| Literature DB >> 35844415 |
Anjina Devi1, Tasir Iqbal1, Ishfaq Ahmad Wani2, Geeta Sharma1, Susheel Verma1, Ahmed Noureldeen3, Hadeer Darwish4.
Abstract
Mentha longifolia is an important medicinal and aromatic perennial herb that exhibits wide distribution range from sub-tropical to temperate regions. In the present study, agro-morphological traits and genetic differences in 19 different populations of M. longifolia were studied to evaluate the level and extent of its diversity. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the different phenotypic characters show considerable differences among various populations and was significant at p < 0.05. Molecular diversity analysis performed by using arbitrary amplified eleven ISSR primers generated a total of 121 amplicons that range within the size of 200-2500 base pairs (bp). Each primer on average generated 11 amplicons with percentage polymorphism being 100. The analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) showed more (64%) among population genetic diversity and less (36%) within the populations. Greater genetic differentiation (Gst = 0.6852) among these populations occurs due to low gene flow (Nm = 0.2297) and greater habitat variability. Geographic and genetic distances were positively correlated according to Mantel's test. In order to remove any kind of biases, we used R software to perform cluster and redundancy analysis to analyse the extent of relatedness among studied populations. In terms of morphological and molecular aspects, the populations were grouped into four and five clusters respectively based on hierarchical clustering method. The results demonstrated that M. longifolia displays a great degree of morphological and genetic variation and can be utilized in breeding, genetic improvement, and gene bank conservation programmes in future.Entities:
Keywords: AMOVA; Conservation; Hierarchical cluster analysis; Mentha longifolia; Molecular diversity; Polymorphism
Year: 2022 PMID: 35844415 PMCID: PMC9280218 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.02.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.052
Fig. 1Study area map depicting different populations of Mentha longifolia.
Location, climatic conditions, geographical coordinates and altitude of the areas under study.
| Pop. Code | Accession name | District | Climatic zone | Latitude | Longitude | Altitude |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | ChakHira | Jammu | Sub-tropical | 32˚46́21.34″ | 74˚45́49.76″ | 270 ± 2 |
| 2. | Nagbani | Jammu | Sub-tropical | 32˚46́35 ” | 74˚46́08″ | 284 ± 3 |
| 3. | Ranbir Canal | Jammu | Sub-tropical | 32˚43́20.82″ | 74˚50́49.89″ | 299 ± 2 |
| 4. | Bawa-da-talab | Jammu | Sub-tropical | 32˚49́44.26″ | 74˚45́04.86″ | 304 ± 2 |
| 5. | Akhnoor | Jammu | Sub-tropical | 33˚1́38.52″ | 74˚52́17.4″ | 333 ± 6 |
| 6. | Garden | Jammu | Sub-tropical | 32˚43́9.18″ | 74˚52́0.96″ | 320 ± 5 |
| 7. | Sanji-morh | Kathua | Sub-tropical | 32˚25́13.24″ | 75˚18́37.10″ | 317 ± 3 |
| 8. | Dhansar | Reasi | Sub-tropical | 33˚01́38.29″ | 74˚52́17.87″ | 546 ± 3 |
| 9. | Panthal | Reasi | Sub-tropical | 32˚58́13.8″ | 74˚58́22.2″ | 654 ± 8 |
| 10. | Laddan | Udhampur | Sub-tropical | 32˚56́10.8″ | 75˚09́33.12″ | 766 ± 2 |
| 11. | Sangoor | Udhampur | Sub-tropical | 32˚54́30.24″ | 75˚09́17.76″ | 790 ± 2 |
| 12. | Phalata | Udhampur | Sub-tropical | 32˚53́30″ | 75˚03́5.4″ | 941 ± 9 |
| 13. | Chauri | Udhampur | Temperate | 33˚1́38.52″ | 74˚52́17.4″ | 2155 ± 3 |
| 14. | Ramban | Ramban | Temperate | 33˚14́45.59″ | 75˚11́38.84″ | 952 ± 2 |
| 15. | Ramgarh | Ramban | Temperate | 33˚07́36.70″ | 75˚11́38.84″ | 1148 ± 4 |
| 16. | Batote | Ramban | Temperate | 33˚06́18.15″ | 75˚20́31.41″ | 1434 ± 3 |
| 17. | Rajouri | Rajouri | Temperate | 33˚23́26.4″ | 74˚20́30.6″ | 1163 ± 2 |
| 18. | Khellaini Top | Doda | Temperate | 33˚03́29.82″ | 75˚37́29.39″ | 1428 ± 3 |
| 19. | Paddar | Kishtwar | Temperate | 33˚1́38.52″ | 74˚52́17.4″ | 2275 ± 5 |
Phenotypic matrices of different M. longifolia populations from Jammu province.
| Chr. | PH | IL | LL | LW | LOS | P L | Inflorescence (In) | CLX | CRL | SYL | STL | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL | IOS | WI | FW | FI | |||||||||||
| Chk H | 72.18 | 3.08 | 7.62 | 2.38 | 39.02 | 0.93 | 6.28 | 5.52 | 12.51 | 21.67 | 393.82 | 1.2 | 5.6 | 4.8 | 4.7 |
| Ngb | 80.10 | 3.52 | 8.13 | 1.78 | 56.56 | 0.23 | 12.3 | 13.82 | 24.6 | 22.87 | 345.07 | 1.33 | 4.5 | 4 | 4.2 |
| 48.5 | 3.6 | 5.66 | 1.50 | 23.5 | 0.5 | 12.44 | 12.27 | 15.09 | 15.09 | 218.51 | 1.3 | 5.3 | 5.0 | 4.8 | |
| Bawa | 71.12 | 3.24 | 7.51 | 2.04 | 34.52 | 0.54 | 12.6 | 15.13 | 22.87 | 24.6 | 263.47 | 1.33 | 5.55 | 4.9 | 5.6 |
| Aknr | 89.51 | 3.47 | 8.76 | 2.11 | 43.64 | 1.13 | 6.83 | 18.36 | 21.6 | 29.18 | 404.98 | 1.15 | 5.8 | 4.2± | 4.3± |
| Bot G | 84.60 | 2.74 | 7.60 | 2.07 | 46.0 | 1.26 | 8.78 | 17.4 | 29.18 | 20.53 | 315 | 0.84 | 3.18 | 5.2 | Male sterile |
| Snjmr | 43.42 | 2.58 | 7.54 | 2.29 | 23.0 | 0.8 | 8.7 | 3.3 | 10.51 | 18.64 | 191.09 | 1.15 | 5.5 | 4.8 | 4.7 |
| 70.27 | 3.71 | 7.07 | 1.99 | 49.82 | 0.34 | 15.55 | 4.69 | 11.67 | 15.38 | 167.78 | 1.34 | 5.6 | 5.8 | 4.5 | |
| Pnthl | 59.41 | 3.30 | 5.87 | 1.51 | 29.80 | 1.08 | 12.78 | 11.4 | 13.13 | 24.51 | 299.96 | 1.34 | 5.4 | 5.4 | 4.9 |
| Ldn | 66.85 | 3.70 | 6.78 | 2.05 | 55.96 | 1.26 | 11 | 15.76 | 12.0 | 16.58 | 188.22 | 1.34 | 5.4 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| 78.33 | 2.42 | 8.63 | 1.66 | 47.57 | 1.27 | 7.29 | 10.86 | 8.69 | 11.62 | 168.98 | 1.34 | 5.6 | 5.2 | 5.0 | |
| Phlta | 82.33 | 3.75 | 7.99 | 2.10 | 43.71 | 0.83 | 11.63 | 3.9 | 12.48 | 19.37 | 226.75 | 1.25 | 4.8 | 4.3 | 4.3 |
| Chri | 77.27 | 3.62 | 7.18 | 2.21 | 52.4 | 1.23 | 30.31 | 11.40 | 28.67 | 20.67 | 678.87 | 2.27 | 5.6 | 4.89 | 5.0 |
| Rmbn | 58.2 | 2.77 | 6.37 | 2.32 | 30.45 | 0.44 | 10.81 | 4.02 | 10.58 | 22.2 | 232.49 | 1.05 | 5.2 | 5.0 | 4,0 |
| Rmgr | 46.93 | 2.59 | 7.04 | 1.99 | 45.05 | 0.88 | 16.59 | 3.95 | 15.93 | 23.8 | 264.44 | 2.3 | 5.6 | 5.2 | 4.6 |
| Btot | 63.33 | 3.12 | 7.04 | 2.13 | 27.30 | 0.78 | 7.28 | 4.85 | 11.69 | 12.38 | 168.4 | 1.54 | 4.6 | 4.8 | 4.0 |
| Kh T | 79.36 | 3.10 | 6.76 | 1.41 | 47.91 | 0.59 | 5.90 | 4.16 | 11.16 | 21.51 | 252.69 | 1.26 | 5.3 | 4.2 | 4.0 |
| Rjri | 63.60 | 3.17 | 6.30 | 2.2 | 45.22 | 1.04 | 6.98 | 4.29 | 9.87 | 17.29 | 189.9 | 1.15 | 5.0 | 4.3 | 4–3 |
| Pddr | 28.89 | 1.82 | 8.28 | 1.55 | 13.0 | 0.59 | 5.67 | 4.07 | 6.8 | 17.87 | 113.07 | 1.27 | 5.2 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 303.49* | 17.50* | 62.38* | 47.05* | 303.49* | 107.11* | 185.09* | 239.98* | 70.75* | 133.07* | 210.63* | 42.55* | 37.59* | 43.11* | 13.35* | |
*denotes significant difference at p = 0.05, Fcritical = 1.58.
PH = plant height, IL = internode length, LL = leaf length, LW = Leaf width, L/OS = leaves per offshoot, PL = petiole length, In L = Inflorescence length, In/OS = no. of inflorescence per offshoot, W/In = no. of whorls per inflorescence, F/W = no. of flowers per whorl, F/In = no. of flowers per inflorescence, Ca = Calyx tube length, Co = Corolla tube length, St = style length and Fl = filament length, -=absent/reduced anther
Fig. 2Correlation plot between the studied morphological variables. The lower half denotes the scatter plot, the upper half the correlation coefficient along with the statistical significance and the middle diagonal the distribution of variables. Statistical significance - p < 0.001*** p < 0.01 ** and p < 0.05 *
Fig. 3Cluster dendrogram of the 19 studied populations based on morphological variables.
Fig. 4RDA plot of the 19 studied populations based on morphological variables.
Fig. 5ISSR marker profile generated by primer 18. l = 250 bp DNA ladder, Thermo Fisher); Lanes 1–24 (Dnsr, Lddn, ChkH, Sngr, RnbC, Botg, Chri, Rmbn), 25–48 (Pnthl, Ngb, Phlta, Rjri, Snjmr, Bawa, Aknr, KhT) and 49–57 (Pddr, Rmgr, Btot).
Fig. 6Cluster dendrogram of the 19 studied populations based on molecular variables.
Fig. 7RDA plot of the 19 studied populations based on molecular data.