Literature DB >> 3584880

Neurorrhaphy, nerve grafting, and neurotization: a functional comparison of nerve reconstruction techniques.

M J McNamara, W E Garrett, A V Seaber, J L Goldner.   

Abstract

This study examines the efficacy of three methods of peripheral nerve reconstruction: neurorrhaphy, nerve grafting, and neurotization. The extensor digitorum longus (EDL) neuromuscular unit of 63 New Zealand rabbits was used as the experimental model. Neuromuscular function was examined after 2, 4, and 6-month recovery periods. Variable recovery was seen after 2 months of recovery. At 6 months postoperatively, nerve grafting and neurorrhaphy were not statistically different from the unoperated control neuromuscular units. Neurotization grafting demonstrated a recovery of function of no greater than 50% at 6 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3584880     DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(87)80003-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  3 in total

1.  Functional recovery of completely denervated muscle: implications for innervation of tissue-engineered muscle.

Authors:  Sung-Bum Kang; Jennifer L Olson; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 2.  Corneal neurotization for neurotrophic keratopathy: Review of surgical techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Catherine Y Liu; Andrea C Arteaga; Sammie E Fung; M Soledad Cortina; Ilya M Leyngold; Vinay K Aakalu
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 5.033

3.  Comparison of neurotization versus nerve repair in an animal model of chronically denervated muscle.

Authors:  Andrew N Swanson; Scott W Wolfe; Michael Khazzam; Joseph Feinberg; John Ehteshami; Stephen Doty
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.230

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.