Literature DB >> 35846266

Knee Kinetics and Kinematics in Patients With Ankle Arthroplasty and Ankle Arthrodesis.

Andrew R Roney1, Andrew P Kraszewski1, Constantine A Demetracopoulos1, Howard J Hillstrom1, Jonathan T Deland1, Cesar de Cesar Netto1, Guilherme H Saito1, Jonathan Day1, Scott J Ellis1.   

Abstract

Background: Previous literature suggests that patients treated with total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) versus ankle arthrodesis (AA) may have better function and lower risk for adjacent joint arthritis in the foot. Little is known on how these interventions affect proximal joints such as the knee. Questions: We sought to assess whether patients with TAA and AA exhibited altered biomechanics linked to the onset and progression of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). We used the knee adduction moment (KAM), a surrogate measure for the mechanical load experienced at the medial tibiofemoral compartment, because it is linked with the onset and progression of KOA.
Methods: At a minimum of 2 years postoperatively, instrumented 3-dimensional walking gait was recorded in 10 TAA and 10 AA patients at self-selected walking speeds. TAA patients had either a Salto Talaris or INBONE prosthesis. Average first and second peak KAMs (Nm/kg), KAM impulse (Nm-s/kg), and range-of-motion (ROM, °) were calculated on both the affected and unaffected limbs for each patient.
Results: There were no significant differences in the KAM's first and second peaks, impulse, or knee ROM in any plane between the unaffected and affected limbs, or between TAA and AA.
Conclusion: TAA and AA may not meaningfully affect ipsilateral knee kinetics and KAMs in short-term follow-up. This study highlights the importance of continuing to study these parameters in larger cohorts of patients with longer follow-up to determine how our treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis may affect the incidence or progression of ipsilateral KOA.
© The Author(s) 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ankle arthrodesis; arthritis; biomechanics; gait studies; knee adduction moment; total ankle arthroplasty

Year:  2021        PMID: 35846266      PMCID: PMC9247585          DOI: 10.1177/15563316211007839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  26 in total

1.  Bone mineral density in the proximal tibia varies as a function of static alignment and knee adduction angular momentum in individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  L E Thorp; M A Wimmer; J A Block; K C Moisio; S Shott; B Goker; D R Sumner
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Knee joint loading differs in individuals with mild compared with moderate medial knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Laura E Thorp; D Richman Sumner; Joel A Block; Kirsten C Moisio; Susan Shott; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2006-12

3.  Dynamic knee loads during gait predict proximal tibial bone distribution.

Authors:  D E Hurwitz; D R Sumner; T P Andriacchi; D A Sugar
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  Conservative biomechanical strategies for knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Neil D Reeves; Frank L Bowling
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 20.543

5.  Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners.

Authors:  Daniel E Lieberman; Madhusudhan Venkadesan; William A Werbel; Adam I Daoud; Susan D'Andrea; Irene S Davis; Robert Ojiambo Mang'eni; Yannis Pitsiladis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  S L Haddad; J C Coetzee; R Estok; K Fahrbach; D Banel; L Nalysnyk
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  A three-year prospective comparative gait study between patients with ankle arthrodesis and arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ava D Segal; Krista M Cyr; Christina J Stender; Eric C Whittaker; Michael E Hahn; Michael S Orendurff; William R Ledoux; Bruce J Sangeorzan
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.063

8.  Ankle replacement versus arthrodesis: a comparative gait analysis study.

Authors:  Philippe Piriou; Paul Culpan; Mark Mullins; Jean-Noel Cardon; Delphine Pozzi; Thierry Judet
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 9.  Current concepts review: total ankle arthroplasty.

Authors:  Aaron J Guyer; Greer Richardson
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 10.  Is end-stage ankle arthrosis best managed with total ankle replacement or arthrodesis? A systematic review.

Authors:  Robert W Jordan; Gurdip S Chahal; Anna Chapman
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2014-08-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.