Fuminori Murase1, Hiroatsu Nakashima1,2, Kenyu Ito3, Yusuke Demizu4, Tetsuro Takatsu1. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gifu Prefectural Tajimi Hospital, Japan. 2. Medical Corporation Rokujukai Goto Orthopaedic Clinic, Japan. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Konan Kosei Hospital, Japan. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center Kobe Proton Center, Japan.
Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) is an aggressive type of mesenchymal malignancy
previously known as malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH). The 2002 World Health Organization
(WHO) Soft Tissue Tumor Classification included MFH in conjunction with UPS, but MFH was
subsequently removed in the 2013 WHO classification[1]). UPS rarely develops in the bones, accounting for less than
2% of primary malignant bone tumors[1]). Bone UPS usually occurs around the knee, proximal femur, and
proximal humerus, whereas spinal development is extremely rare. Spinal UPS reportedly has a
worse prognosis than UPS at other sites, with a 5-year survival rate of only 7%[2], [3]). We report a case of primary UPS of the 11th thoracic
vertebra, in which total en bloc spondylectomy would have been challenging
and highly invasive and was thus treated with carbon ion radiotherapy.
Case report
A 76-year-old man with no medical history visited a local physician with a one-month
history of low back pain without any trigger. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed a
hepatic mass and an osteolytic lesion in the 11th thoracic vertebra, and the patient was
referred to the gastroenterology department of our hospital. The hepatic lesion was
diagnosed as a hemangioma. The patient subsequently visited our department with a thoracic
spinal tumor. The patient was fully ambulatory, but pain was elicited upon percussion of his
back. Plain CT at the initial examination demonstrated an osteolytic lesion with slight
ballooning in the 11th thoracic vertebra that was partly lobulated and accompanied by
marginal osteosclerosis. Thinning and partial disruption of the bone cortex were also
observed (Figure 1). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a thoracic spinal tumor with a high
signal intensity on the T1-weighted image and a slightly high signal intensity on the
T2-weighted image. A peripheral, low-intensity margin suggested osteosclerosis. The tumor
slightly displaced the spinal cord, and extraosseous extension was observed. No abnormal
findings were observed in other vertebral bodies (Figure
2).
Figure 1
Plain CT of the thoracic spine at the first visit.
Plain CT showing an osteolytic lesion with slight ballooning in the 11th thoracic
vertebra, some of which were lobulated and accompanied by marginal osteosclerosis,
thinning, and partial disruption of the bone cortex. a. Sagittal view b. Axial
view.
Figure 2
MRI of the thoracic spine at the first visit.
MRI showing a tumor with high signal intensity on a T1-weighted image (a) and
slightly high signal intensity on a T2-weighted image (b) slightly displacing the
spinal cord, with extraosseous extension.
Plain CT of the thoracic spine at the first visit.Plain CT showing an osteolytic lesion with slight ballooning in the 11th thoracic
vertebra, some of which were lobulated and accompanied by marginal osteosclerosis,
thinning, and partial disruption of the bone cortex. a. Sagittal view b. Axial
view.MRI of the thoracic spine at the first visit.MRI showing a tumor with high signal intensity on a T1-weighted image (a) and
slightly high signal intensity on a T2-weighted image (b) slightly displacing the
spinal cord, with extraosseous extension.A slow-growing tumor with hematoma was considered based on the imaging findings. Because
there was no past history of malignancy and no primary malignancy was detected on positron
emission tomography CT (PET-CT), a CT-guided core needle biopsy was performed. Pathological
findings revealed proliferation of atypical cells. Immunohistochemical staining for
cytokeratin AE1/AE3 was negative, and bone metastasis from carcinoma was ruled out. Since
core needle biopsy did not yield a diagnosis, an incisional biopsy was performed under
general anesthesia. Pathological examination of the biopsy specimen revealed multiple
multinucleated giant cells with diffuse histiocyte-like mononuclear cells. Despite the
general appearance of a giant cell tumor, mononuclear cells showed strong atypia.
Immunohistochemistry was negative for cytokeratin, thyroid transcription factor-1(TTF-1),
prostate-specific antigen (PSA), cluster of differentiation 31(CD31), and CD34, but positive
for CD68 with an MIB-1 labeling index of 20% (Figure
3). A primary UPS of the 11th thoracic vertebra was diagnosed based on pathological
findings. Although there were no distant metastases, total en bloc
spondylectomy was considered to be challenging because of the extraosseous extension and
high invasiveness for his age; thus, carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT; 70.4 GyE/32 fraction)
was performed (Figure 4). After the CIRT, the patient wore a rigid thoracolumbar brace for two years.
Subcutaneous denosumab (120 mg) was administered every four weeks. Denosumab was
discontinued after two years. Single-agent adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin was
advised; however, the patient refused treatment. At one year follow-up, imaging revealed a
compression fracture of the 11th thoracic vertebra and intravertebral cleft; however, the
patient was asymptomatic. Subsequent follow-up imaging showed that the extraosseous tumor
had decreased in size and osteosclerosis was noted in the vertebral body. At present, four
years after CIRT, the patient has no evidence of recurrence, is pain-free, and can walk long
distances (Figure 5).
Figure 3
Histopathological findings and immunohistochemistry stain of incisional biopsy
specimen.
×200 magnification. Pathological findings of the incisional biopsy specimen
demonstrating multiple multinucleated giant cells with diffuse presence of the
surrounding histiocytoid mononuclear cells. Despite appearing similar to a giant cell
tumor, mononuclear cells show strong atypia (a: hematoxylin and eosin stain).
Immunohistochemical staining shows positive CD68 (b) with MIB-1 labelling index of 20%
(c).
Figure 4
The dose distribution of carbon ion therapy is illustrated for UPS of the 11th
thoracic spine (the pink line indicates 95% isodose of the prescribed dose). The
spinal cord is in a donut-shaped low-dose irradiation area.
Figure 5
Plain CT after carbon ion radiotherapy.
Plain CT after carbon ion radiotherapy showed collapse due to a compression fracture
of the 11th thoracic vertebra and intravertebral cleft, and no recurrence of the
tumor. a. 1 year after treatment; b. 4 years after treatment.
Histopathological findings and immunohistochemistry stain of incisional biopsy
specimen.×200 magnification. Pathological findings of the incisional biopsy specimen
demonstrating multiple multinucleated giant cells with diffuse presence of the
surrounding histiocytoid mononuclear cells. Despite appearing similar to a giant cell
tumor, mononuclear cells show strong atypia (a: hematoxylin and eosin stain).
Immunohistochemical staining shows positive CD68 (b) with MIB-1 labelling index of 20%
(c).The dose distribution of carbon ion therapy is illustrated for UPS of the 11th
thoracic spine (the pink line indicates 95% isodose of the prescribed dose). The
spinal cord is in a donut-shaped low-dose irradiation area.Plain CT after carbon ion radiotherapy.Plain CT after carbon ion radiotherapy showed collapse due to a compression fracture
of the 11th thoracic vertebra and intravertebral cleft, and no recurrence of the
tumor. a. 1 year after treatment; b. 4 years after treatment.This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of our hospital. Consent for
publication was obtained from the patient.
Discussion
Primary spinal UPS is very rare, many of which develop in the thoracolumbar spine followed
by the sacrum. Lesions may involve multiple vertebrae, resulting in osteolytic bone
destruction of vertebral bodies, radiculopathy, and myelopathy[2], [3]).Spinal UPS is often slow-growing and appears as a complete osteolytic lesion with clear
margins, destruction of the bone cortex, and extension into the surrounding soft tissue.
Bone destruction is characterized by the absence of a periosteal reaction or new
bone[2],[3],[4],[5]). Similar findings were observed in this case.We initially suspected that the lesion was a spinal metastasis. However, no primary lesion
was detected even on systemic imaging studies, including PET-CT. Histopathological findings
were similar to those of giant cell tumors of the bone. However, the mononuclear cells were
strongly atypical, and we diagnosed the lesion as a primary thoracic spinal UPS. As in this
case, it can be challenging to distinguish spinal UPS from giant cell tumors of the bone,
and there are reports of sacral UPS diagnosed after surgery with extended curettage based on
the preoperative diagnosis of giant cell tumor of the bone[6]).Liu et al. conducted a clinical review of 318 patients with bone UPS and
noted that the median survival of patients who underwent surgery was 56 months and that of
patients who did not undergo surgery was only seven months. They found that surgery alone
was a favorable prognostic factor in a multivariate analysis[7]). Özkurt et al. also investigated
the surgical treatment of 14 patients with UPS in extremity bones and found that the 5-year
survival rate for patients who underwent resection with a wide margin was 81.9%. However,
the 5-year survival rate of patients who underwent marginal resection was 33.3%[8]). A few reports of a relatively large
series of spinal UPS exist, and Teng et al. reported a case series of 13
patients with spinal UPS, with a median survival of 18 months. The median survival was 25
months in patients who underwent en bloc resection and 14 months after
intra-lesional excision[2]). Lou
et al. examined prognostic factors for survival in 44 patients with
spinal UPS who underwent surgery and adjuvant therapy. They reported that subtotal or
segmental resection was an independent poor prognostic factor[3]). In addition, the authors reported that en
bloc resection at wide margins significantly improved prognosis[3]). Therefore, en bloc
resection with negative surgical margins is recommended for spinal UPS[2], [3], [5]). However, resection with a wide margin was considered
impossible because of the extravertebral extension of the tumor in our case; hence, carbon
ion radiotherapy was chosen.In a report by Matsumoto et al. of 47 patients with unresectable spinal
sarcoma (excluding the sacrum) treated with carbon ion radiotherapy, the median survival was
44 months, with a 5-year local control rate of 79% and a 5-year survival of 52%[9]).In cases of dural sac compression, the distance between the spinal cord and tumor cannot be
secured, and recurrence at the margin of the irradiation field near the spinal cord becomes
a problem[9]). However, four years
after the CIRT, no local recurrence or distant metastasis was observed. Therefore, long-term
survival is possible in this patient.The use of chemotherapy for spinal UPS remains controversial. Lehnhardt et
al. analyzed 140 cases of UPS in the extremities and noted that adjuvant
chemotherapy had no prognostic impact[10]). Özkurt et al. reported that all 14 patients
with bone UPS of the limbs were treated with wide resection and adjuvant chemotherapy using
doxorubicin, ifosfamide, methotrexate, and cisplatin, which potentially showed efficacy and
improved survival[8]). The authors
concluded that it was appropriate to administer chemotherapy in addition to wide resection
of the lesion to improve survival[8]). Liu et al. analyzed 318 patients with bone
UPS in the extremities and reported that chemotherapy significantly prolonged survival in
univariate analysis but was not significantly different in multivariate analysis[7]). All previous reports are based on
the UPS of the extremity bone, and the effect of chemotherapy with spinal UPS is
unclear.High-dose radiotherapy, such as stereotactic radiotherapy, can cause tumor shrinkage but
may also cause osteonecrosis, leading to spinal compression fractures and spinal
deformities[11]). A
retrospective analysis of spinal compression fractures after stereotactic radiotherapy by
Sahgal et al.[12]) revealed that the risk of fractures was 14% in 57 lesions.
Therefore, the incidence of spinal compression fractures with stereotactic radiotherapy is
higher than that with conventional radiotherapy (incidence rate, 3–5%), and 65% of these
fractures occur within four months of stereotactic radiotherapy[12]).Matsumoto et al. reported that the incidence of spinal compression
fractures after CIRT was as high as 23% at a median follow-up of seven months[11]). In our case, spinal compression
fracture occurred approximately one year after CIRT. The bone lesion was osteolytic, and
more than half of the vertebral body was replaced by the tumor, which may have led to a
post-irradiation fracture[12]).
Although CT revealed an intravertebral cleft, suggesting non-union, the patient did not
complain of pain, and ambulation with long-distance walking was achieved.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.
Authors: Marcus Lehnhardt; Adrien Daigeler; Heinz H Homann; Vanessa Schwaiberger; Ole Goertz; Cornelius Kuhnen; Hans U Steinau Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2008-06-27 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Arjun Sahgal; Eshetu G Atenafu; Sam Chao; Ameen Al-Omair; Nicholas Boehling; Ehsan H Balagamwala; Marcelo Cunha; Isabelle Thibault; Lilyana Angelov; Paul Brown; John Suh; Laurence D Rhines; Michael G Fehlings; Eric Chang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-08-19 Impact factor: 44.544