| Literature DB >> 35845428 |
Yunong Ao1, En Zhang2, Yangxi Liu3, Liu Yang1, Jun Li1,2, Fuyou Wang1.
Abstract
Cartilage dysfunctions caused by congenital disease, trauma and osteoarthritis are still a serious threat to joint activity and quality of life, potentially leading to disability. The relatively well-established tissue engineering technology based on hydrogel is a promising strategy for cartilage defect repairing. However, several unmet challenges remain to be resolved before its wide application and clinical translation, such as weak mechanical property and compromised bioactivity. The development of nanomedicine has brought a new dawn to cartilage tissue engineering, and composite hydrogel containing nanoparticles can substantially mimic natural cartilage components with good histocompatibility, demonstrating unique biological effects. In this review, we summarize the different advanced nanoparticle hydrogels currently adopted in cartilage tissue engineering. In addition, we also discuss the various application scenarios including injection and fabrication strategies of nanocomposite hydrogel in the field of cartilage repair. Finally, the future application prospects and challenges of nanocomposite hydrogel are also highlighted.Entities:
Keywords: cartilage; composite hydrogels; nanoparticles; repairing; tissue engineering
Year: 2022 PMID: 35845428 PMCID: PMC9277358 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.951513
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 1(A) Schematic representation of nanocomposite hydrogels reinforced by core-shell SiO2-g-PBA hybrid latex particles; (B) Loading–unloading cycle behaviors of SiO2 incorporated nanocomposite hydrogels. Reproduced from Xia et al. (2017) with permission from Copyright 2017 Royal Society of Chemistry.
FIGURE 2(A) Preparation schematic diagram of the preparation of PVA-HA/HACC-Cit DN hydrogelr; (B) SEM images of the cross-section of composite hydrogels. Reproduced from Gan et al. (2020) with permission from Copyright 2020 Elsevier.
FIGURE 3(A) Schematic illustration of BMSCs and TGF-β1 encapsulated SF/PCS injectable hydrogel for cartilage repair; (B) The morphological of prepared hydrogel groups with different blending ratios were observed and visualized by SEM analysis; (C) Fluorescence microscopic observation of BMSCs and L929 seeded on different hydrogels after 24 h incubation. Reproduced from Zheng et al. (2021) with permission from Copyright 2022 Wiley.
FIGURE 4(A) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of KGN-PLGA nanoparticles; (B) The mechanical test of fabricated samples; (C) The FESEM images of KGN-PLGA nanoparticles and Gelatin electrospun mat; (D) The results of hysteresis loop at 50% strain. Reproduced from Zare et al. (2021) with permission from Copyright 2021 Elsevier.
FIGURE 5(A) Schematic representation of 3D bioprinting using Alg/Gel/CNCs hydrogels for tissue engineering; (B) Images of Live/Dead assay of 3D bio-printed cell-laden constructs (Alg/Gel and 1% Alg/gel) at indicated time intervals; (C) Digital photographs showing the un-crosslinked, crosslinked, and fridge-dried scaffolds after 3D printing; SEM images showing the internal structure of printed scaffolds. Reproduced from Dutta et al. (2021) with permission from Copyright 2021 Elsevier.