| Literature DB >> 35847517 |
Songli Wang1,2, Ruifeng Wang1, Nana Meng1, Linwei Lu3, Jun Wang1, Jianfen Zhou1, Jiasheng Lu1, Qianzhu Xu1, Cao Xie1, Changyou Zhan1,2, Yao Li4, Yang Yu4, Weiyue Lu1,5,6, Min Liu1.
Abstract
Thrombolytic agents have thus far yielded limited therapeutic benefits in the treatment of thrombotic disease due to their short half-life, low targeting ability, and association with serious adverse reactions, such as bleeding complications. Inspired by the natural roles of platelets during thrombus formation, we fabricated a platelet-based delivery system (NO@uPA/PLTs) comprising urokinase (uPA) and arginine (Arg) for targeted thrombolysis and inhibition of re-embolism. The anchoring of uPA to the platelet surface by lipid insertion increased the thrombotic targeting and in vivo circulation duration of uPA without disturbing platelet functions. Nitric oxide (NO) generated by the loaded Arg inhibited platelet aggregation and activation at the damaged blood vessel, thereby inhibiting re-embolism. NO@uPA/PLTs effectively accumulated at the thrombi in pulmonary embolism and carotid artery thrombosis model mice and exerted superior thrombolytic efficacy. In addition, the platelet delivery system showed excellent thrombus recurrence prevention ability in a mouse model of secondary carotid artery injury. The coagulation indicators in vivo showed that the platelet-based uPA and NO co-delivery system possessed a low hemorrhagic risk, providing a promising tool for rapid thrombolysis and efficient inhibition of posttreatment re-embolism.Entities:
Keywords: Nitric oxide; Platelet; Targeted thrombolysis; Thrombus reformation; Urokinase
Year: 2022 PMID: 35847517 PMCID: PMC9279721 DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.01.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Pharm Sin B ISSN: 2211-3835 Impact factor: 14.903
Figure 1Illustration of the engineered platelet-based drug delivery platform. The uPA/Arg coloaded platelet delivery system provided a unique combination to achieve targeted delivery of uPA to thrombi, prolong the circulation duration of uPA and prevent the recurrence of thrombi with limited haemorrhagic risk.
Figure 2Preparation and characterization of NO@uPA/PLTs. (A) SDS-PAGE gel of PEG-DSPE-conjugated uPA (uPA-PEG-DSPE). (B) Anchored uPA on the platelet membrane characterized using Western blot. Lysates of unmodified platelets (PLTs), uPA-anchored platelets (uPA/PLTs) and uPA/Arg-coloaded platelets (NO@uPA/PLTs) with equal protein amounts were subjected to gel electrophoresis. (C) Representative TEM and SEM images of PLTs and NO@uPA/PLTs. Scale bar indicates 1 μm. (D) Generation of NO in platelets treated with Arg by DAF-FM DA fluorescence staining. Scale bar indicates 50 μm. (E) Representative confocal images of NO@uPA/PLTs. NO was stained with DAF-FM DA (green); uPA was stained with Cy5 (red); scale bar indicates 5 μm.
Figure 3Biological characterization of NO@uPA/PLTs in vitro and in vivo. Blood circulation retention properties of uPA/PLTs (A) and NO@uPA/PLTs (B). (C) The percentage of uPA/PLTs or NO@uPA/PLTs occupying whole blood platelets at the corresponding time points (n = 3). (D) Representative TEM and SEM images of activated NO@uPA/PLTs and released PMPs. Scale bar indicates 1 μm. (E) Size distribution of NO@uPA/PLTs and PMPs. (F) Representative confocal images of uPA/PLTs or NO@uPA/PLTs binding to HUVECs (scale bar indicates 50 μm). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). HUVECs were labeled with WGA-Alexa 488 (green). NO@uPA/PLTs were labeled with Cy5 (red). Scale bar indicates 50 μm. (G) Flow cytometry profiles of inactivated uPA/PLTs and activated uPA/PLTs incubated with Cy5-Fib. (H) Flow cytometry profiles of inactivated NO@uPA/PLTs and activated NO@uPA/PLTs incubated with Cy5-Fib. uPA/PLTs and NO@uPA/PLTs incubated with PBS only were used as negative controls. (I) Thrombotic degradation efficiency of NO@uPA/PLTs within 35 min in the dynamic thrombolysis model. Data are the means ± SD (n = 3). ∗P < 0.05. ns, not significant.
Figure 4Inhibitory ability of NO@uPA/PLTs against HUVEC apoptosis and platelet activation. (A) Quantification of NO generated by NO@uPA/PLTs incubated with different concentration of Arg using the Griess reaction (n = 3). (B) Protective effects of NO generated by NO@uPA/PLTs on H2O2-induced HUVECs (n = 3). (C) Fluorescent images of HUVECs activated by H2O2 after incubation with NO@uPA/PLTs. The scale bar indicates 50 μm. (D, E) Fluorescent images of FDA-labeled platelet aggregation. Platelets were incubated with PBS, uPA/PLTs, or NO@uPA/PLTs, and were activated by thrombin or ADP. The scale bar indicates 50 μm. (F, G) Number of platelet clumps in each field of view in five randomly selected areas under a fluorescence microscope. (H, I) Thrombin-induced (or ADP-induced) aggregation rates of platelets pretreated with PBS, uPA/PLTs, NO@uPA/PLTs (n = 3). (J) The expression of P-selectin in ADP-induced platelets pretreated with uPA/PLTs and NO@uPA/PLTs by flow cytometry. (K) Flow cytometry to evaluate the expression of P-selectin in thrombin-induced platelets pretreated with uPA/PLTs and NO@uPA/PLTs. (L) The percentage of activated platelets measured by flow cytometry (n = 3). (M) Mean fluorescence intensity of activated platelets measured by flow cytometry (n = 3). (N) Representative confocal immunofluorescence images of carotid artery sections after different treatments. Red: uPA; blue: nuclei; green: ICAM-1. Scale bar indicates 50 μm. Data are shown as the mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗P < 0.05. n.s., not significant.
Figure 5In vivo targeting and therapeutic efficacy of NO@uPA/PLTs in the thrombin-induced pulmonary embolism mouse model. (A) Fluorescence images of uPA/PLTs biodistribution and NO@uPA/PLTs biodistribution in the major organs of the PE model and healthy mice. (B) Fluorescence intensity of uPA/PLTs or NO@uPA/PLTs in the lung tissues (n = 3). (C) Fluorescent images of the lung tissues harvested from the mice after different treatments. The pulmonary embolism was labeled with Cy5. (D) Fluorescence intensity of Cy5 in lung tissues with different treatments (n = 3). (E) Ex vivo fluorescent imaging of lung sections from PE mice after treatment with different Cy5-labeled uPA preparations. The scale bar indicates 100 μm. (F) Quantitative analysis of the thrombus area in the lung tissues after different treatments (n = 3). (G) Representative H&E staining of lung sections from PE mice after different treatments at 2 h after induction. Scale bar indicates 100 μm. Data are shown as the mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗P < 0.05. n.s., not significant.
Figure 6In vivo therapeutic efficacy and re-embolism prevention of NO@uPA/PLTs in FeCl3-induced carotid arterial thrombosis models. (A) Schematic illustration of the experimental schedules for the FeCl3-induced carotid arterial thrombosis model. The uPA preparations were injected before thrombosis. (B) Representative fluorescent images of the carotid arteries of the mice after treatment with different uPA preparations at the corresponding time points. (C) Quantification of the rhodamine 6G fluorescence intensity in panel B (n = 3). (D) Schematic illustration of the experimental schedules for the FeCl3-induced carotid arterial thrombosis models. The uPA preparations were injected 5 min after thrombosis. (E) Representative fluorescent images of the carotid arteries after treatment with different uPA preparations at the corresponding time points. (F) Quantification of the rhodamine 6G fluorescence intensity in panel E (n = 3). (G) Schematic illustration of the experimental schedules for the sequential FeCl3-induced carotid arterial thrombosis models. (H) Representative fluorescent images of the carotid arteries of the mice after treatment with different uPA preparations at the corresponding time points. (I) Quantification of the rhodamine 6G fluorescence intensity in panel H (n = 3). Scale bar indicates 400 μm. Data are shown as the mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗P < 0.05. n.s., not significant.