| Literature DB >> 35849188 |
Aditya Moorthy1,2,3, Tulasi Nayak4,5, Prithvi S Bachalli1,2,3, Krishna Kant Tripathi6, Sunil Narayan Dutt3, Preeti Kale1, Prashanth Bhat1,2, Praveen K Suresh1,2, Rohith Gaikwad1,2, Arjun Raju1,7, Shreya Krishna2, Arvind Conjeevaram1, Sushma Mehta1,2, Abhinav Anil-Kumar1,2, Deepak Haldipur1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To comprehensively analyse the disease presentation and mortality of COVID-associated rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis.Entities:
Keywords: CAM; COVID; COVID-associated mucormycosis; Mucormycosis; ROCM; Rhino-cerebral; Rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35849188 PMCID: PMC9289352 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07544-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ISSN: 0937-4477 Impact factor: 3.236
Age and gender distribution of our cohort
| AGE in years | Total no. of patients | No. of male patients | No. of female patients |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–19 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 20–29 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| 30–39 | 35 | 30 | 5 |
| 40–49 | 66 | 51 | 15 |
| 50–59 | 44 | 30 | 14 |
| 60–69 | 39 | 29 | 10 |
| 70–79 | 11 | 7 | 4 |
| 80–89 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
Fig. 1Comparison of age distribution of our mucormycosis cohort (Black) vs. age distribution of COVID-19 patients (Grey) (x-axis—% of patient distribution, y-axis—age in years)
Fig. 2Time elapsed between the occurrence of COVID-Mucormycosis after a positive RT-PCR
HbA1c of the patients at the first visit
| Hba1c | No. of patients | |
|---|---|---|
| Not available | 20 | |
| Non-diabetic | < 5.7 | 2 |
| Pre-diabetic | 5.7–6.4 | 10 |
| Diabetic | 6.5–7 | 7 |
| 7.1–8 | 23 | |
| 8.1–9 | 19 | |
| 9.1–10 | 35 | |
| 10.1–11 | 31 | |
| 11.1–12 | 25 | |
| 12.1–13 | 21 | |
| > 13 | 9 |
Fig. 3Showing the clinical findings (left half) and radiographic findings of our cohort of patients with CAM (right half)
Table describing the involvement of sinuses in our cohort
| Sinus involvement | No. of patients | % |
|---|---|---|
| Isolated maxillary sinus | 22 | 12.29% |
| Isolated ethmoid air cells | 2 | 1.11% |
| Maxillary and ethmoid sinuses | 28 | 15.64% |
| Maxillary, ethmoid and sphenoid sinuses | 17 | 9.49% |
| Maxillary, ethmoid and frontal sinuses | 10 | 5.58% |
| Sphenoid and ethmoid sinuses | 8 | 4.46% |
| Ethmoid, sphenoid and frontal sinuses | 5 | 2.79% |
| Pansinusitis | 85 | 47.48% |
| No sinus involvement | 2 | 1.11% |
Variables in the regression equation (which were examined as possible determinants of survival)
| Univariate logistic regression | Multiple logistic regression | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (CI) | Sig | OR (CI) | Sig | |
| Sex (male) | 0.958 (0.395–2.323) | 0.925 | 1.184 (0.424–3.307) | 0.747 |
| Involvement of sinuses | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
| Involvement of maxillae | 1.512 (0.632–3.615) | 0.354 | 2.825 (0.848–9.407) | 0.091 |
| Involvement of orbital wall | 1.418 (0.433–4.640) | 0.564 | 2.944 (o.615–14.098) | 0.177 |
| Presence of intra-cranial disease | 1.435 (0.558–3.690) | 0.454 | 1.107 (0.356–3.441) | 0.861 |
Classification table showing outcome of the disease as predicted by the model (using multiple logistic regression equation derived) and its comparison with the actual outcome
| Actual (observed) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| + ve (survived) | − ve (died) | |||
| Through test (model) | + ve (survived) | 145 TP | 24 FP | 169 |
| − ve (died) | 3 FN | 7 TN | 10 | |
| 148 | 31 | 179 | ||