655 (21.4)108 469 (14.9)0.17
Rural residence† Rural 164 607 (9.4)76 733 (10.5)0.04
Pregnant23 137 (1.3)19 410 (2.7)0.10
O blood group315 903 (43.4)751 212 (43.1)0.01
Pre-existing conditions
Diabetes mellitus292 661 (16.8)70 062 (9.6)0.21
Malignancy405 034 (23.2)104 741 (14.4)0.23
Heart failure89 604 (5.1)18 085 (2.5)0.14
Cardiac ischaemia or arrhythmia144 692 (8.3)27 106 (3.7)0.19
Chronic kidney disease90 732 (5.2)19 760 (2.7)0.13
Venous thromboembolism41 006 (2.4)13 342 (1.8)0.04
Stroke or transient ischaemic attack31 638 (1.8)6763 (0.9)0.08
Chronic hypertension571 167 (32.8)116 201 (16.0)0.40
Asthma300 546 (17.2)126 172 (17.3)0.00
Dementia, or frailty264 694 (15.2)107 972 (14.8)0.01
Anaemia265 861 (15.2)96 060 (13.2)0.06
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease89 413 (5.1)20 352 (2.8)0.12
HIV or organ transplant9754 (0.6)2770 (0.4)0.03
At time of first vaccination
Vaccine type Modified RNA 1 600 524 (91.8)----
Adenovirus-vectored 143 358 (8.2)----
Unspecified 34 (0.0)----
Vaccine name AstraZeneca 117 100 (6.7)----
Covishield 26 086 (1.5)----
Janssen 172 (0.0)----
Moderna 315 370 (18.1)----
Pfizer 1 285 154 (73.7)----
Unspecified 34 (0.0)----
At the time of second vaccination
Vaccine type Modified RNA 415 632 (23.8)----
Adenovirus-vectored 12 855 (0.7)----
Unspecified 16 (0.0)----
No second dose 1 315 413 (75.4)----
Vaccine name AstraZeneca 12 692 (0.7)
Covishield 157 (0.0)--
Janssen 6 (0.0)--
Moderna 86 791 (5.0)--
Pfizer 328 841 (18.9)--
Unspecified 16 (0.0)--
No second dose 1 315 413 (75.4)--
Received two vaccine doses by 13 June 2021 (14 days prior to end of follow-up)428 503 (24.6)--
Vaccine dose 2 same as dose 1 Same 424 517 (24.3)--
Different 3969 (0.2)--
Unknown 17 (0.0)--
No second dose 1 315 413 (75.4)
Median (IQR) follow-up for assessing the primary study outcome, d163.0(163.0–163.0)163.0(163.0–163.0)0.39
Median (IQR) follow-up for assessing the secondary study outcome, d163.0(163.0–163.0)163.0(163.0–163.0)0.16
Had SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing during follow-up period, from 15 January 2021 onward439 058 (25.2)175 397 (24.1)0.03

*Missing for 6180 (0.25%) of all persons.

†Missing for 5247 (0.21%) of all persons.

‡Before 15 January 2021.

Characteristics of 2 472 261 individuals in Ontario, Canada, aged 12 years and older, with known ABO blood group and without evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection before 15 January 2021. All data are presented as a number (%) unless otherwise indicated *Missing for 6180 (0.25%) of all persons. †Missing for 5247 (0.21%) of all persons. ‡Before 15 January 2021. After a median follow-up of 163 days (IQR 163–163), the rate of SARS-CoV-2 positivity was 0.54 per 10 000 person-days among first-vaccinated persons, and 1.69 per 10 000 person-days among non-vaccinated persons—an unadjusted HR of 0.38 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.39) and an adjusted HR of 0.46 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.48). The corresponding HR were equally protective for those receiving a first mRNA vaccine (adjusted HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.47) or first Ad-V vaccine (adjusted HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.54), each relative to being unvaccinated (table 2). The adjusted HR for severe COVID-19 was 0.29 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.33) comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated persons, with similar estimates by vaccine type (table 2).
Table 2

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and associated risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, or severe COVID-19 (hospitalisation or death)—each assessed starting at least 14 days after the first vaccination, among the entire cohort. Data are presented by time-varying exposure after first vaccination versus unvaccinated (upper blue), as well as by first-vaccination type versus unvaccinated (lower maroon)

Study outcomeExposure state*No. person-days of follow-up*No. with outcome (rate per 10 000 person-days)Unadjusted HR(95% CI)Adjusted HR(95% CI)†
SARS-CoV-2 infection Unvaccinated (N=2 464 998)303 209 19251 187 (1.69)1.00 (referent)1.00 (referent)
Vaccinated (N=1 743 916)93 324 8054995 (0.54)0.38 (0.37 to 0.39)0.46 (0.45 to 0.48)
Severe COVID-19‡Unvaccinated (N=2 464 998)307 438 1942890 (0.09)1.00 (referent)1.00 (referent)
Vaccinated (N=1 743 916)93 575 031491 (0.05)0.71 (0.64 to 0.79)0.29 (0.26 to 0.33)
SARS-CoV-2 infectionUnvaccinated (N=2 464 998)303 209 19251 187 (1.69)1.00 (referent)1.00 (referent)
Adenovirus-vectored (N=143 358)8 263 735434 (0.53)0.39 (0.36 to 0.43)0.49 (0.44 to 0.54)
Modified RNA (N=1 600 524)85 059 2464561 (0.54)0.38 (0.37 to 0.39)0.46 (0.44 to 0.47)
Severe COVID-19Unvaccinated (N=2 464 998)307 438 1942890 (0.09)1.00 (referent)1.00 (referent)
Adenovirus-vectored (N=143 358)8 284 16227 (0.03)0.46 (0.31 to 0.68)0.29 (0.20 to 0.43)
Modified RNA (N=1 600 524)85 289 045464 (0.05)0.73 (0.66 to 0.82)0.29 (0.26 to 0.33)

*Exposure is time-varying, therefore, some individuals may have contributed time as unvaccinated, and then subsequently, as vaccinated.

†Adjusted for age, sex, rural residence, area income quintile—each at baseline—as well as prior diabetes mellitus, malignancy, heart failure, cardiac ischaemia or arrhythmia, chronic kidney disease or venous thromboembolism.

‡In the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups, respectively, there were 21 deaths (0.02 per 100 000 person-days) and 133 deaths (0.04 per 100 000 person-days), from 1 day before, up to 3 days after, an SARS-CoV-2 positive PCR test, with a corresponding adjusted HR of 0.24 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.41).

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and associated risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, or severe COVID-19 (hospitalisation or death)—each assessed starting at least 14 days after the first vaccination, among the entire cohort. Data are presented by time-varying exposure after first vaccination versus unvaccinated (upper blue), as well as by first-vaccination type versus unvaccinated (lower maroon) *Exposure is time-varying, therefore, some individuals may have contributed time as unvaccinated, and then subsequently, as vaccinated. †Adjusted for age, sex, rural residence, area income quintile—each at baseline—as well as prior diabetes mellitus, malignancy, heart failure, cardiac ischaemia or arrhythmia, chronic kidney disease or venous thromboembolism. ‡In the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups, respectively, there were 21 deaths (0.02 per 100 000 person-days) and 133 deaths (0.04 per 100 000 person-days), from 1 day before, up to 3 days after, an SARS-CoV-2 positive PCR test, with a corresponding adjusted HR of 0.24 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.41). There were 439 058 (25.2%) vaccinated people who had SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing during follow-up period, from 15 January 2021 onward, compared with 175 397 (24.1%) unvaccinated individuals—a small standardised difference of 0.03. Restricting the at-risk denominator to 614 455 individuals, and comparing the vaccinated to the unvaccinated, the adjusted HR were 0.28 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.29) for SARS-CoV-2 positivity, and 0.22 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.25) for severe COVID-19, although, at much higher event rates than seen in the entire cohort (Additional analysis 1, online supplemental table S2). Among the entire cohort, the protective effect associated with a first mRNA or Ad-V vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infection or severe COVID-19 was equally seen among those with O and non-O blood groups (figure 1, upper). This pattern was also seen by vaccine type (online supplemental table S3), and among the 614 455 individuals who had SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing (figure 1, lower).
Figure 1

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and associated risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, or severe COVID-19 (hospitalisation or death), stratified by O and non-O blood groups. Data are presented for the entire cohort (upper panel), and 614 455 individuals who had SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing during the follow-up period (lower panel). Analyses are by time-varying exposure after first vaccination. Unadjusted HRs are in red, and adjusted HRs in blue, adjusted for age, sex, rural residence, area income quintile—each at baseline—as well as prior diabetes mellitus, malignancy, heart failure, cardiac ischaemia or arrhythmia, chronic kidney disease or venous thromboembolism.

In the entire cohort, relative to the unvaccinated, fully vaccinated individuals had the lowest risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, followed by partially vaccinated persons (figure 2, upper). For example, among those with blood group O, the corresponding adjusted HR were 0.39 (95% CI 0.34 to 0.43) and 0.48 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.50). Moreover, the HRs did not differ by blood group. The same was evident for severe COVID-19 (figure 2, upper). Restricting to the subcohort who had SARS-CoV-2 testing, the protective effect conferred by full and partial vaccination was similar by blood groups (figure 2, lower).
Figure 2

Full or partial SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and associated risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, or severe COVID-19 (hospitalisation or death), stratified by O and non-O blood groups. Data are presented for the entire cohort (upper panel), and 614 455 individuals who had SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing during the follow-up period (lower panel). Analyses are by time-varying exposure after first vaccination. Unadjusted HRs are in red, and adjusted HRs in blue, adjusted for age, sex, rural residence, area income quintile—each at baseline—as well as prior diabetes mellitus, malignancy, heart failure, cardiac ischaemia or arrhythmia, chronic kidney disease or venous thromboembolism.

Full or partial SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and associated risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, or severe COVID-19 (hospitalisation or death), stratified by O and non-O blood groups. Data are presented for the entire cohort (upper panel), and 614 455 individuals who had SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing during the follow-up period (lower panel). Analyses are by time-varying exposure after first vaccination. Unadjusted HRs are in red, and adjusted HRs in blue, adjusted for age, sex, rural residence, area income quintile—each at baseline—as well as prior diabetes mellitus, malignancy, heart failure, cardiac ischaemia or arrhythmia, chronic kidney disease or venous thromboembolism.

Discussion

Main findings

This population-based cohort study observed a lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as severe COVID-19 hospitalisation or death, in association with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. This conferred protective effect did not vary by vaccine type or blood group, but was more pronounced among fully, than partially, vaccinated individuals.

Comparison with other studies

A 2021 meta-analysis of 54 218 persons showed a lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection comparing O versus non-O blood group (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.84).13 In a cohort study of 225 556 adults and children in Ontario, before SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, we previously observed a lower-relative risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (0.88, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.92) and severe COVID-19 illness or death (0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.97) among those with O versus non-O blood group.6 The current study is the first to explore effect modification of O blood group on vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection or related illness. Just as we found no effect modification, prior research on the smallpox vaccine suggested no differences in ‘vaccine success’ by ABO blood group,14 nor for influenza A,15 rabies16 and cholera17 vaccines. Thus, if O blood group is somehow protective against SARS-CoV-2 infection or illness, it is unlikely to generate any additive benefit to that conferred by available mRNA and Ad-V vaccines. The current study observed a relative risk reduction against severe COVID-19 of between 82% and 85% after full vaccination, and between 67% and 70% following partial vaccination (figure 2). In Chile, among those aged 60+ years and fully vaccinated, vaccine effectiveness was 67% against infection, 85% for the prevention of hospitalisation and 87% for the prevention of COVID-19-related death, with corresponding estimates of 16%, 37% and 46% after partial vaccination.18 Our findings about vaccine effectiveness are similar to those of randomised clinical trials of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination,1–4 or another observational study from Ontario.10 Taken together, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination by mRNA or Ad-V is effective at preventing serious disease.

Limitations

This study was limited to persons who had ABO blood group testing, and who are more likely to have required blood transfusion or to have been pregnant in the past.6 As a study strength, identification of blood group status preceded SARS-CoV-2 vaccination or index PCR testing. While we excluded those with SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to 15 January 2021, we did not know who had acquired natural immunity. While vaccination and study outcomes were fully ascertained within a universal healthcare system, a minority of individuals may have been vaccinated outside of Ontario and not identified herein. The potential for immortal time bias—the influence of misclassified follow-up time for individuals who were vaccinated, which could differentially favour their survival—was mitigated by treating vaccine exposure as time varying and by setting follow-up time to a common starting date of 15 January 2021.19 All study covariates, including demographic and clinical variables, were captured prior to time zero. A protective effect of vaccination was seen in the additional analyses restricted to those who underwent PCR testing. This was akin to using a test-negative design, in which common access to, and uptake of, medical care can reduce unmeasured confounding related to healthcare-seeking behaviours.20 While the current study was largely completed prior to the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta/B.1.617 variant, it is unlikely that ABO blood group would be expected to modify vaccine effectiveness within the subsequent period. Last, adverse events following immunisation were not studied herein, nor the tendency for such adverse events related to ABO blood group.

Conclusions

The protective benefit offered by mRNA or Ad-V SARS-CoV-2 vaccination—especially full vaccination—is not further modulated by ABO blood group status. Large-scale population or targeted vaccination programmes should continue, with ongoing research about how to mitigate emerging viral variants.
  17 in total

1.  A large study on immunological response to a whole-cell killed oral cholera vaccine reveals that there are significant geographical differences in response and that O blood group individuals do not elicit a higher response.

Authors:  T Ramamurthy; Diane Wagener; Goutam Chowdhury; Partha P Majumder
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2010-06-16

Review 2.  Immortal time bias in pharmaco-epidemiology.

Authors:  Samy Suissa
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Time-Related Biases in Nonrandomized COVID-19-Era Studies Using Real-world Data.

Authors:  Gregory S Calip; Rebecca A Miksad; Somnath Sarkar
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 31.777

4.  Covid-19 Vaccine Effectiveness and the Test-Negative Design.

Authors:  Natalie E Dean; Joseph W Hogan; Mireille E Schnitzer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 176.079

5.  The effect of ABO blood groups on the incidence of epidemic influenza and on the response to live attenuated and detergent split influenza virus vaccines.

Authors:  J S Mackenzie; P J Fimmel
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1978-02

6.  Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine.

Authors:  Lindsey R Baden; Hana M El Sahly; Brandon Essink; Karen Kotloff; Sharon Frey; Rick Novak; David Diemert; Stephen A Spector; Nadine Rouphael; C Buddy Creech; John McGettigan; Shishir Khetan; Nathan Segall; Joel Solis; Adam Brosz; Carlos Fierro; Howard Schwartz; Kathleen Neuzil; Larry Corey; Peter Gilbert; Holly Janes; Dean Follmann; Mary Marovich; John Mascola; Laura Polakowski; Julie Ledgerwood; Barney S Graham; Hamilton Bennett; Rolando Pajon; Conor Knightly; Brett Leav; Weiping Deng; Honghong Zhou; Shu Han; Melanie Ivarsson; Jacqueline Miller; Tal Zaks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Association Between ABO and Rh Blood Groups and SARS-CoV-2 Infection or Severe COVID-19 Illness : A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Joel G Ray; Michael J Schull; Marian J Vermeulen; Alison L Park
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Interim Estimates of Vaccine Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 Vaccines in Preventing SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Health Care Personnel, First Responders, and Other Essential and Frontline Workers - Eight U.S. Locations, December 2020-March 2021.

Authors:  Mark G Thompson; Jefferey L Burgess; Allison L Naleway; Harmony L Tyner; Sarang K Yoon; Jennifer Meece; Lauren E W Olsho; Alberto J Caban-Martinez; Ashley Fowlkes; Karen Lutrick; Jennifer L Kuntz; Kayan Dunnigan; Marilyn J Odean; Kurt T Hegmann; Elisha Stefanski; Laura J Edwards; Natasha Schaefer-Solle; Lauren Grant; Katherine Ellingson; Holly C Groom; Tnelda Zunie; Matthew S Thiese; Lynn Ivacic; Meredith G Wesley; Julie Mayo Lamberte; Xiaoxiao Sun; Michael E Smith; Andrew L Phillips; Kimberly D Groover; Young M Yoo; Joe Gerald; Rachel T Brown; Meghan K Herring; Gregory Joseph; Shawn Beitel; Tyler C Morrill; Josephine Mak; Patrick Rivers; Katherine M Harris; Danielle R Hunt; Melissa L Arvay; Preeta Kutty; Alicia M Fry; Manjusha Gaglani
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 17.586

9.  Effectiveness of an Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Chile.

Authors:  Alejandro Jara; Eduardo A Undurraga; Cecilia González; Fabio Paredes; Tomás Fontecilla; Gonzalo Jara; Alejandra Pizarro; Johanna Acevedo; Katherine Leo; Francisco Leon; Carlos Sans; Paulina Leighton; Pamela Suárez; Heriberto García-Escorza; Rafael Araos
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.