Literature DB >> 3584698

Distribution of auditory-filter bandwidths at 2 kHz in young normal listeners.

B C Moore.   

Abstract

Auditory-filter shapes at 2 kHz were estimated for 95 young normally hearing subjects using a notched-noise masker with spectrum level of 45 dB. Excluding two subjects with a recent history of noise exposure, the equivalent rectangular bandwidths (ERBs) of the filters were approximately normally distributed but the distribution had a slight positive skew. The mean ERB was 308 Hz and the standard deviation was 32 Hz. The two noise-exposed subjects had ERBs of 404 and 497 Hz.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3584698     DOI: 10.1121/1.394518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

2.  Isoresponse versus isoinput estimates of cochlear filter tuning.

Authors:  Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-23

3.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the auditory filter.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Distribution of spectral modulation transfer functions in a young, normal-hearing population.

Authors:  Eric C Hoover; Ann C Eddins; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of Age and Hearing Loss on the Discrimination of Amplitude and Frequency Modulation for 2- and 10-Hz Rates.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Sashi Mariathasan; Aleksander P Sęk
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Towards an understanding of the mechanisms of weak central coherence effects: experiments in visual configural learning and auditory perception.

Authors:  Kate Plaisted; Lisa Saksida; José Alcántara; Emma Weisblatt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Development and current status of the "Cambridge" loudness models.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  A Loudness Model for Time-Varying Sounds Incorporating Binaural Inhibition.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Brian R Glasberg; Ajanth Varathanathan; Josef Schlittenlacher
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Portable Automated Rapid Testing (PART) for auditory assessment: Validation in a young adult normal-hearing population.

Authors:  E Sebastian Lelo de Larrea-Mancera; Trevor Stavropoulos; Eric C Hoover; David A Eddins; Frederick J Gallun; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Clinical Importance of Binaural Information: Extending Auditory Assessment in Clinical Populations Using a Portable Testing Platform.

Authors:  Anna C Diedesch; S J Adelaide Bock; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 1.636

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.