Literature DB >> 35847578

Dexamethasone does not affect endolymphatic hydrops (EH) in patients with Meniere's disease within 24 h, and intratympanic administration of gadolinium plus dexamethasone simplifies high-quality imaging of EH using a novel protocol of 7 min.

Jing Zou1,2, Zikai Zhao1, Hongbin Li1, Guoping Zhang1, Qing Zhang1, Jianping Lu3, Ilmari Pyykkö4.   

Abstract

Background: Intratympanic administration of gadolinium chelate allows for a better visualization of endolymphatic hydrops (EH) using MRI than intravenous injection and was recently further improved to facilitate high-quality imaging of EH in 7 min. The aim of the present study was to simplify the intratympanic administration protocol by mixing gadolinium chelate with therapeutic dexamethasone and to evaluate the effects of this mixture on the visualization of EH in MRI. Materials and methods: In an in vitro study, the potential impact of gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) on the stability of dexamethasone was evaluated by analyzing dynamic changes in dexamethasone with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) after mixing with Gd-DTPA. Ten patients with definite Meniere's disease (MD) were recruited to study the potential interference of dexamethasone on MRI visualization of EH, and 49 patients with MD were recruited to evaluate the effect of intratympanic injection of Gd-DTPA mixed with dexamethasone on MRI of EH using a 3T MR machine and a novel heavily T2-weighted 3-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery reconstructed using a magnitude plus zero-filled interpolation (hT2FLAIR-MZFI) sequence.
Results: The retention times and peak area of dexamethasone in HPLC were not modified by the addition of Gd-DTPA. EH grading in the cochlea and vestibule was not influenced in any ear by intratympanic injection of dexamethasone. Excellent inner ear images were obtained from all patients, and EHs with various grades were displayed. There were significant correlations between diagnosis and cochlear EH (p < 0.01, Spearman's Rho), between diagnosis and vestibular EH (p < 0.01, Spearman's Rho), and between cochlear and vestibular EH (p < 0.01, Spearman's Rho). The distribution of Gd-DTPA plus dexamethasone negatively correlated with the grade of vestibular EH. Injury of the endolymph-perilymph barrier was detected in one cochlea and three vestibules of 59 inner ears with MD. Conclusions: Intratympanic administration of Gd-DTPA plus dexamethasone yielded high-quality MRI images of EH in patients with MD using a novel 7-min protocol and simplified the clinical application. Intratympanic administration of Gd-DTPA plus dexamethasone might be used to test its therapeutic effect in future work. Level of evidence: 3.
© 2022 PLA General Hospital Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Production and hosting by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contrast agent; Endolymphatic hydrops; MRI; Meniere's disease; Therapeutics; Topical administration

Year:  2022        PMID: 35847578      PMCID: PMC9270566          DOI: 10.1016/j.joto.2022.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Otol        ISSN: 1672-2930


Background

Intratympanic administration of gadolinium chelate allows for a better visualization of endolymphatic hydrops (EH) using MRI than intravenous injection with respect to the uptake of contrast agents in the inner ear and potential adverse effects but adds extra work for the otologist (Naganawa et al., 2019; Nakashima et al., 2007; Pyykko et al., 2010; Zou et al., 2005). Intravenous injection of gadolinium chelate has been favored by both radiologists and otologists due to the convenience of the procedure, which is usually performed by a nurse. However, the general low concentration of gadolinium chelate in the perilymph of the inner ear reduced the diagnostic accuracy of EH even though the MRI method was improved several times (Naganawa et al., 2010, 2013, 2019; Ohashi et al., 2020). The application of intravenous injection of gadolinium chelate might be limited for patients with renal diseases due to potential complications such as nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (Pyykko et al., 2010). Intratympanic injection of corticosteroids has become a treatment option for Meniere's disease (MD) given its shortage of adverse effects and relatively good vertigo control without compromising hearing when compared with ablative treatments, such as the use of gentamicin (Basura et al., 2020; Boleas-Aguirre et al., 2008; Clyde et al., 2017; Patel et al., 2016). Intratympanic injection of dexamethasone resulted in higher perilymph steroid levels in the inner ear of animals than did intravenous injection, with variations among species (Chandrasekhar et al., 2000; Wang et al., 2011). If gadolinium chelate is included in therapeutic agents such as dexamethasone and applied intratympanically, the procedure for detecting EH using MRI will be significantly simplified while guaranteeing sufficient uploading of contrast agents in the inner ear. There is a potential that the anti-inflammatory effect of intratympanic injection of glucocorticoid steroids could influence EH because EH may be induced by inflammation and consequential modification of the blood-endolymph barrier (Zou et al., 2007). It was reported that intratympanic injection of dexamethasone reduced EH in patients with MD after one month, as evaluated by electrocochleography (Martin-Sanz et al., 2015). An in vitro study on the semicircular canal duct epithelium of rats indicated that therapeutic glucocorticoids, including dexamethasone, stimulated cation absorption via epithelial sodium channels in the vestibular system (Pondugula et al., 2004). An in vivo study measuring mRNA levels in the cochlea of mice showed that intratympanic injection of prednisolone and dexamethasone upregulated inflammatory cytokine genes as well as ion homeostasis genes in the cochlea and that the upregulation peaked at 6 h (MacArthur et al., 2015). However, the clinical relevance and mechanism of these findings are unknown, and the inner ears of patients with MD may respond differently. We recently reported a novel sensitive heavily T2-weighted 3-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery reconstructed using magnitude plus zero-filled interpolation (hT2FLAIR-MZFI) sequence, to demonstrate strong and homogenous enhancement by minimum gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) in the inner ear (including the apex). The hT2FLAIR-MZFI yielded high-quality images with sharp borders between the endolymph and perilymph (Zou et al., 2021b). The present study aimed to analyze the potential interference of intratympanically administered dexamethasone on EH in patients with MD observed by MRI with the novel technique and test the hypothesis that EH could be evaluated by MRI after intratympanic injection of Gd-DTPA plus dexamethasone. The results of this study may also provide information on the passage of steroids from the middle ear into the inner ear and predict the therapeutic effect.

Materials and methods

In vitro study

Potential impact of Gd-DTPA on the stability of dexamethasone

In principle, the behavior of dexamethasone in chromatography would be modified if it interacts with Gd-DTPA. Therefore, dynamic changes in the retention time and peak area of dexamethasone in high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) were analyzed after mixing with Gd-DTPA as follows: Gd-DTPA (500 mmol/L, Beijing Beilu Pharmaceutical CO., LTD, Beijing, China) was diluted 20-fold using sodium chloride injection (0.9% w/v, China Otsuka Pharmaceutical CO., LTD, Tianjin, China). Dexamethasone (5 mg, Ma An Shan Fengyuan Pharmaceutical CO., LTD, Anhui Province, China) was recovered by 0.5 mL of the abovementioned diluted Gd-DTPA, which resulted in a concentration of 10 mg/ml. For HPLC analysis, the mixtures were further diluted 8-fold using sodium chloride injection and stored at ambient temperature for 0, 24, 48, and 72 h before the measurements. The control dexamethasone sample was prepared by recovering dexamethasone with a 0.5-ml sodium chloride injection (10 mg/mL) and was further diluted 8-fold using sodium chloride injection for HPLC analysis. Gd-DTPA diluted 20-fold was used as a control Gd-DTPA sample. Three repeats were prepared for each sample. Five microliters of the abovementioned final diluted samples was added to a chromatographic column (Agilent XDB-C18, 5 μm 250 × 4.6 mm, Agilent Technologies, Inc., California, USA), which was installed in an HPLC (Ultimate 3000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germering, Germany). The column temperature was 25 °C, and acetonitrile/0.1% phosphoric acid at a ratio of 30/70 (v/v%) was selected as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.62 mL/min. The analyte was monitored spectrophotometrically at 242 nm.

In vivo studies

Participants

The clinical studies were carried out in accordance with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) for experiments involving humans with a subsequent update (2014), and the protocol was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of Shanghai Changhai Hospital (CHEC 2020–107). All participants provided written informed consent. The inclusion criteria were definite or probable MD during interphase diagnosed according to the criteria of the Barany Society in 2015 (Lopez-Escamez et al., 2015). The exclusion criteria were as follows: vertigo with other origins, such as benign paroxysmal positional vertigo and diseases in the central nervous system. In total, 59 patients (aged 30–77 years, average age 51.6 years; 26 males and 34 females) who visited author JZ at the Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, during the period from November 2020 to June 2021 were assigned to two groups. Among them, 10 patients (9 unilateral and 1 bilateral) with definite MD were assigned to the clinical study on the potential interference of intratympanically administered dexamethasone on EH of patients with MD observed by MRI, and 49 patients with definite (39) or probable (10) MD (40 unilateral and 9 bilateral sides) were assigned to the clinical study to evaluate EH after intratympanic injection of Gd-DTPA plus dexamethasone. Patients were assigned to the two different clinical study groups according to the time of their visit.

Potential impact of dexamethasone on the visualization of EH within 24 h in MD

Gd-DTPA was diluted 20-fold with sodium chloride injection (v/v 1:19), and 0.1 ml of the solution was injected onto the posterior upper surface of the tympanic medial wall of both ears using a specifically designed catheter passing through the perforated tympanic membrane in each patient according to the previously reported procedure (Zou et al., 2018; Zou et al., 2019; Zou J et al., 2018). The perforation closed immediately after penetration, and the catheter was inserted through the tiny sanguineous edge of the trauma. The first MRI was performed 24 h after the intratympanic injection of Gd-DTPA, and then 0.1 ml of dexamethasone (10 mg/ml) was delivered to the ear presenting with EH using the same procedure as Gd-DTPA. A second MRI was performed 24 h after intratympanic administration of dexamethasone in 9 patients and 60 h after intratympanic injection of dexamethasone in 1 patient (Table 1).
Table 1

Protocol for the in vivo studies.

StudyInjection 1Injection 2MRI 1MRI 2
Dexamethasone interference#Gd-DTPADexamethasone$24 h48 h@
Gd-DTPA & dexamethasoneGd-DTPA & dexamethasone24 h

Potential interference of dexamethasone on visualization of endolymphatic hydrops (EH) in patients with Meniere's disease (MD).

EH demonstrated by MRI after intratympanic injection of Gd-DTPA mixed with dexamethasone.

Performed immediately after MRI 1.

Performed 60 h post injection 2 in 1 patient.

Protocol for the in vivo studies. Potential interference of dexamethasone on visualization of endolymphatic hydrops (EH) in patients with Meniere's disease (MD). EH demonstrated by MRI after intratympanic injection of Gd-DTPA mixed with dexamethasone. Performed immediately after MRI 1. Performed 60 h post injection 2 in 1 patient.

EH observed by MRI after intratympanic injection of Gd-DTPA plus dexamethasone

The aim of the study was to realize the conclusion drawn from the above study that intratympanic dexamethasone did not influence EH detection by MRI. Therefore, dexamethasone was mixed with Gd-DTPA for MRI. The mixture of dexamethasone and Gd-DTPA was prepared as follows. Gd-DTPA was diluted 20-fold using the abovementioned protocol (v/v 1:19). Dexamethasone powder was recovered using 0.5 ml of diluted Gd-DTPA, and 0.1 ml of the mixture was injected onto the posterior upper surface of the tympanic medial wall of the middle ear on the diseased side as mentioned above. MRI was performed 24 h later (Table 1).

MRI measurement

MRI was performed 24 h post-intratympanic injection of a mixture of dexamethasone and Gd-DTPA using a 3T MR machine (Skyra, Siemens, Munich, Germany) equipped with a 20-channel head/neck coil (Siemens, Munich, Germany). The inner ear was imaged using T2-sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using a flip angle evolution (SPACE) sequence to detect potential inner ear fibrosis or vestibular schwannoma and using heavily T2-weighted 3-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery reconstructed using magnitude plus zero-filled interpolation (hT2FLAIR-MZFI) sequence to display EH with the same parameters as a previous report (Zou et al., 2021a).

Image analysis

All images were sent to an advanced workstation (Leonardo, Siemens Healthcare, Germany) for further analysis by author JZ, who has more than 21 years of experience in inner ear imaging (Zou et al., 2000, 2003). A full set of images covering the cochlea and vestibule was inspected to evaluate the inner ear distribution of gadolinium together with dexamethasone. The cross-sectional slices of the cochlea and vestibule that displayed the structures of interest were selected for image analysis reporting EH. Based on morphological changes as reported in the literature, EH in the cochlea was graded using a 3-stage scale method, and EH in the vestibule was graded using a 4-stage scale method (Bernaerts et al., 2019). The criteria of grading EH were previously described in detail (Table 2) (Zou et al., 2021a), and the criterion in the cochlea was modified as follows: when EH exists in both the basal and second turns to various degrees, the cochlear turn with more severe EH will be chosen for grading. EH in the cochlear apex was graded as 0 (no hydrops) or 1 (obvious hydrops that formed an invaginated arc). ImageJ (version 1.51j8) software was applied to evaluate vestibular EH using the ratio of the area of vestibular endolymphatic space to the total vestibular fluid space for comparison with the abovementioned 4-stage scale method (Nakashima et al., 2009). In addition, suspected injury of the endolymph-perilymph barrier was defined when merged bright images of endolymphatic and perilymphatic compartments appeared in the cochlea and/or vestibule.
Table 2

Grading endolymphatic hydrops in the cochlea and vestibule of Meniere's disease on MRI.

LocationGrade of endolymphatic hydrops
0: normal1: mild hydrops2: marked hydrops3: extreme hydrops
CochleaThe interscalar septum, the scala tympani, and scala vestibuli are recognizable with the scala media normally minimally visible.The scala media becomes nodular black area with narrow scala vestibuli.The scala vestibuli becomes totally invisible.Not applicable.
VestibuleThe smaller saccule and larger utricle are visibly separated and occupy less than half of the surface of the vestibule.The saccule becomes equal to or larger than the utricle but is not yet merged with the utricle.The saccule merges with the utricle, and the surrounding perilymphatic space appears as a bright peripheral rim.The perilymphatic enhancement of the vestibule is no longer visible.
Grading endolymphatic hydrops in the cochlea and vestibule of Meniere's disease on MRI.

Statistical analysis

IBM SPSS 27 software was used for statistical analysis. For the in vivo study on the potential impact of dexamethasone on the visualization of EH, the ratio of the area of endolymphatic space to the vestibular fluid space among patients with various degrees of vestibular EH based on morphological criteria in MRI images acquired before dexamethasone injection was compared using analysis of variance. The ratio of the area of endolymphatic space to the vestibular fluid space in the same patient in MRI obtained before and after dexamethasone injection was compared using a paired sample t-test. Correlations between the grade of vestibular EH using a 4-stage scale method and the ratio of the area of endolymphatic space to the vestibular fluid space were analyzed using Spearman's rho test. For the in vivo study on EH observed by MRI after intratympanic injection of Gd-DTPA plus dexamethasone, the degrees of EH in the cochlea and vestibule were compared among definite MD, probable MD, and non-symptomatic ears using Spearman's rho test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

In general, all patients tolerated the intratympanic injection very well. Transient vertigo was experienced by very few patients immediately after the injection and improved without any treatment. There was no perforation left on the tympanic membrane in any patient during the follow-up.

HPLC of dexamethasone in the appearance of Gd-DTPA

As shown in Fig. 1 and Table 3, under the abovementioned chromatographic conditions, the mean retention time of dexamethasone was 5.6 min, with a mean peak area of 18486 mAU2. A minor peak also appeared at a mean time of 3.8 min. The mean retention time of Gd-DTPA was 2.1 min. The retention times of dexamethasone and Gd-DTPA were not significantly modified by mixing the two compounds within the observation period of 72 h. The peak area of dexamethasone was insignificantly modified by the addition of Gd-DTPA during the observation period of 72 h.
Fig. 1

Representative high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) chromatogram of dexamethasone with and without Gd-DTPA.

Table 3

Retention times of dexamethasone and Gd-DTPA and peak area of dexamethasone in high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).

GroupsnTime (min) (mean ± SD)
Area (mAU2) (mean ± SD)
Dex-majorDex-minorGd-DTPA
Dex + PS35.553 ± 0.0023.837 ± 0.00218485.733 ± 12.675
Dex + PS + Gd-035.551 ± 0.0023.838 ± 0.0012.182 ± 0.00118889.800 ± 4.928
Dex + PS + Gd-2435.548 ± 0.0043.836 ± 0.0022.183 ± 0.00118924.167 ± 0.351
Dex + PS + Gd-4835.549 ± 0.0083.837 ± 0.0042.182 ± 0.00118912.200 ± 19.992
Dex + PS + Gd-7235.545 ± 0.1343.838 ± 0.0062.181 ± 0.00218914.067 ± 6.830
Gd + PS32.133 ± 0.001

Dex + PS: dexamethasone recovered by sodium chloride injection (physiological saline); Dex + PS + Gd-0: dexamethasone recovered by 20-fold diluted Gd-DTPA without storage time; Dex + PS + Gd-24: dexamethasone recovered by 20-fold diluted Gd-DTPA and stored at ambient temperature for 24 h; Dex + PS + Gd-48: dexamethasone recovered by 20-fold diluted Gd-DTPA and stored at ambient temperature for 48 h; Dex + PS + Gd-72: dexamethasone recovered by 20-fold diluted Gd-DTPA and stored at ambient temperature for 72 h; Gd + PS: Gd-DTPA was 20-fold diluted using physiological saline; mAU: mean arbitrary unit.

Representative high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) chromatogram of dexamethasone with and without Gd-DTPA. Retention times of dexamethasone and Gd-DTPA and peak area of dexamethasone in high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Dex + PS: dexamethasone recovered by sodium chloride injection (physiological saline); Dex + PS + Gd-0: dexamethasone recovered by 20-fold diluted Gd-DTPA without storage time; Dex + PS + Gd-24: dexamethasone recovered by 20-fold diluted Gd-DTPA and stored at ambient temperature for 24 h; Dex + PS + Gd-48: dexamethasone recovered by 20-fold diluted Gd-DTPA and stored at ambient temperature for 48 h; Dex + PS + Gd-72: dexamethasone recovered by 20-fold diluted Gd-DTPA and stored at ambient temperature for 72 h; Gd + PS: Gd-DTPA was 20-fold diluted using physiological saline; mAU: mean arbitrary unit.

Dexamethasone and visualization of EH within 24 h in MD

Twenty-four hours after the intratympanic injection of Gd-DTPA without dexamethasone, excellent enhancements of the perilymphatic spaces in both the cochlea and vestibule were achieved, and EH was demonstrated (Fig. 2, Fig. 3). Various grades of EH were detected in 9/11 cochleae of patients with MD using a 3-stage method based on morphological changes (Bernaerts et al., 2019; Zou et al., 2021a). EH in the cochlear apex was detected in 7 of 11 ears with MD but not in the contralateral ears. In the vestibule, EH was detected in all 11 cases evaluated using a 4-stage scale method based on morphological changes (Bernaerts et al., 2019; Zou et al., 2021a). However, using the ratio of the area of endolymphatic space to the vestibular fluid space, vestibular EH was identified in only 9/11 ears evaluated (Nakashima et al., 2009). There was a tendency for the grade of vestibular EH using a 4-stage scale method to correlate with the ratio of the area of endolymphatic space to the vestibular fluid space (p = 0.063, Spearman's rho).
Fig. 2

Dynamics of endolymphatic hydrops of a patient with definite Meniere's disease on the left side after intratympanic administration of Gd-DTPA interfered with by intratympanic dexamethasone. The first MRI was performed 24 h postintratympanic injection of 20-fold diluted Gd-DTPA, followed by intratympanic administration of dexamethasone (10 mg/mL). The second MRI was performed 24 h after dexamethasone administration. The contrast effect of Gd-DTPA in the inner ear was imaged using the hT2FLAIR-MZFI sequence (A, B, D, E-G, I, J). Before dexamethasone administration (Pre-Dex), grade 2 endolymphatic hydrops (2) was detected in the left cochlea (F), grade 3 endolymphatic hydrops (3) was demonstrated in the vestibule, and the right cochlea (A) and vestibule (B) were normal. Twenty-four hours post injection of dexamethasone (Post-Dex), EH was not modified in either the cochlea (I) or the vestibule (J) on the left side, and the cochlea and the vestibule remained normal on the right side (D, E). Signal intensity significantly decayed in the hydropic inner ear on the second MRI (I, J) compared to the first MRI (F, G). Fibrosis in the inner ear was ruled out by MRI with the SPACE sequence (C, H). 1st: the basal turn; 2nd: the second turn; Sa: saccule; Ut: utricle. Scale bars = 3.0 mm.

Fig. 3

Dynamics of endolymphatic hydrops in the left ear of a patient with definite Meniere's disease after intratympanic administration of Gd-DTPA interfered by intratympanic dexamethasone (60 h). The first MRI was performed 24 h postintratympanic injection of 20-fold diluted Gd-DTPA, followed by intratympanic administration of dexamethasone (10 mg/mL). The second MRI was performed 60 h after dexamethasone administration. The contrast effect of Gd-DTPA in the inner ear was imaged using the hT2FLAIR-MZFI sequence. EH grading in neither the cochlea (A, B) nor the apex (C, D) nor the vestibule (E, F) on the left side was modified 60 h after intratympanic injection of dexamethasone (60 h) compared to the predexamethasone injection (Pre-Dex). EHa: endolymphatic hydrops in the cochlear apex; 2: grade 2 endolymphatic hydrops in the cochlea; 3: grade 3 endolymphatic hydrops in the vestibule. Scale bars = 3.0 mm.

Dynamics of endolymphatic hydrops of a patient with definite Meniere's disease on the left side after intratympanic administration of Gd-DTPA interfered with by intratympanic dexamethasone. The first MRI was performed 24 h postintratympanic injection of 20-fold diluted Gd-DTPA, followed by intratympanic administration of dexamethasone (10 mg/mL). The second MRI was performed 24 h after dexamethasone administration. The contrast effect of Gd-DTPA in the inner ear was imaged using the hT2FLAIR-MZFI sequence (A, B, D, E-G, I, J). Before dexamethasone administration (Pre-Dex), grade 2 endolymphatic hydrops (2) was detected in the left cochlea (F), grade 3 endolymphatic hydrops (3) was demonstrated in the vestibule, and the right cochlea (A) and vestibule (B) were normal. Twenty-four hours post injection of dexamethasone (Post-Dex), EH was not modified in either the cochlea (I) or the vestibule (J) on the left side, and the cochlea and the vestibule remained normal on the right side (D, E). Signal intensity significantly decayed in the hydropic inner ear on the second MRI (I, J) compared to the first MRI (F, G). Fibrosis in the inner ear was ruled out by MRI with the SPACE sequence (C, H). 1st: the basal turn; 2nd: the second turn; Sa: saccule; Ut: utricle. Scale bars = 3.0 mm. Dynamics of endolymphatic hydrops in the left ear of a patient with definite Meniere's disease after intratympanic administration of Gd-DTPA interfered by intratympanic dexamethasone (60 h). The first MRI was performed 24 h postintratympanic injection of 20-fold diluted Gd-DTPA, followed by intratympanic administration of dexamethasone (10 mg/mL). The second MRI was performed 60 h after dexamethasone administration. The contrast effect of Gd-DTPA in the inner ear was imaged using the hT2FLAIR-MZFI sequence. EH grading in neither the cochlea (A, B) nor the apex (C, D) nor the vestibule (E, F) on the left side was modified 60 h after intratympanic injection of dexamethasone (60 h) compared to the predexamethasone injection (Pre-Dex). EHa: endolymphatic hydrops in the cochlear apex; 2: grade 2 endolymphatic hydrops in the cochlea; 3: grade 3 endolymphatic hydrops in the vestibule. Scale bars = 3.0 mm. Twenty-four hours after the intratympanic injection of dexamethasone, a decrease in the signal intensity ratio of enhancement occurred in both the cochlear and vestibular perilymph. However, EH remained the same grade in the cochlea, including the apex, compared to that without dexamethasone intervention. Grades in the vestibular EH did not change in all ears evaluated using either a 4-stage scale method or the semiquantitative method by analyzing the ratio of the area of endolymphatic space to the vestibular fluid space (Fig. 2) (Table 4). Grading of EH in both the cochlea and vestibule was not modified even 60 h after intratympanic injection of dexamethasone (Fig. 3).
Table 4

Endolymphatic hydrops detected by MRI 24 h postintratympanic Gd-DTPA and after interference with intratympanic injection of dexamethasone.

PatientEH-Coch
EHa
EH-Vest
VestRatio$
BefAftBefAftBefAftBefAft
12211330.5180.570
2∗2211330.5780.539
31100220.4740.388
42211330.6600.713
51111220.1970.252
62211330.7530.743
7L#0011220.6020.343
7R#2200330.5220.595
80000220.2740.365
91111330.3950.526
101100220.3830.364

Aft: after intratympanic administration of dexamethasone; Bef: before intratympanic injection of dexamethasone; EHa: endolymphatic hydrops in the cochlear apex; EH-Coch: EH in the cochlea; EH-Vest: EH in the vestibule; VestRatio: ratio of the area of endolymphatic space to the vestibular fluid space. ∗The second MRI was performed 60 h after intratympanic injection of dexamethasone. #7L: left ear of patient no. 7, 7R: right ear of patient no. 7. $There was an insignificant difference between the VestRatio before and after dexamethasone administration (p > 0.05, paired sample t-test).

Endolymphatic hydrops detected by MRI 24 h postintratympanic Gd-DTPA and after interference with intratympanic injection of dexamethasone. Aft: after intratympanic administration of dexamethasone; Bef: before intratympanic injection of dexamethasone; EHa: endolymphatic hydrops in the cochlear apex; EH-Coch: EH in the cochlea; EH-Vest: EH in the vestibule; VestRatio: ratio of the area of endolymphatic space to the vestibular fluid space. ∗The second MRI was performed 60 h after intratympanic injection of dexamethasone. #7L: left ear of patient no. 7, 7R: right ear of patient no. 7. $There was an insignificant difference between the VestRatio before and after dexamethasone administration (p > 0.05, paired sample t-test).

EH in MD observed by MRI 24 h postintratympanic administration of Gd-DTPA plus dexamethasone

Enhancement of the cochleae and vestibule was displayed in all 49 patients with MD after intratympanic administration of Gd-DPTA plus dexamethasone. Inner ear images were examined for all patients displaying normal perilymphatic compartments or EH with various grades. The enhancement of the vestibule negatively correlated with the grades of vestibular EH, which was not the case for the cochlea (Fig. 4, Fig. 5). Injury of the endolymph-perilymph barrier was suspected when the endolymphatic compartments could not be distinguished from the perilymphatic compartments (Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 7). As a result, 46 ears with definite MD, 13 ears with probable MD, and 8 ears without symptoms were imaged 24 h after the intratympanic administration of Gd-DTPA mixed with dexamethasone. EH was not detected in the non-symptomatic ear. In the cochlea, grade 2 EH was detected in 23 ears, grade 1 EH was detected in 11 ears, EH in the cochlear apex was detected in 38 ears, no EH was demonstrated in 18 ears, and injury of the endolymph-perilymph barrier was depicted in 1 of 59 ears with MD. In the vestibule, grade 3 EH was confirmed in 20, grade 2 EH was displayed in 12, grade 1 EH was found in 2, no EH was shown in 22, and injury of the endolymph-perilymph barrier was depicted in 3 of 59 ears with MD (Table 5). Significant correlations between probable and certain MDs and cochlear EH (p < 0.01, Spearman's rho), between probable and certain MDs and vestibular EH (p < 0.01, Spearman's rho), and between cochlear and vestibular EH (p < 0.01, Spearman's rho) were observed.
Fig. 4

Representative MRIs in patients with MD displaying various degrees of endolymphatic hydrops (EH) imaged 24 h postintratympanic administration of Gd-DTPA mixed with dexamethasone. In the normal cochlea (grade 0) (A, B), the scala media (SM) was almost visible. In the normal vestibule (grade 0) (C, D), the smaller saccule (Sa) and larger utricle (Ut) was visibly separated and occupied less than half of the surface of the vestibule. In mild cochlear EH (grade 1) (E, F), the SM became a nodular black area with narrow scala vestibuli (SV). In marked cochlear EH (grade 2) (G, H), the SV became completely invisible. In mild vestibular EH (grade 1) (I), the saccule became larger than the utricle but did not yet merge with the utricle. In marked vestibular EH (grade 2) (J), the Sa merged with the Ut, and the surrounding perilymphatic space appeared as a bright peripheral rim. In extreme vestibular EH (grade 3) (G), the perilymphatic enhancement of the vestibule was no longer visible. Vestibular distribution of dexamethasone plus Gd-DPTA (arrowhead) was negatively correlated with the grades of vestibular EH. Scale bars = 3.0 mm.

Fig. 5

Representative MRI in patients with MD displaying impairment in the endo-perilymphatic barrier in the vestibule. There was endolymphatic hydrops grade 1 in which the Sa became equal to the Ut but did not merge with the utricle on the right side (L) (A). The scala media (SM) appeared as a nodular black area, indicating mild EH (grade 1) in the cochlea of the right ear (R) (A). The endolymphatic compartments of the saccule (Sa) and the utricle (Ut) on the left side were not distinguished from the surrounding perilymph, indicating impairment of endo-perilymphatic barriers (C). Potential inner ear fibrosis was ruled out by SPACE (B, D). Scale bars = 3.0 mm.

Fig. 6

Representative MRI in patients with MD displaying impairment of the endo-perilymphatic barrier in the cochlea. There was endolymphatic hydrops grade 2 (2) in the cochlea and grade 3 (3) in the vestibule of the right ear (A). The SV almost disappeared in the basal turn of the right ear (C) but was fully visible in that of the left ear (F). The scala media (SM) fully merged with the scala tympani (ST) and the scala vestibuli (SV) of the left basal turn, indicating impairment of the endo-perilymphatic barrier (arrowhead in D). Potential inner ear fibrosis was ruled out by SPACE (B, E). Scale bars = 3.0 mm.

Fig. 7

Representative MRI in patients with MD displaying cochlear endolymphatic hydrops (EH) were diagnosed with modified criteria. The EH was mild in the basal turn (A, B) but was marked in the second turn (C) of the left cochlea, which was used as a reference to diagnose grade 2 EH in the cochlea. Notable EH in the cochlear apex (EHa) formed an invaginated arc (C, D). The endolymphatic compartments of the saccule (Sa) and the utricle (Ut) were not distinguished from the surrounding perilymph, indicating impairment of endo-perilymphatic barriers (C). SM: scala media; ST: scala tympani; SV: scala vestibuli. Scale bars = 3.0 mm.

Table 5

Endolymphatic hydrops demonstrated by MRI 24 h after intratympanic administration of Gd-DPTA plus dexamethasone.

DiagEarEH stage-Coch
EH stage-Vest
BI-CochBI-Vest
012Ap0123
dMD469152135123101912
pMD139313902101
Norm88000800000

BI-Coch: injury of the endolymph-perilymph barrier of cochlea; BI-Vest: injury of the endolymph-perilymph barrier of vestibule; Diag: diagnosis; dMD: definite MD; EH stage-Coch: cochlear endolymphatic hydrops graded using a 3-stage method; EH stage-Vest: vestibular endolymphatic hydrops graded using a 4-stage scale method; Norm: nonsymptomatic ear; pMD: probable MD.

Representative MRIs in patients with MD displaying various degrees of endolymphatic hydrops (EH) imaged 24 h postintratympanic administration of Gd-DTPA mixed with dexamethasone. In the normal cochlea (grade 0) (A, B), the scala media (SM) was almost visible. In the normal vestibule (grade 0) (C, D), the smaller saccule (Sa) and larger utricle (Ut) was visibly separated and occupied less than half of the surface of the vestibule. In mild cochlear EH (grade 1) (E, F), the SM became a nodular black area with narrow scala vestibuli (SV). In marked cochlear EH (grade 2) (G, H), the SV became completely invisible. In mild vestibular EH (grade 1) (I), the saccule became larger than the utricle but did not yet merge with the utricle. In marked vestibular EH (grade 2) (J), the Sa merged with the Ut, and the surrounding perilymphatic space appeared as a bright peripheral rim. In extreme vestibular EH (grade 3) (G), the perilymphatic enhancement of the vestibule was no longer visible. Vestibular distribution of dexamethasone plus Gd-DPTA (arrowhead) was negatively correlated with the grades of vestibular EH. Scale bars = 3.0 mm. Representative MRI in patients with MD displaying impairment in the endo-perilymphatic barrier in the vestibule. There was endolymphatic hydrops grade 1 in which the Sa became equal to the Ut but did not merge with the utricle on the right side (L) (A). The scala media (SM) appeared as a nodular black area, indicating mild EH (grade 1) in the cochlea of the right ear (R) (A). The endolymphatic compartments of the saccule (Sa) and the utricle (Ut) on the left side were not distinguished from the surrounding perilymph, indicating impairment of endo-perilymphatic barriers (C). Potential inner ear fibrosis was ruled out by SPACE (B, D). Scale bars = 3.0 mm. Representative MRI in patients with MD displaying impairment of the endo-perilymphatic barrier in the cochlea. There was endolymphatic hydrops grade 2 (2) in the cochlea and grade 3 (3) in the vestibule of the right ear (A). The SV almost disappeared in the basal turn of the right ear (C) but was fully visible in that of the left ear (F). The scala media (SM) fully merged with the scala tympani (ST) and the scala vestibuli (SV) of the left basal turn, indicating impairment of the endo-perilymphatic barrier (arrowhead in D). Potential inner ear fibrosis was ruled out by SPACE (B, E). Scale bars = 3.0 mm. Representative MRI in patients with MD displaying cochlear endolymphatic hydrops (EH) were diagnosed with modified criteria. The EH was mild in the basal turn (A, B) but was marked in the second turn (C) of the left cochlea, which was used as a reference to diagnose grade 2 EH in the cochlea. Notable EH in the cochlear apex (EHa) formed an invaginated arc (C, D). The endolymphatic compartments of the saccule (Sa) and the utricle (Ut) were not distinguished from the surrounding perilymph, indicating impairment of endo-perilymphatic barriers (C). SM: scala media; ST: scala tympani; SV: scala vestibuli. Scale bars = 3.0 mm. Endolymphatic hydrops demonstrated by MRI 24 h after intratympanic administration of Gd-DPTA plus dexamethasone. BI-Coch: injury of the endolymph-perilymph barrier of cochlea; BI-Vest: injury of the endolymph-perilymph barrier of vestibule; Diag: diagnosis; dMD: definite MD; EH stage-Coch: cochlear endolymphatic hydrops graded using a 3-stage method; EH stage-Vest: vestibular endolymphatic hydrops graded using a 4-stage scale method; Norm: nonsymptomatic ear; pMD: probable MD.

Discussion

The present study used HPLC to demonstrate that the retention time and peak area of dexamethasone were not modified by mixing with Gd-DTPA within the observation time of 72 h, indicating that no interaction occurred between the two compounds. The observation window of the in vitro study was defined according to a report in the literature that gadolinium had almost disappeared from the inner ear six days post-intratympanic injection (Nakashima et al., 2007). We observed that intratympanic injection of 0.1 ml of dexamethasone (10 mg/ml) did not interfere with the grade of EH in either the cochlea or the vestibule. Therefore, mixing dexamethasone with Gd-DTPA for intratympanic injection does not compromise either the efficacy of the compounds used or safety. Although Gd-DTPA may also be included in gentamicin, it is better to confirm the diagnosis of MD with MRI before destroying vestibular function. Intratympanic gentamicin therapy can only be offered to patients with active MD who are not responsive to nonablative therapy (Basura et al., 2020). Therefore, the present study did not include gentamicin. Glucocorticoid steroids have several different actions but are speculated to stabilize vascular endothelial cells, improve blood flow in the inner ear, and maintain ionic homeostasis in the inner ear (MacArthur et al., 2015; Otake et al., 2009; Pondugula et al., 2004; Shirwany et al., 1998). We could not rule out that the EH of the inner ear might be influenced and modulated by dexamethasone in the long term; however, potential changes in EH in patients with MD were insignificant at 24 h and did not occur at 60 h in 1 patient. As a comparison, grading vestibular EH using the criteria of the 4-stage scale method based on morphological changes is more accurate than using the ratio of the area of endolymphatic space to the vestibular fluid space (Bernaerts et al., 2019; Nakashima et al., 2009). Based on our experience applying the two criteria to evaluate EH, the morphological criteria consistently yielded the same results, which can be attributed to the stable presentation of characteristic structures used for identification. However, when analyzing the ratio of the area of endolymphatic space to the vestibular fluid space, errors always occurred due to difficulty determining the boundary points of the fluids. Intratympanic administration of dexamethasone mixed with Gd-DTPA in 49 MD patients yielded high-quality MRI images obtained 24 h post-intratympanic injection, suggesting that it is clinically feasible to deliver Gd-DTPA and dexamethasone intratympanically simultaneously for the evaluation of EH. The vestibular enhancement was compromised by vestibular EH. This interference could reflect a mechanism whereby Gd-DTPA plus dexamethasone enter the vestibule mainly through the oval window, and the hydropic saccule “squeezes” the perilymphatic space beneath the stapes, subsequently restricting the passage of agents from entering the vestibule. In contrast, the perilymph in the scala tympani was not influenced by cochlear EH, and the pathway for agent transportation into the cochlea mainly via the round window remained patent (Zou et al., 2011, 2012). There were significant correlations between probable and definite MD and cochlear and vestibular EH and between cochlear EH and vestibular EH, suggesting that it is clinically relevant to detect EH in MD using MRI. Postmortal histological evidence of EH has been previously used as the necessary criterion in the definition of certain MDs ((Committee on Hearing and, 1995)). The accuracy of detecting EH using MRI was verified by an identical histological study in an animal model (Zou et al., 2003). Previous studies have reported that grades of EH correlate with impairments in audio-vestibular function, albeit with controversial results regarding vestibular disorder (Gurkov et al., 2011; Jerin et al., 2018; Kahn et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2018). Variability with respect to the correlation between vestibular EH and vestibular function might be caused by the inaccuracy of defining EH grading and MRI protocols as well as vestibular functional evaluations in most previous studies. In the present study, injury to the endolymph-perilymph barrier was also detected in one cochlea and three vestibules among 69 imaged inner ears. Impairment of the endolymph-perilymph barrier may occur at various locations of either the cochlea or the vestibule and by varying degrees. Schuknecht et al. detected ruptures of membranous labyrinths in ten of 24 temporal bones of MD patients (Schuknecht et al., 1991). The incidence of ruptures in the membranous labyrinths reported by Schuknecht et al. was significantly higher than in the current study, which might be caused by histological preparations as artifacts during specimen collection and processing of postmortal histological study. A previous in vivo MRI study on guinea pigs only demonstrated the rupture of Reissner's membrane in one of the 11 observed animals, which was associated with extreme EH (Zou et al., 2003). Kimura et al. reported wide gaps between mesothelial cells in the distended areas of Reissner's membrane in an electron microscopic study of MD (Kimura et al., 1976). Cureoglu et al. detected significantly higher cellular densities of epithelial cells in the basal and middle turns and a significantly decreased number of mesothelial cells in the basal turn of Reissner's membrane in MD patients compared with controls (Cureoglu et al., 2004). The mechanism of injury in the endolymph-perilymph barrier is unknown, but the abovementioned mechanisms are feasible. Additionally, mitochondrial dysfunction was reported to result in cellular impairment involving the barrier in an animal model study (Zou et al., 2013).

Conclusions

Gd-DTPA does not interfere with dexamethasone in the mixture during the 72-h observation period. Degrees of EH observed by MRI in patients with MD were not affected by dexamethasone after 24 h. Intratympanic administration of Gd-DTPA plus dexamethasone allowed for high-quality MRI images to detect EH in patients with MD, which combines therapeutic procedures with imaging techniques. Vestibular entry of dexamethasone was compromised by vestibular EH, which was not the case in the cochlea. Intratympanic administration of Gd-DTPA plus dexamethasone might be used to test its therapeutic effect in future work.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

This work was supported by the (81771006).
  36 in total

1.  Current Management Practices in Ménière's Disease.

Authors:  Joseph W Clyde; Benjamin S Oberman; Huseyin Isildak
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Communication between the perilymphatic scalae and spiral ligament visualized by in vivo MRI.

Authors:  Jing Zou; Ilmari Pyykkö; Börje Bjelke; Prasun Dastidar; Esko Toppila
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Dexamethasone pharmacokinetics in the inner ear: comparison of route of administration and use of facilitating agents.

Authors:  S S Chandrasekhar; R Y Rubinstein; J A Kwartler; M Gatz; P E Connelly; E Huang; S Baredes
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Pharmacokinetics of dexamethasone solution following intratympanic injection in guinea pig and sheep.

Authors:  Xiaobo Wang; Rayne Fernandez; Luis Dellamary; Anne Harrop; Qiang Ye; Jay Lichter; David Lau; Carl Lebel; Fabrice Piu
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Intratympanic Steroid Treatments May Improve Hearing via Ion Homeostasis Alterations and Not Immune Suppression.

Authors:  Carol MacArthur; Fran Hausman; Beth Kempton; Dennis R Trune
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Diagnostic criteria for Menière's disease.

Authors:  Jose A Lopez-Escamez; John Carey; Won-Ho Chung; Joel A Goebel; Måns Magnusson; Marco Mandalà; David E Newman-Toker; Michael Strupp; Mamoru Suzuki; Franco Trabalzini; Alexandre Bisdorff
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Glucocorticoids stimulate cation absorption by semicircular canal duct epithelium via epithelial sodium channel.

Authors:  Satyanarayana R Pondugula; Joel D Sanneman; Philine Wangemann; Pierre G Milhaud; Daniel C Marcus
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2004-03-02

8.  Cochlear blood flow during occlusion and reperfusion of the anterior inferior cerebellar artery--effect of topical application of dexamethasone to the round window.

Authors:  Hironao Otake; Hiroshi Yamamoto; Masaaki Teranishi; Michihiko Sone; Tsutomu Nakashima
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.494

9.  Longitudinal results with intratympanic dexamethasone in the treatment of Ménière's disease.

Authors:  Maria Soledad Boleas-Aguirre; Frank R Lin; Charles C Della Santina; Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  MRI detection of endolymphatic hydrops in Meniere's disease in 8 minutes using MIIRMR and a 20-channel coil after targeted gadolinium delivery.

Authors:  Jing Zou; Zhen Wang; Yukun Chen; Guoping Zhang; Luguang Chen; Jianping Lu
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-01-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.