Literature DB >> 35849152

Mode of delivery following obstetric anal sphincter injury: a 7-year retrospective review and follow-up cohort survey.

R Young1,2, L Bates3, S The3, J King3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Limited evidence exists regarding long-term outcomes following birth after prior obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). This article set out to describe outcomes following birth after OASI by reviewing the grades of tear, endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) findings, subsequent delivery outcomes and long-term symptoms.
METHODS: This study was conducted in two parts. The first involved a retrospective review of all OASI at a tertiary hospital in Australia over 7 years (2013-2019 inclusive) where the patient underwent a subsequent delivery. Following this, a retrospective cohort survey of this group was performed.
RESULTS: There were 27,284 vaginal births and 828 OASIs (3.03%); 247 (29.8%) had at least one subsequent birth by January 2021. Vaginal delivery occurred in 68%; recurrence of OASI was 5.4%. There were 90 responses (36.4%) to the follow-up survey. EAUS had been performed in 87.5%; none demonstrated a defect. Vaginal birth was the preferred mode for 77.8%; this occurred in 64%. The majority had high levels of satisfaction, this related to communication rather than the mode of delivery itself. Ongoing faecal or flatal incontinence was reported by 12%. There was no statistically significant difference in St Mark's incontinence scores between modes of birth.
CONCLUSIONS: In our unit most women who sustain OASI will have a subsequent vaginal delivery in future pregnancies. The majority remain asymptomatic at long-term follow-up with no statistically significant difference in incontinence scores regardless of mode of delivery. The rate of recurrent OASI was 5.4%.
© 2022. Crown.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoanal ultrasound; OASI; Subsequent birth

Year:  2022        PMID: 35849152     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05294-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   1.932


  6 in total

1.  'Please Squeeze': A novel approach to perineal guarding at the time of delivery reduced rates of obstetric anal sphincter injury in an Australian tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Elizabeth Luxford; Lucy Bates; Jennifer King
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.100

2.  The impact of first birth obstetric anal sphincter injury on the subsequent birth: a population-based linkage study.

Authors:  Amanda J Ampt; Christine L Roberts; Jonathan M Morris; Jane B Ford
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Do women with prior obstetrical anal sphincter injury regret having a subsequent vaginal delivery?

Authors:  Madeline Edwards; Emily K Kobernik; Shriya Suresh; Carolyn W Swenson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Effect of subsequent vaginal delivery on bowel symptoms and anorectal function in women who sustained a previous obstetric anal sphincter injury.

Authors:  Polly A Jordan; Madhu Naidu; Ranee Thakar; Abdul H Sultan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  What is the total impact of an obstetric anal sphincter injury? An Australian retrospective study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Evans; Clorinda Falivene; Kathy Briffa; Judith Thompson; Amanda Henry
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  The impact of mode of subsequent birth after obstetric anal sphincter injury on bowel function and related quality of life: a cohort study.

Authors:  Sara S Webb; Alice Sitch; Christine MacArthur
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.894

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.