| Literature DB >> 35847893 |
Violet A Kiesel1, Madeline P Sheeley1, Emily M Hicks1, Chaylen Andolino1, Shawn S Donkin2, Michael K Wendt3,4, Stephen D Hursting5,6,7, Dorothy Teegarden1,4.
Abstract
Regions of hypoxia are common in solid tumors and drive changes in gene expression that increase risk of cancer metastasis. Tumor cells must respond to the stress of hypoxia by activating genes to modify cell metabolism and antioxidant response to improve survival. The goal of the current study was to determine the effect of hypoxia on cell metabolism and markers of oxidative stress in metastatic (metM-Wntlung) compared with nonmetastatic (M-Wnt) murine mammary cancer cell lines. We show that hypoxia induced a greater suppression of glutamine to glutamate conversion in metastatic cells (13% in metastatic cells compared to 7% in nonmetastatic cells). We also show that hypoxia increased expression of genes involved in antioxidant response in metastatic compared to nonmetastatic cells, including glutamate cysteine ligase catalytic and modifier subunits and malic enzyme 1. Interestingly, hypoxia increased the mRNA level of the transaminase glutamic pyruvic transaminase 2 (Gpt2, 7.7-fold) only in metM-Wntlung cells. The change in Gpt2 expression was accompanied by transcriptional (4.2-fold) and translational (6.5-fold) induction of the integrated stress response effector protein activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4). Genetic depletion ATF4 demonstrated importance of this molecule for survival of hypoxic metastatic cells in detached conditions. These findings indicate that more aggressive, metastatic cancer cells utilize hypoxia for metabolic reprogramming and induction of antioxidant defense, including activation of ATF4, for survival in detached conditions.Entities:
Keywords: ATF4 activating transcription factor 4; breast cancer; cell stress; hypoxia; integrated stress response (ISR); metastasis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35847893 PMCID: PMC9280133 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.767479
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 5.738
Primers used for qRT-PCR.
|
| Forward: 5’-CCTGAACAGCGAAGTGTTGG-3’ |
|---|---|
|
| Forward: 5’-GGGGTGACGAGGTGGAGTA-3’ |
|
| Forward: 5’-AGGAGCTTCGGGACTGTATCC-3’ |
|
| Forward: 5’-CCCAACTTCTTCAAGATGGTGG-3’ |
|
| Forward: 5’-GGACCTCCAGATCCCATCCT-3’ |
|
| Forward: 5’-AACCATTCACTGAGGTAATCCGA -3’ |
|
| Forward: 5’-CAAAGCAGGCCATAGACAGGG-3’ |
|
| Forward: 5’-AAACCGAGTAATTGGAAGTGGTTG-3’ |
|
| Forward: 5’-TCAACAAGGACTTGGCTTTTACT-3’ |
|
| Forward: 5’-ACAAGGAGAGCTTCGGGGTGGATC-3’ |
|
| Forward: 5’-CAGTGGAGCGCCAGAATAGAA-3’ |
|
| Forward: 5’-ATCCCTGAGAAGTTCCAGCA-3’ |
Figure 1Metabolic adaptation in hypoxia. Levels of genes involved in glucose and glutamine metabolism were analyzed by qRT-PCR in M-Wnt (A) and metM-Wntlung (B) cells. Stably labeled 13C5 glutamine was used to determine metabolism to glutamate (C), α-ketoglutarate (D), and citrate (F). Percent change in labeling of glutamate (G), α-ketoglutarate (H), and citrate (J) were determined relative to normoxia for each cell line. Stably labeled 13C6 glucose was used to determine metabolism of glucose to alanine (E). Percent decrease in alanine labeling (I) was determined relative to normoxia for each cell line. Overview of glutamine and glucose metabolism (K). Results are expressed as mean + SEM. Asterisk (*) indicates P < 0.05 relative to normoxia (A–F) or relative to M-Wnt (G–J); n=3-4.
Figure 2Effect of hypoxia on oxidative stress markers. Ratios of GSH/GSSG (A), NADPH/NADP+ (B), and levels of intracellular ROS (C) were determined. Levels of genes involved in antioxidant defense were assessed by qRT-PCR in normoxic and hypoxic M-Wnt (D) and metM-Wntlung (E) cells. Results are expressed as mean + SEM. Asterisk (*) indicates P < 0.05 relative to normoxia, n=3-6.
Figure 3Effect of hypoxia on ATF4 expression. mRNA (A) and protein (B) expression of ATF4 was determined using qRT-PCR and Western blotting in M-Wnt and metM-Wntlung cells incubated in hypoxia (H) or normoxia (N) for 48 h. Results are expressed as mean + SEM. Asterisk (*) indicates P < 0.05 relative to normoxia, n=3. Overall survival (C) and relapse-free survival (D) of breast cancer patients with high (red) or low (black) expression of ATF4, where patient data are split by upper quartile (compared to lowest three quartiles) of ATF4 expression.
Figure 4Effect of ATF4 manipulation in normoxic and hypoxic cells. Viability after 48 h in hypoxia or normoxia was assessed by MTT (A). Cells were pre-incubated in normoxia or hypoxia for 48 h and cell death was determined by flow cytometry with Zombie NIR (B), re-plated into transwells to assess migration (C) or low attachment plates to assess viability in detached conditions (D). metM-Wntlung cells were transfected with siCtrl or siATF4 and incubated in hypoxia or normoxia for 48 h. ATF4 depletion was confirmed by qRT-PCR (E). Cell viability (F) and cell death (G) were assessed at the end of incubation. Cells pre-incubated in hypoxia or normoxia were seeded into transwells to assess migration (H) or low attachment plates to assess viability (I) and cell death (J) in detached conditions. M-Wnt cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1-EV or pcDNA3.1-Atf4 and incubated in normoxia for 48 h. ATF4 overexpression was confirmed by qRT-PCR (K). Cells were seeded into low attachment plates to assess viability in detached conditions (L). Results are expressed as mean + SEM. Asterisk (*) indicates P < 0.05 relative to normoxia (A–D) or P < 0.05 relative to siCtrl or empty vector (E–K), n=3-6.