| Literature DB >> 35848123 |
Yuan Li1, Qinxi Liu1, Yi Yang2, Shuangfeng Fan3, Yang Liu3, Na Li4.
Abstract
Our study aimed to understand the relationship between the status of high-risk sexual behaviors of male ≥50 years old (elderly men) and their family support in a rural county-level city in Chengdu. Multi-stage sampling was used to select rural elderly men from six towns to conduct an interview questionnaire survey. Ordinal logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between high-risk sexual behavior and family factors. A total of 790 samples were included, and the prevalence of high-risk sexual behavior was 16.2%. Two-hundred thirty-nine men (30.3%) had three close family members. More than half of the men (n = 397) had never been provided financial support by family members (50.3%). More than half of men (n = 406) never communicate deeply with family members (51.4%). Logistic analysis reported that 50-59 years old (odds ratio [OR] = 1.928, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.070, 3.477]), unmarried, divorced/widowed, married and separated (OR = 8.232, 95% CI = [2.640, 25.673]; OR = 3.589, 95% CI = [1.713, 7.520]; OR = 3.003, 95% CI = [1.238, 7.280]) elderly men were more likely to be involved in commercial sex. Meanwhile, either never or often family financial support (OR = 0.435, 95% CI = [0.228, 0.830]; OR = 0.288, 95% CI = [0.095, 0.876]) helped elderly men to avoid commercial sex. This study predicts family factors may be affected by loneliness, life satisfaction, disposable economic condition, family responsibilities as the middle path, thus affect high-risk sexual behaviors in elderly men.Entities:
Keywords: China; elderly men; family support; high-risk sexual behavior; rural areas
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35848123 PMCID: PMC9290121 DOI: 10.1177/15579883221107729
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Mens Health ISSN: 1557-9883
Differences in the Prevalence of High-Risk Sexual Behaviors Among Elderly Men With Different Characteristics.
| Item | Total ( | High-risk sexual behaviors | χ2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Prevalence (%) | ||||
| Total | 790 | 128 | 16.2 | ||
| Age (years) | 19.22 | <.001 | |||
| 50–59 | 220 | 56 | 25.5 | ||
| 60 or above | 570 | 72 | 12.6 | ||
| Education level | 4.50 | .105 | |||
| Illiteracy | 348 | 51 | 14.7 | ||
| Primary school | 178 | 24 | 13.5 | ||
| Middle school or above | 264 | 53 | 20.1 | ||
| Monthly income (yuan) | 5.96 | .310 | |||
| No personal income | 62 | 10 | 16.1 | ||
| 1–1,000 | 366 | 51 | 13.9 | ||
| 1,000–1,999 | 190 | 30 | 15.8 | ||
| 2,000–2,999 | 78 | 17 | 23.1 | ||
| 3,000–3,999 | 52 | 9 | 17.3 | ||
| 4,000 or above | 42 | 10 | 23.8 | ||
| Marital status | 29.45 | <.001 | |||
| Unmarried | 17 | 6 | 35.3 | ||
| Normal married | 644 | 88 | 13.7 | ||
| Married but separated | 44 | 10 | 22.7 | ||
| The state of being divorced or widowed with a fixed partner | 16 | 9 | 56.3 | ||
| The state of being divorced or widowed without a fixed partner | 69 | 15 | 21.7 | ||
| Number of close family members | 5.62 | .345 | |||
| 0 | 14 | 3 | 21.4 | ||
| 1 | 138 | 22 | 15.9 | ||
| 2 | 230 | 45 | 19.6 | ||
| 3 | 239 | 38 | 15.9 | ||
| 4 | 107 | 15 | 14.0 | ||
| 5 | 62 | 5 | 8.1 | ||
| Willingness of family members to provide financial support | 2.82 | .421 | |||
| Never | 397 | 58 | 14.6 | ||
| Occasionally | 187 | 32 | 17.1 | ||
| Frequently | 69 | 10 | 14.5 | ||
| Always | 137 | 28 | 20.4 | ||
| Frequency of in-depth communication with family members | 2.72 | .252 | |||
| Never | 406 | 59 | 14.5 | ||
| Occasionally | 290 | 49 | 16.9 | ||
| Frequently | 94 | 20 | 21.3 | ||
Ordinal Logistic Regression Analysis Results.
| Independent variables | OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | |
| 50–59 | 1.928 [1.070, 3.477] |
| Education level | |
| Illiteracy | 1.189 [0.647, 2.187] |
| Primary school | 0.615 [0.289, 1.307] |
| Monthly income (yuan) | |
| No personal income | 0.418 [0.128, 1.368] |
| 1–1,000 | 0.522 [0.203, 1.344] |
| 1,000–1,999 | 0.562 [0.217, 1.453] |
| 2,000–2,999 | 0.590 [0.206, 1.690] |
| 3,000–3,999 | 0.297 [0.071, 1.245] |
| Marital status | |
| Unmarried | 8.232 [2.640, 25.673] |
| The state of being divorced or widowed without a fixed partner | 3.589 [1.713, 7.520] |
| The state of being divorced or widowed with a fixed partner | 2.253 [0.478, 10.619] |
| Married but separated | 3.003 [1.238, 7.280] |
| Willingness of family members to provide financial support | |
| Never | 0.435 [0.228, 0.830] |
| Occasionally | 0.613 [0.305, 1.232] |
| Frequently | 0.288 [0.095, 0.876] |
| Frequency of in-depth communication with family members | |
| Never | 0.606 [0.293, 1.249] |
| Occasionally | 0.702 [0.339, 1.455] |
| Number of close family members | 1.015 [0.813, 1.267] |
Note. OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval.
p < .05. ***p < .001.
Figure 1.95% CI Tree View of Regression OR-Value
Note. OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval.
Figure 2.The Influence Path of Family Factors