Janus kinase inhibitors have been reported to be effective in the treatment of patients
with rheumatoid arthritis[1],[2],[3],[4]). However, little is known about their efficacy in patients
with renal failure or those on dialysis. This is because many Janus kinase inhibitors are
renally excreted. The use of Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
and renal insufficiency is not recommended in view of safety concerns. However, because of
its low renal excretion, peficitinib is not contraindicated in patients on dialysis in Japan
according to the package insert. In this report, we describe two cases of patients with
rheumatoid arthritis on maintenance hemodialysis who were administered peficitinib 100
mg/day and showed a favorable course of treatment.
Case 1
A 69-year-old woman, who started maintenance hemodialysis at age 57 due to chronic renal
failure, was diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis at age 61, and started monotherapy with
etanercept at age 63, achieving remission. However, the efficacy gradually decreased, and
the patient was switched to tocilizumab. However, the DAS28-CRP (3.67) and SDAI (20.03)
showed that the drug efficacy was insufficient, and peficitinib 100 mg/day was started as
monotherapy in view of economic and safety considerations. If the efficacy was inadequate,
the dose was increased to 150 mg/day, and peficitinib monotherapy was administered without
any other drug therapy. After 100 mg/day of peficitinib, the disease activity gradually
decreased and remission was achieved after 24 weeks. No adverse events were observed during
peficitinib treatment (Figure 1).
Figure 1
The clinical markers of case 1 during treatment.
The clinical markers of case 1 during treatment.
Case 2
An 85-year-old woman, developed rheumatoid arthritis at the age of 73 and started
hemodialysis at the age of 82. After the induction of dialysis, rheumatoid arthritis
treatment was started initiated with etanercept, which was effective for 3 years. However,
the effect of etanercept gradually diminished and she became secondarily ineffective on
etanercept. Treatment with tofacitinib was initiated, but was discontinued due to the
development of a hepatic disorder. Etanercept was then resumed, but was ineffective with
DAS28-CRP (3.18) and SDAI (14.04); therefore, peficitinib 100 mg/day was started due to
economic and safety considerations. After 4 weeks of treatment, the DAS28-CRP (1.64) and
SDAI (2.35) remained low, and remission was achieved. No adverse events were observed during
treatment with peficitinib (Figure 2).
Figure 2
The clinical markers of case 2 during treatment.
The clinical markers of case 2 during treatment.
Discussion
Methotrexate is a central drug used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. However,
methotrexate is difficult to use in patients on dialysis because of renal failure. Previous
reports have shown that biologics are effective in patients with high disease activity
rheumatoid arthritis on maintenance dialysis, and there have been reports on the use of
TNF-α antibody agents, such as certolizumab pegol and etanercept, and non-TNF-α antibody
agents, such as tocilizumab, in patients on dialysis[5],[6],[7],[8]). However, no reports have been found on the response to the
secondary ineffectiveness of these biologics.Janus kinase inhibitors inhibit Janus kinase, which is required for intracellular
transmission of stimuli by inflammatory cytokines. The efficacy of Janus kinase inhibitors
in rheumatoid arthritis has been reported to be as good as or better than that of
biologics[2]). However,
adverse events such as herpes zoster, upper respiratory tract infection, pneumonia,
tuberculosis, and sepsis have been identified, and caution is required[1],[2],[3],[4]).
The relationship between selectivity and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors has not yet been
clearly established, but there are reports that the selectivity of Janus kinase does not
affect its safety in clinical practice[9]). When using a Janus kinase inhibitor in patients with
rheumatoid arthritis, it is important to consider patient comorbidities rather than Janus
kinase selectivity and to select drugs based on differences in drug pharmacokinetics.Peficitinib is considered to have the least impact on renal function of all the available
Janus kinase inhibitors. Peficitinib is primarily metabolized in the liver by
sulfotransferase (SULT) 2A1. Peficitinib is primarily excreted in the feces, with urinary
excretion rates ranging from 12.5% to 16.8%[10]). When peficitinib was administered to patients with severe
renal dysfunction (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2), Cmax was 21.7% lower and AUCinf
was 8.7% higher than in patients with normal renal function[11]). These values were not significantly different
from those observed in the patients with normal renal function[12]). However, although this drug has the lowest
urinary excretion rate of all Janus kinase inhibitors, some reports have raised concerns
regarding the increased AUC in patients with severely impaired renal function[11], [13]). Unlike in patients with impaired renal function,
there are no reports on the pharmacokinetics of peficitinib in patients on maintenance
dialysis, and it is possible that the pharmacokinetics of peficitinib may not be similar to
those in patients with impaired renal function. Although there have been previous reports of
peficitinib in patients on maintenance hemodialysis, the package insert of peficitinib in
Japan does not contraindicate the use of peficitinib in such patients. Based on previous
reports of peficitinib hemodynamics, peficitinib could be administered to patients on
maintenance hemodialysis[11]). In
the present two patients, a lower dose of peficitinib of 100 mg/day was administered for
economic and safety reasons. The use of biologics in patients on hemodialysis has been
reported to result in a high incidence of infections[14]), and even with Janus kinase inhibitors, care should be
taken to avoid infections. However, given the current treatment for rheumatoid arthritis,
peficitinib may be useful in patients on hemodialysis who have had an inadequate response to
biologics and for whom other treatment options are scarce.
Ethical considerations and patient consent
We give full consideration to the
protection of personal information when presenting our research, and we explain in writing
to the subject of the research and obtain his/her consent.
Authors: Peter Nash; Andreas Kerschbaumer; Thomas Dörner; Maxime Dougados; Roy M Fleischmann; Klaus Geissler; Iain McInnes; Janet E Pope; Désirée van der Heijde; Michaela Stoffer-Marx; Tsutomu Takeuchi; Michael Trauner; Kevin L Winthrop; Maarten de Wit; Daniel Aletaha; Xenofon Baraliakos; Wolf-Henning Boehncke; Paul Emery; John D Isaacs; Joel Kremer; Eun Bong Lee; Walter P Maksymowych; Marieke Voshaar; Lai-Shan Tam; Yoshiya Tanaka; Filip van den Bosch; René Westhovens; Ricardo Xavier; Josef S Smolen Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2020-11-06 Impact factor: 19.103