| Literature DB >> 35844856 |
Zengxin Xue1, Bowei Li2,3,4.
Abstract
In recent years, the problem of migrant workers' excessive labor has attracted much attention. The implementation of the integration policy of urban and rural medical insurance has broken the urban-rural dual division system. While improving migrant workers' health and sense of social integration, can they effectively alleviate their overwork? Based on the panel data of China Labor Dynamics Survey (CLDS) in 2016 and 2018, this paper empirically analyzes the impact of the integration of urban and rural medical insurance on migrant workers' overwork by using the differential difference model (DID). The research shows that the integration of urban and rural medical insurance can significantly alleviate the excessive labor of migrant workers; Heterogeneity analysis shows that, comparing with the new generation, the eastern region, the tertiary industry and low education level migrant workers, it is more obviously that the integration of urban and rural medical insurance alleviates the overwork of the older generation, the central and the western regions, the secondary industry and high education level migrant workers. Path analysis shows that the integration of urban and rural medical insurance will improve the social identity and health level of migrant workers, and then reduce the probability of migrant workers' overwork.Entities:
Keywords: double difference method; health rights; integration of urban and rural medical insurance; migrant workers; overwork
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35844856 PMCID: PMC9283995 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.934524
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1Action path of urban-rural medical insurance integration on migrant workers' overwork.
Descriptive statistics of changes in migrant workers' overwork.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 67.23% | 48.28% | 51.11 (hours) | 14.43 (hours) |
| 2018 | 48.28% | 47.82% | 51.08 (hours) | 15.84 (hours) |
| Full sample | 66.00% | 48.04% | 51.09 (hours) | 15.144 (hours) |
Figure 2Proportion of migrant workers' overwork under 50 h standard.
Figure 3Proportion of migrant workers' overwork under 60 h standard.
Definition and value of each variable.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dependent variables | Overwork | |||
| Under 50 h standard | The weekly labor time exceeds 50 h = 1;Not exceeding = 0 | 0.660 | 0.474 | |
| Under 60 h standard | The weekly labor time exceeds 60 h = 1;Not exceeding = 0 | 0.480 | 0.480 | |
| Weekly working hours | Working hours in the past week | 51.093 | 21.016 | |
| Independent variables | URRBMI | The sample area implements the URRBMI = 1;unenforced = 0 | 0.796 | 0.403 |
| Control variables | Age | Age of respondents (years) | 44.177 | 11.757 |
| Nation | Han nationality = 1;Other nationalities = 0 | 0.953 | 0.212 | |
| Gender | Male = 1;female = 0 | 0.506 | 0.500 | |
| Education level | 0 = Never went to school;6 = primary school;9 = junior middle school;12 = High school / technical school / technical secondary school / vocational school;15 = junior college;16 = undergraduate;19 = master;23 = doctor | 8.454 | 3.511 | |
| level of health | 1 = Very unhealthy;2 = Relatively unhealthy;3 = commonly;4 = Relatively healthy;5 = Very healthy | 3.681 | 0.990 | |
| Marital status | ||||
| Unmarried | Unmarried = 1;other = 0 | 0.057 | 0.232 | |
| Married | Married = 1;other = 0 | 0.913 | 0.286 | |
| Divorced or widowed | Divorced or widowed = 1;other = 0 | 0.030 | 0.170 | |
| Professional types | Private enterprise = 1;Individual business = 2 | 1.604 | 0.901 | |
| Monthly income | Natural logarithm of migrant workers' income in the past month | 7.702 | 0.875 | |
| Economic satisfaction | 1 = Very dissatisfied;2 = Quite dissatisfied;3 = commonly;4 = Quite satisfied;5 = Very satisfied | 3.207 | 1.029 | |
| Family size | Number of family members living together | 4.466 | 1.825 | |
| Household consumption expenditure | Natural logarithm of total household consumption in the past year | 10.513 | 0.867 | |
| Toilet type | 1 = Indoor;2 = Outdoor flushing toilet;3 = Outdoor non-flushing public toilet;4 = Outdoor non-flush toilet;5 = other | 1.648 | 1.174 | |
| Air pollution degree | 1 = Very serious;2 = Relatively serious;3 = Not too serious;4 = It's not serious at all | 3.016 | 0.873 | |
Benchmark regression.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| URRBMI | −0.070** | −0.073** | −2.575* | |||
| (0.032) | (0.030) | (1.383) | ||||
| URRBMI × year | −0.127** | −0.144*** | −8.901*** | |||
| (0.050) | (0.044) | (2.047) | ||||
| Education level | −0.032*** | −0.022*** | −0.817*** | −0.032*** | −0.021*** | −0.789*** |
| (0.003) | (0.003) | (0.134) | (0.003) | (0.003) | (0.134) | |
| Age | −0.004*** | −0.005*** | −0.180*** | −0.003*** | −0.005*** | 0.176*** |
| (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.043) | (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.043) | |
| Healthy | −0.004 | −0.028** | −0.415 | −0.003 | −0.027** | −0.466 |
| (0.011) | (0.010) | (0.475) | (0.011) | (0.010) | (0.472) | |
| Monthly income logarithm | 0.045*** | 0.019* | 2.384*** | 0.049*** | 0.020* | 2.380*** |
| (0.012) | (0.011) | (0.508) | (0.012) | (0.011) | (0.505) | |
| Toilet type | 0.005 | 0.004 | −0.980** | 0.001 | 0.004 | −1.027** |
| (0.011) | (0.010) | (0.461) | (0.011) | (0.010) | (0.460) | |
| Economic satisfaction | −0.017* | −0.010 | −0.652* | −0.019** | −0.011 | −0.638 |
| (0.009) | (0.009) | (0.395) | (0.009) | (0.009) | (0.393) | |
| Air pollution degree | −0.001 | −0.006 | −0.552 | −0.001 | −0.006 | −0.484 |
| (0.011) | (0.010) | (0.462) | (0.011) | (0.010) | (0.460) | |
| Household consumption expenditure | −0.029 ** | −0.010 | −0.670 | −0.028** | −0.010 | −0.627 |
| (0.012) | (0.011) | (0.499) | (0.012) | (0.011) | (0.498) | |
| Nation | −0.051 | −0.037 | −3.868* | −0.050 | −0.037 | −3.871* |
| (0.049) | (0.045) | (2.037) | (0.049) | (0.045) | (2.035) | |
| Married | −0.017 | 0.010 | −0.778 | −0.023 | 0.012 | −0.704 |
| (0.039) | (0.037) | (1.699) | (0.039) | (0.037) | (1.689) | |
| Divorced or widowed | −0.042 | 0.005 | 0.320 | −0.034 | 0.013 | 0.376 |
| (0.074) | (0.071) | (3.204) | (0.075) | (0.072) | (1.690) | |
| Gender | 0.065*** | 0.028 | 0.960 | 0.062*** | 0.026 | 0.776 |
| (0.019) | (0.018) | (0.823) | (0.019) | (0.018) | (0.820) | |
| Family size | 0.011** | −0.000 | 0.173 | 0.010* | −0.006 | 0.110 |
| (0.005) | (0.000) | (0.231) | (0.005) | (0.005) | (0.230) | |
| Professional types | 0.010 | 0.034*** | −0.042 | 0.112 | 0.041*** | 0.153 |
| (0.010) | (0.009) | (0.438) | (0.010) | (0.009) | (0.153) | |
| Control variables | controlled | controlled | controlled | controlled | controlled | controlled |
|
| 0.0582 | 0.0448 | 0.0522 | 0.0568 | 0.0444 | 0.0539 |
| Sample size | 3087 | 3087 | 3087 | 3087 | 3087 | 3087 |
Standard errors are in parentheses; .
Figure 4Kernel density function before and after propensity score matching of urban-rural medical insurance integration.
Balance test results.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Education level | Before matching | 8.648 | 9.079 | 14.0 | 96.9 | 2.63 |
| After matching | 8.958 | 9.079 | −0.4 | −0.16 | ||
| Age | Before matching | 42.28 | 42.168 | −1.1 | −400.5 | −0.20 |
| After matching | 41.59 | 42.168 | 5.4 | 1.97 | ||
| Healthy | Before matching | 3.812 | 3.838 | 3.0 | −51.4 | 0.59 |
| After matching | 3.878 | 3.838 | −4.5 | −1.66 | ||
| Monthly income logarithm | Before matching | 7.488 | 7.752 | 29.7 | 93.8 | 6.02 |
| After matching | 7.736 | 7.752 | 1.8 | 0.70 | ||
| Toilet type | Before matching | 2.062 | 1.493 | −46.3 | 96.1 | −10.15 |
| After matching | 1.471 | 1.493 | 1.8 | 0.77 | ||
| Economic satisfaction | Before matching | 3.201 | 3.207 | 0.5 | −32.9 | 0.10 |
| After matching | 3.200 | 3.207 | 0.7 | 0.25 | ||
| Air pollution degree | Before matching | 3.181 | 2.920 | −30.7 | 97.8 | −5.93 |
| After matching | 2.926 | 2.920 | −0.7 | −0.24 | ||
| Household consumption expenditure | Before matching | 10.4 | 10.586 | 23.9 | 74.8 | 4.46 |
| After matching | 10.539 | 10.586 | 6.0 | 2.17 | ||
| Nation | Before matching | 0.905 | 0.962 | 23.3 | 73.6 | 5.42 |
| After matching | 0.947 | 0.962 | 6.1 | 2.65 | ||
| Married | Before matching | 0.949 | 0.910 | −15.4 | 49.9 | −2.79 |
| After matching | 0.890 | 0.910 | 7.7 | 2.39 | ||
| Divorce or widowhood | Before matching | 0.015 | 0.019 | 2.9 | −76.9 | 0.56 |
| After matching | 0.013 | 0.019 | 5.2 | 1.98 | ||
| Gender | Before matching | 0.613 | 0.571 | −8.4 | 91.8 | −1.65 |
| After matching | 0.575 | 0.571 | −0.7 | −0.25 | ||
| Professional types | Before matching | 1.752 | 1.565 | −20.5 | 71.6 | −4.13 |
| After matching | 1.617 | 1.565 | −5.8 | −2.17 | ||
| Family size | Before matching | 4.527 | 4.410 | −6.6 | −17.3 | −1.26 |
| After matching | 4.274 | 4.410 | 7.7 | 2.82 | ||
| Year | Before matching | 2017.1 | 2017 | −5.3 | 9.0 | −1.05 |
| After matching | 2017 | 2017 | 4.9 | 1.76 | ||
| Province | Before matching | 2.000 | 1.600 | 16.6 | 77.9 | 3.16 |
| After matching | 2.000 | 2.100 | −3.7 | −1.29 | ||
Double differential propensity score matching (PSM-DID).
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
| URRBMI × Year | −0.145*** | −0.151*** | −8.658*** |
| (0.051) | (0.045) | (2.194) | |
| Control variables | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled |
|
| 0.061 | 0.052 | 0.057 |
| Sample size | 3,012 | 3,012 | 3,012 |
Standard errors are in parentheses; .
Heterogeneity analysis.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| URRBMI × year | −0.225*** | −0.176*** | −9.025*** | 0.097 | 0.006 | −3.023 |
| (0.062) | (0.052) | (3.001) | (0.110) | (0.101) | (6.267) | |
| Constant term | −23.515 | 165.142 | ||||
| (71.655) | (102.246) | |||||
| Control variable | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled |
| Sample size | 2206 | 2206 | 2206 | 881 | 881 | 881 |
|
| 0.058 | 0.049 | 0.074 | 0.104 | 0.094 | 0.181 |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| URRBMI × year | −0.091 | −0.087 | −7.884* | −0.193*** | −0.210*** | −15.928** |
| (0.081) | (0.068) | (4.238) | (0.060) | (0.059) | (5.400) | |
| Constant term | −14.055 | 219.672 | ||||
| (37.446) | (162.790) | |||||
| Control variable | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled |
| Sample size | 2,074 | 2,074 | 2,074 | 1,013 | 1,013 | 1,013 |
|
| 0.085 | 0.042 | 0.061 | 0.075 | 0.085 | 0.156 |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| URRBMI × year | −0.182** | −0.540** | −10.506** | −0.150** | −0.230*** | −8.293** |
| (0.076) | (0.224) | (4.758) | (0.068) | (0.078) | (3.140) | |
| Constant term | 76.654 | 61.846 | ||||
| (108.162) | (14.901) | |||||
| Control variable | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled |
| Sample size | 2,037 | 2,037 | 2,037 | 1,050 | 1,050 | 1,050 |
|
| 0.052 | 0.069 | 0.073 | 0.079 | 0.064 | 0.148 |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| URRBMI × year | −0.131** | −0.142*** | −7.148** | −0.209** | −0.155* | −13.120** |
| (0.062) | (0.053) | (3.487) | (0.100) | (0.087) | (6.481) | |
| Constant term | 3.096 | −74.103 | ||||
| (85.668) | (124.297) | |||||
| Control variable | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled |
| Sample size | 2,315 | 2,315 | 2,315 | 772 | 772 | 772 |
|
| 0.078 | 0.059 | 0.108 | 0.070 | 0.074 | 0.235 |
Standard errors are in parentheses; .
Impact path of URRBMI on migrant workers' overwork.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| URRBMI × year | −0.729*** | 0.156** | 0.454** | −0.145*** |
| (0.223) | (0.067) | (0.229) | (0.045) | |
| Sense of identity | −0.071*** | |||
| (0.194) | ||||
| Level of health | −0.039*** | |||
| (0.014) | ||||
| Control variables | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled |
| Sample size | 2,730 | 2,730 | 2,730 | 2,730 |
|
| 0.053 | 0.127 | 0.097 | 0.057 |
Standard errors are in parentheses; .