| Literature DB >> 35846447 |
Isaac Kingsley Amponsah1, Abena Boakye2, Emmanuel Orman3, Francis Ackah Armah4, Lawrence Sheringham Borquaye5, Silas Adjei6, Yaa Afrakoma Dwamena1, Kennedy Ameyaw Baah5, Benjamin Kingsley Harley7.
Abstract
Background: Zingiber officinale Roscoe (ginger) rhizome is a global spice with marked pharmacological activities and industrial applications. The demand for the powdered spice soared in the wake of the COVID-19 global pandemic. The present study sought to assess powdered ginger products on the Ghanaian market for some quality parameters and compare their chemical composition via chemometric analysis of their FT-IR data.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Microbes; Multivariate analysis; Spices; Toxic metals; Zingiber officinale
Year: 2022 PMID: 35846447 PMCID: PMC9280518 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09150
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Label analysis of ginger samples.
| Product code | Label available | Manufacturer's information | Country of origin | Batch number | Best before dates | Net weight | FDA Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | √ | √ | USA | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| B | √ | √ | GH | X | √ | X | √ |
| C | √ | √ | IND | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| D | √ | X | GH | X | X | X | X |
| E | √ | √ | SA | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| F | √ | √ | NG | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| G | X | X | GH | X | X | X | X |
√ = Yes, available; X = No, not available; GH = Ghana; NG = Nigeria; IND = India; SA = South Africa.
FDA; Food and Drugs Authority, Ghana.
Physical features and pharmacopoeial identity test for the ginger products.
| Product code | Colour | Taste | Odour | Texture | Pharmacopeial test for ZO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Dark brown | Burning | Aromatic/choking | Smooth | Detected |
| B | Dark brown | Burning | Aromatic/choking | Very smooth | Detected |
| C | Dark brown | Bland burning | Aromatic/choking | Smooth | Detected |
| D | Light brown | Bland | Aromatic | Smooth | Detected |
| E | Dark brown | Bland burning | Aromatic/choking | Smooth | Detected |
| F | Brown | Sharp burning | Aromatic/choking | Smooth | Detected |
| G | Light brown | Burning | Aromatic | Smooth | Detected |
| STN | Brown | Burning | Aromatic/choking | Smooth | Detected |
| ZO | Light brown | Burning | Aromatic/choking | Smooth | Detected |
| ZZ | Yellowish brown | Bland | Aromatic | Smooth | Not detected |
STN = reference ginger from Nigeria; ZO = Z. officinale and ZZ = Z. zerumbet (reference samples from Ghana).
Microbial load of powdered ginger products.
| Samples | Total aerobic count | Total yeast or molds | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Specifications (BP) | |||||
| A | 2.0 × 101 | 0 | None detected | None detected | None detected |
| B | 1.0 × 102 | None detected | None detected | None detected | |
| C | 0 | None detected | None detected | None detected | |
| D | 1.7 × 102 | None detected | None detected | None detected | |
| E | 1.6 × 103 | 1.0 × 102 | None detected | None detected | None detected |
| F | 1.9 × 102 | None detected | None detected | None detected | |
| G | 1.2 × 102 | None detected | None detected | None detected |
Values are means of two determinations (n = 2).
Levels of heavy metals in powdered ginger samples.
| Samples | Heavy metal content mg/kg | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu | ∗∗∗∗Zn | ∗∗∗∗As | ∗∗∗∗Cd | ∗∗∗∗Hg | |
| A | 6.80 ± 0.42 | 26.66 ± 2.80 | 0.0022 ± 0.001 | 0.0065 ± 0.004 | 0.002 ± 0.002 |
| B | 8.30 ± 0.22 | 13.71 ± 4.20 | 0.0023 ± 0.002 | 0.0054 ± 0.001 | 0.004 ± 0.002 |
| C | 5.80 ± 0.84 | 21.97 ± 2.52 | 0.0025 ± 0.001 | 0.0045 ± 0.002 | 0.042 ± 0.007 |
| D | 7.30 ± 0.24 | 17.73 ± 4.45 | 0.0031 ± 0.002 | 0.0052 ± 0.001 | 0.005 ± 0.001 |
| E | 9.30 ± 1.42 | 17.10 ± 2.64 | 0.0021 ± 0.000 | 0.0054 ± 0.002 | 0.16 ± 0.010 |
| F | 10.40 ± 1.80 | 25.27 ± 6.24 | 0.0027 ± 0.000 | 0.0045 ± 0.003 | 0.003 ± 0.001 |
| G | 11.20 ± 1.20 | 28.61 ± 4.40 | 0.0032 ± 0.001 | 0.0063 ± 0.002 | 0.002 ± 0.007 |
| ZO | 4.40 ± 1.60 | 32.28 ± 6.64 | 0.0022 ± 0.002 | 0.0051 ± 0.001 | 0.002 ± 0.001 |
| ZZ | 8.20 ± 1.05 | 0.0026 ± 0.002 | 0.0045 ± 0.001 | 0.003 ± 0.002 | |
| STN | 6.30 ± 2.20 | 28.10 ± 3.48 | 0.0023 ± 0.000 | 0.0036 ± 0.002 | 0.004 ± 0.002 |
| ∗MPL mg/kg | NS | 50 | 5 | 0.3 | 0.5 |
MPL = maximum permissible limit (∗World Health Organization, 2007; Dghaim et al., 2015); Values are means of four replicates (n = 4); NS = standard not set, ZO = Z. officinale and ZZ = Z. zerumbet (reference samples from Ghana), STN = reference ginger from Nigeria. Values were compared to the maximum permissible limit set by WHO using one way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison test. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001 were considered statistically significant.
Ash values of ginger samples.
| Product code | Mean ± SD | Acid insoluble ash (%W/W) |
|---|---|---|
| A | ∗∗∗3.32 ± 0.74 | ∗∗0.41 ± 0.07 |
| B | 7.36 ± 0.51 | 2.96 ± 0.20 |
| C | ∗5.34 ± 0.61 | ∗0.81 ± 0.09 |
| D | ∗∗4.14 ± 0.06 | 1.43 ± 0.01 |
| E | ∗∗4.72 ± 0.85 | 1.07 ± 0.04 |
| F | 5.78 ± 0.31 | ∗0.86 ± 0.04 |
| G | ∗∗∗∗2.21 ± 0.04 | ∗∗0.60 ± 0.09 |
| STN | ∗5.35 ± 0.71 | 1.27 ± 0.30 |
| ZO | ∗5.26 ± 1.70 | 1.14 ± 1.00 |
| ZZ | ∗∗∗3.60 ± 0.62 | ∗∗0.34 ± 0.06 |
| Reference values (w/w) | Not more than 8.0% | Not more than 2.0% |
ZO = Z. officinale and ZZ = Z. zerumbet (reference samples from Ghana), STN = reference ginger samples from Nigeria. Values are means of two determinations (n = 2), SD = standard deviation. Values were compared to the pharmacopoeial ash values for ginger using one way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison test. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001 were considered statistically significant.
Figure 1Stacked FT-IR spectra of the powdered ginger samples analysed.
Main functional group bands identified in the FT-IR spectra of the ginger samples.
| Sr No | Wavenumber (cm−1) | Functional group assignment | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3200–3400 | OH stretch | Hydroxyl and phenolic groups in gingerols, shogoals, zingerone and paradols, among others. |
| 2 | 2930 | Methylene C–H asymmetric stretch | Backbone of several secondary metabolites |
| 3 | 1900–2200 | Aromatic combination and overtone bands | - |
| 4 | 1640 | C=C stretching | Terpenes like zingiberene, camphene, β-elemene, limonene present. |
| 5 | 1512 | Aromatic skeletal stretch; C–H In-plane deforming and stretching | Aromatic skeletal stretching of lignin |
| 6 | 1230–1380 | C–N stretching | Zingerines |
| 7 | 997 | C=C bending | Terpenes like zingiberene, camphene, β-elemene, limonene present. |
Figure 2FT-IR spectra of powdered ginger samples after pre-processing.
Figure 3Outcomes of pattern recognition analysis on powdered ginger samples. [A] & [B] - Score plots from Principal Component Analysis; [C] - Dendrogram from Hierarchical Cluster Analysis.