| Literature DB >> 35847192 |
Michael Tim-Yun Ong1,2, Sai-Chuen Fu1,2, Sze-Wing Mok1,2, Alfredo Franco-Obregón3,4,5,6, Stacy Lok-Sze Yam1,2, Patrick Shu-Hang Yung1,2.
Abstract
Purpose: Persistent quadriceps muscle atrophy is observed in a subset of patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) despite the completion of comprehensive rehabilitation. Critically, quadriceps muscle atrophy correlates with muscle weakness and quadriceps strength deficits. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of resistance exercise on myokine levels and muscle atrophy status in ACLR patients with persistent quadriceps muscle atrophy.Entities:
Keywords: ACL; Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Brain-derived neurotrophic factor; Myokine; Quadriceps muscle atrophy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35847192 PMCID: PMC9263390 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmart.2022.05.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol ISSN: 2214-6873
Fig. 1Vastus Medialis (VM), Vastus Lateralis (VL), and Rectus Femoris (RF) muscles on both the involved and uninvolved legs were marked for ultrasonographic measurement.
Fig. 2Sagittal plane of Vastus Medialis (VM), Vastus Lateralis (VL), and Rectus Femoris (RF) muscles for ultrasonographic measurement of muscle thickness.
Baseline characteristics of recruited subjects with respect to demographics, patient-reported outcome measures, ultrasonographic measurement of quadriceps thickness and isokinetic muscle strength.
| Number of subjects (Number of female) | 16(8) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 25.7 ± 6 | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.0 ± 26 | ||
| Time Post-Op (months) | 17.9 ± 10 | ||
| IKDC Score | 82(22) | ||
| Lysholm Score | 88 (44) | ||
| Tegner Score | 7(5) | ||
| 6.5±5 | |||
| -1(3) | |||
| RF (cm) | |||
| 2.35 ± 0.4 | 2.28 ± 0.3 | 0.973 ± 0.08 | |
| VM (cm) | |||
| 2.54 ± 0.5 | 2.04 ± 0.5 | 0.812 ± 0.19 | |
| VL (cm) | |||
| 2.25 ± 0.5 | 1.97 ± 0.4 | 0.886 ± 0.17 | |
| Extension Peak TQ/BW at 60°/s (%) | |||
| 248.0 ± 60 | 183.0 ± 60 | 0.741 ± 0.19 | |
| Extension Peak TQ/BW at 180°/s (%) | |||
| 181.5 ± 34 | 137.0 ± 42 | 0.747 ± 0.15 | |
| Flexion Peak TQ/BW at 60°/s (%) | |||
| 109.8 ± 34 | 97.3 ± 30 | 0.891 ± 0.11 | |
| Flexion Peak TQ/BW at 180°/s (%) | |||
| 80.4 ± 21 | 77.5 ± 23 | 0.966 ± 0.12 | |
| H/Q ratio at 60°/s (%) | |||
| 45.0 ± 12 | 55.6 ± 18 | ||
| H/Q ratio at 180°/s (%) | |||
| 44.0 ± 8 | 58.5 ± 16 | ||
∗TQ = Torque; BW = Body Weight; H/Q = Hamstrings strength/Quadriceps strength.
Fig. 33D scatter plot of muscle group thickness ratio distribution in the clustered groups assigned as non-atrophy (muscle thickness ratio ∼1) and atrophy group (muscle thickness ratio <1).
Muscle thickness measurements and isokinetic muscle strengths of uninvolved and involved limbs in clustered groups.
| Muscle thickness measurements and isokinetic muscle strengths | Non-atrophy group N = 9 | Atrophy group N = 7 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RF | 2.35 ± 0.3 | 2.37 ± 0.3 | 1.01 ± 0.2 | 2.35 ± 0.3 | 2.16 ± 0.3 | 0.922 ± 0.08∗ |
| VM | 2.38 ± 0.3 | 2.20 ± 0.5 | 0.93 ± 0.1 | 2.75 ± 0.5 | 1.83 ± 0.4 | 0.668 ± 0.11∗ |
| VL | 2.11 ± 0.4 | 2.17 ± 0.4 | 1.03 ± 0.1 | 2.44 ± 0.5 | 1.71 ± 0.3 | 0.706 ± 0.07∗ |
| Extension Peak TQ/BW at 60°/s | 243 ± 53 | 196 ± 61 | 0.810 ± 0.19 | 256 ± 72 | 166 ± 58 | 0.652 ± 0.17 |
| Flexion Peak TQ/BW at 60°/s | 120 ± 28 | 107 ± 25 | 0.898 ± 0.12 | 97 ± 38 | 86 ± 34 | 0.882 ± 0.10 |
| HQ ratio at 60°/s | 50 ± 10 | 58 ± 17 | N.A. | 38 ± 12∗ | 53 ± 22 | N.A. |
| Extension Peak TQ/BW at 180°/s | 177 ± 30 | 137 ± 39 | 0.769 ± 0.13 | 188 ± 40 | 137 ± 48 | 0.718 ± 0.17 |
| Flexion Peak TQ/BW at 180°/s | 83 ± 18 | 80 ± 24 | 0.956 ± 0.14 | 77 ± 26 | 74 ± 23 | 0.979 ± 0.09 |
| HQ ratio 180°/s | 47 ± 6 | 59 ± 14 | N.A. | 40 ± 9 | 57 ± 19 | N.A. |
Descriptive Statistics of patient demographics and patient self-reported outcome measures in clustered groups.
| Patient demographics and patient self-reported outcome measures | Non-atrophy group N = 9 (6 female) | Atrophy group N = 7 (2 female) | |
| Age (years) | 25.2 ± 4 | 26.3 ± 5 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.3 ± 1 | 22.3 ± 2 | |
| Time Post-Op (months) | 15.7 ± 6 | 20.9 ± 8 | |
| IKDC Score | 87 (25) | 80.5 (24) | |
| Lysholm Score | 90 (28) | 86(11) | |
| Tegner | Before Injury | 9 (2.5) | 7(1)∗ |
| After ACLR | 5(5) | 7(3) | |
| Differences | −24 | (3) | |
Fig. 4Fold change of myokines after resistance exercise training in clustered groups. Significant difference in BDNF fold change was detected.
Serum levels of myokine (in pg/mL) detected before and after single bout of resistance exercise training in the clustered groups.
| Myokine | Non-atrophy group N = 9 | Atrophy group N = 7 | |
| BDNF | Before exercise | 12313 ± 4775 | 14999 ± 5745 |
| After exercise | 13052 ± 4505 | 13815 ± 6314 | |
| Fold change | 1.08 ± 0.1 | 0.891 ± 0.1∗ | |
| FABP3 | Before exercise | 1074 ± 403 | 1284 ± 622 |
| After exercise | 1665 ± 800 | 1634 ± 791 | |
| Fold change | 1.58 ± 0.7 | 1.46 ± 0.6 | |
| SPARC | Before exercise | 450 ± 137 | 356 ± 118 |
| After exercise | 451 ± 159 | 342 ± 117 | |
| Fold change | 0.995 ± 0.1 | 0.965 ± 0.1 |