| Literature DB >> 35846968 |
Yuanchao Shen1, Manna Zheng1, Jiahao Li1, Tianbao Tan1, Jiliang Yang1, Jing Pan1, Chao Hu1, Yan Zou1, Tianyou Yang1.
Abstract
Purpose: Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging is becoming increasingly popular in adult oncologic surgery, but remains relatively uncommon in pediatric oncologic surgery. Herein, we report our experience with the use of ICG fluorescence imaging in the resection of hepatoblastoma (HB). Patients andEntities:
Keywords: children; fluorescence imaging; hepatectomy; hepatoblastoma; indocyanine green
Year: 2022 PMID: 35846968 PMCID: PMC9280053 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.932721
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Surg ISSN: 2296-875X
Figure 1Real-time modified resection plane by indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging (A) and after complete resection (B).
Patients’ demographic and clinical information.
| Gender | Age (month) | PRETEXT | Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cycles) | POSTTEXT | Tumor location | Tumor size (cm) | Operative time (minutes) | Volume of red blood cells transfusion (u) | Pathologic subtype | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | 9 | II | 3 | III | S5, S6 | 6.5 × 6.4 × 8.5 | 265 | 1 | EM |
| 2 | M | 8 | II | 6 | II | S5, S8 | 2.9 × 2.8 × 2.5 | 300 | 1 | MEM |
| 3 | F | 12 | II | 2 | II | S3, S4 | 4.6 × 3.6 × 4.3 | 235 | 0.5 | MEM |
| 4 | M | 48 | II | 5 | II | S5, S6, S7 | 8.6 × 7.2 × 11 | 400 | 2 | MEM |
| 5 | M | 12 | II | 0 | – | S5, S6 | 8.1 × 5.9 × 7.8 | 180 | 0 | EM |
| 6 | F | 29 | III | 2 | II | S4, S5, S6 | – | 240 | 1 | EV |
| 7 | M | 32 | II | 2 | II | S7, S8 | 6.9 × 5.9 × 8.4 | 295 | 0.8 | MEM |
| 8 | M | 16 | II | 2 | II | S4 | 3.1 × 2.9 × 2.0 | 260 | 0.2 | EV |
| 9 | M | 15 | III | 6 | III | S4, S6, S7, S8 | 6.8 × 5.9 × 9.3 | 360 | 1 | MEM |
| 10 | M | 11 | I | 0 | – | S5 | 4.9 × 4.6 × 4.1 | 192 | 0.5 | EM |
| 11 | M | 19 | II | 2 | II | S5, S6, S7, S8 | 7.1 × 5.1 × 9.3 | 340 | 0.8 | EM |
| 12 | M | 23 | IV | 7 | IV | S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S8 | 7.3 × 4.0 × 4.9 | 265 | 1.5 | EV |
| 13 | F | 39 | II | 0 | – | S5, S6 | 10.1 × 6.3 × 10.6 | 120 | 0 | EV |
| 14 | F | 14 | III | 2 | III | S2, S3, S4, S7 | 4.6 × 3.9 × 2.7 | 205 | 1 | EV |
| 15 | M | 132 | IV | 8 | II | S5, S6, S7, S8 | 8.0 × 4.1 × 4.8 | 279 | 1 | MEM |
| 16 | F | 14 | III | 7 | II | S4, S5, S7, S8 | 4.2 × 2.7 × 3.0 | 270 | 1 | EV |
PRETEXT, pre-treatment extent of disease system; POSTTEXT, post-treatment extent of disease system; M, male; F, female; EM, epithelial mixed; MEM, Mixed epithelial and mesenchymal; EV, Epithelial variants.
Figure 2Intraoperative (ICG) fluorescence imaging shows remarkable contrast between tumor (fluorescence color) and normal liver parenchymal.
Figure 3Multiple small lesions were detected by (ICG) fluorescence.
Figure 4No fluorescence was detected at the liver resection plane in situ (A) and ex vivo (B).