| Literature DB >> 35846295 |
Xiangyan Ruan1, Jiaojiao Cheng1, Juan Du1, Fengyu Jin1, Muqing Gu1, Yanglu Li1, Rui Ju1, Yurui Wu2, Huanmin Wang3, Wei Yang3, Haiyan Cheng3, Long Li4, Wenpei Bai5, Weimin Kong6, Xin Yang7, Shulan Lv8, Yuejiao Wang1, Yu Yang1, Xin Xu1, Lingling Jiang1, Yanqiu Li1, Alfred O Mueck1,9.
Abstract
Background: Ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) is the only method of fertility preservation (FP) in prepubertal girls, but the experience remains limited. This study investigates the effectiveness and feasibility of FP of OTC in children facing gonadotoxicity treatment in Chinese first ovarian tissue cryobank. Procedure: OTC and evaluation of 49 children ≤14 years old in the cryobank of Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, from July 2017 to May 19, 2022, were analyzed retrospectively. We compared children's general characteristics, follicle numbers, and hormone levels with and without chemotherapy before OTC.Entities:
Keywords: children; endocrine function; fertility preservation; gonadal toxicity; ovarian tissue cryopreservation; ovarian tissue transplantation; reproduction
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35846295 PMCID: PMC9277002 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.930786
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 6.055
Figure 1Intraoperative photo demonstrating ovarian anatomy in a 11-year-old female with chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection.
Patient characteristics and comparison with chemotherapy and without chemotherapy before OTC.
| Characteristics | Overall children | Chemo before OTC | No-Chemo before OTC |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (mean ± SD) (n) | 7.55 ± 3.64 (49) | 8.54 ± 4.06 (24) | 6.60 ± 2.94 (25) | 0.061 |
| Transport temperature (mean ± SD) (n) | 5.47 ± 1.34 (49) | 5.76 ± 1.53 (24) | 5.20 ± 1.10 (25) | 0.156 |
| The proportion of ovarian retrieval in the total ovary (median, range) (n) | 0.50, 0.15-0.75 (48) | 0.50, 0.25-0.75 (24) | 0.50, 0.15-0.50 (24) | 0.957 |
| Number of cryopreserved cortex pieces (mean ± SD) (n) | 20.52 ± 7.63 (48) | 21.42 ± 8.04 (24) | 19.63 ± 7.26 (24) | 0.422 |
| Follicle number per 2-mm biopsy (median, range) (n) | 705, 122–3628 (45) | 868, 158–2,250 (21) | 507, 122–3628 (24) | 0.290 |
| Follicle density per mm3 (median, range) (n) | 224.52, 38.85–1,155.41 (45) | 276.43, 50.32–716.56 (21) | 161.47, 38.85–1155.41 (24) | 0.290 |
| FSH (IU/L) before OTC (median, range) (n) | 2.34, 0.00–17.66 (41) | 2.20, 0.58–6.83 (21) | 3.18, 0–17.66 (20) | 0.182 |
| LH (IU/L) before OTC (median, range) (n) | 0.00, 0.00–63.23 (41) | 0.10, 0.00–63.23 (21) | 0.00, 0.00–4.26 (20) | 0.270 |
| E2 (pg/ml) before OTC (median, range) (n) | 12.21, 11.80–326.72 (41) | 12.28, 11.80–326.52 (21) | 12.06, 11.80–93.13 (20) | 0.834 |
| AMH (ng/ml) before OTC (median, range) (n) | 0.89, 0.06–5.94 (45) | 0.27, 0.06–3.21 (23) | 1.51, 0.4–5.94 (22) | 0.000*** |
***refers to P < 0.001.
OTC, ovarian tissue cryopreservation; SD, standard deviation; FSH, follicle stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone; E2, estradiol; AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone.
Figure 2Disease classification of 49 children undergone OTC. OTC, ovarian tissue cryopreservation.
Figure 3The proportion of children among patients with OTC per year. OTC, ovarian tissue cryopreservation.
Figure 4Correlation analysis and linear regression analysis between Age and AMH (A) (n = 45, r = 0.084, P = 0.585), between age and follicle count per 2-mm biopsy (B) (n = 45, r = −0.128, P = 0.403), between log10 (follicle count per 2-mm biopsy) and log10 (AMH) (C) (n = 45, r = −0.118, P = 0.456). AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone.
Figure 5Comparison of age (A), AMH (B), and follicle count per 2-mm biopsy (C) in children with and without chemotherapy before OTC. *** refers to P<0.001. OTC, ovarian tissue cryopreservation.