| Literature DB >> 35846125 |
Ting Shen1,2,3, Tianru Yang1,2,3, Mianfeng Yao1,2,3, Ziran Zheng1,2,3, Mi He1,2,3, Mengying Shao1,2,3, Jiang Li1,2,3, Changyun Fang1,2,3.
Abstract
Purpose: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors of the head and neck, while metastasis is the main cause of OSCC-related death. There is an urgent need to explore novel prognostic biomarkers and identify biological targets related to metastasis in OSCC treatment.Entities:
Keywords: EMT—epithelial to mesenchymal transformation; betacellulin; migration; oral squamous cell carcinoma; proliferation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35846125 PMCID: PMC9283838 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.875617
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.772
Association between the clinicopathological variables and BTC expression in 38 OSCC patients.
| Clinicopathological variable | No. | BTC expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative ( | Positive ( |
| ||
| Gender | — | — | — | 0.226 |
| Male | 29 | 16 | 13 | — |
| Female | 9 | 7 | 2 | — |
| Age (years) | — | — | — | 0.929 |
| <60 | 25 | 15 | 10 | — |
| ≥60 | 13 | 8 | 5 | — |
| Smoking | — | — | — | 0.046 |
| Yes | 23 | 15 | 8 | — |
| No | 15 | 8 | 7 | — |
| Human papilloma virus infection | — | — | — | 0.162 |
| Yes | 20 | 10 | 10 | — |
| No | 18 | 13 | 5 | — |
| N classification | — | — | — | 0.004** |
| N2-N3 | 16 | 14 | 2 | — |
| N0-N1 | 22 | 9 | 13 | — |
| Tumor stage | — | — | — | 0.007* |
| III-IV | 29 | 21 | 8 | — |
| I-II | 9 | 2 | 7 | — |
| Histological grade | — | — | — | 0.01* |
| Poor | 12 | 11 | 1 | — |
| Well-moderate | 26 | 12 | 14 | — |
| Metastasis | ||||
| Positive | 24 | 19 | 5 | 0.002** |
| Negative | 14 | 4 | 10 | |
FIGURE 1DEGs in OSCC. (A,B) Volcano plots were constructed using FC values and FDRs. The red points in the plot represent the overexpressed mRNAs, and the blue points indicate the downregulated mRNAs with statistical significance. (A) DEGs between normal and tumor tissues. (B) DEGs between metastasis-positive and metastasis-negative tumor tissues. (C) Hierarchical clustering analysis of mRNAs that were differentially expressed between metastasis-negative and metastasis-positive tissues. The normalized expression levels in the heatmaps are colored from blue to red in ascending order. (D) Multivariate Cox regression analysis according to gene expression. (E) Kaplan–Meier survival curves were performed to show the prognosis of patients with high and low expression of BTC through the analysis of the mRNA expression profile data of 260 OSCC tumor samples from TCGA database.
FIGURE 2BTC expression is correlated with clinicopathological parameters in OSCC patients. (A) Representative images of immunohistochemical staining and (B) immunoreactive score of BTC in human normal mucosa samples, OSCC tissue samples, and metastatic LN samples. The experiment was repeated three times independently. Results are shown as mean ± SD. T-test, n = 38. (C) mRNA expression of BTC in normal and tumor tissues was detected by RT-PCR. (D) Kaplan–Meier survival curves of 38 patients from our department. (E–L) Analysis of 330 OSCC samples from TCGA database and 32 pairs of OSCC samples selected from TCGA database showed the comparison of (E,F) BTC expressed in tumor tissues and normal tissues. Correlation analysis with BTC expression and (G) age, (H) histological grade, (I) sex, (J) T category, (K) tumor stage, and (L) LN metastasis status. *p < 0.05. **p < 0.01. ***p < 0.001. ****p < 0.0001.
Statistical analyses of clinicopathological features associated with survival in 38 OSCC patients with the multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| BTC expression | |||
| Positive vs. negative | 0.688 | 0.506–0.994 | 0.031* |
| Gender | |||
| Male vs. female | 1.124 | 0.903–1.868 | 0.329 |
| Age (years) | |||
| <60 vs. ≥ 60 | 1.341 | 1.002–1.849 | 0.021* |
| Smoking | |||
| Yes vs. no | 1.091 | 0.702–1.892 | 0.343 |
| Drinking | |||
| Yes vs. no | 0.926 | 0.678–1.893 | 0.781 |
| Tumor stage | |||
| III-IV vs. I-II | 2.449 | 1.567–3.459 | 0.038* |
| Histological grade | |||
| Poor vs. well-moderate | 1.311 | 0.912–2.466 | 0.061 |
| Metastasis | |||
| Positive vs. negative | 2.612 | 1.232–3.635 | 0.043* |
FIGURE 3Overexpression of BTC inhibits the proliferation, migration, and invasion of OSCC cell lines. (A) Cancer cell transfectants of the BTC-expressing vector and empty vector control were identified in SCC4 and CAL27 cells by Western blot. (B,C) Overexpression of BTC inhibited cell proliferation, as indicated by the CCK-8 assay, in CAL27 and SCC4 cells. (D) Wound healing assay showed that overexpression of BTC inhibited CAL27 and SCC4 cell migration. (E,F) Transwell assays showed that the migration and invasion abilities of CAL27 and SCC4 cells were impaired after overexpression of BTC.
FIGURE 4(A) Comparison of EMT scores in normal and tumor (in BTC low- and high-expression groups) tissue. (B) TCGA and GSEA showed highly regulated genes in patients with high-BTC expression versus those with low-BTC expression. (C) Heatmap of EMT marker expression in the BTC high- and low-expression groups. (D–F) Relationship between BTC and EMT markers, such as E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and vimentin. (G) PPI network analysis and Western blot analysis. The PPI network of the DEGs was constructed using STRING. The network nodes represent different proteins. The edges represent protein–protein associations, and the line thickness indicates the strength of the supporting data. (H) Protein expression level of EMT-related markers and the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway after overexpression of BTC in SCC4 and Cal27 cells.