| Literature DB >> 35847727 |
Emmanuel Katsanis1,2,3,4,5,6, Keri Maher3,5,6, Denise J Roe5,7, Richard J Simpson1,2,5,8.
Abstract
We have initiated a single center phase I study in patients with hematologic malignancies progressively substituting day +4 posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PT-CY) with bendamustine (PT-BEN) following myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and T-cell replete haploidentical bone marrow transplantation (haplo-BMT). We report herein our interim analysis of our first three cohorts PT-CY (mg/kg)/PT-BEN (mg/m2): 40/20, 20/60, and 0/90. All patients have tolerated PT-CY/BEN well with no dose limiting toxicities. Compared to contemporaneous controls undergoing haplo-BMT with the same MAC regimens but only PT-CY, we have observed earlier trilineage engraftment (P = .002 neutrophils, P = .014 platelets) and a lower incidence of cytomegalovirus reactivation (P = .016) in the PT-CY/BEN cohorts. After substituting day +4 PT-CY with PT-BEN, the registered trial (www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02996773) is proceeding to replace day +3 PT-CY with PT-BEN with a view to identifying further evidence on the potential advantages of PT-BEN.Entities:
Keywords: haploidentical BMT; myeloablative; posttransplant bendamustine
Year: 2020 PMID: 35847727 PMCID: PMC9176108 DOI: 10.1002/jha2.20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EJHaem ISSN: 2688-6146
Phase I/Ib trial of PT‐bendamustine
| Day +3 | Day +4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort # | CY mg/kg | BEN, mg/m2 | CY, mg/kg | BEN, mg/m2 |
| 1 | 50 | 0 | 40 | 20 |
| 2 | 50 | 0 | 20 | 60 |
| 3 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 90 |
| 4 | 40 | 20 | 0 | 90 |
| 5 | 20 | 60 | 0 | 90 |
| 6 | 0 | 90 | 0 | 90 |
| Phase Ib | 0 | 90 | 0 | 90 |
Patient, disease, and transplant characteristics
| PT‐CY/BEN (n = 9) | PT‐CY (n = 8) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, median year (range) | 21.4 (9.2‐42.9) | 30.7 (16.8‐44.6) | .11 |
| Male gender, n (%) | 5 (55.6) | 6 (75) | .62 |
| Race/ethnicity, n (%) | .99 | ||
| White Hispanic | 5 (55.5) | 4 (50) | |
| Native American | 0 | 0 | |
| African American | 1 (11.1) | 2 (25) | |
| White | 3 (33.3) | 2 (25) | |
| Diagnosis, n (%) | .58 | ||
| B‐ALL | 4 (55.6) | 3 (37.5) | |
| T‐ALL | 1 (11.1) | 1 (12.5) | |
| AML | 1 (11.1) | 1 (12.5) | |
| Bi/Un‐AL | 1 (11.1) | 1 (12.5) | |
| CML | 1 (11.1) | 2 (25) | |
| NHL | 1 (11.1) | 0 (0) | |
| Pretransplant status, n (%) | .99 | ||
| CR1 | 3 (33.3) | 2 (25) | |
| CR2 | 2 (22.2) | 3 (37.5) | |
| >CR2 | 2 (22.2) | 1 (12.5) | |
| Other | 2 (22.2) | 2 (25) | |
| Disease risk index, n (%) | .99 | ||
| Low | 1 (11.1) | 1 (12.5) | |
| Intermediate | 8 (88.9) | 7 (87.5) | |
| High | 0 | 0 | |
| Lansky/Karnofsky, median (range) | 90 (60‐100) | 90 (50‐100) | .99 |
| HCT comorbidity index, median (range) | 0 (0‐4) | 1.5 (0‐4) | .11 |
| Conditioning, n (%) | .99 | ||
| TBI‐FLU | 5 (55.5) | 4 (50) | |
| BU‐FLU‐MEL | 4 (44.4) | 4 (50) | |
| BMT service | .64 | ||
| Pediatric | 6 (66.7) | 4 (50) | |
| Adult | 3 (33.3) | 4 (50) | |
| Graft composition median (range) | .07 | ||
| CD34+ × 106/kg | 4.05 (2.1‐7.4) | 2.70 (1.5‐4.8) | |
| RBC incompatibility, n (%) | .64 | ||
| None | 4 (44.4) | 5 (62.5) | |
| Major | 4 (44.4) | 3 (37.5) | |
| Minor | 1 (11.1) | 0 (0) | |
| Donor age, median year, (range) | 27 (17.9‐57.6) | 37.7 (20.9‐62.4) | .74 |
| Donors of male recipients, n (%) | .18 | ||
| Mother | 1 (20) | 2 (33.3) | |
| Father | 2 (40) | 0 (0) | |
| Sister | 1 (20) | 1 (16.6) | |
| Brother | 0 | 3 (50) | |
| Son | 1 (20) | 0 | |
| Donors of female recipients, n (%) | .47 | ||
| Mother | 2 (50) | 0 | |
| Father | 0 | 1 (50) | |
| Sister | 1 (25) | 0 | |
| Brother | 1 (25) | 1 (50) | |
| Donors match, n (%) | .13 | ||
| 5/10 | 8 (88.9) | 4 (50) | |
| 6/10 | 0 | 3 (37.5) | |
| 7/10 | 1 (11.1) | 1 (12.5) | |
Abbreviations: ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; BEN, bendamustine; Bi/U, bispecific or undifferentiated acute leukemia; BU, busulfan; CML, chronic myeloid leukemia; CR, complete remission; CY, cyclophosphamide; FLU, fludarabine; MEL, melphalan; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; NHL, non‐Hodgkin lymphoma; Tacro, Tacrolimus; TBI, total body irradiation.
It includes one half‐sibling.
FIGURE 1A, Time to an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of 1 × 109/L. Median time PT‐CY, 17 days; Cohort #1, 16 days (P = .14); Cohort #2, 14 days (P = .0004); Cohort 3, 13 days, (P = .0005). B, Time to a platelet count of 20 × 109/L. Median time PT‐CY, 33 days; Cohort #1, 27 days (P = .18); Cohort #2, 17 days (P = .0007); Cohort #3, 20 days (P = 0.07). C, Number of units of platelets transfused. Median PT‐CY, 16.5 units; Cohort #1, 14 units, (P = n.s.); Cohort #2, 5 units (P = .05); Cohort #3, 6 units, (P = n.s.). D, Number of units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) transfused. Median PT‐CY, 4 units; Cohort #1, 0 units (P = n.s.); Cohort #2, 1 unit (P = .07); Cohort #3, 0 units (P = .03). E, Cumulative incidence of grades II‐IV acute graft‐versus‐host disease (aGvHD); (P = n.s.). F, Cumulative incidence of grades III‐IV aGvHD; (P = n.s.). G, Cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD; (P = n.s.). H, Cumulative incidence of CMV viremia; (P = .016). I, Overall survival (OS); (P = n.s.) J, Progression‐free survival (PFS); (P = n.s.) K, Graft‐versus‐host‐free‐relapse‐free survival (GRFS); (P = n.s.). L, Chronic graft‐versus‐host‐free‐relapse‐free survival (CRFS); (P = n.s.).
CMV reactivation following haplo‐BMT
| PT‐CY/BEN | PT‐CY |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMV status recipient/donor, n (%) | |||
| R+/D+ | 1/4 (25) | 3/4(75) | .49 |
| R+/D− | 0/4 (0) | 2/2 (100) | .06 |
| R−/D+ | 0/0 (0) | 0/1 (50) | .99 |
| Total/at risk | 1/8 (12.5) | 5/7 (71.4) | .04 |
| R−/D− | 0/1(0) | 0/1 (0) |
|