| Literature DB >> 35847856 |
Shuntao Wang1,2, Qi Zhang3, Ning Zeng3, Pengyuan Qi4, Chunyu Huang5, Qinqin Huang1.
Abstract
Single photothermal therapy (PTT) has many limitations in tumor treatments. Multifunctional nanomaterials can cooperate with PTT to achieve profound tumor killing performance. Herein, we encapsulated chemotherapeutic drug camptothecin (CPT) and pyrite (FeS2) with dual enzyme activity (glutathione oxidase (GSH-OXD) and peroxidase (POD) activities) into an injectable hydrogel to form a CFH system, which can improve the level of intratumoral oxidative stress, and simultaneously realize FeS2-mediated PTT and nanozymes catalytic treatment. After laser irradiation, the hydrogel gradually heats up and softens under the photothermal agent FeS2. The CPT then released from CFH to tumor microenvironment (TME), thereby enhancing the H2O2 level. As a result, FeS2 can catalyze H2O2 to produce ·OH, and cooperate with high temperature to achieve high-efficiency tumor therapy. It is worth noting that FeS2 can also deplete excess glutathione (GSH) in the cellular level, further amplifying oxidative stress. Both in vivo and in vitro experiments show that our CFH exhibits good tumor-specific cytotoxicity. The CFH we developed provides new insights for tumor treatment.Entities:
Keywords: camptothecin; catalytic treatment; hydrogel; photothermal therapy; pyrite nanozyme
Year: 2022 PMID: 35847856 PMCID: PMC9280668 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.904960
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 5.738
Scheme 1Schematic illustration of injectable hydrogel system for camptothecin initiated nano-catalytic tumor therapy with high performance.
Figure 1(A) TEM image of FeS2 nanozymes. (B) SEM image of hydrogel. (C) Statistical graph of measured diameter size of FeS2. (D) Rheological and temperature curves (red and blue, respectively) for the prepared CFH under conditions that simulate an exposure to 0.5 W/cm2 808 nm laser irradiation. (E) The morphology of the prepared CFH before (i) and after (ii) 0.5 W/cm2 808 nm laser irradiation for 10 min. (F) The infrared thermal image of the prepared CFH before (i) and after (ii) irradiation. (G) UV–vis spectra of FeS2. (H) Temperature changes of FeS2 at different concentrations under a 5 min irradiation from an 808 nm laser at 0.5 W/cm2. (I) Temperature variations of a FeS2 solution over four cycles of heating and natural cooling. (J) In vitro CFH CPT release profile in the presence and absence of 808 nm laser irradiation.
Figure 2(A) Calculation of the time constant for heat transfer using a linear regression of the cooling profile. (B) Hemolysis ratio of FeS2 at different FeS2 concentrations. (C) pH-dependent POD activity of FeS2. (D) Time-dependent reduction of GSH after incubating with the indicated concentrations of FeS2.
Figure 3(A) DCFH-DA fluorescence image under the indicated treatments. (B) Fluorescence images of CT26 cells stained with fluorescein diacetate (FDA) (live cells, green fluorescence) and propidium iodide (PI) (dead cells, red fluorescence) after incubation with different formulations. (C) DCFH-DA fluorescence intensity after the indicated treatments. (D) The impact of FeS2 on the intracellular level of GSH was estimated using a GSH assay kit (n = 5). (E) UV − vis absorbance spectra and color changes of TMB in different reaction systems. (F) MTT assays were conducted using CT26 cells treated with different formulations. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.005; Student’s t-test.
Figure 4(A) Temperature increases in mice implanted with CT26 tumors following 808 nm laser irradiation (0.5 W/cm2) for 5 min in the indicated treatment groups. (B) Tumor volume change over time in groups treated as indicated. (C) Average tumor weight values associated with the indicated treatments. (D) H&E and Ki-67 stained tumor sections from the indicated treatment groups. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.005; Student’s t-test.