Literature DB >> 35846064

Long-term outcome of immunologic autograft engineering.

Luis F Porrata1, David J Inwards1, Stephen M Ansell1, Ivana N Micallef1, Patrick B Johnston1, Jose C Villasboas1, Jonas Paludo1, Svetomir N Markovic2.   

Abstract

Our phase III trial reported that autograft-absolute lymphocyte count (A-ALC) improved survival post-autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (APBHSCT) for a short-term follow-up of 2 years. We evaluated retrospectively in our phase III trial patients that the A-ALC still confers survival benefit with a longer follow-up. With a median follow-up of 127.6 months, patients infused with an A-ALC ≥ 0.5 × 109 cells/kg experienced better overall survival (HR = 0.392, 95% confidence of interval [CI]: 0.224-0.687, p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (HR = 0.413, 95% CI: 0.253-0.677), p < 0.0004). This study supports that A-ALC provides long-term survival benefit post APBHSCT.
© 2022 The Authors. eJHaem published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autograft absolute lymphocyte count; autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; survival

Year:  2022        PMID: 35846064      PMCID: PMC9176079          DOI: 10.1002/jha2.404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EJHaem        ISSN: 2688-6146


INTRODUCTION

A limitation of our phase III study (NCT00566228) that showed autograft‐absolute lymphocyte count (A‐ALC) improves survival post‐autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (APBHSCT) is the short‐term follow‐up of 2 years [1]. To assess if the A‐ALC still provides improved clinical outcomes, we evaluated the survival prognostic ability of the A‐ALC and autograft natural killer cells (A‐NK) in a post‐hoc analysis in the patients enrolled in our phase III trial with a longer term follow‐up.

METHODS

Patient cohort

This study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board according to the regulation of the Declaration of Helsinki. Sixty‐two patients were accrued to the modified setting arm and 60 patients to the standard setting arm from December 10, 2007 until October 12, 2010. A total of 56 patients in the modified setting arm and 55 in the standard setting arm were able to finish the trial. These 111 patients were studied in this retrospective study. All patients baseline characteristics has been previously published [1]. The primary end point of the study was to investigate if the A‐ALC affects overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) in longer follow‐up in lymphoma patients treated with APBHSCT. OS was defined as the date of autograft infusion to the date of death due to any cause. PFS was defined as the time from the date of autograft infusion to disease progression or death due to any cause.

Statistical analysis

OS and PFS were analyzed using the approach of Kaplan and Meier [2]. Differences between survival curves were tested for statistical significance using the two‐tailed log‐rank test. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazard model [3]. Variables with a p‐value < 0.2 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis. An A‐ALC ≥ 0.5 × 109 cells/kg cut‐off value tested was based on our previous publication [1]. The cut‐off choice value for autograft natural killer cells (A‐NK) to assess survival was based on the utility as a marker for the clinically relevant binary outcome of death/survival using the receiver operating characteristics curves (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC). A K‐fold cross‐validation with K values of 10 was performed to validate the A‐NK cut‐off obtained by the ROC and AUC curves. For the autograft lymphocytes subset analysis, patients autograft samples for each apheresis collection were collected and studied by flow cytometry as previously published [1]. Chi‐square tests and Fisher exact tests were used to determine relationships between categorical variable as appropriate. The Wilcoxon rank test was used to determine associations between continuous variables and categorical and nonparametric tests were used to evaluate associations for continuous variables. All p‐values represented were two‐sided and statistical significance was declared at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The median age at the time of ABPHSCT was 57 years (range: 20–74). The median follow‐up for the living patients (N = 52) was 127.6 months (range: 5.9–158.1 months). The transplant‐related mortality at day 100 was 3.6% (4/111). Forty‐four patients had died due to lymphoma; 4 patients due to myocardial infarction; 3 patients due to therapy‐related acute myelogenous leukemia; 2 patients due to septic shock; 2 patients due to pneumonia; 1 patient of heart failure; 1 patient of prostate cancer; 1 patient due to acute respiratory distress syndrome; and 1 patient of anaplastic astrocytoma. The OS and PFS were observed to be superior for patients infused with an A‐ALC ≥ 0.5 × 109 cells/kg. The 13‐year OS rates for the A‐ALC ≥ 0.5 × 109 cells/kg group was 54% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36–72%) and for the A‐ALC < 0.5 × 109 cells/kg group was 28% (95% CI, 18–42%) (p < 0.0007) (Figure 1A). The 13‐year PFS rates for the A‐ALC ≥ 0.5 × 109 cells/kg group was 46% (95% CI, 30–64%) and for the A‐ALC < 0.5 × 109 cells/kg group was 17% (95% CI, 6–32%) (p < 0.0003) (Figure 1B).
FIGURE 1

(A) Overall survival based on the infused autograft absolute lymphocyte count (A‐ALC). (B) Progression‐free survival based on the infused autograft absolute lymphocyte count. (C) Overall survival based on the infused autograft natural killer cells (A‐NK). (D) Progression‐free survival based on the infused autograft absolute lymphocyte count

(A) Overall survival based on the infused autograft absolute lymphocyte count (A‐ALC). (B) Progression‐free survival based on the infused autograft absolute lymphocyte count. (C) Overall survival based on the infused autograft natural killer cells (A‐NK). (D) Progression‐free survival based on the infused autograft absolute lymphocyte count includes the univariate analysis table with the variables tested for OS and PFS. Of the original tested lymphocyte subsets, A‐NK as a continuous variable was an OS and PFS predictor. Using the ROC and AUC curves with internal validation of the AUC curves from the k‐fold cross‐validation with k = 10, the best cut‐off value for the A‐NK was 0.09 × 109 cells/kg with an AUC of 0.7, p < 0.03, and sensitivity of 0.73 and specificity of 0.66. The 13‐year OS rates for the A‐NK ≥ 0.09 × 109 cells/kg group was 44% (95% CI, 25–65%) and for the A‐NK < 0.09 × 109 cells/kg group was 36% (95% CI, 25–49%) (p < 0.02) (Figure 1C). The 13‐year PFS rates for the A‐NK ≥ 0.09 × 109 cells/kg group was 45% (95% CI, 26–65%) and for the A‐NK < 0.09 × 109 cells/kg group was 21% (95% CI, 12–35%) (p < 0.0004) (Figure 1D). Table 1 shows that in multivariate analysis both A‐ALC and A‐NK were independent predictors for OS and PFS.
TABLE 1

Multivariate analysis for overall survival and progression‐free survival including all the patients

Overall survivalProgression‐free survival
VariablesHR95% CI p HR95% CI p
A‐ALC ≥ 0.5 × 109 cells/kg0.3670.195–0.690<0.0010.4770.271‐0.840<0.01
A‐NK ≥ 0.09 × 109 cells/kg0.4110.275–0.892<0.010.4900.266‐0.903<0.02
Age, years ≤ 600.6810.316–1.4650.3
CD34 × 106 cells/kg (continuous variable)0.1150.014–1.6720.20.1780.028‐1.0800.07
Complete response prior to transplant0.5380.303–0.951<0.030.4860.292‐0.808<0.005
Extranodal disease < 20.6730.431–1.3310.40.3930.156‐0.993<0.05
LDH (U/L) normal0.5540.259–1.1860.10.9600.488‐1.8860.9
IPI index < 30.6980.268–1.8180.40.7380.345‐1.5780.4
Stage I/II vs. III/IV0.8580.330–2.2320.70.6340.257‐1.5650.3

Abbreviations: A‐ALC, Autograft absolute lymphocyte count; A‐NK, autograft natural killer cell; IPI, International Prognostic Index; LDH, Lactate dehydrogenase (normal value < 222 U/L).

Multivariate analysis for overall survival and progression‐free survival including all the patients Abbreviations: A‐ALC, Autograft absolute lymphocyte count; A‐NK, autograft natural killer cell; IPI, International Prognostic Index; LDH, Lactate dehydrogenase (normal value < 222 U/L).

DISCUSSION

The current study shows superior survival for lymphoma patients that received an A‐ALC ≥ 0.5 × 109 cells/kg for longer follow‐up after APBHSCT. Our group recently published a 3‐year follow‐up matched‐control study comparing clinical outcomes before and after we changed our clinical practice collecting A‐ALC ≥ 0.5 × 109 cells/kg in conjunction with CD34 stem cells on April 1, 2017 showing better survival of patients infused with an A‐ALC ≥ 0.5 × 109 cells/kg compared with those infused with an A‐ALC < 0.05 × 109 cells/kg [4]. A‐ALC was an independent predictor for OS and PFS in the match‐control study as well as this present study; thus, providing more clinical evidence of the A‐ALC as a survival biomarker in APBHSCT. A‐NK as a subset of the A‐ALC was also an independent predictor for survival in the study. In the allogeneic setting, the NK immunoglobulin‐like receptors (KIRs) affect survival [5]. Our group reported that the infusion of autograft NKp30 NK cells (activating receptor) and KIR2DL2 NK cells (inhibitory receptor) impact clinical outcomes post‐APBHSCT [6]. In multiple myeloma, patients post‐APBHSCT showing evidence of the adaptive NKG2C NK cells (activating receptor) expansion showed decreased relapse rates [7]. These findings argue that the KIR mechanism of tumor targeting seen in the allogeneic stem cell transplantation might also apply in the APBHSCT. Recently, our group published a more detailed analysis of the autograft collected and infused immune effector cells affecting clinical outcomes post‐APBHSCT [6] and our findings have recently confirmed [8, 9, 10]; thus, supporting the concept of autologous graft versus tumor effect [11]. This current study with a longer term follow‐up supports our practice change to collect A‐ALC ≥ 0.5 × 109 cells/kg in addition to CD34 to improve clinical outcomes for lymphoma patients undergoing APBHSCT.

AUTHORSHIP CONTRIBUTIONS

Conception and design: LFP; Data collection and analysis: LFP and SNM; Data interpretation: all authors; Manuscript writing: LFP; Manuscript editing: all authors; Final approval of the manuscript: all authors.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest. Supporting information Click here for additional data file.
  9 in total

1.  Autograft immune content and survival in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: A post hoc analysis.

Authors:  Luis F Porrata; David J Inwards; Stephen M Ansell; Ivana N Micallef; Patrick B Johnston; Jose C Villasboas; Svetomir N Markovic
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.156

2.  Mobilization characteristics, blood graft composition, and outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after autologous stem cell transplantation: Results from the prospective multicenter GOA study.

Authors:  Anu Partanen; Antti Turunen; Jaakko Valtola; Marja Pyörälä; Kaija Vasala; Outi Kuittinen; Hanne Kuitunen; Karri Penttilä; Leena Keskinen; Taru Kuittinen; Pentti Mäntymaa; Jukka Pelkonen; Ville Varmavuo; Esa Jantunen
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 3.  The importance of natural killer cell killer immunoglobulin-like receptor-mismatch in transplant outcomes.

Authors:  Kate Stringaris; Austin J Barrett
Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.284

4.  Autograft cellular composition and outcome in myeloma patients: Results of the prospective multicenter GOA study.

Authors:  Antti Turunen; Raija Silvennoinen; Anu Partanen; Jaakko Valtola; Timo Siitonen; Mervi Putkonen; Marja Sankelo; Marja Pyörälä; Taru Kuittinen; Karri Penttilä; Anu Sikiö; Eeva-Riitta Savolainen; Pentti Mäntymaa; Jukka Pelkonen; Ville Varmavuo; Esa Jantunen
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Infused Autograft Absolute Lymphocyte Count Predicts Superior Survival in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Patients Post-Autologous Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Matched Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Luis F Porrata; Edwin A Burgstaler; Jeffrey L Winters; Eapen Jacob; David J Inwards; Stephen M Ansell; Ivana N Micallef; Patrick B Johnston; Jose Villasboas; Jonas Paludo; Svetomir N Markovic
Journal:  Transplant Cell Ther       Date:  2021-06-06

6.  Autograft cellular composition and outcome in NHL patients: results of the prospective multicenter GOA study.

Authors:  Antti Turunen; Jaakko Valtola; Anu Partanen; Antti Ropponen; Outi Kuittinen; Hanne Kuitunen; Kaija Vasala; Lasse Ågren; Karri Penttilä; Leena Keskinen; Eeva-Riitta Savolainen; Marja Pyörälä; Taru Kuittinen; Tuomas Selander; Pentti Mäntymaa; Jukka Pelkonen; Esa Jantunen; Ville Varmavuo
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2020-05-18

7.  Immunologic Autograft Engineering and Survival in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Authors:  Luis F Porrata; Edwin A Burgstaler; Jeffrey L Winters; Eapen K Jacob; Dennis A Gastineau; Vera J Suman; David J Inwards; Stephen M Ansell; Ivana N Micallef; Patrick B Johnston; Wendy Nevala; Svetomir N Markovic
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Early Adaptive Natural Killer Cell Expansion Is Associated with Decreased Relapse After Autologous Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Aimee M Merino; Rohtesh S Mehta; Xianghua Luo; Hansol Kim; Todd De For; Murali Janakiram; Sarah Cooley; Rose Wangen; Frank Cichocki; Daniel J Weisdorf; Jeffrey S Miller; Veronika Bachanova
Journal:  Transplant Cell Ther       Date:  2020-12-17

Review 9.  Autologous Graft-versus-Tumor Effect: Reality or Fiction?

Authors:  Luis F Porrata
Journal:  Adv Hematol       Date:  2016-08-22
  9 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Impact of Infused Autograft Absolute Numbers of Immune Effector Cells on Survival Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Luis F Porrata
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 7.666

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.