Literature DB >> 35847334

Tannic Acid Exhibits Antiangiogenesis Activity in Nonsmall-Cell Lung Cancer Cells.

Elham Hatami1,2, Prashanth K B Nagesh1,3,4, Mohammed Sikander1,4,5, Anupam Dhasmana4,5, Subhash C Chauhan1,4,5, Meena Jaggi1,4,5, Murali M Yallapu1,4,5.   

Abstract

Nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer, with a dismal prognosis. NSCLC is a highly vascularized tumor, and chemotherapy is often hampered by the development of angiogenesis. Therefore, suppression of angiogenesis is considered a potential treatment approach. Tannic acid (TA), a natural polyphenol, has been demonstrated to have anticancer properties in a variety of cancers; however, its angiogenic properties have yet to be studied. Hence, in the current study, we investigated the antiproliferative and antiangiogenic effects of TA on NSCLC cells. The (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium) (MTS) assay revealed that TA induced a dose- and time-dependent decrease in the proliferation of A549 and H1299 cells. However, TA had no significant toxicity effects on human bronchial epithelial cells. Clonogenicity assay revealed that TA suppressed colony formation ability in NSCLC cells in a dose-dependent manner. The anti-invasiveness and antimigratory potential of TA were confirmed by Matrigel and Boyden chamber studies, respectively. Importantly, TA also decreased the ability of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) to form tube-like networks, demonstrating its antiangiogenic properties. Extracellular vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) release was reduced in TA-treated cells compared to that in control cells, as measured by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Overall, these results demonstrate that TA can induce antiproliferative and antiangiogenic effects against NSCLC.
© 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35847334      PMCID: PMC9281317          DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c02727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Omega        ISSN: 2470-1343


Introduction

Lung cancer (LC) is the most common and fatal malignancy in men and women in the United States. For the year 2022, the American Cancer Society estimated that about 236,740 new cancer cases and 130,180 deaths will occur due to LC in the United States.[1] It accounts for 12.5% of all cancer diagnoses and 21% of total cancer-related mortality. Nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) are two different types of cancer, which differ in their histology, patterns of occurrence, and prognoses.[2] NSCLC is the most common LC, accounting for 85 percent of all cases. Despite recent advancements in standard treatment approaches such as surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy, the survival rate remains low. Angiogenesis, like that of other solid tumors, is considered as a critical phase in the advancement of lung malignancies. Angiogenesis is a process of blood vessel formation in tumor microenvironments and represents one of the hallmarks of cancer growth, proliferation, metastasis, and chemoresistance.[3] These newly formed blood vessel networks are responsible for carrying nutrients and oxygen to the tumor cells, and they undergo rapid development and serve as channels to promote metastasis of cancer cells to distant organs.[4,5] The lungs are a highly vascularized organ, and studies have shown that NSCLC development and progression are closely linked to major changes in the blood vessel system; thus, inhibiting angiogenesis is a promising approach for NSCLC treatment.[6] Angiogenesis inhibitors such as bevacizumab and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors are used to treat lung cancer. Bevacizumab, a potent vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-humanized monoclonal antibody, blocks/inhibits angiogenesis and neovascularization.[7] The VGEF is a critical element in cancer angiogenesis, where an induction in VGEF activation is responsible to boost the new blood vessel formation and enhance the development of fresh vasculature networks to be able to efficiently supply the oxygen and nutrient stock to the constantly growing tumor.[8] Notably, the VEGF is also a potent stimulator of proliferation and migration; it induces the expression of the metalloproteinases (MMPs). Numerous studies have reported that the overexpression of the VEGF intensifies the tumor growth and metastasis by expanding the vasculature network.[9] Bevacizumab has also been studied in SCLC, with varying results in both confined and prolonged disease. When paired with first-line chemotherapy, bevacizumab increased progression-free survival but not overall survival.[10] As a result, finding effective antilung cancer drugs, especially those generated from natural resources, is a viable strategy to increase patient compliance and survival rates. Tannic acid (TA, C76H52O46) (Figure A), a naturally occurring water-soluble polyphenolic extract, has been approved as a safe compound by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which made it a safe excipient/active additive in food, drink, and pharmaceutical formulations.[11−13] TA is abundantly available, as it is commonly present in plant leaves (e.g., green tea), fruit skins, vegetables, nuts, red wine, coffee, and wood bark. TA (penta-m-digalloyl glucose) contains a unique hydrolyzable structure of tannin with a glucose moiety core.[14] The hydroxyl groups of this glucose are esterified with five digallic acids.[15] TA exhibits antioxidant, antimicrobial, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory properties.[16] TA’s broad range of bioactivities makes it a potent and viable pharmaceutical additive molecule for various indications. We anticipate that TA could effectively modulate the tumor biology of NSCLC by altering the angiogenesis processes.
Figure 1

Tannic acid exhibits NSCLC cell-specific cytotoxicity. (A) Chemical structure of tannic acid. (B) Normal human bronchial epithelium cell line (BEAS-2B) and NSCLC (A549 and H1299) cells were treated with different concentrations of TA (0–40 μM) and incubated for 48 and 72 h. Cell proliferation assay was evaluated after addition of the (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium) (MTS) reagent. Data represent means ± SEM, n = 3. A table representing the IC50 of TA in NSCLC cells at 48 and 72 h. (C) Cell (BEAS-2B, A549 and H1299) morphology changes were studied using an inverted microscope.

Tannic acid exhibits NSCLC cell-specific cytotoxicity. (A) Chemical structure of tannic acid. (B) Normal human bronchial epithelium cell line (BEAS-2B) and NSCLC (A549 and H1299) cells were treated with different concentrations of TA (0–40 μM) and incubated for 48 and 72 h. Cell proliferation assay was evaluated after addition of the (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium) (MTS) reagent. Data represent means ± SEM, n = 3. A table representing the IC50 of TA in NSCLC cells at 48 and 72 h. (C) Cell (BEAS-2B, A549 and H1299) morphology changes were studied using an inverted microscope. The chemopreventive and anticancer effects of TA have been shown against various types of cancers such as breast,[17,18] ovarian,[19] and brain cancers.[20] The literature supports that TA is able to suppress cancer progression via inhibiting various oncogenic signaling pathways.[21−23] TA-induced apoptotic effects on FAS-overexpressed human breast cancer cells have also been reported.[24] TA modulates drug efflux and enhances the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic agents in human cholangiocarcinoma.[25] TA is involved in reversing drug resistance by inhibiting the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway,[26] inhibiting ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters,[27] and downregulating P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and multidrug resistance (MDR) via downregulation of NF-κB and MAPK/ERK.[28] A recent study in our laboratory has confirmed TA-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated apoptosis and lipid metabolism in prostate cancer cells.[29,30] TA has been shown to have a potent tyrosine kinase activity.[31] In lung cancer cells, TA inhibits stemness by triggering caspase-dependent mitochondria-mediated apoptosis.[32] Tannic acid exhibits a selective CXCL12/CXCR4 antagonist, which suggests its antitumor and antiangiogenic potential.[33] To the best of our knowledge, TA’s influence on angiogenesis via modulation of the VEGF secretion from NSCLC remains largely unknown.[29] Therefore, understanding the response of NSCLC cells to a water-soluble natural anticancer agent (TA) is a clinically unmet need. In addition, revealing the underlying aspects of TA’s antiangiogenic effects and how it may alter the tumor biology holds great promise for identifying new therapeutic targets for NSCLC in clinical translation. Taken together, in this study, our goal is to elucidate the effect of TA on NSCLC cells. We will investigate NSCLC cells that were incubated with different concentrations of TA. Outcomes were measured by characterizing cell proliferation, invasiveness, apoptosis, VEGF secretion, and angiogenesis in NSCLC cell lines.

Materials and Methods

Materials, Reagents, and Cell Culture

All the chemicals, solvents, reagents, and cell culture media were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO) and Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA) and used without further purification unless otherwise stated. Nonsmall-cell lung cancer cell lines (A549 and H1299), a human normal bronchial epithelial cell line (BEAS-2B), and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). The H1299, A549, BEAS-2B, and HUVECs were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute-1640 (RPMI-1640), Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM), bronchial epithelial cell growth medium (BEGM), and endothelial cell medium-2 (EGM TM-2). All media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% (w/v) penicillin–streptomycin. Cell lines were maintained at 37 °C with a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in an incubator. Cell lines were regularly monitored for their typical morphology and contamination under a microscope. These cells were trypsinized and seeded for in vitro studies.

Cell Viability

The CellTiter 96 AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (MTS reagent, Promega, Mannheim, Germany) was performed to determine the cell viability.[29] The assay was carried out in 96-well microplates. Each of the A549, H1299, and BEAS-2B cell lines (5 × 103 cells/well) was seeded in their respective media and left overnight for adhesion. On the following day, cells were treated with different concentrations of TA (1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, and 40 μM). After 48 and 72 h of treatment, 20 μL of the MTS solution was added to each well and incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The absorbance of each well was measured using a microplate reader (Cytation 5, BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT) at 490 nm according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cell viability of treated cells was normalized to absorbance readings in untreated control cells (considered to have 100% viability). The concentration required for 50% cell growth inhibition (IC50) was calculated using GraphPad Prism 6.07 software (Dotmatics, San Diego, CA).

Colony Formation

The impact of TA on inhibiting the clonogenicity of NSCLC cells was tested by the colony formation assay.[29] The A549 and H1299 cells (500 cells/well) were cultured in multi-well plates and were allowed to attach and initiate the colonization for 48 h. Then, the medium was replaced with a fresh one containing a varying concentration of TA (2.5, 5, and 10 μM) alongside one without treatment for the control and incubated further for 2 weeks. At the end of the 14 days, colonies were fixed with cold methanol and stained using 0.05% crystal violet at room temperature. The cell colonies were photographed utilizing a ChemiDoc MP imaging system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), and the number of colonies was counted using publicly available ImageJ software (www.imagej.nih.gov/ij/).

Cell Migration

The effect of TA on NSCLC cell mobility and migration was evaluated through Boyden’s chamber assay and was utilized .[29] In brief, the cells were subjected to starvation by culturing them overnight in serum-free media and plated in the upper chambers of a 96-transwell plate at 5 × 105 cells containing 20 μM TA concentration and one with an equivalent amount of the phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) as the control in the serum-free medium, while lower chamber contains complete medium containing 10% FBS. Cells were allowed to migrate toward the fetal bovine serum (FBS) gradient for 24 h; then, the migrated cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 45 min and stained with 0.05% crystal violet for 30 min at room temperature. The migrated cells were imaged under a microscope (EVOS FL microscopy (AMF4300, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA)).

Wound Healing

The effect of TA on NSCLC cell’s wound healing ability was assessed using a scratch assay.[29] Briefly, A549 and H1299 cells were cultured in 6-well plates overnight at the density of 1 × 106 cells/well. When the degree of fusion reached 80%, to create wounds, a 200 μL sterile pipette tip was applied to create wounds on each well. After rinsing the cells with PBS to wash out the debris, cells were treated with 10 μM TA with an untreated well as a control, and the extent of the treatment effect was monitored till 72 h. The residual of the wounds was closely observed and photographed at 24 h intervals using an EVOS FL imaging system.

Cell Invasion

To analyze the effect of TA on the invasion potential of NSCLCs (A549 and H1299), BioCoat Matrigel invasion chambers (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA) were utilized.[21,29] The starved cells, as described above, were distributed on the transwell inserts at a density of 3.5 × 104 and incubated with 20 μM TA and PBS (as control) for 24 h. The cells that invaded to the lower chamber were fixed with cold methanol for 30 min and were stained using crystal violet. Invaded cells on membranes were imaged using EVOS FL microscopy.

Bioinformatics Analysis

A total of 53 altered protein targets of TA were manually curated from the literature and standardized by authors. The protein–protein interaction (PPI) network and pathway enrichment analyses were obtained from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) plugin of STRING databases. Cytoscape was used for the construction of the final PPI of TA-regulated proteins, which was notified with the color gradient on the basis of the bottleneck property of protein topology.[34,35] The three-dimensional (3D) structures of VEGFA (PDB ID: 5FV1), CBP (PDB ID: 5J0D), and P300 (PDB ID: 6GYR) proteins were retrieved from the RCSB protein databank, whereas the 3D structure of TA (PubChem CID: 16129778) was constructed using Biovia Discovery Studio 20202. The FireDock docking server was applied for the interaction analysis between VEGFA, CBP, P300, and TA.[36]

Tube Forming Assay

The in vitro antiangiogenic effect of TA on HUVECs (with a passage number lower than five) was analyzed by evaluating the extent of vascular structure/tubular formation of cells.[37] The 96-well plates were filled with 50 μL of Matrigel (Becton, Dickinson and Company) diluted with PBS (1:1) and placed in an incubator at 37 °C for 1 h to be solidified. Then, HUVECs (1 × 104 cells/well) were incubated with a range of TA concentrations (10, 15, 20, and 30 μM) and added to the Matrigel-coated plates. After allowing vascular structure formation for 4 h at 37 °C in an incubator, the vascular-like structures/networks were observed using an EVOS FL imaging system; a quantification of three random regions was assessed using ImageJ software using an angiogenesis analyzer.

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to test the TA influence on the downregulation of the VEGF protein expression on NSCLC. The A549 and H1299 cells were cultured in 6-well plates at a density of 1 × 106 cells/well. On the next day, the cells were treated with TA (5, 10, 20, and 30 μM) for 24, 48, and 72 h. Then, the supernatant media were harvested and stored at −20 °C. A commercially available VEGF Quantikine ELISA Kit-DVE00 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) was used to measure the levels of the VEGF, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were attempted using GraphPad Prism (Version 6.07, GraphPad Software) to analyze the data. The results are described as the means ± SEM of three individual sets of experiments. The difference among the groups was estimated by Student’s t-test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The level of statistical significance was set to *p < 0.01 and **p < 0.001.

Results

Tannic Acid Inhibits the Proliferation of NSCLC Cells

First, the cell viability assay was utilized to test a safe concentration range of TA against the normal human bronchial epithelium cell line (BEAS-2B). The tested concentrations from 2.5 to 40 μM appear to be nontoxic to BEAS-2B cells in 48 and 72 h treatments (Figure B, blue color line graphs and Figure C). At these concentrations, it was observed that there is more than 90% of cell viability. Then, the potential inhibitory effect of TA on the proliferation of two NSCLC (A549 and H1299) cells in this concentration range or vehicle solution control over two different incubation times (48 and 72 h) was characterized. As shown in Figure B, TA suppressed the growth of NSCLC cells in a dose-dependent and time-responsive manner. IC50 values were calculated as 23.76 ± 1.17 and 10.69 ± 0.83 μM for the A549 cell line and 21.58 ± 1.12 and 7.136 ± 0.64 μM for the H1299 cell line, at 48 and 72 h, respectively. Both A549 and H1299 cells demonstrated varied degrees of phenotypic alterations, such as the loss of viable cells and blebbing, when treated with TA, while control cells maintained their usual phenotype until the treatment step was completed (Figure C).

Tannic Acid Suppresses the Clonogenic Potential of NSCLC Cells

Enhanced clonogenic potential is a very important characteristic of cancer growth and metastasis. The clonogenic growth characteristic is necessary for the cancer cells to establish a primary tumor and eventually metastasis.[38] Therefore, the effect of TA on the colony formation ability of A549 and H1299 cells was determined on a long-term basis (14 days) at various concentrations (2.5, 5, and 10 μM) (Figure ).
Figure 2

Tannic acid treatment significantly reduces the clonogenic potential of NSCLC cells. The long-term antiproliferative effects of TA were evaluated in a colony formation assay. The colony formation assay was performed on A549 and H1299 cells. The 500 cells were seeded per well of a multi-well plate, and treatment with TA was done at different concentrations (0, 2.5, 5, and 10 μM) for 14 days. (A) Colonies were stained with hematoxylin, and images were captured using a phase-contrast microscope. Representative images of the colony formation assay of A549 and H1299. (B) Number of colonies are counted and plotted for A549 and H1299. Data represent means ± SEM, n = 3. *p < 0.01, **p < 0.001.

Tannic acid treatment significantly reduces the clonogenic potential of NSCLC cells. The long-term antiproliferative effects of TA were evaluated in a colony formation assay. The colony formation assay was performed on A549 and H1299 cells. The 500 cells were seeded per well of a multi-well plate, and treatment with TA was done at different concentrations (0, 2.5, 5, and 10 μM) for 14 days. (A) Colonies were stained with hematoxylin, and images were captured using a phase-contrast microscope. Representative images of the colony formation assay of A549 and H1299. (B) Number of colonies are counted and plotted for A549 and H1299. Data represent means ± SEM, n = 3. *p < 0.01, **p < 0.001. TA exhibited reduction of the number of visible and bigger colonies in a dose-dependent manner (Figure A). The quantitative analysis revealed that the percent number of cell colonies was significantly reduced with increasing TA concentration. This effect is similar in both A549 and H1299 cell lines (Figure B). Together, these results indicate that TA suppresses the colony formation ability of the NSCLC.

Tannic Acid Inhibits the Migration and Invasion Potential of NSCLC Cells

Tumor cell metastasis is known as a complex of events, which involves cell adhesion, extracellular matrix (ECM) component degradation, and tumor cell migration. Thus, blocking one or more of these steps is required for antimetastatic therapy.[39] The effects of TA on NSCLC’s invasion and migratory abilities were subsequently assessed by performing the Boyden chamber assay (Figure ).
Figure 3

Tannic acid treatment minimizes the migration and invasion ability of NSCLC cells. (A) Boyden chamber migration assay was performed on NSCLC cells A549 and H1299. The cells were treated with 0 and 20 μM concentrations for 18 h. After that, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, stained with crystal violet, and left for drying. Furthermore, the images were captured. Scale bar: 200 μm. (B) For wound healing assay, cells were wounded by scratching and monitored over different time intervals (24, 48, and 72 h) upon treatment with 10 μM TA to observe the wound closure (40×) magnification, scale bar: 400 μm. (C) Matrigel invasion assay was performed on NSCLC cells A549 and H1299. The cells were treated with TA at 20 μM for 24 h. Thereafter, the cells were washed with PBS, fixed with methanol, and stained using crystal violet. Upon drying, images were taken. Scale bar: 200 μm.

Tannic acid treatment minimizes the migration and invasion ability of NSCLC cells. (A) Boyden chamber migration assay was performed on NSCLC cells A549 and H1299. The cells were treated with 0 and 20 μM concentrations for 18 h. After that, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, stained with crystal violet, and left for drying. Furthermore, the images were captured. Scale bar: 200 μm. (B) For wound healing assay, cells were wounded by scratching and monitored over different time intervals (24, 48, and 72 h) upon treatment with 10 μM TA to observe the wound closure (40×) magnification, scale bar: 400 μm. (C) Matrigel invasion assay was performed on NSCLC cells A549 and H1299. The cells were treated with TA at 20 μM for 24 h. Thereafter, the cells were washed with PBS, fixed with methanol, and stained using crystal violet. Upon drying, images were taken. Scale bar: 200 μm. The number of migrating cells after TA treatment was evidently inhibited in A549 and H1299 cells compared with that in the control (Figure A). The ability of the cells to heal the wound and fill the gap to support the reduced migratory capability (Figure B) was confirmed by a wound healing assay. The extent of the wound closure was maintained with TA treatment, while the untreated-well wound was healed due to the inherent migratory characteristics of NSCLC. Overall, these results confirm the antimigratory ability of TA on NSCLC cells. In carcinogenic events, cancer cells disseminated through blood or lymphatics to other sites via invasion.[40,41] To gain a better understanding of the anti-invasion ability of TA, a transwell assay was performed on A549 and H1299 cells. The number of invaded cells A549 and H1299 toward the FBS gradient was markedly lower in the treatment group compared to that in the control group (Figure C). These results indicated that TA could be a promising adjuvant to inhibit the invasion of NSCLC cells.

Bioinformatics Analysis

After pathway enrichment and PPI analysis of the altered TA target protein dataset (Figure ), we found the involvement of numerous proteins in different types of cancers. In this enrichment analysis, we found that around 35 proteins out of 53 proteins in the dataset follow a category of cancer-related pathways (hsa05200) with the highest FDR being 2.47E-39. These proteins include MAPK1, NFKBIA, MMP2, TGFB1, NFKB1, CDKN1B, CDK4, PDGFRB, CCNE1, WNT5A, RB1, EGFR, NOTCH1, BRAF, BAX, BCL2L1, CYCS, CASP3, KLK3, GSK3B, CASP9, TCF7, CTNNB1, FAS, STAT1, PTGS2, CASP7, MMP9, JAK2, CXCL12, BCL2, CDKN1A, CXCR4, WNT8A, and VEGFA. After carrying out network analysis, it was found that around five top proteins have bottleneck features of more than two. In between all these important proteins, CTNNB1 and VGFRA were featured as the most important key regulatory proteins of this TA-governed interactome. Among these two proteins, lung cancer was clinically treated using angiogenesis inhibitors which regulate VEGFA. Therefore, the TA influence on this protein is considered in this investigation. VEGFA is also spotted as an important key regulatory node of the TA-governed interactome with a 78 score of degree and 0.33796 (its less than 0.5) score of clustering coefficient. These statistical connections show the importance of VEGFA in the TA-governed interactome. The degree stands for the number of physical or functional interactions of a node with other nodes, and the clustering coefficient represents the closeness of nodes and neighbors; the clustering coefficient also illustrates that the network has a high number of nodes but holds a lesser number of connections, so there are high chances of binding of ligands such as tannic acid.[34]
Figure 4

Tannic acid interactive network analyses. Protein–protein interaction: an interactive protein–protein network of all 53 tannic acid-regulated proteins. Color coding was done on the basis of the bottleneck rank of individual protein networks generated from Cytoscape. Most of the proteins are found in various types of cancer groups. CTNNB1 and VEGFA are the top two identified main regulatory proteins in this interactome.

Tannic acid interactive network analyses. Protein–protein interaction: an interactive protein–protein network of all 53 tannic acid-regulated proteins. Color coding was done on the basis of the bottleneck rank of individual protein networks generated from Cytoscape. Most of the proteins are found in various types of cancer groups. CTNNB1 and VEGFA are the top two identified main regulatory proteins in this interactome. After getting the probable target (VEGFA) of TA, docking analysis was performed; the resultant TA docked perfectly with VEGFA with −36.17 global binding energy (Figure A). On the other hand, TA was also able to dock with CBP (Figure B) and P300 (Figure C) with global binding energies of −34.24 and −59.99, respectively.
Figure 5

Molecular interaction of tannic acid and angiogenesis-related proteins. Figures were generated using Discovery Studio. (A) Interaction between VEGFA (PDB ID: 5FV1) and tannic acid (PubChem CID: 16129778). Binding pattern of VEGFA and tannic acid docking done using FireDock with −36.17 global binding energy. The amino acid residues of the binding pocket are THR 31, LEU 32, ASP 34, PHE 36, PRO 40, ARG 56, CYS 57, GLY 59, CYS 60, CYS 61, LEU 66, GLU 67, CYS 68, VAL 69, PRO 70, GLU 73, LEU 97, and HIS 99. (B) Molecular interaction between CBP (PDB ID: 5J0D) and tannic acid (PubChem CID: 16129778). Binding pattern of CBP and tannic acid docking done using FireDock with −34.24 global binding energy. The amino acid residues of the binding pocket are Leu1109, Arg1112, Gln1113, Pro1114, Val1115, Asp1116, Leu1120, Gly1121, Ile1122, Tyr1167, Asn1168, Arg1169, Ser1172, Arg1173, and Val1174. (C) Molecular interaction between P300 (PDB ID: 6GYR) and tannic acid (PubChem CID: 16129778). Binding pattern of CBP and tannic acid docking done using FireDock with −59.99 global binding energy. The amino acid residues of the binding pocket are Tyr1394, Ile1395, Ser1396, Tyr1397, Ile1435, Trp1436, Ala1437, Cys1438, Pro1439, Pro1440, Ser1441, Glu1442, Asp1444, Tyr1446, Pro1460, Glu1505, Gly1506, Asp1507, Phe1508, Asn1511, Lys1590, His1591, Val1594, and Arg1627.

Molecular interaction of tannic acid and angiogenesis-related proteins. Figures were generated using Discovery Studio. (A) Interaction between VEGFA (PDB ID: 5FV1) and tannic acid (PubChem CID: 16129778). Binding pattern of VEGFA and tannic acid docking done using FireDock with −36.17 global binding energy. The amino acid residues of the binding pocket are THR 31, LEU 32, ASP 34, PHE 36, PRO 40, ARG 56, CYS 57, GLY 59, CYS 60, CYS 61, LEU 66, GLU 67, CYS 68, VAL 69, PRO 70, GLU 73, LEU 97, and HIS 99. (B) Molecular interaction between CBP (PDB ID: 5J0D) and tannic acid (PubChem CID: 16129778). Binding pattern of CBP and tannic acid docking done using FireDock with −34.24 global binding energy. The amino acid residues of the binding pocket are Leu1109, Arg1112, Gln1113, Pro1114, Val1115, Asp1116, Leu1120, Gly1121, Ile1122, Tyr1167, Asn1168, Arg1169, Ser1172, Arg1173, and Val1174. (C) Molecular interaction between P300 (PDB ID: 6GYR) and tannic acid (PubChem CID: 16129778). Binding pattern of CBP and tannic acid docking done using FireDock with −59.99 global binding energy. The amino acid residues of the binding pocket are Tyr1394, Ile1395, Ser1396, Tyr1397, Ile1435, Trp1436, Ala1437, Cys1438, Pro1439, Pro1440, Ser1441, Glu1442, Asp1444, Tyr1446, Pro1460, Glu1505, Gly1506, Asp1507, Phe1508, Asn1511, Lys1590, His1591, Val1594, and Arg1627.

TA Inhibits In Vitro Tube Formation Activity

Endothelial cell migration, invasion, adhesiveness, tube assembly, and remodeling are footsteps of the new vessel formation (angiogenesis).[42] Angiogenesis is a highly regulated process that involves the growth of new blood vessels from the existing vasculature. This process plays an important role in both normal developmental processes and numerous pathologies, ranging from wound healing, tumor growth, and metastasis to inflammation and ocular diseases. Therefore, to determine the physiological significance of the changes in the presence and absence of TA treatment, in vitro angiogenesis was performed on the HUVECs (Figure ).
Figure 6

Tannic acid treatments inhibit the tube formation abilities of HUVECs. In vitro tube formation assay was performed to determine the effect of TA on HUVEC cells. (A) 1 × 104 cells/well were seeded in Matrigel-coated 96-well plates followed by various TA concentrations (10, 15, 20, and 30 μM). Morphology images of vascular-like structures/networks were captured using an EVOS FL imaging system, and a quantification of three random regions was assessed using ImageJ software using an angiogenesis analyzer. (B) Bar graph representing the quantification of three random regions assessed using ImageJ software using an angiogenesis analyzer. Data represent means ± SEM, n = 3. *p < 0.01, **p < 0.001.

Tannic acid treatments inhibit the tube formation abilities of HUVECs. In vitro tube formation assay was performed to determine the effect of TA on HUVEC cells. (A) 1 × 104 cells/well were seeded in Matrigel-coated 96-well plates followed by various TA concentrations (10, 15, 20, and 30 μM). Morphology images of vascular-like structures/networks were captured using an EVOS FL imaging system, and a quantification of three random regions was assessed using ImageJ software using an angiogenesis analyzer. (B) Bar graph representing the quantification of three random regions assessed using ImageJ software using an angiogenesis analyzer. Data represent means ± SEM, n = 3. *p < 0.01, **p < 0.001. HUVEC tubular formation was suppressed by incubation with the media conditioned with 10, 15, and 20 μM TA (Figure A). The total length of tubules decreased with respect to the increased concentrations of TA: 40.01 ± 2.37, 32.53 ± 4.50, and 19.22 ± 3.37% (Figure B). The control group was HUVECs incubated with untreated media and was set as 100%, proposing that the TA treatment with 20 μM was able to inhibit tube formation in HUVECs.

TA Significantly Reduces VEGF Secretion by NSCLC Cells

Angiogenesis occurs primarily due to the production of excessive VEGF.[5,43] Therefore, we sought to investigate whether TA inhibits the secretion of VEGF using ELISA (Figure ).
Figure 7

Tannic acid treatment significantly lowers the VEGF secretion from tumor cells. ELISA assay was performed to determine the effect of TA on the VEGF protein expression in (A) A549 and H1299 (B) cells. The cells were treated with TA (5, 10, 20, and 30 μM) for 24, 48, and 72 h. The supernatant media were used to measure the levels of VEGF secretion. Data represent means ± SEM, n = 3. *p < 0.01, **p < 0.001.

Tannic acid treatment significantly lowers the VEGF secretion from tumor cells. ELISA assay was performed to determine the effect of TA on the VEGF protein expression in (A) A549 and H1299 (B) cells. The cells were treated with TA (5, 10, 20, and 30 μM) for 24, 48, and 72 h. The supernatant media were used to measure the levels of VEGF secretion. Data represent means ± SEM, n = 3. *p < 0.01, **p < 0.001. The treatment of NSCLC cells with different concentrations of TA significantly decreased the VEGF expression level in a dose-dependent manner, suggesting that TA treatment has an inhibitory effect on the level of the VEGF produced. Indeed, as the treatment continued with longer incubation, the level of the VEGF also decreased accordingly in both cell lines. The reduction in VEGF levels was statistically significant.

Discussion

Lung cancer is one of the most common cancers globally, both in terms of incidence and mortality (18 percent of total cancer deaths).[44] NSCLC is the most common form of LC, accounting for 85 percent of all occurrences. Despite enormous scientific investigations in lung cancer, the incidence and fatality rates have not decreased significantly.[45] The presence of increased angiogenesis in NSCLC has been linked to a bad prognosis.[46,47] Several angiogenic switch molecular mediators are linked to a poor clinical outcome.[48] Hence, antiangiogenesis therapy remains an attractive treatment option for patients with NSCLC.[49] In this study, we investigated a simple yet clinically suitable natural molecule-based treatment approach for NSCLC, which may augment the survival outcome by inhibiting angiogenesis and decreasing the systemic side effect. TA is a naturally occurring polyphenol molecule. The water-soluble polyphenols in TA attribute unique biological properties, which made it an excellent candidate for the medicinal applications. Accumulating studies confirmed TA as an antimutagenic, antioxidant, and anticancer agent.[19,24,50,51] Moreover, TA has been used for therapeutic purposes for centuries.[22] Notably, TA has become a very interesting topic in anticancer drug discovery because of its economic and organic production, in comparison to other chemical components. Previous reports have shown anticancer potential in breast, prostate cancer, and other cancers,[17,29] but to the best of our knowledge, its effect on NSCLC due to the antiangiogenesis effect and downregulation of the VEGF signaling pathway has not yet been studied. In our study, TA has shown a significant anticancer effect on NSCLC cells. The quantification of the proliferation of A549 and H1299 by cell viability studies showed that TA treatment reduces the rate of the proliferations of both cell lines drastically and inhibits the growth and suppresses the cell viability of A549 and H1299 (Figure ). Additionally, our results showed that in the presence of TA, there is a significant decline in the number of colonies (Figure ). It was noticed that viable cells and colonies of H1299 were not as much as those in A549 cells. This result suggests that H1299 cells are more sensitive to TA treatment than A549 cells. Moreover, there is an inhibitory effect on the number of cells invaded and migrated, on A549 and H1299 (Figure ). The process of wound healing predominantly regulates and promotes the growth of malignant cells[52] and migration of cancer cells; our scratch assay results support that TA has an inhibitory effect on the mechanism that regulates wound healing, in a time-dependent fashion in both cell lines. Our findings are consistent with the previous literature that have reported the antitumoral and anticancer activity of TA on other types of cancers such as prostate cancer,[29,53] breast cancer,[17,24] and colon cancer.[54] Angiogenesis occurs to build an intact network to circulate nutrition and oxygen and is vital for cancer cells’ function, growth, and survival. A high level of the VEGF is necessary for this network, and if its function is hindered and could not keep up with the rapid growth of the tumor, the cancerous cells have no other option but to undergo apoptosis.[6] Collective reports show that a decreased level of the VEGF caused inhibition of tumor growth and proliferation.[9,55−57] We have measured the VEGF protein concentrations by ELISA, and the respective data revealed that the VEGF level of the supernatant remarkedly decreased following TA treatment. A high amount of VEGF is generated from cancer cells early in tumor-induced angiogenesis, and it then binds to VEGFR2 on endothelial cells to cause angiogenesis.[58−60] Our results (Figures and 7) suggest that such a decrease in VEGF secretion in NSCLC when exposed to TA had attributed to the reduction of tube formulation capability, hence leading to a decline in angiogenesis and formation of intact blood vasculature networks. Inhibition of angiogenesis would potentially suppress the metastasis and inhibit the chance of tumor cells spreading around the patient’s body. Overall, TA has an advantageous therapeutic profile owing to its safe and nontoxic plant-based nature, which makes it a very suitable candidate for cancer therapy, especially for unfit NSCLC patients. These results manifest that TA acts as a potent inhibitor for blood vessel formation, hence strengthening the rationale of using TA as an antiangiogenic agent for NSCLC therapy (Figure ).
Figure 8

Schematic representation depicting the mechanism of action of TA in NSCLC.

Schematic representation depicting the mechanism of action of TA in NSCLC. It is noteworthy to mention that additional in-depth studies and in vivo studies would add more insights to the potential use of TA as a new adjuvant treatment modality or a potential preventive agent for NSCLC.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that TA inhibits angiogenesis via decreasing the VEGF level and also suppressing the growth of the NSCLC cells. TA treatment showed antitumor effects through various functional assays in NSCLC cells. Furthermore, the TA treatment strategy enhanced the antimetastatic activity such as reduction in the cell migratory effect and invasion, in addition to significant inhibition of the wound healing process. We believe that these findings will pave the way for the transfer of TA as a novel natural therapeutic for NSCLC therapy, either alone or in combination with other anticancer drugs, to improve the patient’s quality of life by reducing cancer therapy side effects. The data also provide support for that TA can be used as a preventive agent against NSCLC.
  60 in total

1.  Tannic acid elicits selective antitumoral activity in vitro and inhibits cancer cell growth in a preclinical model of glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Natália P Bona; Nathalia S Pedra; Juliana H Azambuja; Mayara S P Soares; Luíza Spohr; Nicolly E Gelsleichter; Bernardo de M Meine; Fernanda G Sekine; Lorenço T Mendonça; Francine H de Oliveira; Elizandra Braganhol; Roselia M Spanevello; Elita F da Silveira; Francieli Moro Stefanello
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.584

2.  Angiogenesis as a prognostic indicator of survival in non-small-cell lung carcinoma: a prospective study.

Authors:  G Fontanini; M Lucchi; S Vignati; A Mussi; F Ciardiello; M De Laurentiis; S De Placido; F Basolo; C A Angeletti; G Bevilacqua
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-06-18       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Tannic acid potently inhibits tumor cell proteasome activity, increases p27 and Bax expression, and induces G1 arrest and apoptosis.

Authors:  S Nam; D M Smith; Q P Dou
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 5.  Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation.

Authors:  Douglas Hanahan; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Secondary Metabolites from Plants Inhibiting ABC Transporters and Reversing Resistance of Cancer Cells and Microbes to Cytotoxic and Antimicrobial Agents.

Authors:  Michael Wink; Mohamed L Ashour; Mahmoud Zaki El-Readi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Curcumin attenuates β-catenin signaling in prostate cancer cells through activation of protein kinase D1.

Authors:  Vasudha Sundram; Subhash C Chauhan; Mara Ebeling; Meena Jaggi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Wound healing and cancer stem cells: inflammation as a driver of treatment resistance in breast cancer.

Authors:  Kimberly M Arnold; Lynn M Opdenaker; Daniel Flynn; Jennifer Sims-Mourtada
Journal:  Cancer Growth Metastasis       Date:  2015-01-29

Review 9.  Broad targeting of angiogenesis for cancer prevention and therapy.

Authors:  Zongwei Wang; Charlotta Dabrosin; Xin Yin; Mark M Fuster; Alexandra Arreola; W Kimryn Rathmell; Daniele Generali; Ganji P Nagaraju; Bassel El-Rayes; Domenico Ribatti; Yi Charlie Chen; Kanya Honoki; Hiromasa Fujii; Alexandros G Georgakilas; Somaira Nowsheen; Amedeo Amedei; Elena Niccolai; Amr Amin; S Salman Ashraf; Bill Helferich; Xujuan Yang; Gunjan Guha; Dipita Bhakta; Maria Rosa Ciriolo; Katia Aquilano; Sophie Chen; Dorota Halicka; Sulma I Mohammed; Asfar S Azmi; Alan Bilsland; W Nicol Keith; Lasse D Jensen
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 15.707

10.  Cytoproliferative and Anti-Oxidant Effects Induced by Tannic Acid in Human Embryonic Kidney (Hek-293) Cells.

Authors:  Pearl O Perumal; Priscilla Mhlanga; Anou M Somboro; Daniel G Amoako; Hezekiel M Khumalo; Rene M Khan
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2019-11-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.