| Literature DB >> 35847619 |
Razak M Gyasi1,2, Siaw Frimpong3, Richard Bruce Lamptey4, Gilbert Kwabena Amoako5, Gershim Asiki1, Anokye M Adam3.
Abstract
Background: Physical activity (PA) is a vital modifiable psychosocial intervention for promoting healthy longevity but problematically decreases with age. Innovative community-based strategies are recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) to improve PA but prior research has seldom considered the interactive effect of financial inclusion, social networks, and sex differences on PA. In this study, we examine the role of sex differences and resourceful social networks in relation to the association of financial inclusion with PA among older Ghanaian people.Entities:
Keywords: Financial inclusion; Ghana; Healthy longevity; Older people; Physical activity; Social networks
Year: 2022 PMID: 35847619 PMCID: PMC9284389 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09901
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Flow diagram showing an overview of the study inclusion/exclusion process.
Descriptive characteristics of the study sample.
| M (±SD) | Valid N (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Variables | ||
| Age (in years) | 66.15 (11.85) | |
| Sex (women) | 759 (63.3) | |
| Residence (urban) | 660 (55.0) | |
| Marital status (not married/partnered) | 679 (56.6) | |
| Educational level | 1034 (86.2) | |
| None or Primary | 104 (8.7) | |
| Secondary | 62 (5.2) | |
| Tertiary | 667 (55.6) | |
| Employment (not employed) | ||
| Income (in Ghana Cedis) | 308.18 (338.89) | |
| Self-rated health | ||
| Very good/excellent | 239 (19.9) | |
| Good | 369 (30.8) | |
| Fair | 348 (29.0) | |
| Poor | 244 (20.3) | |
| Social networks score | 6.10 (2.68) | |
| PA score | 9.03 (4.41) | |
| Chronic disease count | 1.67 (0.79) | |
| Psychological distress score | 14.87 (6.21) | |
| Functional impairment score | 13.70 (5.09) | |
| Financial inclusion score | 1.91 (1.79) | |
Note: M – mean; SD – standard deviation; N – valid frequency; PA – physical activity.
Exchange rate: $1 ∼ ¢4.8 as of the time of data collection.
Correlations of PA with independent variables included in the regression analysis.
| Variable | PA score |
|---|---|
| Physical activity score | 1 |
| Functional impairment score | −.399∗∗∗ |
| Age (in years) | −.309∗∗∗ |
| Sex | .164∗∗∗ |
| Rural residence | −.081∗∗∗ |
| Marital status | −.255∗∗ |
| Higher education | .023 |
| Employment | .275∗∗∗ |
| Income level (in Ghana Cedis) | .132∗∗∗ |
| Self-rated health | −.309∗∗∗ |
| Social networks score | −.089∗∗ |
| Chronic disease count | −.218∗∗∗ |
| Psychological distress score | −.156∗∗∗ |
| Financial inclusion score | .127∗∗∗ |
Note: PA – physical activity.
Pearson product-moment correlations were used to calculate the association between continuous variables, point-biserial correlations were used to assess the relationship between continuous and dichotomous variables, and phi correlations were used to assess the relationship between dichotomous variables.
∗∗p < .001; ∗∗∗p < .005.
Multivariable linear regressions predicting PA with a composite score of financial inclusion.
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (SE) | (SE) | (SE) | ||||
| Age | −.036∗∗∗ | (.007) | −.036∗∗∗ | (.007) | ||
| Sex (ref: Males) | ||||||
| Females | −.115 | (.163) | −.065 | (.184) | ||
| Residence (ref: rural) | ||||||
| Urban | −.588∗∗∗ | (.151) | −.601∗∗∗ | (.162) | ||
| Marital status (Married) | ||||||
| Not married | −.704∗∗∗ | (.161) | −.689∗∗∗ | (.162) | ||
| Education (ref: Primary/none) | ||||||
| Secondary | −.335 | (.265) | −.336 | (.266) | ||
| Higher | −.782∗ | (.318) | −.798∗ | (.319) | ||
| Employment (ref: unemployed) | ||||||
| Employed | .374∗ | (.155) | .381∗ | (.155) | ||
| Income | .481∗∗ | (.185) | .479∗ | (.185) | ||
| Social networks | −.287∗ | (.150) | −.324∗ | (.164) | ||
| Self-rated health (ref: Very good) | ||||||
| Good | −.079 | (.212) | −.082 | (.213) | ||
| Fair | −.262 | (.214) | −.266 | (.215) | ||
| Poor | −1.220∗∗∗ | (.251) | −1.234∗∗∗ | (.252) | ||
| Comorbidities | −.253∗ | (.099) | −.250∗ | (.099) | ||
| Psychological distress score | −.349∗ | (.149) | −.350 | (.150) | ||
| Financial inclusion (0–8; higher values indicating higher levels) | .190 | (023)∗∗∗ | .308∗∗ | (.163) | .341∗ | (.180) |
| Financial inclusion × sex | −.202 | (.351) | ||||
| Financial inclusion × social networks | .151∗∗∗ | (.314) | ||||
| Constant | 2.715∗∗∗ (.061) | 2.457∗∗∗ (.487) | 2.426∗∗∗(.491) | |||
| Adjusted R2 | .035 | .292 | .303 | |||
PA – physical activity; Beta-Coefficients are reported; Cluster-robust standard errors in parentheses.
Model 1 was the unadjusted model which contained the financial inclusion variable only. Model 2 was adjusted for age (in years), sex, rural/urban residence, marital status, educational status, employment status, income levels, social networks, self-rated health, chronic disease count, and psychological distress score. Model 3 added the interaction terms (financial inclusion × sex; financial inclusion × social networks).
∗∗∗p < .001; ∗∗p < .005; ∗p < .05.
Figure 2Simple slope test on the specific moderating effect of social networks. Social networks strengthen the positive association of financial inclusion with physical activity.
Multivariable linear regressions predicting PA with composite financial inclusion: Age-stratified analysis.
| 50-64 age group | ≥65 age group | |
|---|---|---|
| Potential confounders | √ | √ |
| Financial inclusion (0–8; higher values indicating higher levels of financial inclusion) | .180∗ | .413∗∗ |
| (.268) | (.216) | |
| Constant | 2.619∗ | 1.168∗∗ |
| (1.543) | (.927) | |
| Adjusted R2 | .361 | .166 |
PA – physical activity; Beta-Coefficients are reported; Cluster-robust standard errors in parentheses.
All models were adjusted for age (in years), sex, rural/urban residence, marital status, educational status, employment status, and income levels, social networks, self-rated health, chronic disease count, and psychological distress score.
∗∗p < .005; ∗p < .05.
Multivariable linear regressions predicting PA with specific financial inclusion instruments.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Withdrawal of money from a bank | .253 | |||||||
| Ownership of a bank account | .392∗∗ | |||||||
| Use of automatic teller machine card | .653∗ | |||||||
| Ownership of a credit union | .807∗∗∗ | |||||||
| Ownership of “susu” account | .237 | |||||||
| Access to loan from financial institution | −.491∗ | |||||||
| Ownership of Mobile Money account | .298∗ | |||||||
| Having active NHIS card | .010 | |||||||
| Potential confounders | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| Constant | 2.558∗∗∗ | 2.576∗∗∗ | 2.820∗∗∗ | 2.687∗∗∗ | 2.682∗∗∗ | 2.689∗∗∗ | 2.476∗∗∗ | 2.674∗∗∗ |
| Adjusted R2 | .291 | .294 | .293 | .301 | .290 | .293 | .292 | .288 |
PA – physical activity; Beta-Coefficients are reported with cluster-robust standard errors in parentheses.
All Models were adjusted for theoretically relevant confounders (√): age, sex, rural/urban residence, educational level, employment status, living arrangement, social networks score, self-rated health, psychological distress, and chronic conditions.
∗∗∗p < .001; ∗∗p < .005; ∗p < .05.