| Literature DB >> 35844455 |
Yuanyu Zhao1, Ting Chen2, Hui Wang2, Qiang Xue3, Wenyuan Guo1, Guoshan Ding1, Junfeng Dong1, Junsong Ji1.
Abstract
Hepatobiliary malignancies, such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and biliary tract cancers, namely, gallbladder carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma, are linked to a high rate of morbidity and mortality, depending on the phase of the disease. The intricate hepatobiliary anatomy and the need for accurate peroperative management, especially in patients with advanced liver disease, make these tumors difficult to treat. Surgical resection is a notable therapy for hepatobiliary cancers. Unnecessary or excessive liver excision influences patient rehabilitation, normal liver function, and postoperative complications. Hepatobiliary operations must therefore include accurate liver removal. The present advancements in imaging technology are aimed at improving the diagnostic efficacy of liver injury even more. Three-dimensional visual reconstruction is becoming more important in the diagnosis as well as treatment of a variety of disorders. In this paper, we proposed a novel three-dimensional visual reconstruction technology using enhanced nonuniform rational basis spline (ENURBS) combined with virtual surgical planning of Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) images for precise liver cancer resection. The purpose of this project is to rebuild 2D CTA scan images of liver cancer into a 3D reconstructed model for efficient visualization and diagnosis of liver cancer and to prepare an effective preoperative surgical plan for precise liver excision based on a 3D recreated liver model. This method's performance is compared to that of 2D planning in terms of accuracy and time taken to complete the plan. It is concluded that our proposed technique outperforms the planning technique based on 2D images.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35844455 PMCID: PMC9283065 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4376654
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.809
Figure 1Detailed flow of the proposed work.
3D visualization classification of HCC.
| Classification description | Surgical methods |
|---|---|
| Type I: lesions are identified in the parenchyma of liver segments V and VIII or both segments and are distinguished by their closeness to, or even direct violation of, the next portal vein. They do not cling to the right hepatic vein trunk or compress it | Excision of liver segments V and VIII ± partial intervention of segment IV |
|
| |
| Type II: lesions are located in the parenchyma of hepatic segments IVa and IVb or both segments and are distinguished by their proximity to, or even direct violation of, the left hepatic vein branch. Furthermore, it does not attach to or compress the trunk of the left hepatic vein | Excision of liver segments IVa and IVb or left hepatectomy |
|
| |
| Type III: most of the liver parenchyma in segments IV, V, and VIII is occupied by the lesions, which is characterized by a wide and deep invasion of the parenchyma, as well as proximity to the main hepatic vein | Central bisectionectomy (removal of segments IV, V, and VIII±I) |
|
| |
| Type IV: most liver parenchyma in segments IV, V, and VIII is occupied by lesions, which is distinguished by its closeness to, or direct violation of, the left/right portal vein branch or the left/right hepatic vein. | Excision of segment IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII removal reduced right trisectionectomy or reduced left trisectionectomy |
|
| |
| Type V: the superficial liver parenchyma of segments IV, V, and VIII is occupied by this form of liver tumor. Neither the portal branch nor the hepatic vein is near the lesions | Hepatectomy with a negative margin |
Figure 23D reconstructed liver model.
Figure 3Accuracy of the 3D reconstructed model.
Comparative analysis of the performance of 3D and 2D approaches.
| Approaches | Average time for completing the plan (s) | Accuracy of the plan (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Surgical planning based on 2D images | 86 | 65 |
| ENURBS-VSP technique (proposed) | 70 | 85 |
Figure 4Accuracy of surgical planning techniques.
Figure 5Average time taken to finish the plan by different techniques.