Literature DB >> 3584537

Factors affecting place of death in Washington State, 1968-1981.

L Polissar, R K Severson, N K Brown.   

Abstract

A study was carried out to determine factors affecting place of death (home, hospital, nursing home or "other places") among all 426,115 resident deaths in Washington State during 1968-1981, using death certificate information. Sixteen percent of deaths occurred at home, 74% in institutions (51% in hospitals, 23% in nursing homes) and 9% at "other places." Age, marital status and cause of death all strongly affect place of death. Further, the effect of each factor was strongly dependent on the others. Sex had no effect on place of death after controlling for other factors. Elderly people died relatively more frequently in nursing homes, infants and middle aged people in hospitals and young adults in "other places." The frequency of deaths at home was quite constant by age. Hospitals were the most common place of death following both vascular disease (including heart attack) and neoplasms, and nursing homes were the most common place of death following cerebrovascular disease (including "stroke"). Race, socioeconomic status and urban or rural residents affected the place of death only slightly or not at all. The place of death pattern changed little during the time period 1968-1981, except for a slight increase in frequency of home deaths and a corresponding decrease in the frequency of deaths in other places. Among cancer patients, the likelihood of death at home was positively associated with longer periods of survival after diagnosis. Cancer patients of hospitals serving targeted populations, such as veterans, were relatively more likely to die in a hospital and less likely to die in a nursing home compared to other cancer patients, suggesting that the "targeted" hospitals are sometimes serving a nursing home function. There was a marked difference in the terminal cancer caseload by hospital. The number of cancer deaths per cancer diagnosis varied widely across hospitals (0.1 to 1.6) and was unrelated to size of the hospital or level of services offered. Intervention aimed at affecting place of death, such as increasing the number of deaths at home, will need to take account of the joint effect of age, marital status and disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3584537     DOI: 10.1007/bf01321396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  18 in total

1.  The case for active treatment in patients with advanced cancer: not everyone needs a hospice.

Authors:  I H Krakoff
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1979 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  The cost and quality of dying: a comparison of home and hospital.

Authors:  M G Kassakian; L R Bailey; M Rinker; C A Stewart; J W Yates
Journal:  Nurse Pract       Date:  1979 Jan-Feb

3.  Hospice.

Authors:  B E Robinson
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  The concept of hospice.

Authors:  L A Leone
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1982 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Sounding board. The hospice movement.

Authors:  M J Krant
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-09-07       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Dying at home.

Authors:  W I Sampson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1977-11-28       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  On death, dying, and terminality: today, yesterday, and tomorrow.

Authors:  T Halper
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.265

8.  Where cancer patients die: an epidemiologic study.

Authors:  J McCusker
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1983 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

9.  Experience with a hospice-care program for the terminally ill.

Authors:  J M Zimmerman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Where do cancer patients die? A review of cancer deaths in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, 1957--1974.

Authors:  A Flynn; D E Stewart
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1979
View more
  7 in total

1.  Predictors of home care expenditures and death at home for cancer patients in an integrated comprehensive palliative home care pilot program.

Authors:  Doris M Howell; Tom Abernathy; Rhonda Cockerill; Kevin Brazil; Frank Wagner; Larry Librach
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2011-02

2.  Likelihood of home death associated with local rates of home birth: influence of local area healthcare preferences on site of death.

Authors:  Maria J Silveira; Laurel A Copeland; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Factors affecting place of death of hospice and non-hospice cancer patients.

Authors:  C M Moinpour; L Polissar
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Destined to die in hospital? Systematic review and meta-analysis of place of death in haematological malignancy.

Authors:  Debra A Howell; Eve Roman; Helen Cox; Alexandra G Smith; Russell Patmore; Anne C Garry; Martin R Howard
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.234

5.  Where do patients with cancer die in Belfast?

Authors:  D Davison; G Johnston; P Reilly; M Stevenson
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2001 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Dying from cancer or other chronic diseases in the Netherlands: ten-year trends derived from death certificate data.

Authors:  Lud F J van der Velden; Anneke L Francke; Lammert Hingstman; Dick L Willems
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 3.234

7.  Using death certificate data to study place of death in 9 European countries: opportunities and weaknesses.

Authors:  Joachim Cohen; Johan Bilsen; Guido Miccinesi; Rurik Löfmark; Julia Addington-Hall; Stein Kaasa; Michael Norup; Gerrit van der Wal; Luc Deliens
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-10-08       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.