| Literature DB >> 35842471 |
Muhammad Sohail1, Umar Nazir2, Essam R El-Zahar3,4, Choonkil Park5, Kanit Mukdasai6, Amjad Iqbal7.
Abstract
Flow in a rotating cone for magnetized Prandtl fluid model is inspected in this investigation. The momentum equation of Prandtl model is derived under the consideration of Hall and ion slip effects and heat transport phenomenon is considered with Joule heating and viscous dissipation effects. The model of Hamilton Crosser and Yamada Ota are considered for the empirical relations of nanofluid mixture. The flow presenting expression of Prandtl fluid model with thermal transport is modeled under boundary layer approximation in the form of partial differential equations (PDEs). The derived PDEs have been converted into set of coupled nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODEs) by engaging an appropriate scaling group transformation and these converted nonlinear set of ODEs have been tackled numerically via finite element scheme (FES). Impact of different emerging parameters has been displayed graphically and the physics behind the observed phenomena is explained in detail. The convergence of FES is established by carrying the grid independent survey. From the performed investigation, it is recorded that the parameters appear due to Hall and Ion slip currents enhance the fluid velocity but the inverse behavior is recorded for temperature profile.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35842471 PMCID: PMC9288551 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-16555-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Rotating cone for developed problem.
Thermal properties for density (), heat capacity () and thermal conductivity ()[12].
| 0.253 | 2430 | 1113.5 | |
| 8.4 | 692 | 4230 | |
| 1.4013 | 3.5 × 106 | 2270 |
Simulations of mesh free analysis for velocities and temperature when
| Number of elements | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | 0.6586386817 | 0.0001721355025 | 0.6605821625 |
| 60 | 0.6233792179 | 0.6437292447 | 0.0002229082388 |
| 90 | 0.6116725178 | 0.6380761926 | 0.0002319259575 |
| 120 | 0.6058311283 | 0.6352430888 | 0.0002348216628 |
| 150 | 0.6023296966 | 0.6335412345 | 0.0002360353595 |
| 180 | 0.5999974251 | 0.6324058465 | 0.0002366270036 |
| 210 | 0.5983324921 | 0.6315945612 | 0.0002369433746 |
| 240 | 0.5970846646 | 0.6309857193 | 0.0002371243282 |
| 270 | 0.5961135026 | 0.6305118421 | 0.0002372274024 |
| 300 | 0.5953371601 | 0.6301329244 | 0.0002372898241 |
Validation in view of numerical behavior for flow rates and temperature gradient when
| Present work | Malik et al.[ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 0.6330341643 | 0.6153201962 | 0.4295412140 | 1.0253 | 0.6153 | 0.4295 |
| 1.0 | 2.2006812241 | 0.8492300251 | 0.6128301282 | 2.2007 | 0.8492 | 0.6121 |
| 10 | 8.5982303219 | 1.3993024924 | 1.009332492 | 8.5041 | 1.3990 | 1.0097 |
Figure 2(a,b) Velocity field in y-direction and x-direction against when
Figure 3(a,b) Velocity field in y-direction and x-direction against when
Figure 4(a,b) Velocity field in y-direction and x-direction against when
Figure 5Analysis of heat energy field in against when
Figure 6Analysis of heat energy field in against when
Figure 7Analysis of heat energy field in against when
Figure 8Analysis of heat energy field in against when
Numerical impacts of skin friction coefficients and heat transfer rate versus and when
| Change in parameters | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 0.5553481694 | 1.748625433 | 0.7829754254 | |
| 0.3 | 0.6552943007 | 1.754302238 | 0.7237240327 | |
| 0.6 | 0.7551674911 | 1.783088915 | 0.7161334864 | |
| 0.0 | 0.5553328293 | 1.748062602 | 0.7831495083 | |
| 0.4 | 0.4553404122 | 1.648160325 | 0.8830709949 | |
| 0.8 | 0.3553430627 | 1.628288537 | 0.9830395354 | |
| -1.8 | 0.5160815058 | 1.659381887 | 0.794817722 | |
| 0.4 | 0.4011296359 | 1.518494450 | 0.674217273 | |
| 0.8 | 0.3943834879 | 1.509256446 | 0.410370366 | |
| 0.0 | 0.5555095192 | 1.746942157 | 0.7606163594 | |
| 0.5 | 0.4555101361 | 1.647591937 | 0.8606106152 | |
| 1.7 | 0.3555110713 | 1.617968095 | 0.9605989369 |