| Literature DB >> 35844931 |
Lin Zhu1,2.
Abstract
In recent years, more and more questions have been raised about the idea that a sentence alone can fully analyze the semantics without considering the context. When we talk about the acceptability of a sentence, we immediately and naturally think of the context in which the sentence can be used correctly. In the current English classroom teaching, teachers follow the traditional teaching procedures too much: first give detailed explanations, and then carry out mechanical exercises. The lack of flexible teaching methods and the creation of contexts affects the improvement of students' communicative ability. During my long-term learning of English, I have considered the following questions: how to make use of the function of context to make English learning diverse and challenging; how to create a variety of practical forms, such as creating a way to make students interested and able to participate in learning, in order to improve students' language communication ability. This paper analyzes the current situation of English teaching, expounds the concept and classification of context and language application, summarizes the applied linguistics theory and related theory, and analyzes the context of English linguistics horizon function and application. This study combines context with English learning, and English learning "how to create and use context," so as to improve students' communicative competence.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35844931 PMCID: PMC9286887 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1757002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Public Health ISSN: 1687-9805
Ranking of English proficiency indicators by countries in the world.
| Very high proficiency | High proficiency | Medium proficiency | Low proficiency |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Netherlands | 15 Hungary | 30 Costa Rica | 47 Belarus |
| 2 Sweden | 16 Romania | 31 France | 48 Russia |
| 3 Norway | 17 Serbia | 32 Latvia | 49 Ukraine |
| 4 Denmark | 18 Kenya | 33 Hong Kong, China | 50 Albania |
| 5 Singapore | 19 Switzerland | 34 India | 51 Bolivia |
| 6 South Africa | 20 Philippines | 35 Spain | 52 Vietnam |
| 7 Finland | 21 Lithuania | 36 Italy | 53 Japan |
| 8 Austria | 22 Greece | 37 South Korea | 54 Pakistan |
| 9 Luxembourg | 23 Czech republic | 38 Taiwan, China | 55 Bahrain |
| 10 Germany | 24 Bulgaria | 39 Ma Gugui | 56 Georgia |
| 11 Poland | 25 Slovakia | 40 China | 57 Honduras |
| 12 Portugal | 26 Malaysia | 41 Macau, China | 58 Peru |
| 13 Belgium | 27 Argentina | 42 Chile | 59 Brazil |
| 14 Croatia | 28 Estonia | 43 Cuba | 60 El Salvador |
| 29 Nigeria | 44 Dominican Republic | 61 Indonesia | |
| 45 Paraguay | 62 Nicaragua | ||
| 46 Guatemala | 63 Ethiopia | ||
| 64 Panama | |||
| 65 Tunisia | |||
| 66 Nepal | |||
| 67 Mexico | |||
| 68 Colombia | |||
| 69 Iran |
Figure 1Market size and growth rate of China's English literacy training industry from 2017 to 2023.
Figure 2Asian countries' English mastery level.
Figure 3Basic English grammar framework.
Comparison of English reading ability of Chinese and American students.
| American education grade | U.S. education level | Lexile level | Chinese education grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| American preschool | 0L to 100L | Chinese preschool | |
| American preschool | 100L to 200L | Chinese primary school grades 1–3 | |
| American preschool | 150L to 300L | Chinese primary school grades 4–6 | |
| 1st grade American elementary school | 1st grade | 200L to 400L | Chinese junior high school grade 1 |
| 2nd grade American elementary school | 2nd grade | 300L to 500L | Chinese junior high school grade 2 |
| 3rd grade American elementary school | 3rd grade | 500L to 700L | Chinese junior high school grade 3 |
| 4th grade American elementary school | 4th grade | 650L to 850L | Chinese high school grade 1 |
| 5th grade American elementary school | 5th grade | 750L to 950L | Chinese high school grade 2/3 |
| 6tht grade American elementary school | 6th grade | 850L to 1050L | Year 1 of Chinese university |
| American junior high school grade 1 | 7th grade | 950L to 1075L | Year 2 of Chinese university |
| American junior high school grade 2 | 8th grade | 1000L to 1100L | Year 3 of Chinese university |
| American junior high school grade 3 | 9th grade | 1050L to 1150L | Year 4 of Chinese university |
| American high school grade 1 | 10th grade | 1100L to 1200L | 1st year postgraduate students in China |
| American high school grade 2/3 | 11th and 12th grade | 1100L to 1300L | 2nd year postgraduate students in China |
| SAT, GRE, GMAT, CAST | 1300L | Chinese doctoral students |
Chinese English proficiency evaluation scale.
| Scale registration | Roughly corresponds to the learning stage | National English Proficiency Test | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High | 9 | High-end foreign language talents | Level 9 (redevelopment on demand) | ||
| 8 | Level 8 (redevelopment on demand) | ||||
| 7 | English major | Level 7 | |||
| Low | 6 | University | So hard | Level 6 | |
| 5 | Basic requirements | Level 5 | |||
| 4 | High school | Level 4 | |||
| 3 | Junior high school | Level 3 | |||
| 2 | Primary school | Level 2 (evaluation only) | |||
| 1 | Level 1 (evaluation only) | ||||
Figure 4Chinese parents' choices for improving oral language for children of different ages.
Figure 5My country's youth population growth rate and online English penetration rate.