| Literature DB >> 35842660 |
Paolo Borghetti1, Jessica Imbrescia2, Giulia Volpi2, Vieri Scotti3, Michele Aquilano3, Alessio Bruni4, Davide Franceschini5, Stefano Ursino6, Patrizia Ciammella7, Gaia Piperno8, Maria Taraborrelli9, Stefano Maria Magrini2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: tumor recurrence after NSCLC surgical resection is the most common cause of treatment failure that sharply reduces the patient's life expectancy. The optimal treatment strategy for loco-regional recurrences developing after surgical resection in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not established yet. This report aims to describe the pattern of relapse, PFS, and OS in patients treated with radio-chemotherapy and durvalumab for loco-regional relapse after surgery.Entities:
Keywords: Chemo-radiotherapy; Durvalumab; Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); Recurrence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35842660 PMCID: PMC9288672 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02084-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiat Oncol ISSN: 1748-717X Impact factor: 4.309
Patients’ characteristics at the time of surgery (n = 24)
| Mean | Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 65.29 | 47–78 |
| Sex | Frequency | % |
| Male | 14 | 58.3 |
| Female | 10 | 41.7 |
| Histologic type | Frequency | % |
| Adenocarcinoma | 22 | 91.7 |
| Squamous cell | 2 | 8.3 |
| Surgery | Frequency | % |
| Lobectomy | 20 | 83.5 |
| Sublobar resection | 4 | 16.5 |
| Lymphadenectomy | Frequency | % |
| Yes | 21 | 87.5 |
| No | 3 | 12.5 |
| pT stage | Frequency | % |
| pT1 | 9 | 37.5 |
| pT2 | 11 | 45.8 |
| pT3 | 1 | 4.2 |
| pT4 | 3 | 12.5 |
| pN stage | Frequency | % |
| pN0 | 17 | 70.8 |
| pN1 | 6 | 25.0 |
| pN2 | 1 | 4.2 |
| TNM Classification 8th Ed | ||
| I | 6 | 25.0 |
| IIA | 5 | 20.8 |
| IIB | 8 | 33.4 |
| IIIA | 5 | 20.8 |
| (Neo)Adjuvant treatment at the time of surgery | ||
| None | 16 | 66.6 |
| Adjuvant | 4 | 16.7 |
| Neoadjuvant | 4 | 16.7 |
Patients’ characteristics at the time of first recurrence prior to CRT plus durvalumab (n = 24)
| Mean | Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Median disease-free intervala (months) | 31.29 | 3–185 |
| Frequency | % | |
| Histological confirmation | 13 | 54.2 |
| Time to recurrence | Frequency | % |
| < 1 year | 10 | 41.7 |
| > 1 year | 14 | 58.3 |
| Pulmonary recurrence site | Frequency | % |
| No pulmonary site | 16 | 66.6 |
| At surgical staple lines | 4 | 16.7 |
| Other lung sites | 4 | 16.7 |
| Lymph nodes relapse | Frequency | % |
| Ipsilateral hilum | 2 | 8.3 |
| Ipsilateral ilo-mediastinic | 18 | 75.0 |
| Contralateral ilo-mediastinic | 3 | 12.5 |
| Supraclavicular | 1 | 4.2 |
| PD-L1 expression | Frequency | % |
| Negative | 1 | 4.2 |
| ≤ 50% | 11 | 45.9 |
| > 50% | 12 | 50.0 |
| PD-L1 assessment | Frequency | % |
| At surgery | 12 | 50.0 |
| At recurrence | 12 | 50.0 |
| ECOG performance status | Frequency | % |
| 0 | 15 | 62.5 |
| 1 | 8 | 33.3 |
| 2 | 1 | 4.2 |
From primary resection to recurrent disease diagnosis
Treatment at recurrence
| CT 1° drug | Frequency | % |
| Cisplatin | 8 | 33.3 |
| Carboplatin | 16 | 66.7 |
| CT 2° drug | Frequency | % |
| Etoposide | 3 | 12.5 |
| Paclitaxel | 9 | 37.5 |
| Pemetrexed | 3 | 12.5 |
| Gemcitabine | 5 | 20.8 |
| Vinorelbine | 4 | 16.7 |
| CT schedule | Frequency | % |
| Weekly | 10 | 41.7 |
| Every three weeks | 14 | 58.3 |
| Timing of CRT | Frequency | % |
| Concomitant | 18 | 75.0 |
| Sequential | 6 | 25.0 |
| Total RT dose | Mean | Range |
| 59.5 | 50–66 | |
| Timing from CRT to Durvalumab (days) | Mean | Range |
| 29 | 5–90 |
Radio-chemotherapy related adverse events
| Frequency | % | |
|---|---|---|
| Esophagitis | 14 | 58.3 |
| G1 | 7 | 29.2 |
| G2 | 5 | 20.8 |
| G3 | 2 | 8.3 |
| Pneumonitis G1 | 1 | 4.2 |
| Hematological toxicity | 5 | 20.8 |
| G1 | 3 | 12.5 |
| G2 | 2 | 8.3 |
Durvalumab-related adverse events
| Frequency | % | |
|---|---|---|
| Pneumonitis | 6 | 25.0 |
| G1 | 1 | 4.2 |
| G2 | 3 | 12.5 |
| G3 | 2 | 8.3 |
Causes of durvalumab discontinuation
| Frequency | % | |
|---|---|---|
| Still ongoing | 7 | 29.2 |
| Adverse events | 3 | 12.5 |
| Disease progression | 9 | 37.5 |
| All dose received (as planned) | 5 | 20.8 |
Fig. 1Progression-free survival in treated population. Kaplan–Meier curve for progression-free survival (PFS). Tick marks indicate censored observations, and vertical lines indicate the times of landmark PFS analyses