| Literature DB >> 35844481 |
Thi Hong Van Nguyen1, Elsie Yekwa1, Barbara Selisko1, Bruno Canard1,2, Karine Alvarez1, François Ferron1,2.
Abstract
Arenaviruses are emerging enveloped negative-sense RNA viruses that cause neurological and hemorrhagic diseases in humans. Currently, no FDA-approved vaccine or therapeutic agent is available except for ribavirin, which must be administered early during infection for optimum efficacy. A hallmark of arenavirus infection is rapid and efficient immune suppression mediated by the exonuclease domain encoded by the nucleoprotein. This exonuclease is therefore an attractive target for the design of novel antiviral drugs since exonuclease inhibitors might not only have a direct effect on the enzyme but could also boost viral clearance through stimulation of the innate immune system of the host cell. Here, in silico screening and an enzymatic assay were used to identify a novel, specific but weak inhibitor of the arenavirus exonuclease, with IC50 values of 65.9 and 68.6 µM for Mopeia virus and Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus, respectively. This finding was further characterized using crystallographic and docking approaches. This study serves as a proof of concept and may have assigned a new therapeutic purpose for the bisphosphonate family, therefore paving the way for the development of inhibitors against Arenaviridae. © Thi Hong Van Nguyen et al. 2022.Entities:
Keywords: Arenaviridae; Lassa virus; Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus; Mopeia virus; alendronate; compound optimization; exonucleases; metal chelation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35844481 PMCID: PMC9252148 DOI: 10.1107/S2052252522005061
Source DB: PubMed Journal: IUCrJ ISSN: 2052-2525 Impact factor: 5.588
Data processing, structure solution and refinement of MOPV NP-exo
Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.
| Soaked with ALD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complexed with Mn2+ | 6 min | 12 min | Overnight | |
| Data processing | ||||
| Wavelength (Å) | 0.9786 | 0.9724 | 0.972 | 0.9786 |
| Space group |
|
|
|
|
|
| 45.54, 38.01, 137.23 | 133.21, 111.34, 49.15 | 45.59, 37.97, 137.38 | 45.85, 38.29, 137.31 |
| α, β, γ (°) | 90.00, 92.94, 90.00 | 90.00, 104.17, 90.00 | 90.00, 93.31, 90.00 | 90.00, 92.63, 90.00 |
| Resolution range (Å) | 38.82–1.80 (1.864–1.800) | 44.66–1.76 (1.82–1.76) | 42.48–2.00 (2.07–2.00) | 33.13–2.08 (2.16–2.08) |
| Total No. of reflections | 159861 (15626) | 242240 (24702) | 90988 (6843) | 154341 (15620) |
| No. of unique reflections | 43794 (4304) | 67897 (6824) | 29975 (2211) | 28850 (2855) |
| Completeness (%) | 98.69 (97.97) | 98.27 (98.88) | 92.75 (69.22) | 98.88 (98.40) |
| Multiplicity | 3.7 (3.6) | 3.6 (3.6) | 3.0 (3.1) | 5.3 (5.5) |
| 〈 | 14.99 (2.99) | 10.54 (2.31) | 23.73 (6.53) | 12.85 (2.28) |
|
| 0.04673 (0.4050) | 0.08419 (0.5895) | 0.03108 (0.1421) | 0.1177 (0.9836) |
| CC1/2 | 0.999 (0.976) | 0.996 (0.800) | 0.999 (0.995) | 0.998 (0.950) |
| Wilson | 27.2 | 21.79 | 18.4 | 35.3 |
| Structure solution and refinement | ||||
| No. of reflections, working set | 43526 (4243) | 67834 (6822) | 29970 (2208) | 28680 (2832) |
| No. of reflections, test set (%) | 2195 (217) | 3468 (330) | 1983 (142) | 1346 (124) |
| Reflections in test set (%) | 5.0 | 5.21 | 6.6 | 4.7 |
|
| 0.21 | 0.1908 (0.2394) | 0.23 | 0.25 |
|
| 0.25 | 0.2161 (0.2817) | 0.27 | 0.28 |
| No. of non-H atoms | ||||
| Total | 3417 | 5721 | 3282 | 3302 |
| Protein | 3183 | 4926 | 3151 | 3183 |
| Ligand | 4 | 6 | 11 | 2 |
| Water | 230 | 789 | 120 | 117 |
| R.m.s. deviations | ||||
| Bond lengths (Å) | 0.007 | 0.009 | 0.007 | 0.014 |
| Angles (°) | 1.18 | 1.38 | 0.81 | 1.61 |
| Average | ||||
| Overall | 43.00 | 29.27 | 25.97 | 53.84 |
| Protein | 43.76 | 28.03 | 25.39 | 53.96 |
| Ligand | 38.10 | 20.22 | 41.34 | 40.17 |
| Water | 47.04 | 37.11 | 39.87 | 50.75 |
| Ramachandran plot | ||||
| Favored (%) | 97.43 | 96.89 | 97.93 | 97.43 |
| Allowed (%) | 2.57 | 3.11 | 2.07 | 2.57 |
| Outliers (%) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Clashcore | 6.77 | 6.72 | 6.83 | 4.10 |
| PDB code |
|
|
|
|
Figure 1Screening and docking experiments against MOPV NP-exo. (a) The crystal structure of MOPV NP-exo used for docking studies (PDB entry 5lrp) presented as a ribbon diagram of the protein with helices in blue, β-strands in pink and loops in cyan. Active-site residues are shown with their side chains as sticks (C atoms in gray, O atoms in red and N atoms in blue). The coordination of the Mg2+ ion (green sphere) is also illustrated. The expanded square corresponds to the red/green box shown on the molecular-surface representation of the MOPV NP-exo structure. It represents the grid box used to define the docking space covering the entire active site. (b) Interactions of RNA with the catalytic site of LASV NP-exo and a single Mn2+ ion (purple sphere; PDB entry 4gv6) for reference. (c) Interactions of ALD inside the MOPV NP-exo active site in the presence of a single Mg2+ ion obtained by AutoDock Vina. (d) Interaction of ALD with the MOPV NP-exo model containing two Mg2+ ions after AutoDock Vina.
Figure 2ALD inhibition of 3′–5′ exonuclease activity. (a) MOPV NP-exo was incubated with HP4 dsRNA in the absence or presence of the catalytic ions Mg2+ or Mn2+ and a fixed concentration of ALD (100 µM). Reaction samples were taken after time intervals of 0, 5 and 30 min. The products were analyzed on urea–PAGE and visualized by autoradiography. (b) Inhibition of hTREX2 activity in the presence of 100 µM ALD. Left, inhibition of hTREX2 activity on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA); right, inhibition of hTREX2 activity using Y-shaped DNA with four-nucleotide 3′- and 5′-overhangs. (c) and (d) show representative gels showing the effect of ALD on the exonuclease activity of MOPV NP-exo and LCMV NP-exo, respectively. (e) and (f) are dose–response curves, from which IC50 values were calculated. For IC50 determination, the percentage of activity was measured by quantifying the total product formed after 5 min. IC50 values were then determined by fitting the dose–response curves. Reactions were performed in triplicate.
Figure 3Crystal structure of MOPV NP-exo complexed with Mn2+ and soaked in the presence of ALD. (a) Ribbon representation of MOPV NP-exo complexed with Mn2+ (PDB entry 6sx8). Mn2+ is represented as a purple sphere and coordinated by three water molecules (red spheres). The protein structure color code follows that in Fig. 1 ▸. Catalytic residues are labeled. Three of the residues coordinating the structural Zn2+ ion (gray sphere) are also shown, with their side chains in stick representation. (b) Enlargement of the Mn2+ ion in the active site of MOPV NP-exo complexed with Mn2+. The theoretical Mn2+ coordination by the catalytic residues and water molecules is illustrated by yellow arrows. (c, d, e) The same view as in (b) presenting a 2F o − F c map corresponding to the metal ion-binding site contoured at 1.3σ at different soaking times: (c) 6 min (PDB entry 6t6l), (d) 12 min (PDB entry 6t2a) and (e) overnight (PDB entry 6sy8).
Figure 4Exploration of potential ALD poses resulting from docking experiments using the crystal structure of MOPV NP-exo complexed with Mn2+. (a) Molecular-surface representation of the MOPV NP-exo structure complexed with Mn2+, which is represented as a purple sphere and coordinated by three water molecules (red spheres). The positioning of the water molecules serves as a reference for potential binding modes. Their distances from the ion are given in the enlargement (lower panel). (b) Molecular-surface representation of the MOPV NP-exo structure complexed with Mn2+ depleted of water molecules. The orange box corresponds to the relaxed docking grid encompassing the active site; the ion is at its center. The three best poses compatible with the observed unrefined density (Supplementary Fig. S3) and the positions of the water molecules are shown. The given distances are compatible with the observed distances to coordinated waters.