As the global population ages together with increasing life expectancies among people with
disabilities, the need for rehabilitation has continued to increase worldwide[1]). Notably, the World Health
Organization estimates that approximately 1 billion people suffer from disabilities
worldwide (15% of the world’s population)[2]). Patients with orthopedic, neurological, cardiac, pulmonary,
and other diseases often receive outpatient rehabilitation given the decline in their
physical function, hence the need for rehabilitation is increased. Moreover, patients whose
physical function declines after hospitalization for acute diseases often receive outpatient
rehabilitation after discharge. Unlike inpatient rehabilitation, outpatient rehabilitation
requires patients return to their homes after treatment. Consequently, they receive
treatment near their homes and use the local medical resources.At present various countries have established registry databases in the field of
rehabilitation to clarify their current status. For instance, the United States has the
Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation database[3]), the largest rehabilitation registry database in the United
States, while Japan has the Japan Rehabilitation Database[4]), the largest rehabilitation registry database in Japan.
Although descriptive epidemiological studies have been conducted on rehabilitation, none
have, thus far, focused on outpatient rehabilitation given that the databases are mainly for
inpatients, with only a few large-scale databases available for outpatients.The National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan
(NDB), one of the most comprehensive national health management databases worldwide, does
cover outpatients[5]). The
understanding of the detailed payment status in outpatient rehabilitation can provide useful
insights for developing effective medical plans by aiding in the identification of diseases,
ages, and demand for outpatient rehabilitation in communities. Therefore, the current study,
aimed to clarify the current status of outpatient rehabilitation in Japan, its changes over
time, age distribution, and regional differences using the NDB.
Materials and Methods
This study used the NDB constructed by the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare. The NDB
is a database that includes information on medical claims and specific health examinations
collected by the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare since 2008, as well as information
on over 20 million medical claims and specific health examinations per year. Moreover, the
Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare has been providing data to researchers and government
agencies since 2011. The NDB is considered a useful source of data for determining the
actual medical trends and health status of covered individuals. To promote further use of
the NDB, the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare has been publishing aggregate NDB data
from a general perspective since 2016 as NDB open.Outpatient rehabilitation in Japanese hospitals is provided using medical fees for the
rehabilitation of specific diseases such as cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease,
orthopedic disease, respiratory disease, and disuse syndrome. Outpatient rehabilitation is
performed by physical, occupational, and speech therapists under the supervision of a
physician. The healthcare fee for disease-specific rehabilitation is determined as one unit
per 20 minutes. To provide disease-specific rehabilitation, the number of physicians,
therapists, training room area, and equipment standards must meet the defined requirements.
The fees for swallowing therapy can be reimbursed when a physician or dentist, speech
therapist, nurse, assistant nurse, dental hygienist, physical therapist, or occupational
therapist provides training and education. Such fees can be reimbursed once a day when the
therapy is performed for at least 30 minutes. During disease-specific rehabilitation, only
rehabilitation for cardiovascular disease can have multiple patients simultaneously.We obtained outpatient rehabilitation data from the National Database of Health Insurance
Claims and Specific Health Checkups of the Japan dataset from April 2014 to March
2019[6],[7],[8],[9],[10]). This study collected data on rehabilitation and swallowing
therapy according to diseases such as cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease,
orthopedic disease, respiratory disease, and disuse syndrome. For disease-specific
rehabilitation, the number of units per day was determined, whereas for swallowing therapy,
one session was counted as one unit. This study used data on the number of rehabilitation
units for cardiovascular rehabilitation, cerebrovascular rehabilitation, disuse syndrome
rehabilitation, orthopedic rehabilitation, respiratory rehabilitation, and dysphagia
rehabilitation and following which we examined the changes in the total number of units per
year, changes in the total number of units by age, changes in the number of units per type
of rehabilitation, and changes in the number of units according to age per type of
rehabilitation. We described the number of rehabilitation units in the outpatient setting
using the 2018 data. The total number of units corresponding to the prefecture represents
the number of units per 100,000 population in 2018. Population numbers corresponding to the
prefecture were obtained from the census (October 1, 2017) of the Statistic Bureau, Ministry
of Internal Affairs and Communications data[11]).
Results
Some of the figures are available on figshare as Appendix[12]).
Total number of units for outpatient rehabilitation
The total number of units for outpatient rehabilitation patients gradually increased from
approximately 87 million units in 2014 to approximately 99 million units in 2018 (Figure 1). The greatest number of total units for outpatient rehabilitation according to age
was observed among those in their late 70s (Figure
2). Orthopedic rehabilitation was the most frequent rehabilitation unit per disease
in 2018 (83.6%), followed by cerebrovascular rehabilitation (13.5%) and cardiovascular
rehabilitation (2.2%) (Figure 3). The frequency of disuse syndrome rehabilitation, respiratory rehabilitation, and
dysphagia rehabilitation was <1%.
Figure 1
Total number of units for outpatient rehabilitation from 2014 to 2018
Figure 2
Total number of units according to age for outpatient rehabilitation from 2014 to
2018
Figure 3
Percentage of units for disease-specific rehabilitation among outpatients in
2018
Total number of units for outpatient rehabilitation from 2014 to 2018Total number of units according to age for outpatient rehabilitation from 2014 to
2018Percentage of units for disease-specific rehabilitation among outpatients in
2018
Cardiovascular rehabilitation
The total number of units for cardiovascular rehabilitation increased from approximately
1.2 million in 2014 to approximately 2.3 million in 2018 (Appendix 1). Cardiovascular
rehabilitation was most frequent among those in their early 70s in 2014, but was most
frequent among those in their late 70s in 2016 (Appendix 2). The maximum regional
disparity in cardiovascular rehabilitation according to the prefecture in 2018 was
approximately 19 times greater (Appendix 3).
Cerebrovascular rehabilitation
The total number of units for cerebrovascular rehabilitation was roughly 14 million and
13 million in 2014 and 2018, respectively (Appendix 4). During 2014 and 2018,
cerebrovascular rehabilitation was most common in children aged 5 to 9 years, followed by
those aged 0 to 4 years (Appendix 5). Cerebrovascular rehabilitation showed a large number
of units in children aged 0 to 9 years and people over 65, between 2014 and 2018. The
maximum regional disparity in cerebrovascular rehabilitation according to the prefecture
in 2018 was approximately 8 times greater (Appendix 6).
Disuse syndrome rehabilitation
In 2014, the total number of units in disuse syndrome rehabilitation were around 214,000.
It decreased from 2015 to approximately 172,000 in 2018 (Appendix 7). Disuse syndrome
rehabilitation was most frequent among those in their early 70s in 2014, although from
2017, it was most frequent among those in their early 80s. The second most frequent age
group for disuse syndrome rehabilitation was the late 70s and the third was the late 80s
(Appendix 8). The maximum regional disparity in disuse syndrome rehabilitation according
to the prefecture in 2018 was approximately 35 times (Appendix 9).
Orthopedic rehabilitation
The total number of units for orthopedic rehabilitation was approximately 83 million in
2018, increased from approximately 70 million in 2014 (Appendix 10). The number of units
of orthopedic rehabilitation were the highest among those in their late 70s from the years
2014–2018 (Appendix 11). The second and third most frequent age groups for orthopedic
rehabilitation were the early 70s and early 80s, respectively. The maximum regional
disparity in orthopedic rehabilitation according to the prefecture in 2018 was
approximately 10 times (Appendix 12).
Respiratory rehabilitation
The total number of units for respiratory rehabilitation increased from roughly 260,000
in 2014 to almost 320,000 in 2018 (Appendix 13). Respiratory rehabilitation was most
common among those in their late 70s from the years 2014–2018. Although variations
existed, the second and third most common age groups were the early 70s and the early 80s,
respectively (Appendix 14). The maximum regional disparity in respiratory rehabilitation
according to the prefecture in 2018 was approximately 28 times (Appendix 15).
Dysphagia rehabilitation
The total number of units for dysphagia rehabilitation decreased slightly, from roughly
63,000 units in 2014 to almost 57,000 units in 2018 (Appendix 16). Dysphagia
rehabilitation was most frequent in the age group of 0 to 4 years from the years 2014–2018
(Appendix 17). Although some variation existed, the second and third most frequent age
groups in 2018 were the early and late 80s, respectively. The maximum regional disparity
in dysphagia rehabilitation according to the province in 2018 was 36 times (Appendix
18).
Discussion
The total number of units for all outpatient rehabilitation services increased gradually
between 2014 and 2018. Cieza et al., who reported the need for
rehabilitation worldwide[13]),
stated that the number of people requiring rehabilitation had increased by 69% from 1990 to
2019, possibly due to population growth and an aging population. Indeed, studies have shown
that population aging has caused a decline in muscle mass, strength, and functional
performance[14]), which also
increases the demand for rehabilitation[15]).The total population of Japan has increased from about 120 million in 1990 to 130 million
in 2019, with the number of older people aged 65 years and above becoming more than double
from about 15 million to 36 million[16]). These circumstances increased the demand for rehabilitation,
thereby increasing the total number of units for all outpatients in rehabilitation. The
number of physical and occupational therapists in Japan has continued to increase
annually[17]). Similarly, the
number of speech-language pathologists has also increased from approximately 27,000 to
34,000 between the years 2016–2020[18]). The increase in the total number of outpatient
rehabilitation units could be attributed to an increase in the number of therapists. In
2018, orthopedic rehabilitation accounted for more than 80% of the total units for
rehabilitation according to disease, followed by cerebrovascular rehabilitation (14%) and
cardiovascular rehabilitation (2.3%). After categorizing patients worldwide who would
benefit from rehabilitation according to disease, Cieza et al. reported
that musculoskeletal and neurological disorders were the greatest factors for rehabilitation
in people over 65 years of age[13]). The number of disease-specific rehabilitation units in the
current study was consistent with that reported by Cieza et al. One of the
reasons for the high rate of rehabilitation for musculoskeletal diseases (>80%) in the
current study was that a large number of patients who required rehabilitation for
musculoskeletal diseases did not receive inpatient treatment.Patients aged over 70 years received a large number of units of disease-specific
rehabilitation, whereas patients aged between 0 to 9 years received a large number of units
of cerebrovascular rehabilitation, and patients aged between 0 to 4 years received a large
number of units of dysphagia rehabilitation. The number of units of disease-specific
rehabilitation according to age was higher in individuals aged over 70 years, which could be
due to age-related changes. People are more susceptible to diseases such as cardiovascular
rehabilitation, pulmonary rehabilitation, and orthopedic rehabilitation as they
age[14]), which has increased
the demand for rehabilitation. However, the number of units for cerebrovascular
rehabilitation and dysphagia rehabilitation was higher for children than for older people. A
2006 survey conducted by the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare found that cerebral
palsy was the most common cause of physical disability among children under 18 years of age
(25.9%). Overall, 53.8% of the patients had limb disabilities, 18.6% had auditory-verbal
disabilities, and 1.6% had speech, language, and masticatory dysfunction[19]). Indeed, cerebral palsy has been a
target of cerebrovascular rehabilitation, with limb disability, auditory language
impairment, and masticatory dysfunction also being targets of cerebrovascular and dysphagia
rehabilitation in Japan. Kim et al. reported that the rate of outpatient
rehabilitation was higher than that of inpatient rehabilitation in pediatric patients with
cerebral palsy throughout Korea[20]). The same study also speculated ahigh demand for outpatient
rehabilitation in Japan. The demand for rehabilitation in pediatric patients before school
age is anticipated to be high. The presence of parents may have contributed to the ease of
attending the outpatient rehabilitation. The current study found an increasing trend in the
number of units for cerebrovascular rehabilitation in the 5–9 years age group, whereas the
number of units for dysphagia rehabilitation showed a gradual decrease in the 0–4 years age
group, albeit still showing high rates. These results suggest a high demand for
cerebrovascular and dysphagia rehabilitation in children.The results obtained herein can be useful for planning medical care for outpatient
rehabilitation given the few large-scale database studies on outpatient rehabilitation.
Accordingly, the current study found a large variation in the percentage of rehabilitation
performed according to the region. Studies on cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, and chronic
obstructive pulmonary diseases have shown that transportation, motivation, and medical costs
are barriers to outpatient rehabilitation[21],[22],[23],[24]). Additionally, regional disparities in outpatient
rehabilitation may be caused by disparities in disease frequency, patient age, and the
number of patients requiring care. These problems may also have been a constraint on the
implementation of outpatient rehabilitation in the current study. As such, more detailed
information regarding the patient and local environment will need to be collected for a
comprehensive analysis of the number of units according to the prefecture. For patients with
limited access to outpatient rehabilitation, telerehabilitation may be effective, and the
demand for telerehabilitation is expected to increase, especially after the COVID-19
pandemic. Indeed, telerehabilitation has been reported to have similar or even greater
effect as compared to face-to-face rehabilitation in patients with stroke and total knee
replacement[25], [26]). Moreover, telerehabilitation has
also been reported in patients with COVID-19[27]), suggesting its potential efficacy for improving regional
disparities in rehabilitation implementation.This study has several strengths, one of which is the use of a large database such as NDB
Open Data. This database contains health insurance claims for more than 90% of the Japanese
population. Therefore, this database contains almost all available cases, suggesting little
bias in the information. This study provides an overview of the current status of outpatient
rehabilitation as well as basic data for future outpatient rehabilitation provision.
However, this study has some limitations. First, this study was unable to obtain details
regarding the diseases that necessitated rehabilitation. The need for rehabilitation may
differ depending on the causative disease, and additional research including the causative
disease is required for a more detailed study. Second, it is unclear which therapists
performed rehabilitation in this study. During outpatient rehabilitation, physical
therapists, occupational therapists, and speech-language pathologists primarily provide
rehabilitation. This study could not examine the rehabilitation implementation status of
each therapist. Third, the NDB Open Data are collected from hospitals and clinics and do not
include daycare centers and home-visit rehabilitation. Further research is required to
examine long-term care and rehabilitation services.
Conclusion
The current study investigated changes in the provision of outpatient rehabilitation in
Japan according to time, age distribution, and regional differences from the years 2014–2018
using NDB open data. The total number of units for outpatient rehabilitation had gradually
increased from 2014 to 2018. Orthopedic rehabilitation accounted for more than 80% of the
total number of units for outpatient rehabilitation in 2018. The total number of units for
outpatient rehabilitation according to age was highest among those in their late 70s.
Meanwhile, cerebrovascular and dysphagia rehabilitation had the highest number of units in
children. A large difference in the implementation status of rehabilitation in each region
was observed among the prefectures, suggesting the need for policy planning to address
regional disparities.
Conflict of interest
The authors do not have any conflict of interest related
to this research.
Authors: Chan Zeng; Mark W Melberg; Heather M Tavel; Suzanne E Argosino; Denise A Kiepe; Ella E Lyons; Morgan A Ford; Claudia A Steiner Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2020-02-21 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Leonard Baatiema; Olutobi Sanuade; John Kuumuori Ganle; Anthony Sumah; Linus Baatiema; Joshua Sumankuuro Journal: Health Soc Care Community Date: 2020-12-05