| Literature DB >> 35846673 |
Rong Yu1, Xuerui Cai2.
Abstract
The immediacy of feedback in media is emerging to enhance the interactivity of online experience for users. There is a gap in the study to explore the impacts of the immediacy of feedback on continuous intentions to use online learning from the student perspective. This study aims to fill the gap to investigate the impacts of the immediacy of feedback on students' continuous intentions to use online learning. This study utilizes the technology acceptance model (TAM) and expectation theory model (ETM) to conceptualize the effect of the immediacy of feedback on student continuous intentions to use online learning in terms of the mediation effect of Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU), Perceived Usefulness (PU), satisfaction, and attitude of students for continuous intentions to use online learning. An online survey of higher education students with experience in online learning is conducted to test the proposed hypothesis. The collected data are analyzed by using structural equation modeling (SEM) to establish the proposed hypothesis. The findings reveal that the immediacy of feedback from the media has a strong association with PEOU, PU, students' attitudes, students' satisfaction, and ultimately toward the continuous intentions to use online line learning in future. The study set key theoretical and practical insights to pave the way for future research.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; immediacy of feedback; information system continuance; online learning environment; technology acceptance model
Year: 2022 PMID: 35846673 PMCID: PMC9280469 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865680
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1Media richness of different media (Daft and Lengel, 1986).
Related work.
| Research context | Foundation theories | Constructs | Ref. |
| E-learning | TAM, TPB, ECT, Flow theory | Attitude, Ease of Use, Behavioral Control, Concentration, Enjoyment, Continuous Intentions |
|
| MOOCs | ECT, Flow Theory | Perceived Usefulness, Confirmation, Satisfaction, Continuous Intention |
|
| MOOCs | ECT | Attitude, Curiosity, Continuance Intentions, Satisfaction Usefulness, Confirmation |
|
| MOOCs | ECT | Continuance Intentions, Performance proficiency, Knowledge outcome, Confirmation, Satisfaction, Social Influence |
|
| MOOCs | ECT | Openness, Reputation, Enjoyment, Continuance intention, Satisfaction, Usefulness, Confirmation |
|
| Online learning | Task Technology Fit (TTF), ECT | Confirmation, Usefulness, Satisfaction, Continuance Intentions, Task Technology Fit (TTF) |
|
FIGURE 2Conceptual model.
Operational definition of constructs.
| Constructs | Operational definition | Source |
| The immediacy of feedback from media | The capacity of the media to allow participants to provide feedback immediately | |
| Perceived usefulness | The level to which a technology is helpful in the completion of a task, as compared to existing solutions | |
| Satisfaction | The degree to which users are satisfied with the technology |
|
| Continuous usage intentions | The degree to which user’s behavioral tendency to adopt online learning in the future | |
| Attitude | My personal feeling about a technology |
|
| Perceived Ease of Use | The level to which a technology is easy to use as compared to existing |
|
Constructs with items.
| Constructs | Number of items | Source |
| Perceived Ease of Use (PEU) | 4 |
|
| Satisfaction (SAT) | 3 | |
| Attitude (AT) | 3 | |
| The immediacy of Feedback (IF) | 3 | |
| Continuous Intentions to use online Learning (CIOL) | 3 | |
| Perceived Usefulness (PU) | 4 |
FIGURE 3Measurement model.
Reliability analysis.
| Constructs | Items | Factor loading | Cronbach’s Alpha value | CR | AVE |
| PEU | PEU_1 | 0.942 | 0.952 | 0.965 | 0.873 |
| PEU_2 | 0.936 | ||||
| PEU_3 | 0.936 | ||||
| PEU_4 | 0.924 | ||||
| PU | PU_1 | 0.941 | 0.969 | 0.977 | 0.914 |
| PU_1 | 0.966 | ||||
| PU_1 | 0.960 | ||||
| PU_1 | 0.957 | ||||
| SAT | SAT_1 | 0.928 | 0.911 | 0.944 | 0.848 |
| SAT_2 | 0.884 | ||||
| SAT_3 | 0.950 | ||||
| AT | AT_1 | 0.951 | 0.933 | 0.957 | 0.881 |
| AT_2 | 0.912 | ||||
| AT_3 | 0.951 | ||||
| IF | IF_1 | 0.902 | 0.908 | 0.942 | 0.844 |
| IF_2 | 0.897 | ||||
| IF_3 | 0.957 | ||||
| CIOL | CIOL_1 | 0.936 | 0.934 | 0.958 | 0.884 |
| CIOL_1 | 0.926 | ||||
| CIOL_3 | 0.958 |
Heterotrait–monotrait ratio.
| AT | CIOL | IF | PEU | PU | SAT | |
| AT | ||||||
| CIOL | 0.539 | |||||
| IF | 0.355 | 0.675 | ||||
| PEU | 0.489 | 0.640 | 0.452 | |||
| PU | 0.678 | 0.329 | 0.523 | 0.248 | ||
| SAT | 0.272 | 0.638 | 0.590 | 0.632 | 0.237 |
Fornell–Larcker criterion.
| AT | CIOL | IF | PEU | PU | SAT | |
| AT |
| |||||
| CIOL | 0.514 |
| ||||
| IF | 0.338 | 0.628 |
| |||
| PEU | 0.468 | 0.607 | 0.428 |
| ||
| PU | 0.652 | 0.319 | 0.495 | 0.240 |
| |
| SAT | 0.264 | 0.596 | 0.539 | 0.604 | 0.229 |
|
The square root of the AVE of each construct (highlighted) is higher than all other correlations underneath.
FIGURE 4Result of hypothesis testing.
Direct relationship.
| Path | β | T statistics | |
| IF→PEU | 0.428 | 3.757 | 0.000 |
| IF→PU | 0.495 | 4.600 | 0.000 |
| PEU→SAT | 0.604 | 6.324 | 0.000 |
| SAT→CIOL | 0.327 | 2.601 | 0.009 |
| PU→AT | 0.652 | 6.452 | 0.000 |
| AT→CIOL | 0.311 | 3.262 | 0.001 |
| IF→CIOL | 0.347 | 2.743 | 0.006 |
Indirect relationship.
| Path | β | T statistics | |
| IF→PU→AT→CIOL | 0.100 | 2.401 | 0.016 |
| IF→PU→AT | 0.323 | 4.950 | 0.000 |
| PU→AT→CIOL | 0.203 | 3.911 | 0.000 |
| IF→PEU→SAT→CIOL | 0.084 | 2.987 | 0.003 |
| IF→PEU→SAT | 0.258 | 2.734 | 0.006 |
| PEU→SAT→COIL | 0.197 | 2.325 | 0.020 |
Total effect.
| Path | β | T statistics | |
| IF→PEU | 0.428 | 3.757 | 0.000 |
| IF→PU | 0.495 | 4.600 | 0.000 |
| PEU→SAT | 0.604 | 6.324 | 0.000 |
| SAT→CIOL | 0.327 | 2.601 | 0.009 |
| PU→AT | 0.652 | 6.452 | 0.000 |
| AT→CIOL | 0.311 | 3.262 | 0.001 |
| IF→CIOL | 0.532 | 5.107 | 0.000 |
Impact of moderator.
| Path | β | T statistics | ||
| H8 | IF→CIOL | 0.448 | 3.857 | 0.000 |