| Literature DB >> 35846679 |
Jie Huang1, Tianqi Qiao1, Zhanmei Song1, Jingfeng Yan1.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the multiple mediating effects of achievement motivation and subjective wellbeing between social support and individual occupational identity.Entities:
Keywords: achievement motivation; individual occupational identity; multiple mediating effect; social support; subjective wellbeing
Year: 2022 PMID: 35846679 PMCID: PMC9280683 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.884606
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1Hypothesized model.
Descriptive statistics and correlations analysis (n = 565).
| Variable |
| SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1 | Social support | 59.610 | 6.850 | – | |||
| 2 | Occupational identity | 42.330 | 7.878 | 0.244 | – | ||
| 3 | Achievement motivation | -3.290 | 11.791 | 0.221 | 0.326 | – | |
| 4 | Subjective wellbeing | 79.900 | 12.982 | 0.591 | 0.417 | 0.455 | – |
**p < 0.01.
Regression analysis of variable relationships in the model.
| Regression equation | Fit index | Regression coefficient significance | ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Outcome variable | Predictor variable | R | R2 |
|
|
|
| Occupational identity | 0.269 | 0.072 | 10.904 | |||
| Gender | 0.352 | 1.568 | ||||
| Grade | 0.202 | 1.921 | ||||
| One child | –0.118 | –1.194 | ||||
| Social support | 0.246 | 6.038 | ||||
| Achievement motivation | 0.238 | 0.057 | 8.388 | |||
| Gender | 0.428 | 1.890 | ||||
| Grade | 0.080 | 0.754 | ||||
| One child | –0.039 | –0.393 | ||||
| Social support | 0.221 | 5.388 | ||||
| Subjective wellbeing | 0.680 | 0.462 | 95.939 | |||
| Gender | –0.120 | –0.696 | ||||
| Grade | –0.090 | –1.116 | ||||
| One-child | 0.058 | 0.769 | ||||
| Achievement motivation | 0.345 | 10.792 | ||||
| Social support | 0.513 | 16.110 | ||||
| Occupational identity | 0.458 | 0.209 | 24.617 | |||
| Gender | 0.273 | 1.312 | ||||
| Grade | 0.210 | 2.160 | ||||
| One child | –0.127 | –1.388 | ||||
| Achievement motivation | 0.161 | 3.782 | ||||
| Subjective wellbeing | 0.343 | 6.688 | ||||
| Social support | 0.008 | 0.172 | ||||
***p < 0.001. All variables of the model are standard scores.
FIGURE 2Intermediary model of social support and occupational identity. ***p < 0.001.
Summary of the indirect effects.
| Intermediate path | Effect value | Boot standard error | Relative mediating effect | 95% confidence interval | |
| Lower limit | Upper limit | ||||
| Total indirect effect | 0.238 | 0.034 | 0.176 | 0.305 | |
| SS→AM→OI | 0.036 | 0.014 | 15.006% | 0.009 | 0.066 |
| SS→SW→OI | 0.176 | 0.030 | 74.023% | 0.117 | 0.239 |
| SS→AM→SW→OI | 0.026 | 0.007 | 11.013% | 0.013 | 0.044 |
SS, social support; AM, achievement motivation; SW, subjective wellbeing; OI, occupational identity.