| Literature DB >> 35846235 |
Arunrat Srithawong1,2, Puttipong Poncumhak1,2, Pacharee Manoy1,2, Sirintip Kumfu1,2, Tichanon Promsrisuk2,3, Piyapong Prasertsri4,5, Orachorn Boonla4,5.
Abstract
This study was carried out to evaluate sensitivity, specificity, and test cutoff score to predict cardiorespiratory fitness by using the 2-min step test (2MST) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellites (DM). The association of the 2MST and physical fitness tests including a 6-min walk test (6MWT), a 5 time sit-to-stand test (FTSST), and leg strength in the form of a leg performance test were also investigated. This study was cross-sectional and conducted in 100 type 2 DM patients. Patients were screened through health questionnaires, medical illness, general characteristics, and physical fitness tests; 2MST, 6MWT, FTSST, and leg strength. Blood was collected for assessment of fasting blood sugar and lipid profiles. The number of steps in the 2MST was positively correlated with the distance of the 6MWT (r=0.6995, P<0.0001) and leg strength (r=0.4292, P<0.0001). 2MST was negatively correlated with time to perform the FTSST (r=-0.405, P<0.0001). Moreover, this study established the optimal cutoff score of the 2MST at ≤61 steps with 92.24% sensitivity, and 81.36% specificity to predict cardiorespiratory fitness in type 2 DM patients. Our findings indicate that the 2MST may be used as a predictor for walking capacity, leg strength, and ability to change position from sitting to standing in type 2 DM. In addition, this result may imply that patients with type 2 DM performing the 2MST at less than 61 steps was significantly associated with decreased cardiorespiratory fitness.Entities:
Keywords: 2-Minute step test; Cardiorespiratory fitness; Optimal cutoff score; Physical fitness test; Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Year: 2022 PMID: 35846235 PMCID: PMC9271641 DOI: 10.12965/jer.2244232.116
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exerc Rehabil ISSN: 2288-176X
General characteristics of all participants
| Variable | All participants | Female | Male |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 68.98±6.23 | 69.41±6.46 | 68.31±5.87 |
|
| |||
| No. of participants | 100 | 61 (63.93) | 39 (36.07) |
|
| |||
| Body weight (kg) | 55.12±7.78 | 52.78±6.93 | 58.78±7.70 |
|
| |||
| Height (cm) | 156.29±6.62 | 153.23±5.75 | 161.08±4.83 |
|
| |||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.55±2.83 | 22.48±2.82 | 22.66±2.87 |
|
| |||
| FBS (mg/dL) | 128.45±37.58 | 124.85±35.94 | 134.08±39.82 |
|
| |||
| HbA1c (%) | 6.12±1.22 | 6.08±1.35 | 6.19±0.97 |
|
| |||
| Duration of DM (yr) | 8.40±7.93 | 10.15±8.61 | 5.67±5.85 |
|
| |||
| Medical conditions | |||
| None | 7 (7) | 1 (14.29) | 6 (85.71) |
| Hypertension | 74 (74) | 48 (64.86) | 26 (35.14) |
| Dyslipidemia | 46 (46) | 33 (71.74) | 13 (28.26) |
| Orthopedic problems (gout, rheumatoid disease) | 11 (11) | 7 (63.64) | 4 (36.36) |
| Cardiovascular diseases | 12 (12) | 11 (91.67) | 1 (8.33) |
|
| |||
| HR rest (bpm) | 78.12±18.12 | 81.38±11.44 | 81.56±13.43 |
|
| |||
| SBP rest (mmHg) | 134.98±23.68 | 132.64±16.98 | 136.10±20.25 |
|
| |||
| DBP rest (mmHg) | 72.65±10.04 | 71.77±10.98 | 74.51±9.26 |
|
| |||
| 6MWT (m) | 320.97±83.45 | 297.03±82.44 | 358.41±1.09[ |
|
| |||
| 2MST (step) | 58.84±17.34 | 55.31±17.47 | 64.35±15.80[ |
|
| |||
| PAQ-EJ score (METs hr/wk) | 5.79±3.60 | 5.30±3.59 | 6.55±3.53 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).
BMI, body mass index; FBS, fasting blood glucose; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; DM, diabetes mellitus; HR, heart rate; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; 6MWT, 6-min walk test; 2MST, 2-min step test; PAQ-EJ, Physical Activity Questionnaire for Elderly Japanese; METs, metabolic equivalents.
P<0.05, statistically significant differences between female versus male.
Comparation of 6MWT and 2MST on physiological responses, dyspnea, and leg fatigue in type 2 DM participants (n=100)
| Variable | 6MWT | 2MST | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||
| All participants | Female (n=61) | Male (n=39) | All participants | Female (n=61) | Male (n=39) | ||
| HR (beats/min) | 84.93±15.14 | 78.80±13.46 | 77.97±13.31 | 88.37±15.90[ | 79.18±13.19 | 76.46±13.01 | 0.029 |
|
| |||||||
| ΔHR (beats/min) | 6.45±5.73 | 6.43±5.29 | 6.49±6.43 | 10.25±10.37[ | 9.89±12.39 | 10.82±6.10 | 0.0003 |
|
| |||||||
| HR (% pred) | 56.33±10.28 | 56.64±10.21 | 55.83±10.52 | 58.53±10.32[ | 59.12±10.90 | 57.61±9.41 | 0.033 |
|
| |||||||
| SBP (mmHg) | 148.23±21.34 | 133.10±18.99 | 134.79±18.61 | 155.70±23.68[ | 134.13±17.92 | 136.31±18.61 | 0.001 |
|
| |||||||
| ΔSBP (mmHg) | 14.47±12.58 | 15.15±12.07 | 13.41±13.43 | 20.72±14.85[ | 20.21±14.66 | 21.51±15.30 | 0.0006 |
|
| |||||||
| DBP (mmHg) | 78.97±11.84 | 71.00±11.63 | 75.23±10.90 | 78.49±11.71 | 71.74±10.68 | 74.08±8.92 | 0.654 |
|
| |||||||
| ΔDBP (mmHg) | 6.32±7.99 | 6.95±8.40 | 5.33±7.30 | 5.84±8.60 | 6.36±8.81 | 5.03±8.30 | 0.544 |
|
| |||||||
| O2 sat (%) | 97.82±1.13 | 97.80±1.12 | 97.49±1.60 | 98.10±1.09 | 97.69±1.47 | 97.33±1.40 | 0.051 |
|
| |||||||
| ΔO2 sat (%) | 0.14±1.28 | 0.23±1.17 | 0.01±1.43 | 0.55±1.43 | 0.39±1.51 | 0.79±1.28 | 0.077 |
|
| |||||||
| Dyspnea (6–20 grade) | 11.25±2.82 | 11.75±2.83 | 10.46±2.65 | 12.63±2.76[ | 12.90±2.57 | 12.21±3.01 | 0.0002 |
|
| |||||||
| Leg fatigue (0–10 grade) | 1.78±1.58 | 2.01±1.63 | 1.41±1.44 | 2.53±2.29[ | 2.75±2.22 | 2.17±2.37 | 0.0014 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
6MWT, 6-min walk test; 2MST, 2-min step test; DM, diabetes mellitus; HR, heart rate; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; O2 sat, oxygen saturation.
P<0.05, statistically significant differences between female versus male.
P<0.05, statistically significant differences between 6MST versus 2MST.
Δ defined as the difference between baseline and at the end of the test.
Fig. 1The relationship between number of steps in the 2-min step test (2MST) and distance in the 6-min walk test (6MWT) (A), leg strength test (B), and 5 time sit-to-stand test (FTSST) (C) in all type 2 diabetes mellites participants (n=100).
Fig. 2The relationship between number of steps in the 2-min step test (2MST) and age (A), body weight (B), and height (C) in all type 2 diabetes mellites participants (n=100).
The optimal cut off score, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of the 2MST in all type 2 DM participants
| Participant | Cutoff (steps) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | AUC (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total (n=100) | ≤61 | 90.24 | 81.36 | 0.95 (0.91–0.99) |
| Female (n=61) | ≤59 | 82.14 | 81.82 | 0.94 (0.89–0.99) |
| Male (n=39) | ≤61 | 87.10 | 87.50 | 0.95 (0.87–1.00) |
AUC, area under ROC curve; 2MST, 2-min step test; DM, diabetes mellites; CI, confident interval.