Elham Hatami1,2, Prashanth K B Nagesh1,3,4, Mohammed Sikander1,4,5, Anupam Dhasmana4,5, Subhash C Chauhan1,4,5, Meena Jaggi1,4,5, Murali M Yallapu1,4,5. 1. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee 38163, United States. 2. Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States. 3. Laboratory of Signal Transduction, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, United States. 4. Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, Texas 78504, United States. 5. South Texas Center of Excellence in Cancer Research, School of Medicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, Texas 78504, United States.
Abstract
Nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer, with a dismal prognosis. NSCLC is a highly vascularized tumor, and chemotherapy is often hampered by the development of angiogenesis. Therefore, suppression of angiogenesis is considered a potential treatment approach. Tannic acid (TA), a natural polyphenol, has been demonstrated to have anticancer properties in a variety of cancers; however, its angiogenic properties have yet to be studied. Hence, in the current study, we investigated the antiproliferative and antiangiogenic effects of TA on NSCLC cells. The (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium) (MTS) assay revealed that TA induced a dose- and time-dependent decrease in the proliferation of A549 and H1299 cells. However, TA had no significant toxicity effects on human bronchial epithelial cells. Clonogenicity assay revealed that TA suppressed colony formation ability in NSCLC cells in a dose-dependent manner. The anti-invasiveness and antimigratory potential of TA were confirmed by Matrigel and Boyden chamber studies, respectively. Importantly, TA also decreased the ability of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) to form tube-like networks, demonstrating its antiangiogenic properties. Extracellular vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) release was reduced in TA-treated cells compared to that in control cells, as measured by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Overall, these results demonstrate that TA can induce antiproliferative and antiangiogenic effects against NSCLC.
Nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer, with a dismal prognosis. NSCLC is a highly vascularized tumor, and chemotherapy is often hampered by the development of angiogenesis. Therefore, suppression of angiogenesis is considered a potential treatment approach. Tannic acid (TA), a natural polyphenol, has been demonstrated to have anticancer properties in a variety of cancers; however, its angiogenic properties have yet to be studied. Hence, in the current study, we investigated the antiproliferative and antiangiogenic effects of TA on NSCLC cells. The (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium) (MTS) assay revealed that TA induced a dose- and time-dependent decrease in the proliferation of A549 and H1299 cells. However, TA had no significant toxicity effects on human bronchial epithelial cells. Clonogenicity assay revealed that TA suppressed colony formation ability in NSCLC cells in a dose-dependent manner. The anti-invasiveness and antimigratory potential of TA were confirmed by Matrigel and Boyden chamber studies, respectively. Importantly, TA also decreased the ability of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) to form tube-like networks, demonstrating its antiangiogenic properties. Extracellular vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) release was reduced in TA-treated cells compared to that in control cells, as measured by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Overall, these results demonstrate that TA can induce antiproliferative and antiangiogenic effects against NSCLC.
Lung cancer (LC) is the
most common and fatal malignancy in men
and women in the United States. For the year 2022, the American Cancer
Society estimated that about 236,740 new cancer cases and 130,180
deaths will occur due to LC in the United States.[1] It accounts for 12.5% of all cancer diagnoses and 21% of
total cancer-related mortality. Nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) are two different types of cancer,
which differ in their histology, patterns of occurrence, and prognoses.[2] NSCLC is the most common LC, accounting for 85
percent of all cases. Despite recent advancements in standard treatment
approaches such as surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and targeted
therapy, the survival rate remains low.Angiogenesis, like that
of other solid tumors, is considered as
a critical phase in the advancement of lung malignancies. Angiogenesis
is a process of blood vessel formation in tumor microenvironments
and represents one of the hallmarks of cancer growth, proliferation,
metastasis, and chemoresistance.[3] These
newly formed blood vessel networks are responsible for carrying nutrients
and oxygen to the tumor cells, and they undergo rapid development
and serve as channels to promote metastasis of cancer cells to distant
organs.[4,5] The lungs are a highly vascularized organ,
and studies have shown that NSCLC development and progression are
closely linked to major changes in the blood vessel system; thus,
inhibiting angiogenesis is a promising approach for NSCLC treatment.[6] Angiogenesis inhibitors such as bevacizumab and
other tyrosine kinase inhibitors are used to treat lung cancer. Bevacizumab,
a potent vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-humanized monoclonal
antibody, blocks/inhibits angiogenesis and neovascularization.[7] The VGEF is a critical element in cancer angiogenesis,
where an induction in VGEF activation is responsible to boost the
new blood vessel formation and enhance the development of fresh vasculature
networks to be able to efficiently supply the oxygen and nutrient
stock to the constantly growing tumor.[8] Notably, the VEGF is also a potent stimulator of proliferation and
migration; it induces the expression of the metalloproteinases (MMPs).
Numerous studies have reported that the overexpression of the VEGF
intensifies the tumor growth and metastasis by expanding the vasculature
network.[9] Bevacizumab has also been studied
in SCLC, with varying results in both confined and prolonged disease.
When paired with first-line chemotherapy, bevacizumab increased progression-free
survival but not overall survival.[10] As
a result, finding effective antilung cancer drugs, especially those
generated from natural resources, is a viable strategy to increase
patient compliance and survival rates.Tannic acid (TA, C76H52O46) (Figure A), a naturally occurring
water-soluble polyphenolic extract, has been approved as a safe compound
by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which made it a safe
excipient/active additive in food, drink, and pharmaceutical formulations.[11−13] TA is abundantly available, as it is commonly present in plant leaves
(e.g., green tea), fruit skins, vegetables, nuts, red wine, coffee,
and wood bark. TA (penta-m-digalloyl glucose) contains
a unique hydrolyzable structure of tannin with a glucose moiety core.[14] The hydroxyl groups of this glucose are esterified
with five digallic acids.[15] TA exhibits
antioxidant, antimicrobial, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory properties.[16] TA’s broad range of bioactivities makes
it a potent and viable pharmaceutical additive molecule for various
indications. We anticipate that TA could effectively modulate the
tumor biology of NSCLC by altering the angiogenesis processes.
Figure 1
Tannic acid
exhibits NSCLC cell-specific cytotoxicity. (A) Chemical
structure of tannic acid. (B) Normal human bronchial epithelium cell
line (BEAS-2B) and NSCLC (A549 and H1299) cells were treated with
different concentrations of TA (0–40 μM) and incubated
for 48 and 72 h. Cell proliferation assay was evaluated after addition
of the (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium) (MTS) reagent. Data represent means ± SEM, n = 3. A table representing the IC50 of TA in NSCLC cells
at 48 and 72 h. (C) Cell (BEAS-2B, A549 and H1299) morphology changes
were studied using an inverted microscope.
Tannic acid
exhibits NSCLC cell-specific cytotoxicity. (A) Chemical
structure of tannic acid. (B) Normal human bronchial epithelium cell
line (BEAS-2B) and NSCLC (A549 and H1299) cells were treated with
different concentrations of TA (0–40 μM) and incubated
for 48 and 72 h. Cell proliferation assay was evaluated after addition
of the (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium) (MTS) reagent. Data represent means ± SEM, n = 3. A table representing the IC50 of TA in NSCLC cells
at 48 and 72 h. (C) Cell (BEAS-2B, A549 and H1299) morphology changes
were studied using an inverted microscope.The chemopreventive and anticancer effects of TA have been shown
against various types of cancers such as breast,[17,18] ovarian,[19] and brain cancers.[20] The literature supports that TA is able to suppress
cancer progression via inhibiting various oncogenic
signaling pathways.[21−23] TA-induced apoptotic effects on FAS-overexpressed
human breast cancer cells have also been reported.[24] TA modulates drug efflux and enhances the cytotoxicity
of chemotherapeutic agents in human cholangiocarcinoma.[25] TA is involved in reversing drug resistance
by inhibiting the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway,[26] inhibiting ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters,[27] and downregulating P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and
multidrug resistance (MDR) via downregulation of
NF-κB and MAPK/ERK.[28] A recent study
in our laboratory has confirmed TA-induced endoplasmic reticulum
stress-mediated apoptosis and lipid metabolism in prostate cancer
cells.[29,30] TA has been shown to have a potent tyrosine
kinase activity.[31] In lung cancer cells,
TA inhibits stemness by triggering caspase-dependent mitochondria-mediated
apoptosis.[32]Tannic acid exhibits
a selective CXCL12/CXCR4 antagonist, which
suggests its antitumor and antiangiogenic potential.[33] To the best of our knowledge, TA’s influence on
angiogenesis via modulation of the VEGF secretion
from NSCLC remains largely unknown.[29] Therefore,
understanding the response of NSCLC cells to a water-soluble natural
anticancer agent (TA) is a clinically unmet need. In addition, revealing
the underlying aspects of TA’s antiangiogenic effects and how
it may alter the tumor biology holds great promise for identifying
new therapeutic targets for NSCLC in clinical translation. Taken together,
in this study, our goal is to elucidate the effect of TA on NSCLC
cells. We will investigate NSCLC cells that were incubated with different
concentrations of TA. Outcomes were measured by characterizing cell
proliferation, invasiveness, apoptosis, VEGF secretion, and angiogenesis
in NSCLC cell lines.
Materials and Methods
Materials, Reagents, and Cell Culture
All the chemicals,
solvents, reagents, and cell culture media were
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO) and Fisher Scientific
(Pittsburgh, PA) and used without further purification unless otherwise
stated. Nonsmall-cell lung cancer cell lines (A549 and H1299), a human
normal bronchial epithelial cell line (BEAS-2B), and human umbilical
vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were purchased from American Type Culture
Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). The H1299, A549, BEAS-2B, and HUVECs
were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute-1640 (RPMI-1640),
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM), bronchial epithelial
cell growth medium (BEGM), and endothelial cell medium-2 (EGM TM-2).
All media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% (w/v)
penicillin–streptomycin. Cell lines were maintained at 37 °C
with a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in an incubator.
Cell lines were regularly monitored for their typical morphology and
contamination under a microscope. These cells were trypsinized and
seeded for in vitro studies.
Cell
Viability
The CellTiter 96 AQueous
One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (MTS reagent, Promega, Mannheim,
Germany) was performed to determine the cell viability.[29] The assay was carried out in 96-well microplates.
Each of the A549, H1299, and BEAS-2B cell lines (5 × 103 cells/well) was seeded in their respective media and left overnight
for adhesion. On the following day, cells were treated with different
concentrations of TA (1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, and 40 μM). After
48 and 72 h of treatment, 20 μL of the MTS solution was added
to each well and incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The
absorbance of each well was measured using a microplate reader (Cytation
5, BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT) at 490 nm according to the manufacturer’s
instructions. The cell viability of treated cells was normalized to
absorbance readings in untreated control cells (considered to have
100% viability). The concentration required for 50% cell growth inhibition
(IC50) was calculated using GraphPad Prism 6.07 software (Dotmatics,
San Diego, CA).
Colony Formation
The impact of TA
on inhibiting the clonogenicity of NSCLC cells was tested by the colony
formation assay.[29] The A549 and H1299 cells
(500 cells/well) were cultured in multi-well plates and were allowed
to attach and initiate the colonization for 48 h. Then, the medium
was replaced with a fresh one containing a varying concentration of
TA (2.5, 5, and 10 μM) alongside one without treatment for the
control and incubated further for 2 weeks. At the end of the 14 days,
colonies were fixed with cold methanol and stained using 0.05% crystal
violet at room temperature. The cell colonies were photographed utilizing
a ChemiDoc MP imaging system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), and the number
of colonies was counted using publicly available ImageJ software (www.imagej.nih.gov/ij/).
Cell Migration
The effect of TA on
NSCLC cell mobility and migration was evaluated through Boyden’s
chamber assay and was utilized .[29] In brief,
the cells were subjected to starvation by culturing them overnight
in serum-free media and plated in the upper chambers of a 96-transwell
plate at 5 × 105 cells containing 20 μM TA concentration
and one with an equivalent amount of the phosphate-buffered saline
(PBS) as the control in the serum-free medium, while lower chamber
contains complete medium containing 10% FBS. Cells were allowed to
migrate toward the fetal bovine serum (FBS) gradient for 24 h; then,
the migrated cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 45 min
and stained with 0.05% crystal violet for 30 min at room temperature.
The migrated cells were imaged under a microscope (EVOS FL microscopy
(AMF4300, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA)).
Wound
Healing
The effect of TA on
NSCLC cell’s wound healing ability was assessed using a scratch
assay.[29] Briefly, A549 and H1299 cells
were cultured in 6-well plates overnight at the density of 1 ×
106 cells/well. When the degree of fusion reached 80%,
to create wounds, a 200 μL sterile pipette tip was applied to
create wounds on each well. After rinsing the cells with PBS to wash
out the debris, cells were treated with 10 μM TA with an untreated
well as a control, and the extent of the treatment effect was monitored
till 72 h. The residual of the wounds was closely observed and photographed
at 24 h intervals using an EVOS FL imaging system.
Cell Invasion
To analyze the effect
of TA on the invasion potential of NSCLCs (A549 and H1299), BioCoat
Matrigel invasion chambers (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA) were utilized.[21,29] The starved cells, as described above, were distributed on the transwell
inserts at a density of 3.5 × 104 and incubated with
20 μM TA and PBS (as control) for 24 h. The cells that invaded
to the lower chamber were fixed with cold methanol for 30 min and
were stained using crystal violet. Invaded cells on membranes were
imaged using EVOS FL microscopy.
Bioinformatics
Analysis
A total of
53 altered protein targets of TA were manually curated from the literature
and standardized by authors. The protein–protein interaction
(PPI) network and pathway enrichment analyses were obtained from the
Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) plugin of STRING databases.
Cytoscape was used for the construction of the final PPI of TA-regulated
proteins, which was notified with the color gradient on the basis
of the bottleneck property of protein topology.[34,35] The three-dimensional (3D) structures of VEGFA (PDB ID: 5FV1), CBP (PDB ID: 5J0D), and P300 (PDB
ID: 6GYR) proteins
were retrieved from the RCSB protein databank, whereas the 3D structure
of TA (PubChem CID: 16129778) was constructed using Biovia Discovery
Studio 20202. The FireDock docking server was applied for the interaction
analysis between VEGFA, CBP, P300, and TA.[36]
Tube Forming Assay
The in
vitro antiangiogenic effect of TA on HUVECs (with a passage
number lower than five) was analyzed by evaluating the extent of vascular
structure/tubular formation of cells.[37] The 96-well plates were filled with 50 μL of Matrigel (Becton,
Dickinson and Company) diluted with PBS (1:1) and placed in an incubator
at 37 °C for 1 h to be solidified. Then, HUVECs (1 ×
104 cells/well) were incubated with a range of TA concentrations
(10, 15, 20, and 30 μM) and added to the Matrigel-coated plates.
After allowing vascular structure formation for 4 h at 37 °C
in an incubator, the vascular-like structures/networks were observed
using an EVOS FL imaging system; a quantification of three random
regions was assessed using ImageJ software using an angiogenesis analyzer.
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
The enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to test
the TA influence on the downregulation of the VEGF protein expression
on NSCLC. The A549 and H1299 cells were cultured in 6-well plates
at a density of 1 × 106 cells/well. On the next day,
the cells were treated with TA (5, 10, 20, and 30 μM) for 24,
48, and 72 h. Then, the supernatant media were harvested and stored
at −20 °C. A commercially available VEGF Quantikine ELISA
Kit-DVE00 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) was used to measure the
levels of the VEGF, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Statistical analysis
All statistical
analyses were attempted using GraphPad Prism (Version 6.07, GraphPad
Software) to analyze the data. The results are described as the means
± SEM of three individual sets of experiments. The difference
among the groups was estimated by Student’s t-test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The level of statistical
significance was set to *p < 0.01 and **p < 0.001.
Results
Tannic
Acid Inhibits the Proliferation of
NSCLC Cells
First, the cell viability assay was utilized
to test a safe concentration range of TA against the normal human
bronchial epithelium cell line (BEAS-2B). The tested concentrations
from 2.5 to 40 μM appear to be nontoxic to BEAS-2B cells in
48 and 72 h treatments (Figure B, blue color line graphs and Figure C). At these concentrations, it was observed
that there is more than 90% of cell viability. Then, the potential
inhibitory effect of TA on the proliferation of two NSCLC (A549 and
H1299) cells in this concentration range or vehicle solution control
over two different incubation times (48 and 72 h) was characterized.
As shown in Figure B, TA suppressed the growth of NSCLC cells in a dose-dependent and
time-responsive manner. IC50 values were calculated as 23.76 ±
1.17 and 10.69 ± 0.83 μM for the A549 cell line and 21.58
± 1.12 and 7.136 ± 0.64 μM for the H1299 cell line,
at 48 and 72 h, respectively. Both A549 and H1299 cells demonstrated
varied degrees of phenotypic alterations, such as the loss of viable
cells and blebbing, when treated with TA, while control cells maintained
their usual phenotype until the treatment step was completed (Figure C).
Tannic Acid Suppresses the Clonogenic Potential
of NSCLC Cells
Enhanced clonogenic potential is a very important
characteristic of cancer growth and metastasis. The clonogenic growth
characteristic is necessary for the cancer cells to establish a primary
tumor and eventually metastasis.[38] Therefore,
the effect of TA on the colony formation ability of A549 and H1299
cells was determined on a long-term basis (14 days) at various concentrations
(2.5, 5, and 10 μM) (Figure ).
Figure 2
Tannic acid treatment significantly reduces the clonogenic
potential
of NSCLC cells. The long-term antiproliferative effects of TA were
evaluated in a colony formation assay. The colony formation assay
was performed on A549 and H1299 cells. The 500 cells were seeded per
well of a multi-well plate, and treatment with TA was done at different
concentrations (0, 2.5, 5, and 10 μM) for 14 days. (A) Colonies
were stained with hematoxylin, and images were captured using a phase-contrast
microscope. Representative images of the colony formation assay of
A549 and H1299. (B) Number of colonies are counted and plotted for
A549 and H1299. Data represent means ± SEM, n = 3. *p < 0.01, **p < 0.001.
Tannic acid treatment significantly reduces the clonogenic
potential
of NSCLC cells. The long-term antiproliferative effects of TA were
evaluated in a colony formation assay. The colony formation assay
was performed on A549 and H1299 cells. The 500 cells were seeded per
well of a multi-well plate, and treatment with TA was done at different
concentrations (0, 2.5, 5, and 10 μM) for 14 days. (A) Colonies
were stained with hematoxylin, and images were captured using a phase-contrast
microscope. Representative images of the colony formation assay of
A549 and H1299. (B) Number of colonies are counted and plotted for
A549 and H1299. Data represent means ± SEM, n = 3. *p < 0.01, **p < 0.001.TA exhibited reduction of the
number of visible and bigger colonies
in a dose-dependent manner (Figure A). The quantitative analysis revealed that the percent
number of cell colonies was significantly reduced with increasing
TA concentration. This effect is similar in both A549 and H1299 cell
lines (Figure B).
Together, these results indicate that TA suppresses the colony formation
ability of the NSCLC.
Tannic Acid Inhibits the
Migration and Invasion
Potential of NSCLC Cells
Tumor cell metastasis is known as
a complex of events, which involves cell adhesion, extracellular matrix
(ECM) component degradation, and tumor cell migration. Thus, blocking
one or more of these steps is required for antimetastatic therapy.[39] The effects of TA on NSCLC’s invasion
and migratory abilities were subsequently assessed by performing the
Boyden chamber assay (Figure ).
Figure 3
Tannic acid treatment minimizes the migration and invasion ability
of NSCLC cells. (A) Boyden chamber migration assay was performed on
NSCLC cells A549 and H1299. The cells were treated with 0 and 20 μM
concentrations for 18 h. After that, the cells were fixed with 4%
paraformaldehyde, stained with crystal violet, and left for drying.
Furthermore, the images were captured. Scale bar: 200 μm. (B)
For wound healing assay, cells were wounded by scratching and monitored
over different time intervals (24, 48, and 72 h) upon treatment with
10 μM TA to observe the wound closure (40×) magnification,
scale bar: 400 μm. (C) Matrigel invasion assay was performed
on NSCLC cells A549 and H1299. The cells were treated with TA at 20
μM for 24 h. Thereafter, the cells were washed with PBS, fixed
with methanol, and stained using crystal violet. Upon drying, images
were taken. Scale bar: 200 μm.
Tannic acid treatment minimizes the migration and invasion ability
of NSCLC cells. (A) Boyden chamber migration assay was performed on
NSCLC cells A549 and H1299. The cells were treated with 0 and 20 μM
concentrations for 18 h. After that, the cells were fixed with 4%
paraformaldehyde, stained with crystal violet, and left for drying.
Furthermore, the images were captured. Scale bar: 200 μm. (B)
For wound healing assay, cells were wounded by scratching and monitored
over different time intervals (24, 48, and 72 h) upon treatment with
10 μM TA to observe the wound closure (40×) magnification,
scale bar: 400 μm. (C) Matrigel invasion assay was performed
on NSCLC cells A549 and H1299. The cells were treated with TA at 20
μM for 24 h. Thereafter, the cells were washed with PBS, fixed
with methanol, and stained using crystal violet. Upon drying, images
were taken. Scale bar: 200 μm.The number of migrating cells after TA treatment was evidently
inhibited in A549 and H1299 cells compared with that in the control
(Figure A). The ability
of the cells to heal the wound and fill the gap to support the reduced
migratory capability (Figure B) was confirmed by a wound healing assay. The extent of the
wound closure was maintained with TA treatment, while the untreated-well
wound was healed due to the inherent migratory characteristics of
NSCLC. Overall, these results confirm the antimigratory ability of
TA on NSCLC cells. In carcinogenic events, cancer cells disseminated
through blood or lymphatics to other sites via invasion.[40,41] To gain a better understanding of the anti-invasion ability of TA,
a transwell assay was performed on A549 and H1299 cells. The number
of invaded cells A549 and H1299 toward the FBS gradient was markedly
lower in the treatment group compared to that in the control group
(Figure C). These
results indicated that TA could be a promising adjuvant to inhibit
the invasion of NSCLC cells.
Bioinformatics Analysis
After pathway
enrichment and PPI analysis of the altered TA target protein dataset
(Figure ), we found
the involvement of numerous proteins in different types of cancers.
In this enrichment analysis, we found that around 35 proteins out
of 53 proteins in the dataset follow a category of cancer-related
pathways (hsa05200) with the highest FDR being 2.47E-39. These proteins
include MAPK1, NFKBIA, MMP2, TGFB1, NFKB1, CDKN1B, CDK4, PDGFRB, CCNE1,
WNT5A, RB1, EGFR, NOTCH1, BRAF, BAX, BCL2L1, CYCS, CASP3, KLK3, GSK3B,
CASP9, TCF7, CTNNB1, FAS, STAT1, PTGS2, CASP7, MMP9, JAK2, CXCL12,
BCL2, CDKN1A, CXCR4, WNT8A, and VEGFA. After carrying out network
analysis, it was found that around five top proteins have bottleneck
features of more than two. In between all these important proteins,
CTNNB1 and VGFRA were featured as the most important key regulatory
proteins of this TA-governed interactome. Among these two proteins,
lung cancer was clinically treated using angiogenesis inhibitors which
regulate VEGFA. Therefore, the TA influence on this protein is considered
in this investigation. VEGFA is also spotted as an important key regulatory
node of the TA-governed interactome with a 78 score of degree and
0.33796 (its less than 0.5) score of clustering coefficient. These
statistical connections show the importance of VEGFA in the TA-governed
interactome. The degree stands for the number of physical or functional
interactions of a node with other nodes, and the clustering coefficient
represents the closeness of nodes and neighbors; the clustering coefficient
also illustrates that the network has a high number of nodes but holds
a lesser number of connections, so there are high chances of binding
of ligands such as tannic acid.[34]
Figure 4
Tannic acid
interactive network analyses. Protein–protein
interaction: an interactive protein–protein network of all
53 tannic acid-regulated proteins. Color coding was done on the basis
of the bottleneck rank of individual protein networks generated from
Cytoscape. Most of the proteins are found in various types of cancer
groups. CTNNB1 and VEGFA are the top two identified main regulatory
proteins in this interactome.
Tannic acid
interactive network analyses. Protein–protein
interaction: an interactive protein–protein network of all
53 tannic acid-regulated proteins. Color coding was done on the basis
of the bottleneck rank of individual protein networks generated from
Cytoscape. Most of the proteins are found in various types of cancer
groups. CTNNB1 and VEGFA are the top two identified main regulatory
proteins in this interactome.After getting the probable target (VEGFA) of TA, docking analysis
was performed; the resultant TA docked perfectly with VEGFA with −36.17
global binding energy (Figure A). On the other hand, TA was also able to dock with CBP (Figure B) and P300 (Figure C) with global binding
energies of −34.24 and −59.99, respectively.
Figure 5
Molecular interaction
of tannic acid and angiogenesis-related proteins.
Figures were generated using Discovery Studio. (A) Interaction between
VEGFA (PDB ID: 5FV1) and tannic acid (PubChem CID: 16129778). Binding pattern of VEGFA
and tannic acid docking done using FireDock with −36.17 global
binding energy. The amino acid residues of the binding pocket are
THR 31, LEU 32, ASP 34, PHE 36, PRO 40, ARG 56, CYS 57, GLY 59, CYS
60, CYS 61, LEU 66, GLU 67, CYS 68, VAL 69, PRO 70, GLU 73, LEU 97,
and HIS 99. (B) Molecular interaction between CBP (PDB ID: 5J0D) and tannic acid
(PubChem CID: 16129778). Binding pattern of CBP and tannic acid docking
done using FireDock with −34.24 global binding energy. The
amino acid residues of the binding pocket are Leu1109, Arg1112, Gln1113,
Pro1114, Val1115, Asp1116, Leu1120, Gly1121, Ile1122, Tyr1167, Asn1168,
Arg1169, Ser1172, Arg1173, and Val1174. (C) Molecular interaction
between P300 (PDB ID: 6GYR) and tannic acid (PubChem CID: 16129778). Binding
pattern of CBP and tannic acid docking done using FireDock with −59.99
global binding energy. The amino acid residues of the binding pocket
are Tyr1394, Ile1395, Ser1396, Tyr1397, Ile1435, Trp1436, Ala1437,
Cys1438, Pro1439, Pro1440, Ser1441, Glu1442, Asp1444, Tyr1446, Pro1460,
Glu1505, Gly1506, Asp1507, Phe1508, Asn1511, Lys1590, His1591, Val1594,
and Arg1627.
Molecular interaction
of tannic acid and angiogenesis-related proteins.
Figures were generated using Discovery Studio. (A) Interaction between
VEGFA (PDB ID: 5FV1) and tannic acid (PubChem CID: 16129778). Binding pattern of VEGFA
and tannic acid docking done using FireDock with −36.17 global
binding energy. The amino acid residues of the binding pocket are
THR 31, LEU 32, ASP 34, PHE 36, PRO 40, ARG 56, CYS 57, GLY 59, CYS
60, CYS 61, LEU 66, GLU 67, CYS 68, VAL 69, PRO 70, GLU 73, LEU 97,
and HIS 99. (B) Molecular interaction between CBP (PDB ID: 5J0D) and tannic acid
(PubChem CID: 16129778). Binding pattern of CBP and tannic acid docking
done using FireDock with −34.24 global binding energy. The
amino acid residues of the binding pocket are Leu1109, Arg1112, Gln1113,
Pro1114, Val1115, Asp1116, Leu1120, Gly1121, Ile1122, Tyr1167, Asn1168,
Arg1169, Ser1172, Arg1173, and Val1174. (C) Molecular interaction
between P300 (PDB ID: 6GYR) and tannic acid (PubChem CID: 16129778). Binding
pattern of CBP and tannic acid docking done using FireDock with −59.99
global binding energy. The amino acid residues of the binding pocket
are Tyr1394, Ile1395, Ser1396, Tyr1397, Ile1435, Trp1436, Ala1437,
Cys1438, Pro1439, Pro1440, Ser1441, Glu1442, Asp1444, Tyr1446, Pro1460,
Glu1505, Gly1506, Asp1507, Phe1508, Asn1511, Lys1590, His1591, Val1594,
and Arg1627.
TA Inhibits In Vitro Tube
Formation Activity
Endothelial cell migration, invasion,
adhesiveness, tube assembly, and remodeling are footsteps of the new
vessel formation (angiogenesis).[42] Angiogenesis
is a highly regulated process that involves the growth of new blood
vessels from the existing vasculature. This process plays an important
role in both normal developmental processes and numerous pathologies,
ranging from wound healing, tumor growth, and metastasis to inflammation
and ocular diseases. Therefore, to determine the physiological significance
of the changes in the presence and absence of TA treatment, in vitro angiogenesis was performed on the HUVECs (Figure ).
Figure 6
Tannic acid treatments
inhibit the tube formation abilities of
HUVECs. In vitro tube formation assay was performed
to determine the effect of TA on HUVEC cells. (A) 1 × 104 cells/well were seeded in Matrigel-coated 96-well plates
followed by various TA concentrations (10, 15, 20, and 30 μM).
Morphology images of vascular-like structures/networks were captured
using an EVOS FL imaging system, and a quantification of three random
regions was assessed using ImageJ software using an angiogenesis analyzer.
(B) Bar graph representing the quantification of three random regions
assessed using ImageJ software using an angiogenesis analyzer. Data
represent means ± SEM, n = 3.
*p < 0.01, **p < 0.001.
Tannic acid treatments
inhibit the tube formation abilities of
HUVECs. In vitro tube formation assay was performed
to determine the effect of TA on HUVEC cells. (A) 1 × 104 cells/well were seeded in Matrigel-coated 96-well plates
followed by various TA concentrations (10, 15, 20, and 30 μM).
Morphology images of vascular-like structures/networks were captured
using an EVOS FL imaging system, and a quantification of three random
regions was assessed using ImageJ software using an angiogenesis analyzer.
(B) Bar graph representing the quantification of three random regions
assessed using ImageJ software using an angiogenesis analyzer. Data
represent means ± SEM, n = 3.
*p < 0.01, **p < 0.001.HUVEC tubular formation was suppressed by incubation
with the media
conditioned with 10, 15, and 20 μM TA (Figure A). The total length of tubules decreased
with respect to the increased concentrations of TA: 40.01 ± 2.37,
32.53 ± 4.50, and 19.22 ± 3.37% (Figure B). The control group was HUVECs incubated
with untreated media and was set as 100%, proposing that the TA treatment
with 20 μM was able to inhibit tube formation in HUVECs.
TA Significantly Reduces VEGF Secretion by
NSCLC Cells
Angiogenesis occurs primarily due to the production
of excessive VEGF.[5,43] Therefore, we sought to investigate
whether TA inhibits the secretion of VEGF using ELISA (Figure ).
Figure 7
Tannic acid treatment
significantly lowers the VEGF secretion from
tumor cells. ELISA assay was performed to determine the effect of
TA on the VEGF protein expression in (A) A549 and H1299 (B) cells.
The cells were treated with TA (5, 10, 20, and 30 μM) for 24,
48, and 72 h. The supernatant media were used to measure the levels
of VEGF secretion. Data represent means ± SEM, n = 3. *p < 0.01, **p < 0.001.
Tannic acid treatment
significantly lowers the VEGF secretion from
tumor cells. ELISA assay was performed to determine the effect of
TA on the VEGF protein expression in (A) A549 and H1299 (B) cells.
The cells were treated with TA (5, 10, 20, and 30 μM) for 24,
48, and 72 h. The supernatant media were used to measure the levels
of VEGF secretion. Data represent means ± SEM, n = 3. *p < 0.01, **p < 0.001.The treatment of NSCLC cells with
different concentrations of TA
significantly decreased the VEGF expression level in a dose-dependent
manner, suggesting that TA treatment has an inhibitory effect on the
level of the VEGF produced. Indeed, as the treatment continued with
longer incubation, the level of the VEGF also decreased accordingly
in both cell lines. The reduction in VEGF levels was statistically
significant.
Discussion
Lung
cancer is one of the most common cancers globally, both in
terms of incidence and mortality (18 percent of total cancer deaths).[44] NSCLC is the most common form of LC, accounting
for 85 percent of all occurrences. Despite enormous scientific investigations
in lung cancer, the incidence and fatality rates have not decreased
significantly.[45] The presence of increased
angiogenesis in NSCLC has been linked to a bad prognosis.[46,47] Several angiogenic switch molecular mediators are linked to a poor
clinical outcome.[48] Hence, antiangiogenesis
therapy remains an attractive treatment option for patients with NSCLC.[49] In this study, we investigated a simple yet
clinically suitable natural molecule-based treatment approach for
NSCLC, which may augment the survival outcome by inhibiting angiogenesis
and decreasing the systemic side effect.TA is a naturally occurring
polyphenol molecule. The water-soluble
polyphenols in TA attribute unique biological properties, which made
it an excellent candidate for the medicinal applications. Accumulating
studies confirmed TA as an antimutagenic, antioxidant, and anticancer
agent.[19,24,50,51] Moreover, TA has been used for therapeutic purposes
for centuries.[22] Notably, TA has become
a very interesting topic in anticancer drug discovery because of its
economic and organic production, in comparison to other chemical components.
Previous reports have shown anticancer potential in breast, prostate
cancer, and other cancers,[17,29] but to the best of
our knowledge, its effect on NSCLC due to the antiangiogenesis effect
and downregulation of the VEGF signaling pathway has not yet been
studied.In our study, TA has shown a significant anticancer
effect on NSCLC
cells. The quantification of the proliferation of A549 and H1299 by
cell viability studies showed that TA treatment reduces the rate of
the proliferations of both cell lines drastically and inhibits the
growth and suppresses the cell viability of A549 and H1299 (Figure ). Additionally,
our results showed that in the presence of TA, there is a significant
decline in the number of colonies (Figure ). It was noticed that viable cells and colonies
of H1299 were not as much as those in A549 cells. This result suggests
that H1299 cells are more sensitive to TA treatment than A549 cells.
Moreover, there is an inhibitory effect on the number of cells invaded
and migrated, on A549 and H1299 (Figure ). The process of wound healing predominantly
regulates and promotes the growth of malignant cells[52] and migration of cancer cells; our scratch assay results
support that TA has an inhibitory effect on the mechanism that regulates
wound healing, in a time-dependent fashion in both cell lines. Our
findings are consistent with the previous literature that have reported
the antitumoral and anticancer activity of TA on other types of cancers
such as prostate cancer,[29,53] breast cancer,[17,24] and colon cancer.[54]Angiogenesis
occurs to build an intact network to circulate nutrition
and oxygen and is vital for cancer cells’ function, growth,
and survival. A high level of the VEGF is necessary for this network,
and if its function is hindered and could not keep up with the rapid
growth of the tumor, the cancerous cells have no other option but
to undergo apoptosis.[6] Collective reports
show that a decreased level of the VEGF caused inhibition of tumor
growth and proliferation.[9,55−57] We have measured the VEGF protein concentrations by ELISA, and the
respective data revealed that the VEGF level of the supernatant remarkedly
decreased following TA treatment. A high amount of VEGF is generated
from cancer cells early in tumor-induced angiogenesis, and it then
binds to VEGFR2 on endothelial cells to cause angiogenesis.[58−60] Our results (Figures and 7) suggest that such a decrease in VEGF
secretion in NSCLC when exposed to TA had attributed to the reduction
of tube formulation capability, hence leading to a decline in angiogenesis
and formation of intact blood vasculature networks. Inhibition of
angiogenesis would potentially suppress the metastasis and inhibit
the chance of tumor cells spreading around the patient’s body.Overall, TA has an advantageous therapeutic profile owing to its
safe and nontoxic plant-based nature, which makes it a very suitable
candidate for cancer therapy, especially for unfit NSCLC patients.
These results manifest that TA acts as a potent inhibitor for blood
vessel formation, hence strengthening the rationale of using TA as
an antiangiogenic agent for NSCLC therapy (Figure ).
Figure 8
Schematic representation depicting the mechanism
of action of TA
in NSCLC.
Schematic representation depicting the mechanism
of action of TA
in NSCLC.It is noteworthy to mention that
additional in-depth studies and in vivo studies would
add more insights to the potential
use of TA as a new adjuvant treatment modality or a potential preventive
agent for NSCLC.
Conclusions
This
study demonstrates that TA inhibits angiogenesis via decreasing the VEGF level and also suppressing the growth of the
NSCLC cells. TA treatment showed antitumor effects through various
functional assays in NSCLC cells. Furthermore, the TA treatment strategy
enhanced the antimetastatic activity such as reduction in the cell
migratory effect and invasion, in addition to significant inhibition
of the wound healing process. We believe that these findings will
pave the way for the transfer of TA as a novel natural therapeutic
for NSCLC therapy, either alone or in combination with other anticancer
drugs, to improve the patient’s quality of life by reducing
cancer therapy side effects. The data also provide support for that
TA can be used as a preventive agent against NSCLC.
Authors: Natália P Bona; Nathalia S Pedra; Juliana H Azambuja; Mayara S P Soares; Luíza Spohr; Nicolly E Gelsleichter; Bernardo de M Meine; Fernanda G Sekine; Lorenço T Mendonça; Francine H de Oliveira; Elizandra Braganhol; Roselia M Spanevello; Elita F da Silveira; Francieli Moro Stefanello Journal: Metab Brain Dis Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 3.584
Authors: G Fontanini; M Lucchi; S Vignati; A Mussi; F Ciardiello; M De Laurentiis; S De Placido; F Basolo; C A Angeletti; G Bevilacqua Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1997-06-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Zongwei Wang; Charlotta Dabrosin; Xin Yin; Mark M Fuster; Alexandra Arreola; W Kimryn Rathmell; Daniele Generali; Ganji P Nagaraju; Bassel El-Rayes; Domenico Ribatti; Yi Charlie Chen; Kanya Honoki; Hiromasa Fujii; Alexandros G Georgakilas; Somaira Nowsheen; Amedeo Amedei; Elena Niccolai; Amr Amin; S Salman Ashraf; Bill Helferich; Xujuan Yang; Gunjan Guha; Dipita Bhakta; Maria Rosa Ciriolo; Katia Aquilano; Sophie Chen; Dorota Halicka; Sulma I Mohammed; Asfar S Azmi; Alan Bilsland; W Nicol Keith; Lasse D Jensen Journal: Semin Cancer Biol Date: 2015-01-16 Impact factor: 15.707