| Literature DB >> 35845065 |
Gabriel D Rodrigues1,2, Marco Vicenzi3,4, Chiara Bellocchi1,5, Lorenzo Beretta5, Angelica Carandina1,5, Eleonora Tobaldini1,5, Stefano Carugo1,3, Nicola Montano1,5.
Abstract
The current study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients with higher systolic pulmonary arterial pressures (PAPs) present a blunted cardiac autonomic modulation and a pro-inflammatory profile. Thirty-nine SSc patients were enrolled (mean age 57 ± 11 years). ECG and respiration were recorded in the supine (SUP) position and during the active standing (ORT). Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis was performed on samples of 300 beats. The symbolic analysis identified three patterns, 0V%, (sympathetic) and 2UV% and 2LV%, (vagal). The %ΔORT was calculated from the differences between HRV in ORT and SUP, normalized (%) by the HRV values at rest. The PAPs was obtained non-invasively through echocardiography. For the inter-group analysis, participants were allocated in groups with higher (+PAPs ≥ median) and lower PAPs (-PAPs < median) values. At rest, the cardiac sympathetic modulation (represented by 0V%) was positively correlated with PAPs, while parasympathetic modulation (represented by 2LV%) was negatively correlated with PAPs. The dynamic response to ORT (represented by Δ0V% and Δ2LV%), sympathetic and parasympathetic were negatively and positively correlated with PAPs, respectively. The +PAPs group presented a higher inflammatory status and a blunted cardiac autonomic response to ORT (↓Δ0V% and ↑Δ2LV%) compared to the -PAPs group. These findings suggest an interplay among cardiac autonomic control, inflammatory status, and cardiopulmonary mechanics that should be considered for the assessment, monitoring, and treatment of SSc patients.Entities:
Keywords: autoimmune diseases; heart rate variability; inflammatory reflex; scleroderma; symbolic analysis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35845065 PMCID: PMC9283676 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.899290
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Participants’ characteristics and clinical features.
| All | -PAPs | +PAPs | ||
|
| ||||
|
| 39 | 19 | 20 | – |
| Sex (M/F) | 9/30 | 4/15 | 6/14 | – |
| Age (years) | 57 ± 11 | 56 ± 10 | 64 ± 11 | 0.03 |
| SSc subsets (dcSSc/lcSSc) | 6/33 | 3/16 | 3/17 | – |
| Disease duration (years) | 11 ± 8 | 10 ± 8 | 13 ± 9 | 0.17 |
| Controlled arterial hypertension ( | 4 | 2 | 2 | – |
|
| ||||
| Anti-Scl-70+ ( | 11 | 7 | 4 | – |
| ACA+ ( | 17 | 7 | 10 | – |
| ANA+ ( | 11 | 7 | 4 | – |
|
| ||||
| TLC (L) | 5.33 ± 1.30 | 5.17 ± 1.44 | 5.43 ± 1.24 | 0.72 |
| FVC (L) | 3.20 ± 1.00 | 3.43 ± 1.03 | 3.03 ± 0.96 | 0.30 |
| FEV1 (L) | 2.48 ± 0.92 | 2.72 ± 1.15 | 2.30 ± 0.67 | 0.08 |
| DLCO SB, ml/mmHg/min | 24.16 ± 35.35 | 16.52 ± 10.27 | 30.55 ± 46.92 | 0.58 |
| DLCO SB, % | 80 ± 17% | 83 ± 12% | 77 ± 20% | |
| DLCO SB/VA, ml/mmHg/min/L | 7.65 ± 15.35 | 4.44 ± 1.59 | 9.52 ± 19.34 | 0.46 |
| DLCO SB/VA, % | 90 ± 18% | 92 ± 10% | 90 ± 22% | |
|
| ||||
| LVEF (%) | 61 ± 12 | 59 ± 16 | 63 ± 6 | 0.60 |
| TAPSE (mm) | 23 ± 5 | 24 ± 5 | 22 ± 5 | 0.39 |
| PAPs (mmHg) | 31 ± 8 | 25 ± 4 | 37 ± 6 | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
| CRP (mg/dL) | 0.73 ± 1.01 | 0.40 ± 0.25 | 1.01 ± 1.04 | 0.02 |
| ESR (mm/hour) | 22 ± 18 | 20 ± 12 | 24 ± 12 | 0.84 |
| γ-globulin (g/dL) | 16.94 ± 7.07 | 16.70 ± 4.09 | 17.31 ± 10.78 | 0.74 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.84 ± 0.21 | 0.76 ± 0.08 | 0.93 ± 0.30 | 0.26 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 87 ± 9 | 89 ± 10 | 84 ± 5 | 0.28 |
SSc, systemic sclerosis; lcSSc, limited cutaneous SSc; dcSSc, diffuse cutaneous SSc; Anti-Scl-70+, anti-topoisomerase I; ACA+, anti-centromere antibodies positive; TLC, total lung capacity; FVC, forced vital capacity; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; DLCO SB, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide; DLCO SB/VA, diffusing capacity corrected for alveolar volume; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; PAPs, mean pulmonary artery pressure; CRP, C reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; PAPs-, PAPs group of PAPs < median; PAPs+, group of PAPs ≥ median; *p < 0.05 from Mann–Whitney U test (–PAPs vs. +PAPs).
FIGURE 1Correlations between systolic pulmonary artery pressure and cardiac autonomic modulation in SSc patients. PAPs, systolic pulmonary artery pressure; Δ0V%, [(0V% in supine position-0V% in orthostatic position)/0V% in supine position]. 0V% and 2LV% are non-linear heart rate variability markers of sympathetic and vagal modulation. Plots (A,B) represent cardiac sympathetic modulation at rest and sympathetic dynamic response to ORT, respectively. Plots (C,D) represent cardiac vagal modulation at rest and vagal dynamic response to ORT, respectively. *p < 0.05 from Spearman’s correlation.
FIGURE 2Comparisons of dynamic cardiac response to active standing test between –PAPs and +PAPs groups between. PAPs, mean pulmonary artery pressure; PAPs-, PAPs group of PAPs < median; PAPs+, group of PAPs ≥ median; Δ0V%, [(0V% in supine position-0V% in orthostatic position)/0V% in supine position]. 0V% and 2LV% are non-linear heart rate variability markers of sympathetic and vagal modulation. *p < 0.05 from Mann–Whitney U test.