| Literature DB >> 35844261 |
Yi Wang1,2, Deqiang Zhang1,2, Shengliang Pei1,2, Peiyong He1,2.
Abstract
A landslide monitoring technology based on BeiDouand, a wireless sensor network, is proposed in order to solve the problem that landslide has brought severe threat to people's life and safety of property. The landslide monitoring system based on the BeiDouand wireless sensor network is analyzed and designed from the point of view of hardware and software. BeiDou message and GPRS double redundancy transmission mode are adopted to improve the reliability of transmission. It also adopts the factor compression method to improve the effectiveness of BeiDoutransmission and adopts queue management and packet scheduling mechanism to improve the real-time and reliability of wireless sensor network transmission. The result is that, as the number of visible satellites increases, the efficiency of the algorithm decreases. However, the overall efficiency of the algorithm has been significantly improved. When there are 28 visible satellites, the number of algorithm times decreases from 20,475 to 1,140, and the efficiency of the algorithm increases by 16.9 times. The GDOP simulated by the fast star selection algorithm proposed in this paper is less than 3.9, reaching an excellent grade.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35844261 PMCID: PMC9283076 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1393024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Anal Chem ISSN: 1687-8760 Impact factor: 1.698
Figure 1Flow chart of landslide monitoring.
Figure 2Classification of the landslide monitoring content.
Comparative analysis of data transmission technology.
| Project | ZigBee | GPRS/GSM | BeiDou communication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transmission rate | Average transmission rate | Average transmission rate | Low transmission rate |
| Coverage area | Covers most of the area | Covers most of the area | Large coverage |
| Construction cost | Low construction cost | Low construction cost | High construction cost |
| Communication cost | Low communication cost | Low communication cost | High communication cost |
| Instantaneity | Bad real-time performance | Real-time performance is a bit poor | Good real-time performance |
| Reliability | Reliability is low | Relatively low reliability | Good reliability |
| Security | Low security | Moderate security | High security |
The corresponding relationship between GDOP value and positioning accuracy grade.
| GDOP value | 1-2 | 2-3 | 3–6 | 6–9 | 9–20 | More than 20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positional accuracy | Ideal | Excellent | Good | Moderate | Mediocre | Bad |
| Grade | Best | Excellent | Good | Moderate | Qualified | Bad |
Algorithm complexity comparison.
| Number of visible stars | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The number of times calculated by the old algorithm | 2380 | 3060 | 3876 | 4845 | 5985 | 7315 |
|
| New algorithm calculation times | 84 | 120 | 165 | 220 | 286 | 364 |
|
| Efficiency improvement multiple | 27.3 | 24.5 | 22.4 | 21 | 19.9 | 19 |
|
Figure 3GDOP comparison curve of simulation results.